Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Morganella morganii infections: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Morganella morganii is a Gram-negative, opportunistic pathogen that can cause a variety of infections, including bloodstream infections, especially in those with compromised immune systems. It is often resistant to antibiotics, making it a difficult organism to treat. Limited studies have addressed M. morganii, but the organism is becoming increasingly recognized as a public health threat. More research is needed to understand the epidemiology and virulence factors of M. morganii in Saudi Arabia, as well as to develop effective treatment strategies.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all M. morganii bloodstream infections patients admitted to five tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia between 2015 and 2022.

RESULTS

The study population included 75 patients (45 males and 30 females) between the age of 53-72 with a 54% ICU admission rate. The most comorbidities were hypertension followed by diabetes. The most common symptoms were fever, cough, shortness of breath, vomiting, and fatigue. The study also found that M. morganii was often resistant to multiple antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin, amoxicillin, nitrofurantoin, and colistin. The most common treatment for M. morganii bacteremia was carbapenems, followed by aminoglycosides, ciprofloxacin, and colistin. Source control measures, such as surgery, line removal, drainage, and tissue removal, were also used in some cases. The study found that the in-hospital mortality rate for M. morganii bacteremia was 41%. The risk of mortality was increased in patients who were admitted to the ICU, who were older than 65 years, and who had Klebsiella pneumoniae co-infection.

CONCLUSION

M. morganii bacteremia is a serious infection that is often resistant to antibiotics. Elderly patients and patients with comorbidities are at increased risk of mortality. Source control measures and appropriate antibiotic therapy are important for improving outcomes.

Outcome of Respiratory Viral Infections in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) commonly cause morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. This study aimed at the prevalence of RVIs in adult HSCT recipients and their outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on all adult patients who underwent HSCT in the period between January 2016 and December 2020. Data were retrospectively abstracted from electronic medical records from a total of 400 patients. All cases with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed RVIs based on real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were included in the data analysis.

RESULT

A total of 79 patients had positive results. Sixty-three patients had allogeneic stem cell transplants. Women were 53% of the patients, and the mean age was 32 years (±13.5). The prevalence of documented respiratory virus infections was around 20% during the 4 years of the study. The most common virus was rhinovirus (60.76%), followed by respiratory syncytial virus (15.19%), then parainfluenza (11.39%). Among the 9 patients (11%) who required intensive care unit admission, 67% had lymphopenia (P = .03), 71% had abnormal chest computed tomography scan with pleural effusion (P = .03), 22% required renal support (P = .057), and 2 patients (22%) died (P = .057).

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the associated morbidity and mortality with RVIs among HSCT recipients and the need for more preventive measures and treatment studies.

Assessing the influence of COVID-19 on influenza prevalence: A multicenter time series study

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, countries around the world implemented various interventions to manage the spread of respiratory illnesses, including influenza. However, there is a lack of studies that have assessed the influence of COVID-19 on influenza prevalence in Saudi Arabia. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of positive influenza cases before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to the mitigation measures and policy initiatives in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

A multicenter, time-series cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate influenza prevalence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic between 01/01/2017 and 31/12/2021. This study included all patients who were screened for influenza infection at healthcare facilities across Saudi Arabia using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The primary outcome was to determine the prevalence of influenza infections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, while the secondary outcome was to describe the demographic data and comorbidities of the included patients in both periods.

RESULTS

During the study period, 5238 cases were identified based on a positive PCR result for influenza virus. The yearly number of influenza cases in the pre-COVID-19 period was 1123 (2.03 %), 1075 (1.63 %), and 1883 (2.20 %) cases in 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively. On the other hand, the number of cases during the COVID-19 pandemic was 417 (0.63 %) and 740 (1.27 %) in 2020 and 2021, respectively, with a comparable number of performed tests. Patients infected with the influenza virus between 2020 and 2021 were older than patients who were infected before the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

The study found a lower number of influenza cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, with no clear peak during November and December 2020 and 2021.

Case Report: COVID-19 Infection of a Transplanted Heart Simulating Cellular Rejection

Contemporary reports showed that solid organ transplantation patients who contract SARS-CoV-2 infection have a high mortality rate. There are sparse data about recurrent cellular rejections and the immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus in patients after heart transplantation. Herein, we report a case of a 61-year-old male post-heart transplant patient who tested positive for COVID-19 and developed mild symptoms 4 months after transplantation. Thereafter, a series of endomyocardial biopsies showed histologic features of acute cellular rejection despite optimal immunosuppression, good cardiac functions, and hemodynamic stability. Demonstration of SARS-CoV-2 viral particles by electron microscopy in the endomyocardial biopsy confirmed the presence of the virus in the foci of the cellular rejection, pointing to a possible immunologic reaction to the virus. To our knowledge, there is limited information regarding the pathology of COVID-19 infection in immunocompromised heart transplant patients, and there are no well-established guidelines for treating such patients. Based on the demonstration of SARS-CoV-2 viral particles within the myocardium, we concluded that myocardial inflammation visible on endomyocardial biopsy might be attributed to the host's immune response to the virus, which mimics acute cellular rejection in newly heart transplanted patients. We report this case to increase awareness of such events post-transplantation and to add to knowledge regarding the management of patients with ongoing SARS-CoV-2 infection that proved to be challenging.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against clinically important carbapenem non-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria from Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVES

Cefiderocol is a novel catechol-substituted siderophore cephalosporin with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-negative pathogens. However, variation of its activity among carbapenemase producers from various regions and countries has been reported. Here, we checked the in vitro activity against Gram-negative carbapenem non-susceptible bacteria collected in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Cefiderocol MICs were determined using the iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Isolates (n = 288) included carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli (n = 46), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 98), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 65), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 79) clinical isolates.

RESULTS

Cefiderocol inhibited 73.26% (211/288) of the isolates studied at concentrations of ≤ 4 mg/L. Cefiderocol inhibited all carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates (65/65, 100%) producing OXA-23-like, OXA-24-like, and NDM, and nearly all P. aeruginosa isolates (75/79, 94.94%), including those producing VIM and NDM. In contrast, the carbapenemase-producing isolates from the Enterobacterales group demonstrated significantly higher MICs with only 53.06% (52/98) of K. pneumoniae and 41.3% (19/46) of E. coli isolates exhibiting MICs of ≤4 mg/L. Isolates showing elevated MICs (73/144, 50.69%) included NDM (20/29, 68.97%), NDM/OXA-48-like (34/59, 57.63%), OXA-48-like (18/52, 34.62%), and KPC (1/4, 25%) producers, thus showing no clear association with the production of serine-type or metallo-type carbapenemases. However, high cefiderocol MICs (≥ 32mg/L) were associated with isolates producing NDM, and in particular, among those coproducing the OXA-232-type enzyme.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol had excellent activity against multi-drug resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative pathogens. Reasons behind the high cefiderocol MICs in certain Enterobacterales isolates need further investigation.

