Pharmacist care in hospital emergency departments: a consensus paper from the Spanish hospital pharmacy and emergency medicine associations

OBJECTIVES

To draft a list of actions and quality indicators for pharmacist care in hospital emergency departments, based on consensus among a panel of experts regarding which actions to prioritize in this setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A panel of experts from the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) evaluated a preliminary list of potential actions and quality of care indicators. The experts used a questionnaire to assess the proposals on the basis of available evidence. In the first round, each expert individually assessed the importance of each proposed action based on 4 dimensions: evidence base, impact on clinical response and patient safety, ease of implementation, and priority. In the second round the experts attended a virtual meeting to reach consensus on a revised list of proposals; suggestions and comments that had been made anonymously in the first round were included. The group then prioritized each action as basic, intermediate, or advanced.

RESULTS

The experts evaluated a total of 26 potential actions and associated quality indicators. No items were eliminated in the analysis of scores and comments from the first round. After the second round, 25 actions survived. Nine were considered basic, 10 intermediate, and 6 advanced.

CONCLUSION

The expert panel's list of pharmacist actions and care quality indicators provides a basis for developing a pharmacist care program in Spanish emergency departments on 3 levels of priority. The list can serve as a guide to pharmacists, managers, physicians, and nurses involved in the effort to improve drug therapy in this hospital setting.

[Translated article] Usefulness of ICD-10 diagnostic triggers to identify adverse drug events in emergency care

OBJECTIVES

To assess the usefulness of a tool based on ICD-10 diagnostic codes to identify patients who consult an emergency department for adverse drug events (ADE).

METHODS

Prospective observational study, in which patients discharged from an emergency department during May to August 2022 with a diagnosis coded with one of the 27 ICD-10 diagnoses considered as triggers were included. ADE confirmation was carried out by analyzing drugs prescribed prior to admission, and through a discussion among experts and a phone interview with patients after hospital discharge.

RESULTS

1143 patients with trigger diagnoses were evaluated, of which 310 (27.1%) corresponded to patients whose emergency visit was attributed to an ADE. A 58.4% of ADE consultations were found with three diagnostic codes: K59.0-Constipation (n = 87; 28.1%), I16.9-Hypertensive Crisis (n = 72; 23.2%) and I95.1-Orthostatic hypotension (n = 22; 7.1%). The diagnoses with the highest degree of association with consultations attributed to ADE were E16.2-Hypoglycemia, unspecified (73.7%) and E11.65-Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (71.4%), while diagnoses D62-Acute posthemorrhagic anemia and I74.3-Embolism and thrombosis of arteries of the lower limbs were not attributed to any case of ADE.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICD-10 codes associated with trigger diagnoses are a useful tool to identify patients who consult the emergency services with ADE and could be used to apply secondary prevention programs to avoid new consultations to the health care system.

Association of sex and age and delay predictors on the time of primary angioplasty activation for myocardial infarction patients in an emergency department

BACKGROUND

Time between Emergency Department (ED) and ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) activation time is a good indicator of ED quality. STEMI delays are of particular importance in some subgroups, such as women and the elderly.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of sex and age with activation time in STEMI patients admitted to the ED.

METHODS

An observational retrospective study was conducted including all patients admitted to the ED activated as a STEMI. The main variable was activation time. To evaluate the independent predictors of activation time, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out, variables were sex, age, sex and age combined, chest pain, ST elevation in the electrocardiogram, and first medical contact (FMC) at the hospital's ED.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients were included. They were classified by sex: 23.9% (78) women and 76.1% (249) men; and age: 51.1% (167) <65 yo and 48.9% (160) ≥65 yo. Women and elderly patients exhibited a more atypical presentation. Multivariate analysis shows that showed that elderly age (OR=1.976 95%; CI=1.257-3.104; p = 0.003) and FMC prior to attending the ED (OR=1.762; 95% CI=1.117-2.779; p = 0.015) were associated with a longer activation time. Women older than 65 years old showed the longest activation time.

