1
|
Kirov H, Fischer J, Caldonazo T, Tasoudis P, Runkel A, Soletti GJ, Cancelli G, Dell'Aquila M, Mukharyamov M, Doenst T. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024. [PMID: 38759955 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mechanisms of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) differ as CABG provides surgical collateralization and may prolong life by preventing future myocardial infarctions (MIs). However, evidence for CABG in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) has not been fully elucidated and the impact of PCI is discussed controversially. METHODS We performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing outcomes in patients with/without multivessel disease undergoing CABG or PCI for CTO. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality (≥5 years). Secondary outcomes were MIs, repeat revascularization, cardiac mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and stroke, as well as short-term mortality (30 days/in-hospital) and stroke. A pooled Kaplan-Meier survival curve after reconstruction analysis was generated. Random-effects models were used. RESULTS Six studies totaling 12,504 patients were included. In the pooled Kaplan-Meier analysis, PCI showed a significantly higher risk of death in the follow-up compared with CABG (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.88-2.38, p < 0.01). During the observation period, PCI was also associated with higher rates of MI (odds ratio [OR]: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.82-4.48, p < 0.01) and more repeat revascularization (OR: 4.88, 95% CI: 1.99-11.91, p = 0.0005). The other outcomes did not show significant differences. CONCLUSION CABG is associated with superior survival to PCI over time in patients with CTO who are eligible for both PCI and CABG. This survival advantage is associated with fewer events of MI and repeat revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hristo Kirov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Johannes Fischer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Tulio Caldonazo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Tasoudis
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States
| | - Angelique Runkel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Murat Mukharyamov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kirov H, Caldonazo T, Mukharyamov M, Toshmatov S, Fischer J, Schneider U, Siemeni T, Doenst T. Cardiac Surgery 2023 Reviewed. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024. [PMID: 38740368 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
We reviewed the cardiac surgical literature for 2023. PubMed displayed almost 34,000 hits for the search term "cardiac surgery AND 2023." We used a PRISMA approach for a results-oriented summary. Key manuscripts addressed the mid- and long-term effects of invasive treatment options in patient populations with coronary artery disease (CAD), comparing interventional therapy (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) with surgery (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]). The literature in 2023 again confirmed the excellent long-term outcomes of CABG compared with PCI in patients with left main stenosis, specifically in anatomically complex chronic CAD, but even in elderly patients, generating further support for an infarct-preventative effect as a prognostic mechanism of CABG. For aortic stenosis, a previous trend of an early advantage for transcatheter (transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]) and a later advantage for surgical (surgical aortic valve replacement) treatment was also re-confirmed by many studies. Only the Evolut Low Risk trial maintained an early advantage of TAVI over 4 years. In the mitral and tricuspid field, the number of interventional publications increased tremendously. A pattern emerges that clinical benefits are associated with repair quality, making residual regurgitation not irrelevant. While surgery is more invasive, it currently generates the highest repair rates and longest durability. For terminal heart failure treatment, donor pool expansion for transplantation and reducing adverse events in assist device therapy were issues in 2023. Finally, the aortic diameter related to adverse events and technical aspects of surgery dominated in aortic surgery. This article summarizes publications perceived as important by us. It cannot be complete nor free of individual interpretation, but provides up-to-date information for patient-specific decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hristo Kirov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Tulio Caldonazo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Murat Mukharyamov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Sultonbek Toshmatov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Johannes Fischer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Ulrich Schneider
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg Saar, Germany
| | - Thierry Siemeni