Microbiological and Clinical Outcomes of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolated in Lung Transplant Perioperative Donor and Recipient Respiratory Cultures

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common organisms isolated from respiratory secretions in lung transplant donors and recipients perioperatively. Within the first 90 days after lung transplantation, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections have been associated with increased mortality and acute and chronic rejection. However, it is unclear whether respiratory cultures positive for MSSA at the time of transplantation can lead to clinically significant infection. The aim of this study was to assess the microbiological and clinical outcomes for lung transplant recipients (LTRs) with positive perioperative donor or/and recipient respiratory cultures for MSSA. A retrospective study was conducted evaluating MSSA-positive respiratory cultures at the time of lung transplantation from donors and/or recipients from January 1, 2008, to December 30, 2019. Patients who did not have a bronchoalveolar lavage at 2 weeks after the lung transplant or died within 2 weeks of lung transplant were excluded. The main outcome was MSSA eradication at 2-week bronchoscopy. Recipients were evaluated for MSSA infections at the 12-week period after the transplant. Of the 1,678 individuals who underwent lung transplantation, 218 LTRs had S. aureus isolated in perioperative donor or recipient respiratory cultures, and 29 were subsequently excluded. Of the remaining 189 LTRs, MSSA eradication at the 2-week bronchoscopy was achieved in 186 (98.4%) recipients. During the 12-week follow-up, 15 (7.9%) recipients were diagnosed with MSSA pneumonia; concurrent MSSA bacteremia was noted in one recipient. No anastomotic infection, empyema, or lung abscess related to MSSA was diagnosed during the follow-up period.In LTRs, the rate of MSSA eradication at 2-week post-transplant recipients is high, and it is associated with a low rate of infectious complication within the first 12 weeks after transplant. Most of the recipients received a combination therapy with at least one agent active against MSSA. More studies to evaluate the optimal antimicrobial stewardship policies regarding the regimen and duration of antibiotic therapy for these patients are needed.

Clinical characteristics and outcome of Covid-19 illness and predictors of in-hospital mortality in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Patients' race and ethnicity may play a role in mortality from Covid-19. Studies in China, the US, and Europe have been conducted on the predictors of Covid-19 mortality, yet in the EMR countries, such studies are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to describe the hospitalization rate, ICU-admission, and in-hospital mortality of Covid-19 and predictors of in-hospital mortality in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

E-medical records were examined for all Covid-19 patients diagnosed in five tertiary hospitals affiliated with the Saudi-National Guard-Health Affairs during March 21, 2020, and September 12, 2021, based on a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test, (n = 35,284). Data were collected on patients' characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory findings, hospitalization, ICU admission, and in-hospital and overall mortality. Logestic regressions were used to identify the independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. The best laboratory parameters cut-off values to predict in-hospital mortality were identified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Significance was considered at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of all 35,284 Covid-19 patients, 81.8% were adults and 21.7% were hospitalized. Compared to non-hospitalized patients, hospitalized patients were more of female gender (52.1% versus 47.3%, p < 0.001) and had higher mean age (p < 0.001), higher mean BMI (p < 0.001), and higher rates of: diabetes (p < 0.001), hypertension (p < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (p < 0.001), cancer (p < 0.001), COPD (p < 0.001) and asthma (p = 0.011). The study showed 3.1% overall case-fatality, 20.3% ICU admission rate, and 9.7% in-hospital mortality. Predictors of in-hospital mortality among adult patients were; patients' age ≥ 70 years (OR = 6.93, 95% CI 1.94-24.79), ischemic heart disease (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.09), ICU admission (OR = 24.38, 95% CI 15.64-38.01), abnormal C-reactive protein "CRP" (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.08-3.16), abnormal D-dimer (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.15-3.36), lymphopenia (OR = 2.76, 95% CI 2.03-3.3.76), high neutrophil count (OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.54-2.87), and abnormal procalcitonin (OR = 3.33, 95% CI 1.88-5.90). The best laboratory parameters cut-off values to predict in-hospital mortality were CRP > 72.25 mg/L (AUC = 0.64), D-dimer > 1125 µg/L (AUC = 0.75), neutrophils count > 5,745 × 10^9/L (AUC = 0.70), lymphocytic count < 1.10 × 10^9/L (AUC = 0.72), and procalcitonin > 0.18 ng/mL (AUC = 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of hospitalization, ICU-admission, in-hospital mortality and overall case fatality were nearly comparable to the rates in western countries. Early interventions are necessary for high-risk Covid-19 patients, especially elderly patients and those with cardiac diseases.

Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Due to Human Rhinovirus-A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Human rhinovirus (HRV) can lead to a variety of respiratory illnesses; it is also an uncommon cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We described the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for CAP due to HRV.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied consecutive adult patients admitted to King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh with CAP due to HRV between 2016 and 2019. The diagnosis was made by respiratory multiplex PCR within 48 hours of hospitalization. We compared patients requiring ICU admission to those who did not.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-six patients were studied (peak hospitalization between November and January, median age 71.5 years, hypertension 59%, diabetes 50%, and chronic respiratory disease 44.3%); 16 (15.1%) patients required ICU admission. The median pneumonia severity index score (PSI) was 107, with no significant difference between ICU and nonICU patients. ICU patients had a higher prevalence of tachypnea (62.5% vs. 26.7%, p=0.005), hemoptysis (12.5% vs 0%, p=0.001), and lymphopenia (71.4% vs 26.3%, p=0.01). Chest X-ray on presentation showed bilateral infiltrates in 47/101 (46.5%) patients and unilateral infiltrates in 26/101 (25.7%) patients. Systemic corticosteroids were used in 54.7% of patients (the median initial dose was 120 mg of prednisone equivalent and was higher in nonICU patients). Most (69.2%) ICU patients received mechanical ventilation (median duration of 8 days). Bacterial coinfection (6.6%) and superinfection (3.8%) were rare. The overall hospital mortality was 9.4% (higher for ICU patients: 37.5% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with CAP due to HRV were elderly and had significant comorbidities. ICU admission was required in almost one in six patients and was associated with higher mortality.