CONCLUSION

STEMI delays are longer in women and the elderly with atypical presentation. Age ≥65 and FMC outside the ED were associated with an increase in the activation time. This highlights the need to develop strategies to improve activation time for these specific patient groups.

Development of an Emergency Revisit Score for Patients With Drug-Related Problems

Background: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are a frequent reason for emergency departments (EDs) visits. However, data about the risk factors associated with EDs revisits are limited. Objective: To develop and validate a predictive model indicating the risk factors associated with EDs revisit within 30 days of the first visit. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients who attended an ED for DRPs related to cardiovascular drugs. A 30-day prediction model was created in a derivation cohort by logistic regression. An integer score proportional to the regression coefficient was assigned to the variables with P < .100 in the multivariate analysis. Results: 581 patients (mean age: 80.0 [12.6] years) were included, 133 (22.9%) revisited the ED within 30 days from discharge. Six factors (chronic kidney disease, chronic heart failure, visit to an ED in the preceding 3 months, high anticholinergic burden, DRPs associated with heparin, and safety-related DRPs) were identified as risk factors and combined into a final score, termed the DREAMER score. The model reached an area under the receiver operating curve values of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67-0.77) in the referral cohort and 0.71 (95% CI = 0.65-0.74) in the validation cohort (P = .273). Three risk categories were generated, with the following scores and estimated risks: low risk (0-8 points): 11.6%; intermediate risk (9-14 points): 21.3%; and high risk (>14 points): 41.2%. Conclusion and Relevance: The DREAMER score identifies patients at high risk for ED revisit within 30 days from the first visit for a DRPs, being a useful tool to prioritize interventions on discharge.

Learn, unlearn, and learn again: the secret to changing how elderly patients are attended in the emergency department

The demographic shift toward ever greater numbers of older patients with multiple conditions and functional dependency has increased pressure on emergency departments (EDs). The traditional approach to emergency treatment does not resolve problems in this population, creates risk, leads to high admission rates, and collapses the ED itself. Medical associations recommend that multidisciplinary teams incorporate geriatric assessment strategies and procure safe care enviroments. Implementing such recommendations will require profound changes in ED processes and staff and in connections between the ED and the community the patient is discharged to. This paper describes the processes we used in our tertiary-care hospital to achieve the necessary level of change. Our aims were to ensure that the ED staff provides correct diagnoses and treatments for elderly patients; bases decisions on the patients’ clinical, social and functional needs and the preferences of both patient and family; and arranges for the most appropriate treatment environment in each case. All these changes were essential for properly addressing new care demands while achieving optimal patient outcomes and contributing to better ED and hospital performance.

Anticholinergic burden in patients treated for constipation in an emergency department

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the anticholinergic burden on discharge of patients treated for constipation in an emergency department (ED) and to assess the effect on emergency revisiting within 30 days.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observational retrospective cohort study. We collected cases with a discharge diagnosis of constipation after ED treatment between September 2018 and June 2019 and recorded information on all drugs taken and the anticholinergic burden of treatment. A revisit to the ED within 30 days was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

We included 104 patients. A high anticholinergic burden of treatment was identified in 47 (56.6%), an intermediate burden in 30 (36.1%), and a low burden in 6 (7.2%). Twenty-nine (27.9%) patients revisited the ED within 30 days of discharge. An intermediate anticholinergic burden (23 patients [31.1%] vs 4 [13.3%]; P = .061) and high burden (19 [40.4%] vs 8 [14.1%]; P = .002] was associated with revisiting within 30 days in the univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, a high anticholinergic burden was independently associated with a higher rate of revisiting than a low burden: adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.21; 95% CI, 1.07-16.5; P = .039. An intermediate load was not associated with more revisits, however: aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.25-6.41; P = .776. Prescription of long-term treatment with laxatives on discharge did not reduce revisiting withing 30-days in the group with a high anticholinergic load (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.48-3.27; P = .526), but it did have an effect in patients an intermediate burden (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.99; P = .049).

CONCLUSION

The prescription of drugs leading to a high anticholinergic burden was a factor associated with ED revisits within 30 days in patients treated for constipation.