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mukharyamov M, Kirov H, Caldonazo T, Doenst T. Impact of Age on the Relationship between Cross-Clamp Time and Mortality in Cardiac Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024. [PMID: 38325405 DOI: 10.1055/a-2263-1933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Age is an independent risk factor for mortality even when all known comorbidities are considered. Thus, other factors may additionally contribute to the age-associated risk. We performed a systematic literature search and identified 161 manuscripts, of which 32 studies (18,256 patients) were analyzed. Cross-clamp time correlated with observed mortality. The increase in mortality risk with cross-clamp time was much greater in older patients than in younger patients. The log odds ratio (OR) for age and cross-clamp time was 0.07 and 0.01, respectively, which was highly significant for both independent risk factors. Age accelerates the increase in mortality risk with increasing aortic cross-clamp times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Mukharyamov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Hristo Kirov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Tulio Caldonazo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kirov H, Caldonazo T, Runkel A, Fischer J, Tasoudis P, Mukharyamov M, Cancelli G, Dell'Aquila M, Doenst T. Percutaneous Versus Surgical Femoral Cannulation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Innovations (Phila) 2024:15569845241241534. [PMID: 38604983 DOI: 10.1177/15569845241241534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) is increasing worldwide. In most cases, the surgical technique includes cannulation of the groin for the establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass, requiring a second surgical incision (SC) for exposure and cannulation of the femoral vessels. With the introduction of arterial closure devices, percutaneous cannulation (PC) of the groin has become a possible alternative. We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to compare clinical endpoints between the patients who underwent PC and SC for MICS. METHODS Three databases were assessed. The primary outcome was any access site complication. Secondary outcomes were perioperative mortality, any wound complication, any vascular complication, lymphatic complications, femoral/iliac stenosis, stroke, procedural duration, and hospital length of stay (LOS). A random effects model was performed. RESULTS A total of 5 studies with 2,038 patients were included. When compared with PC, patients who underwent SC showed a higher incidence of any access site complication (odds ratio [OR] = 3.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.87 to 5.10, P < 0.01), any wound complication (OR = 10.10, 95% CI: 3.31 to 30.85, P < 0.01), lymphatic complication (OR = 9.37, 95% CI: 2.15 to 40.81, P < 0.01), and longer procedural duration (standardized mean difference = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.51, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding perioperative mortality, any vascular complication, femoral/iliac stenosis, stroke, or hospital LOS. CONCLUSIONS The analysis suggests that surgical groin cannulation in MICS is associated with a higher incidence of any access site complication (especially wound complication and lymphatic fistula) and with a longer procedural time compared with PC. There was no difference in perioperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hristo Kirov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
| | - Tulio Caldonazo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
| | - Angelique Runkel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
| | - Johannes Fischer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Tasoudis
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Murat Mukharyamov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
| | - Gianmarco Cancelli
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michele Dell'Aquila
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mukharyamov M, Kirov H, Caldonazo T, Doenst T. Reply to Condello. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 65:ezae134. [PMID: 38569879 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Mukharyamov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Hristo Kirov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Tulio Caldonazo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Costa V, Caldonazo T, Montanhesi P, Fischer J, Mukharyamov M, Kirov H, Doenst T. Minimally Invasive Correction of Failed Percutaneous Atrial Septal Closure with Device Embolization. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep 2024; 13:e12-e15. [PMID: 38495071 PMCID: PMC10942831 DOI: 10.1055/a-2276-9898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
We present the case of a minimally invasive surgical correction for failed percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) closure in a 57-year-old female patient with residual ASD, tricuspid regurgitation, atrial fibrillation, and embolization of one of two occluders to the superior mesenteric artery. Our surgical approach consisted of anterolateral minithoracotomy, aortic and femoral vein cannulation, cryoablation, cardiac device removal, closure of ASD with autologous pericardium, and tricuspid repair. The procedure was uneventful and patient was discharged home on postoperative day 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlander Costa
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Tulio Caldonazo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Paola Montanhesi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Israeli Hospital Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Johannes Fischer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Murat Mukharyamov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Hristo Kirov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mukharyamov M, Schneider U, Kirov H, Caldonazo T, Doenst T. Myocardial protection in cardiac surgery-hindsight from the 2020s. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 64:ezad424. [PMID: 38113432 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Myocardial protection and specifically cardioplegia have been extensively investigated in the beginnings of cardiac surgery. After cardiopulmonary bypass had become routine, more and more cardiac operations were possible, requiring reliable and reproducible protection for times of blood flow interruptions to the most energy-demanding organ of the body. The concepts of hypothermia and cardioplegia evolved as tools to extend cardiac ischaemia tolerance to a degree considered safe for the required operation. A plethora of different solutions and delivery techniques were developed achieving remarkable outcomes with cross-clamp times of up to 120 min and more. With the beginning of the new millennium, interest in myocardial protection research declined and, as a consequence, conventional cardiac surgery is currently performed using myocardial protection strategies that have not changed in decades. However, the context, in which cardiac surgery is currently performed, has changed during this time. Patients are now older and suffer from more comorbidities and, thus, other organs move more and more into the centre of risk assessment. Yet, systemic effects of cardioplegic solutions have never been in the focus of attention. They say hindsight is always 20-20. We therefore review the biochemical principles of ischaemia, reperfusion and cardioplegic extension of ischaemia tolerance and address the concepts of myocardial protection with 'hindsight from the 2020s'. In light of rising patient risk profiles, minimizing surgical trauma and improving perioperative morbidity management becomes key today. For cardioplegia, this means accounting not only for cardiac, but also for systemic effects of cardioplegic solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Mukharyamov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Ulrich Schneider
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Hristo Kirov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Tulio Caldonazo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Caldonazo T, Kirov H, Doenst T, Tasoudis P, Moschovas A, Faerber G, Treml RE, Sá MP, Mukharyamov M, Diab M. Outcomes of Concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Cardiol 2023; 205:354-359. [PMID: 37639761 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
It is current practice to perform concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with infective endocarditis who have relevant coronary artery disease. However, CABG may add complexity to the operation. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of studies that presented outcomes from patients who underwent valve surgery because of infective endocarditis with or without concomitant CABG. Three databases were assessed. Perioperative mortality was the primary outcome. Long-term mortality and postoperative stroke were the secondary outcomes. Inverse variance method and random model were performed. Five studies with a total of 5,408 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 8.2 years. Just 1 study addressed exclusively patients with documented coronary artery disease. Perioperative mortality did not differ between patients with or without concomitant CABG (odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 4.48, p = 0.44). Long-term mortality did not differ between patients who received and those who did not receive concomitant CABG (odds ratio 1.79, confidence interval 0.88 to 3.65, p = 0.11). Only 1 study from a multicenter registry reported data on the occurrence of postoperative stroke, which demonstrated that its incidence after adjustment was 26% in patients with concomitant CABG versus 21% in patients without concomitant CABG (p = 0.003). The results suggest that in endocarditis patients, adding CABG to valve surgery does not affect perioperative or long-term mortality. Data available on the impact of concomitant CABG on neurologic outcomes are limited to a retrospective multicenter registry and suggest that concomitant CABG may be associated with higher postoperative stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tulio Caldonazo
- Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Hristo Kirov
- Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Tasoudis
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Alexandros Moschovas
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Gloria Faerber
- Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Ricardo E Treml
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Michel Pompeu Sá
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Murat Mukharyamov
- Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Mahmoud Diab
- Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Herz- und Kreislaufzentrum, Rotenburg an der Fulda, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Faerber G, Mukharyamov M, Doenst T. Is There a Future for Minimal Access and Robots in Cardiac Surgery? J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:380. [PMID: 37754809 PMCID: PMC10531980 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10090380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive techniques in cardiac surgery have found increasing use in recent years. Both patients and physicians often associate smaller incisions with improved outcomes (i.e., less risk, shorter hospital stay, and a faster recovery). Videoscopic and robotic assistance has been introduced, but their routine use requires specialized training and is associated with potentially longer operating times and higher costs. Randomized evidence is scarce and transcatheter treatment alternatives are increasing rapidly. As a result, the concept of minimally invasive cardiac surgery may be viewed with skepticism. In this review, we examine the current status and potential future perspectives of minimally invasive and robotic cardiac surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Caldonazo T, Treml RE, Vianna FSL, Tasoudis P, Kirov H, Mukharyamov M, Doenst T, Silva JM. Outcomes comparison between the first and the subsequent SARS-CoV-2 