Comparing Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis Mortality Between Liposomal Amphotericin B and Voriconazole in Patients With Hematological Malignancy or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Objectives We evaluated liposomal amphotericin B versus voriconazole for the treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in patients with hematological malignancy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Methods This retrospective cohort, single-center study included patients with compatible radiological diagnosis of IPA between 2016 and 2021. Results Forty-six patients with hematological malignancy or HSCT were diagnosed with IPA. Thirty-nine of them fulfilled the criteria for comparing liposomal amphotericin B (n=15) with voriconazole (n=24). Their median age was 48.5 years. Stem cell transplant recipients were 45.65%, and nearly half of the patients (47.83%) had acute myeloid leukemia. Twenty-six (56.52%) of the patients did not require oxygen therapy. The 12-week mortality was 13.33% (two out of 15) in patients who received liposomal amphotericin B compared to 25% (six out of 24) in patients who received voriconazole. There was no mortality judged to be related to IPA. Success or global clinical response was not different between the two drugs: 80% for liposomal amphotericin B versus 83.33% for voriconazole. However, the safety profile favored liposomal amphotericin B. Conclusion In this small cohort, there was an equipoise in the mortality and clinical and radiological outcomes obtained using liposomal amphotericin B or voriconazole for the treatment of IPA in hematological malignancy or HSCT.

Evaluation of ceftazidime/avibactam for treatment of carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales with OXA-48 and/or NDM genes with or without combination therapy

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is an urgent public health threat of significant global concern. Few observational studies have evaluated the clinical outcomes for treatment of CRE harbouring OXA-48 or NDM genes with ceftazidime/avibactam. Previous findings showed lower 30 day mortality with ceftazidime/avibactam ranges between 8.3% and 22%.

Method

This single-centre retrospective cohort study included adult patients aged ≥18 years admitted to King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) who had received ceftazidime/avibactam for at least 72 h for infections caused by CRE with genes encoding for carbapenemase production (CP-CRE).

Results

A total of 211 patients, mostly male (57%), having CP-CRE infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam were included, with an average age of 62 years. More than 50% of patients were critically ill, for which 46% received invasive ventilation and 36% were on inotropes. The most frequent infectious disease was hospital/ventilator-acquired pneumonia with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the most frequent causative pathogen. The majority of isolates harboured OXA-48 (81%), followed by NDM ± OXA-48 (19%). The overall clinical cure and 30 day mortality was 78% and 21% respectively (stratified per gene: 79% and 21.6% for OXA-48 and 75% and 17.5% for NDM ± OXA-48).

Conclusions

This was the largest study that evaluated clinical outcomes associate with CP-CRE harbouring OXA-48 gene infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam. Clinical cure and 30 day mortality were consistent with those of previous studies. Findings suggested that combination therapy with ceftazidime/avibactam had no direct impact on clinical outcomes for CP-CRE with OXA-48.

Immunogenicity of High-Dose MVA-Based MERS Vaccine Candidate in Mice and Camels

The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a zoonotic pathogen that can transmit from dromedary camels to humans, causing severe pneumonia, with a 35% mortality rate. Vaccine candidates have been developed and tested in mice, camels, and humans. Previously, we developed a vaccine based on the modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) viral vector, encoding a full-length spike protein of MERS-CoV, MVA-MERS. Here, we report the immunogenicity of high-dose MVA-MERS in prime–boost vaccinations in mice and camels. Methods: Three groups of mice were immunised with MVA wild-type (MVA-wt) and MVA-MERS (MVA-wt/MVA-MERS), MVA-MERS/MVA-wt, or MVA-MERS/MVA-MERS. Camels were immunised with two doses of PBS, MVA-wt, or MVA-MERS. Antibody (Ab) responses were evaluated using ELISA and MERS pseudovirus neutralisation assays. Results: Two high doses of MVA-MERS induced strong Ab responses in both mice and camels, including neutralising antibodies. Anti-MVA Ab responses did not affect the immune responses to the vaccine antigen (MERS-CoV spike). Conclusions: MVA-MERS vaccine, administered in a homologous prime–boost regimen, induced high levels of neutralising anti-MERS-CoV antibodies in mice and camels. This could be considered for further development and evaluation as a dromedary vaccine to reduce MERS-CoV transmission to humans.

Risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients pre- and post-vaccination

Background

Severe complications from COVID-19 and poor responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were commonly reported in cancer patients compared to those without cancer. Therefore, the identification of predisposing factors to SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients would assist in the prevention of COVID-19 and improve vaccination strategies. The literature lacks reports on this topic from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Therefore, we studied clinical and laboratory data of 139 cancer patients from King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, KSA.

Methods

The cancer patients fall into three categories; (i) uninfected with SARS-CoV-2 pre-vaccination and remained uninfected post-vaccination (control group; n = 114; 81%), (ii) pre-vaccination infected group (n = 16; 11%), or (iii) post-vaccination infected group (n = 9; 6%). Next, the clinical and lab data of the three groups of patients were investigated.

Results

Comorbidity factors like diabetes and hemodialysis were associated with the risk of infection in cancer patients before the vaccination (p<0.05). In contrast to breast cancer, papillary thyroid cancer was more prevalent in the infected patients pre- and post-vaccination (p<0.05). Pre-vaccination infected group had earlier cancer stages compared with the control group (p = 0.01). On the other hand, combined therapy was less commonly administrated to the infected groups versus the control group (p<0.05). Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was lower in the post-vaccination infected group compared to the control group (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Collectively, this is the first study from KSA to report potential risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients pre- and post-vaccination. Further investigations on these risk factors in a larger cohort are worthwhile to draw a definitive conclusion about their roles in predisposing cancer patients to the infection.

Current State of Antimicrobial Stewardship and organ transplantation in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance constitutes a major public health issue that leads to poor outcomes and increased costs associated with healthcare. Solid organ transplant recipients are more prone due to prolonged exposure to antimicrobials.

METHODS

We reviewed existing programs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and pattern of drug resistance, and the extent of transplant medicine in the kingdom through published articles in databases and official documents from health authorities.

RESULTS

A national committee for antimicrobial resistance was established to set the guidelines required for ASP, especially when there is a high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. A survey noted that ASPs are implemented in only 26% of Saudi MOH hospitals. Factors affecting the implementation of ASPs in Saudi hospitals included a lack of necessary staff resources and specific ASP staff/teams to advocate adopting ASP in the organizations. Specific attention should be given to transplant patients as transplantations are expected to increase in the next few years. No antimicrobial stewardship programs are currently specifically tailored to transplant centers.

CONCLUSION

The current healthcare system transformation in Saudi Arabia should take into consideration the urgent need for effective ASP that might help face the increasing trends in the MDRO prevalence rate. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Successful heart transplantation from a donor with bacterial and fungal bloodstream infection: Case report of donor optimization strategy

Donor optimization is vital to increase donor hearts utilized for transplantation. We report a case of a 34-year-old female with end-stage cardiomyopathy that was admitted to the intensive care unit on inotropic support with progressive decline (INTERMACS-2). She was offered a donor heart from a 14-year male that was found to have Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia and candidemia co-infection. The donor was transferred to our hospital and optimized hemodynamically and biochemically. Targeted antimicrobial and antifungal therapy based on the susceptibility testing was established in the donor till blood cultures were negative. The recipient received similar prophylactic therapy for 2-week course starting 24-h before transplantation. The patient was transplanted with no clinical consequences. She was discharged home in 4 weeks post-transplantation. Her 3-month follow-up was completely uneventful.

Safety and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background: Kidney transplant recipients appear to be at high risk for critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) illness. They are considered a priority for COVID-19 vaccination. Only a few studies report on the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in these patients.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, we measured anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (anti-SARS-CoV-2) spike-specific IgG post first and second COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in 113 kidney transplant recipients and compared them to 62 healthy volunteers.

Result: After the first COVID-19 vaccine, SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were undetectable in 38.9% of kidney transplant recipients, and after the second, it remained undetectable in 12.4%. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were significantly lower in kidney transplant recipients. The average antibody titer after the first vaccine was 1243.6±4137.5 in kidney transplant recipients compared to 20012.2±44436.4 in the controls after the first dose (P=0.002), and 7965.5±12431.3 versus 82891.3±67418.7, respectively, after the second dose (P <0.001). The immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine seemed to be influenced by mycophenolate dose in kidney transplant recipients and pre-vaccination infection.

Conclusion: Kidney transplant recipients are prone to have attenuated antibody responses (anti-spike IgGs) to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Patients on mycophenolate mofetil (2 gm daily) had significantly lower SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG levels as compared to patients on no or reduced dose of mycophenolate. Hence, kidney transplant recipients need to continue all infection control precautionary measures against COVID-19 infection and should be considered a priority for a third COVID-19 vaccine.

Outcomes of single dose COVID-19 vaccines: Eight month follow-up of a large cohort in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Two vaccines for COVID-19 have been approved and administered in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA); Pfizer-BioNtech BNT162b2 and AstraZeneca-Oxford AZD1222 vaccines. The purpose of this study was to describe the real-world data on the outcome of single dose of these COVID-19 vaccines in a large cohort in KSA and to analyse demographics and co-morbidities as risk factors for infection post one-dose vaccination.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, a total of 18,543 subjects received one dose of either of the vaccines at a vaccination centre in KSA, and were followed up for three to eight months. Data were collected from three sources; clinical data from medical records, adverse events (AEs) from a self-reporting system, and COVID-19 infection data from the national databases. The study was conducted during the pandemic restrictions on travel, mobility, and social interactions.

RESULTS

The median age of participants was 33 years with an average body mass index of 27.3. The majority were males (60.1%). Results showed that 92.17% of the subjects had no COVID-19 infection post-vaccination as infection post-vaccination was documented for 1452 (7.83%). Diabetes mellitus 03), organ transplantation (p = 0.02), and obesity (p < 0.01) were associated with infection post-vaccination. Unlike vaccine type, being Saudi, male, or obese was associated with the occurrence breakthrough infections more than other parameters. AEs included injection site pain, fatigue, fever, myalgia, headache and was reported by 5.8% of the subjects.

CONCLUSION

Single dose COVID-19 vaccines showed a protection rate of 92.17% up to eight months follow-up in this cohort. This rate in AZD1222 was higher than what have been previously reported in effectiveness studies and clinical trials. Obese, male, and Saudi were at higher risk of contracting the infection post-vaccination, Saudi and male might have more social interaction with the public when mobility and social interactions were limited during the pandemic. Side effects and AEs were within what has been reported in clinical trials.

Efficacy of favipiravir in adults with mild COVID-19: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial clinical trial

Objective

To evaluate whether favipiravir reduces the time to viral clearance as documented by negative RT-PCR results for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in mild cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to placebo.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, and placebo-controlled trial, adults with PCR-confirmed mild COVID-19 were recruited in an outpatient setting at seven medical facilities across Saudi Arabia. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either favipiravir 1800 mg by mouth twice daily on day 1 followed by 800 mg twice daily (n = 112) or a matching placebo (n = 119) for a total of 5 to 7 days. The primary outcome was the effect of favipiravir on reducing the time to viral clearance (by PCR test) within 15 days of starting the treatment compared to the placebo group. The trial included the following secondary outcomes: symptom resolution, hospitalization, intensive care unit admissions, adverse events, and 28-day mortality.

Results

Two hundred thirty-one patients were randomized and began the study (median age, 37 years; interquartile range (IQR): 32–44 years; 155 [67%] male), and 112 (48.5%) were assigned to the treatment group and 119 (51.5%) into the placebo group. The data and safety monitoring board recommended stopping enrolment because of futility at the interim analysis. The median time to viral clearance was 10 days (IQR: 6–12 days) in the favipiravir group and 8 days (IQR: 6–12 days) in the placebo group, with a hazard ratio of 0.87 for the favipiravir group (95% CI 0.571–1.326; p = 0.51). The median time to clinical recovery was 7 days (IQR: 4–11 days) in the favipiravir group and 7 days (IQR: 5–10 days) in the placebo group. There was no difference between the two groups in the secondary outcome of hospital admission. There were no drug-related severe adverse events.

Conclusion

In this clinical trial, favipiravir therapy in mild COVID-19 patients did not reduce the time to viral clearance within 15 days of starting the treatment.

Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 MERS vaccine candidate in healthy Middle Eastern adults (MERS002): an open-label, non-randomised, dose-escalation, phase 1b trial

BACKGROUND

ChAdOx1-vectored vaccine candidates against several pathogens have been developed and tested in clinical trials and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 has now been licensed for emergency use for COVID-19. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 MERS vaccine in a phase 1b trial in healthy Middle Eastern adults.