waves - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Multidiscip Respir Med 2023; 18:933. [PMID: 38155706 PMCID: PMC10690722 DOI: 10.4081/mrm.2023.933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, health care professionals dealing with COVID-19 had to rely exclusively on general supportive measures since specific treatments were unknown. The subsequent waves could be faced with new diagnostic and therapeutic tools (e.g., anti-viral medications and vaccines). We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to compare clinical endpoints between the first and subsequent waves. Methods Three databases were assessed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), acute renal failure, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implantation, mechanical ventilation time, hospital LOS, systemic thromboembolism, myocarditis and ventilator associated pneumonia. Results A total of 25 studies with 126,153 patients were included. There was no significant difference for the primary endpoint (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p=0.35). The first wave group presented higher rates of ICU LOS (SMD= 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.35, p<0.01), acute renal failure (OR=1.71, 95% CI 1.36-2.15, p<0.01) and ECMO implantation (OR=1.64, 95% CI 1.06-2.52, p=0.03). The other endpoints did not show significant differences. Conclusions The analysis suggests that the first wave group, when compared with the subsequent waves group, presented higher rates of ICU LOS, acute renal failure and ECMO implantation, without significant difference in in-hospital or ICU mortality, mechanical ventilation time, hospital LOS, systemic thromboembolism, myocarditis or ventilator- associated pneumonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tulio Caldonazo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
| | - Ricardo E Treml
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
| | - Felipe S L Vianna
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Intensive Care, Israeli Hospital Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Panagiotis Tasoudis
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (NC), USA
| | - Hristo Kirov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
| | - Murat Mukharyamov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
| | - João M Silva
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Intensive Care, Israeli Hospital Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Richter M, Moschovas A, Bargenda S, Freiburger S, Mukharyamov M, Doenst T. Off-pump Surgery Mitigates Risk in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Evidence of Liver Dysfunction. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Richter
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | | | - S. Bargenda
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - S. Freiburger
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - M. Mukharyamov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schneider U, Mukharyamov M, Beyersdorf F, Dewald O, Liebold A, Gaudino M, Fremes S, Doenst T. The value of perioperative biomarker release for the assessment of myocardial injury or infarction in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 61:735-741. [PMID: 34791135 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cardiac biomarkers are indicators of irreversible cell damage. Current myocardial infarction (MI) definitions require concomitant clinical characteristics. For perioperative MI, a correlation of biomarker elevations and mortality has been suggested. Definitions emerged relying on cardiac biomarker release only. This approach is questionable as several clinical and experimental scenarios exist where relevant biomarker release can occur apart from MI. METHODS We reviewed the clinical and basic science literature and revealed important aspects regarding the use and interpretation of cardiac biomarker release with special focus on their interpretation in the perioperative setting. RESULTS Ischaemic biomarkers may be released without cell death in multiple conditions, such as after endurance runs in athletes, temporary inotropic stimulation in animal models and flow variations in in vitro cell models. In addition, access through atrial tissue during cannulation or concomitant valve procedures adds sources of enzyme release that may not be related to ventricular ischaemia (i.e. MI). Such non-cell death-related mechanisms may explain the lack of poor correlations of enzyme release and long-term outcomes in recent trials. In addition, the 3 main biomarkers, troponin T, I and creatine kinase myocardial band, differ in their release kinetics, which may differentially trigger MI events in trial patients. CONCLUSIONS The identification of irreversible myocardial injury in cardiac surgery based only on biomarker release is unreliable. Cell death- and non-cell death-related mechanisms create a mix in the perioperative setting that requires additional markers for proper identification of MI. In addition, the 3 most common ischaemic biomarkers display different release kinetics adding to the confusion. We review the topic. SUBJ COLLECTION 120, 123.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Schneider
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Murat Mukharyamov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Friedhelm Beyersdorf
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Medical Faculty of the Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Dewald
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Liebold
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mario Gaudino
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stephen Fremes
- Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|