METHOD

MERS002 is an open-label, non-randomised, dose-escalation, phase 1b trial. Healthy Middle Eastern adults aged 18-50 years were included in the study. ChAdOx1 MERS was administered as a single intramuscular injection into the deltoid muscle of the non-dominant arm at three different dose groups: 5·0 × 109 viral particles in a low-dose group, 2·5 × 1010 viral particles in an intermediate-dose group, and 5·0 × 1010 viral particles in a high-dose group. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of ChAdOx1 MERS, measured by the occurrence of solicited and unsolicited adverse events after vaccination for up to 28 days and occurrence of serious adverse events up to 6 months. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04170829.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 17, 2019, and June 1, 2020, 24 participants were enrolled (six to the low-dose, nine to the intermediate-dose, and nine to the high-dose group) and received a dose; 23 were available for follow-up at 6 months. The one dose of ChAdOx1 MERS vaccine was well tolerated with no serious adverse event reported during the 6 months of follow-up. Most adverse events were mild (67, 74%) and moderate (17, 19%). Six (7%) severe adverse events were reported by two participants in the intermediate-dose group (two feverish, two headache, one joint pain, and one muscle pain). Pain at the injection site was the most common local and overall adverse event, reported by 15 (63%) of the 24 participants. The most common systemic adverse event was headache, reported by 14 (58%), followed by muscle pain reported by 13 (54%). The vaccine induced both antibody and T cell immune responses in all volunteers; antibodies peaked at day 28 and T cell responses peaked at day 14; and continued until the end of follow-up at 6 months.

INTERPRETATION

The acceptable safety and immunogenicity data from this phase 1b trial of ChAdOx1 MERS vaccine candidate in Healthy Middle Eastern adults, combined with previous safety and immunogenicity data from a trial in the UK, support selecting the ChAdOx1 MERS vaccine for advancement into phase 2 clinical evaluation.

FUNDING

UK Department of Health and Social Care, using UK Aid funding, managed by the UK National Institute for Health Research; and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center.

COVID-19 reinfection: A multicenter retrospective study in Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION:

There are limited direct data on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) long-term immune responses and reinfection. This study aimed to evaluate the rate, risk factors, and severity of COVID-19 reinfection.

METHODS:

This retrospective cohort study included five hospitals across Saudi Arabia. All subjects who were presented or admitted with positive SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests were evaluated between March 2020 and August 2021. Reinfection was defined as a patient who was infected followed by clinical recovery, and later became infected again 90 days post first infection. The infection was confirmed with a positive SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR). Four hundred and seventeen recovered cases but with no reinfection were included as a control.

RESULTS:

A total of 35,288 RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients were observed between March 2020 and August 2021. Based on the case definition, (0.37%) 132 patients had COVID-19 reinfection. The mean age in the reinfected cases was 40.95 ± 19.48 (range 1–87 years); Females were 50.76%. Body mass index was 27.65 ± 6.65 kg/m²; diabetes and hypertension were the most common comorbidities. The first infection showed mild symptoms in 91 (68.94%) patients; and when compared to the control group, comorbidities, severity of infection, and laboratory investigations were not statistically different. Hospitalization at the first infection was higher, but not statistically different when compared to the control group (P = 0.093).

CONCLUSION:

COVID-19 reinfection is rare and does not carry a higher risk of severe disease. Further studies are required, especially with the continuously newly emerging variants, with the unpredictable risk of reinfection.

Clinical characteristics and outcome of candidemia: Experience from a tertiary referral center in Saudi Arabia

Background:

Candida bloodstream infections cause significant excess morbidity and mortality in the health-care setting. There is limited evidence regarding Candida species causing invasive infections in Saudi Arabia.

Objective:

To identify Candida species causing bloodstream infection and determine the clinical outcome and factors associated with mortality in a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective study included all cases of positive blood culture for Candida in patients admitted to King Abdulaziz Medical City, a tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2019.

Results:

A total of 532 patients with candidemia were identified (male: 55.4%; mean age: 54 ± 26.2 years). The most common Candida species isolated was Candida albicans (26.7%), followed by Candida glabrata (22.7%), Candida parapsilosis (22.2%), and Candida tropicalis (18.4%). Non-albicans candidemia was more common in patients with diabetes (76.7%; P = 0.0560), neutropenia (89.8%; P = 0.0062), recent exposure to fluconazole (85.7%; P = 0.0394), and active chemotherapy (83.1%; P = 0.0128). In non-albicans, susceptibility to fluconazole varied from 95.9% with C. tropicalis to 41.5% with C. parapsilosis; nonetheless, all species were highly susceptible to echinocandins. The overall 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 39.9% and 56.4%, respectively. The mortality rate was nonsignificantly higher with non-albicans species at 30 days (41.2% vs. 35.9%; P = 0.2634) and 90 days (58.2% vs. 51.4%; P = 0.1620).

Conclusion:

This study found a changing pattern in the Candida species causing bloodstream infections and an epidemiological shift toward more non-albicans Candida species in Saudi Arabia.

Non-SARS Non-MERS Human Coronaviruses: Clinical Characteristics and Outcome

Human coronaviruses (HCoVs) have become evident sources of human respiratory infections with new emerging HCoVs as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The common four coronaviruses (229E, HKU1, NL63, and OC43) are known to cause respiratory illness in humans, but their clinical impact is poorly described in the literature. We analyzed the data of all patients who tested positive for at least one of the four HCoVs from October 2015 to January 2020 in a tertiary care center. HCoVs were detected in 1062 specimens, with an incidence rate of 1.01%, out of all documented respiratory illnesses. Detection of these viruses was reported sporadically throughout the years, with a peak of occurrence during winter seasons. OC43 had the highest incidence (53.7%), followed by NL63 (21.9%), HKU1 (12.6%), and 229E (11.8%). Most of these infections were community-acquired, with symptoms of both upper and lower respiratory tract. Co-detection with other viruses were observed, mostly with rhinovirus. 229E was the most frequent (26.4%) HCoV in patients requiring intensive care, while NL63 and 229E were the most common in patients requiring invasive ventilation. The highest 30-day mortality rate was observed in patients infected with 229E (6.4%). HCoVs are common circulating pathogens that have been present for decades, with 229E being the most virulent in this study cohort.

Early Prediction of COVID-19 Ventilation Requirement and Mortality from Routinely Collected Baseline Chest Radiographs, Laboratory, and Clinical Data with Machine Learning

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in Wuhan, China, in late 2019 and created a global pandemic that overwhelmed healthcare systems. COVID-19, as of July 3, 2021, yielded 182 million confirmed cases and 3.9 million deaths globally according to the World Health Organization. Several patients who were initially diagnosed with mild or moderate COVID-19 later deteriorated and were reclassified to severe disease type.

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to create a predictive model for COVID-19 ventilatory support and mortality early on from baseline (at the time of diagnosis) and routinely collected data of each patient (CXR, CBC, demographics, and patient history).

METHODS

Four common machine learning algorithms, three data balancing techniques, and feature selection are used to build and validate predictive models for COVID-19 mechanical requirement and mortality. Baseline CXR, CBC, demographic, and clinical data were retrospectively collected from April 2, 2020, till June 18, 2020, for 5739 patients with confirmed PCR COVID-19 at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh. However, of those patients, only 1508 and 1513 have met the inclusion criteria for ventilatory support and mortalilty endpoints, respectively.

RESULTS

In an independent test set, ventilation requirement predictive model with top 20 features selected with reliefF algorithm from baseline radiological, laboratory, and clinical data using support vector machines and random undersampling technique attained an AUC of 0.87 and a balanced accuracy of 0.81. For mortality endpoint, the top model yielded an AUC of 0.83 and a balanced accuracy of 0.80 using all features with balanced random forest. This indicates that with only routinely collected data our models can predict the outcome with good performance. The predictive ability of combined data consistently outperformed each data set individually for intubation and mortality. For the ventilator support, chest X-ray severity annotations alone performed better than comorbidity, complete blood count, age, or gender with an AUC of 0.85 and balanced accuracy of 0.79. For mortality, comorbidity alone achieved an AUC of 0.80 and a balanced accuracy of 0.72, which is higher than models that use either chest radiograph, laboratory, or demographic features only.

CONCLUSION

The experimental results demonstrate the practicality of the proposed COVID-19 predictive tool for hospital resource planning and patients' prioritization in the current COVID-19 pandemic crisis.

Interferon-induced transmembrane protein-3 genetic variant rs12252 is associated with COVID-19 mortality

Interferon-induced membrane proteins (IFITM) 3 gene variants are known risk factor for severe viral diseases. We examined whether IFITM3 variant may underlie the heterogeneous clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced COVID-19 in large Arab population. We genotyped 880 Saudi patients; 93.8% were PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, encompassing most COVID-19 phenotypes. Mortality at 90 days was 9.1%. IFITM3-SNP, rs12252-G allele was associated with hospital admission (OR = 1.65 [95% CI; 1.01-2.70], P = 0.04]) and mortality (OR = 2.2 [95% CI; 1.16-4.20], P = 0.01). Patients less than 60 years old had a lower survival probability if they harbor this allele (log-rank test P = 0.002). Plasma levels of IFNγ were significantly lower in a subset of patients with AG/GG genotypes than patients with AA genotype (P = 0.00016). Early identification of these individuals at higher risk of death may inform precision public health response.

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become increasingly common in hospitals worldwide. In an era of pandemics, it is important to understand all types of infectious diseases in order to control its outcome and reduce mortality rates related to it. This study aims to identify the epidemiology of MRSA bloodstream infection, risk factors, and mortality in King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh.

Methods

This is a retrospective chart review study from January 2013 to June 2017. All patients with positive blood culture for MRSA at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), which is a tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, were included. Data were extracted from electronic and paper medical records for patients who had a positive blood culture for MRSA. Data collected included demographics, microbiological details, risk factors, and 30-day mortality.

Results

From 2013 through June 2017, 633 Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia were reported in KAMC, of which 184 (29.1%) were MRSA with a mean age of 60±19 years. Almost all of our isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline. The most common infectious syndrome these patients presented with was an endovascular infection which accounts for 30.4% while 19.9% presented as a case of pneumonia. The mortality within 30 days of collection of the positive blood culture was 20.65%. Male gender (OR = 2.33; 95% CI = 1.34-4.05; P-value = 0.003) and patients with history of recent hospital (OR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.27-4.34; P-value = 0.007) or ICU (OR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.09-2.52; P-value = 0.018) admissions were more likely to acquire MRSA.

Conclusions

The incidence of MRSA bacteremia at King Abdulaziz Medical City is high and increasing in conjunction with incidence rate posing a significantly high rate of mortality. Recent history of hospital admission, ICU admission and males were found to be significantly associated with higher rates of MRSA infection. Some modifiable risk factors that could be used to facilitate the reduction of MRSA acquisition rates is to avoid unnecessary hospital and ICU admissions.

Multicentre randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled trial of favipiravir in adults with mild COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

A novel coronavirus, designated SARS-CoV-2, caused an international outbreak of a respiratory illness, termed COVID-19 in December 2019. There is a lack of specific therapeutic agents based on evidence for this novel coronavirus infection; however, several medications have been evaluated as a potential therapy. Therapy is required to treat symptomatic patients and decrease the virus carriage duration to limit the communitytransmission.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We hypothesise that patients with mild COVID-19 treated with favipiravir will have a shorter duration of time to virus clearance than the control group. The primary outcome is to evaluate the effect of favipiravir on the timing of the PCR test conversion from positive to negative within 15 days after starting the medicine.Adults (>18 years, men or nonpregnant women, diagnosed with mild COVID-19 within 5 days of disease onset) are being recruited by physicians participating from the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs and the Ministry of Health ethics committee approved primary healthcare centres. This double-blind, randomised trial comprises three significant parts: screening, treatment and a follow-up period. The treating physician and patients are blinded. Eligible participants are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the therapy group (favipiravir) or a control group (placebo) with 1800 mg by mouth two times per day for the first day, followed by 800 mg two times per day for 4-7 days. Serial nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab samples are obtained on day 1 (5 days before therapy). On day5±1 day, 10±1 day, 15±2 days, extra nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal PCR COVID-19 samples are requested.The primary analysis population for evaluating both the efficacy and safety outcomes will be a modified intention to treat population. Anticipating a 10% dropout rate, we expect to recruit 288 subjects per arm. The results assume that the hazard ratio is constant throughout the study and that the Cox proportional hazard regression is used to analyse the data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre Institutional Review Board (28 April 2020) and the Ministry of Health Institutional Review Board (1 July 2020). Protocol details and any amendments will be reported to https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04464408. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

National Clinical Trial Registry (NCT04464408).

Strongyloides and hookworms co-infection in a liver transplant patient

We here present a female patient who is a recipient of liver transplantation from a cadaveric donor. She developed abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea for two weeks of duration, after four months of the transplant. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy and stool analysis for ova and parasite showed Necator americanus / Ancylostoma duodenale (Hookworm) ova /larvae and Strongyloides stercoralis Larvae. She had a dramatic clinical response to Ivermectin and Albendazole combination, which was given until the clearance of her stool exam. She was discharged from the hospital in good condition, and her infection is considered as a donor-derived transmission of these parasites. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm co-infection in a liver transplant patient. Parasitic infection should be considered in the differential diagnosis of diarrheal illness of cadaveric transplant patients, even if it is not prevalent in the region.

Developing Machine-Learning Prediction Algorithm for Bacteremia in Admitted Patients

Purpose

Bloodstream infection among hospitalized patients is associated with serious adverse outcomes. Blood culture is routinely ordered in patients with suspected infections, although 90% of blood cultures do not show any growth of organisms. The evidence regarding the prediction of bacteremia is scarce.

Patients And Methods

A retrospective review of blood cultures requested for a cohort of admitted patients between 2017 and 2019 was undertaken. Several machine-learning models were used to identify the best prediction model. Additionally, univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the predictive factors for bacteremia.

Results

A total of 36,405 blood cultures of 7157 patients were done. There were 2413 (6.62%) positive blood cultures. The best prediction was by using NN with the high specificity of 88% but low sensitivity. There was a statistical difference in the following factors: longer admission days before the blood culture, presence of a central line, and higher lactic acid—more than 2 mmol/L.

Conclusion

Despite the low positive rate of blood culture, machine learning could predict positive blood culture with high specificity but minimum sensitivity. Yet, the SIRS score, qSOFA score, and other known factors were not good prognostic factors. Further improvement and training would possibly enhance machine-learning performance.

Viruses Causing Aseptic Meningitis: A Tertiary Medical Center Experience With a Multiplex PCR Assay

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) infection is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, and despite advancements in molecular testing, aseptic meningitis remains challenging to diagnose. Aseptic meningitis cases are often underreported worldwide, which impacts the quality of patient care. Therefore, we aimed to assess the results of BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis (ME) PCR panel, clinical characteristics, and etiologies of aseptic meningitis patients.

Methods: From January 2018 to January 2020, all pediatric and adult patients in a large tertiary medical center who underwent lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing by a ME multiplex PCR panel and who fit the aseptic meningitis definition were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: Data were reviewed from 1,607 patients; 240 met the inclusion criteria (54.6% males; 68.8% <4 years of age). The rate of detected viral causes of aseptic meningitis was 40.4%; therefore, 59.6% of the patients remained with unidentified etiology. Among the identified viral meningitis, enterovirus and human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) were the most common (25 and 7.9%, respectively). The median length of hospital stay was 6 days, and it was longer in patients with unidentifiable aseptic meningitis (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Aseptic meningitis is common among suspected meningitis patients, but most cases remained of unknown etiology. The most common identified viruses were enterovirus followed by HHV-6, and there is predominance in males and the pediatric age group. These results highlight that further research is needed to identify other etiologies and possible additional viral pathogens for aseptic meningitis in the current diagnostic methods.

A Trial of Favipiravir and Hydroxychloroquine combination in Adults Hospitalized with moderate and severe Covid-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

The selected combination was based on limited evidence clinically and in vitro on the efficacy of the Favipiravir and Hydroxychloroquine in SARS-CoV-2. The two medications were listed in many guidelines as treatment options and ongoing trials assessing their efficacy and safety. Thus, we want to prove the clinical effectiveness of the combination as therapy.

TRIAL DESIGN

This is an Open label, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of novel therapeutic agents in hospitalized adults diagnosed with COVID-19. It is a multicenter trial that will compare Favipiravir plus Hydroxychloroquine combination (experimental arm) to a control arm.

PARTICIPANTS

All study procedures will be conducted in eight centres in Saudia Arabia: King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs in Riyadh. King Abdulaziz Hospital - Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia AlMadina General Hospital, Madnia, Saudi Arabia Al-Qatif Central Hospital, Saudi Arabia Imam Abdulrahman Al Faisal Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia King Abdulaziz Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia Imam Abdulrahman Alfaisal Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Inclusion Criteria • Should be at least 18 years of age, • Male or nonpregnant female, • Diagnosed with COVID-19 by PCR confirmed SARS-coV-2 viral infection. • Able to sign the consent form and agree to clinical samples collection (or their legal surrogates if subjects are or become unable to make informed decisions).. • Moderate or Severe COVID-19, defined as oxygen saturation (Sao2) of 94% or less while they were breathing ambient air or significant clinical symptoms that require hospital admission. • patients had to be enrolled within 10 days of disease onset. Exclusion Criteria • Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding. • Will be transferred to a non-study site hospital or discharged from hospital within 72 hours. • Known sensitivity/allergy to hydroxychloroquine or Favipiravir • Current use of hydroxychloroquine for another indication • Prior diagnosis of retinopathy • Prior diagnosis of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency • Major comorbidities increasing the risk of study drug including: i. Hematologic malignancy, ii. Advanced (stage 4-5) chronic kidney disease or dialysis therapy, iii. Known history of ventricular arrhythmias, iv. Current use of drugs that prolong the QT interval, Severe liver damage (Child-Pugh score ≥ C, AST> 5 times the upper limit), HIV. • The investigator believes that participating in the trial is not in the best interests of the patient, or the investigator considers unsuitable for enrollment (such as unpredictable risks or subject compliance issues). • Clinical prognostic non-survival, palliative care, or in deep coma and no have response to supportive treatment within three hours of admission • Patient with irregular rhythm • Patient with a history of heart attack (myocardial infarction) • Patient with a family history of sudden death from heart attack before the age of 50 • Take other drugs that can cause prolonged QT interval • Patient who is receiving immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporin) which cannot be switched to another agent or adjusted while using the investigational drug • Gout/history of Gout or hyperuricemia (above the ULN), hereditary xanthinuria or xanthine calculi of the urinary tract.

INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR

The treatment intervention would be for a maximum of 10 days from randomization and it would be as follows: Favipiravir for 10 days: Administer 1800 mg (9 tablets) by mouth twice daily for one day, followed by 800mg (4 tablets) twice daily (total days of therapy is 10 days) Hydroxychloroquine for 5 days: (400mg) twice daily on day 1; for days 2-5 (200mg) twice daily. Reference Comparator Therapy: Standard of care is defined as: Treatment that is accepted by medical experts as a proper treatment for Covid-19 disease. Standard care comprised of, as necessary, supplemental oxygen, noninvasive and invasive ventilation, antibiotic agents, vasopressor support, renal-replacement therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and antiviral therapy except Favipiravir. Also, it may include intravenous fluids and medications for symptoms relief .

MAIN OUTCOMES

The primary endpoint is the time to clinical improvement, defined as the time from randomization to an improvement of two points (from the status at randomization) on a seven-category ordinal scale or live discharge from the hospital, whichever came first (14 days from Randomization).

RANDOMISATION

Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the combination group (Favipiravir and Hydroxychloroquine) or a control group. The patients will be randomized utilizing Web based data entry System with a stratification based on the centre and the ICU admission.

BLINDING (MASKING)

This is an Open label study and only the analyst will be blinded during the study conduct.

NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE)

Under the classical two arm parallel design the total effective sample sizes needed is 472 subjects (236 subjects per group).

TRIAL STATUS

Protocol version 3.1 (dated 11 Aug 2020), and currently recruitment is ongoing. The date recruitment started was May 21, 2020 and the investigators anticipate the trial will finish recruiting by the end of December 2020.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04392973 , 19 May 2020 FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Ceftobiprole for Treatment of MRSA Blood Stream Infection: A Case Series

While methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia has poor outcomes, we describe our experience with Ceftobiprole mainly as a combination therapy for the treatment of MRSA bacteremia. All the cases of MRSA bacteremia in our center at the King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, that had undergone Ceftobiprole treatment were included. We had six cases of MRSA bacteremia between 2018 and 2019, secondary to different infectious syndromes including endocarditis. There was a severe infection that required intensive care unit (ICU) admission in four cases. Ceftobiprole is used in combination with vancomycin in four cases. On day 14, all cases had a favorable outcome with microbiological and clinical improvement. However, three patients died after months of suffering from bacteremia from unrelated causes for the infection. The clinical outcome in our series of treatment of MRSA bacteremia using Ceftobiprole was favorable. Further studies for the evaluation of the use of Ceftobiprole in MRSA bacteremia should be encouraged.

Melioidosis: Case reports of confirmed Burkholderia pseudomallei in Saudi Arabia

Melioidosis is an infectious disease of tropical climates. The disease is caused by the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei. Most cases are diagnosed in southeast Asia and northern Australia. Some imported cases diagnosed in returning tourists, soldiers, and immigrants from endemic areas. It caught much attention since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) designated B. pseudomallei as an agent for biological warfare and terrorism. We describe two cases of a 26-year-old Saudi woman who had fulminant sepsis soon after returning from Thailand & a 48-year-old woman with a long history of fever. B. pseudomallei was isolated from both patients blood cultures, and they had different consequences. A confirmed case of melioidosis was not reported before in Saudi Arabia.

Experience With Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for the Treatment of Serious Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in Saudi Tertiary Care Center

Introduction:

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates have multiple resistance mechanisms, and there are insufficient therapeutic options to target them. Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a novel antipseudomonal agent that contains a combination of an oxyimino-aminothiazolyl cephalosporin (ceftolozane) and a β-lactamase inhibitor (tazobactam).

Methods:

A single-center retrospective observational study between January 2017 and December 2018 for patients who had been diagnosed with carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa infections and treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam for more than 72 hours. We assessed clinical success based on microbiological clearance as well as the clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection.

Results:

A total of 19 patients fit the inclusion criteria, with a median age was 57 years, and 53% were female. The types of infections were nosocomial pneumonia, acute bacterial skin, and skin structure infections; complicated intra-abdominal infections; and central line–associated bloodstream infections. All of the isolates were resistant to both meropenem and imipenem. The duration of therapy was variable (average of 14 days). At day 14 of starting ceftolozane-tazobactam, 18 of 19 patients had a resolution of signs and symptoms of the infection. Only 14 of 19 patients (74%) had proven microbiological eradication observed at the end of therapy. During therapy, there was no adverse event secondary to ceftolozane-tazobactam, and no Clostridium difficile infection was identified. The 30-day mortality rate was 21% (4/19).

Conclusions:

Multidrug-resistant P aeruginosa infection is associated with high mortality, which would potentially be improved using a new antibiotic such as ceftolozane-tazobactam. Studies are required to explain the role of combination therapy, define adequate dosing, and identify the proper duration of treatment.

Successful treatment of relapsed enterococcal endocarditis with amoxicillin/clavulanate: A case report

Enterococcus is considered to be a common cause of endocarditis with unfavorable outcomes. We report a case of successful treatment of relapsed prosthetic valve Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis with oral amoxicillin/clavulanate. Enterococcal endocarditis is associated with a high relapse rate, even with the recommended treatment duration by the guidelines. Oral therapy is increasingly considered as part of the management of such serious infections.

Seasonal influenza vaccine in immunocompromised persons

Immunocompromised persons are at high risk of complications from influenza infection. This population includes those with solid organ transplants, hematopoietic stem cell transplants, solid cancers and hematologic malignancy as well as those with autoimmune conditions receiving biologic therapies. In this review, we discuss the impact of influenza infection and evidence for vaccine effectiveness and immunogenicity. Overall, lower respiratory disease from influenza is common; however, vaccine immunogenicity is low. Despite this, in some populations, influenza vaccine has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing severe disease. Various strategies to improve influenza vaccine immunogenicity have been attempted including two vaccine doses in the same influenza season, intradermal, adjuvanted, and high-dose vaccines. The timing of influenza vaccine is also important to achieve optimal immunogenicity. Given the suboptimal immunogenicity, family members and healthcare professionals involved in the care of these populations should be vaccinated. Health care professional recommendation for vaccination is an important factor in vaccine coverage.

Knowledge and Attitude of Physicians Toward Prescribing Antibiotics and the Risk of Resistance in Two Reference Hospitals

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotics are essential and abundantly prescribed in hospitals because of their effectiveness and lifesaving benefits. However, the unnecessary use of antibiotics has been observed in earlier studies, and it has persisted through recent years as a major issue since it is one of the leading causes of antibiotic resistance. The increase in antibiotic resistance nowadays is one of the most critical concerns in global public health around the world. The objective of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and perceptions related to antibiotic prescription among physicians at our medical centers.

METHOD

A cross-sectional survey of non-infectious diseases specialized physicians. The study was conducted during 2015 at two tertiary care centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

RESULT

Of the 107 returned questionnaires, 93 were complete and valuable. Most respondents (82%) perceived antibiotic resistance to be a critical problem globally, and 78% also think that it is a very important national problem. These attitudes did not differ across specialty or level of training. Widespread antibiotic use and inappropriate empirical choices were believed by 81% of the participants to be important general causes of resistance. Only half of respondents thought that antibiotic restriction is a useful intervention to decrease the antibiotic resistance. The physicians believed educational interventions are the most useful and effective way to improve prescription patterns and decrease antibiotic resistance. Complications due to infection with resistant organisms were acknowledged by almost all of the participants, with some differences in their estimations of how often it will occur.

CONCLUSION

Antimicrobial resistance, globally and nationally, is considered as a serious threat, and physicians in this survey acknowledged that. Among the most significant factors is antimicrobial misuse, either by overprescribing or providing inappropriate drugs with some ambivalence, as well as the importance of hand hygiene and antibiotic restrictions. By adhering to local guidelines, continuous education, and other practical interventions, the burden of resistance can be alleviated, as highlighted in this survey.