Closing the gap in Australian Aboriginal infant immunisation rates -- the development and review of a pre-call strategy

Background

Improving timely immunisation is key to closing the inequitable gap in immunisation rates between Aboriginal children and non-Indigenous children. Aboriginal Immunisation Officers were employed in Hunter New England Local Health District (HNELHD), New South Wales (NSW), Australia, to telephone the families of all Aboriginal infants prior to the due date for their first scheduled vaccination.

Methods

Aboriginal Immunisation Officers contacted the families of Aboriginal children born in the Hunter New England Local Health District (HNELHD) by telephone before their due immunisation date (pre-call) to provide the rationale for timely immunisation, and to facilitate contact with culturally safe local immunisation services if this was required. The impact of this strategy on immunisation coverage rates is reviewed.

Results

For the period March 2010 to September 2014 there was a significant increase in immunisation coverage rate for Aboriginal children at 12 months of age in HNELHD (p < 0.0001). The coverage in the rest of NSW Aboriginal children also increased but not significantly (p = 0.218). Over the full study period there was a significant decrease in the immunisation coverage gap between Aboriginal children and non-Indigenous children in HNELHD (p < 0.0001) and the rest of NSW (p = 0.004). The immunisation coverage gap between Aboriginal and non-Indigenous infants decreased at a significantly faster rate in HNELHD than the rest of NSW (p = 0.0001). By the end of the study period in 2014, immunisation coverage in HNELHD Aboriginal infants had surpassed that of non-Indigenous infants by 0.8 %.

Conclusions

The employment of Aboriginal immunisation officers may be associated with closing of the gap between Aboriginal and non-Indigenous infants’ immunisation coverage in HNELHD and NSW. The pre-call telephone strategy provided accelerated benefit in closing this gap in HNELHD.

Setting times for endodontic sealers under clinical usage and in vitro conditions

The object of this study was to determine the set of sealers under simulated clinical versus bench-top conditions. One hundred twenty extracted teeth were divided into four groups (Roth's, Tubuliseal, Sealapex, AH26). Canal preparation and lateral condensation were performed with the four sealers (30 teeth each). Teeth were placed into 100% humidity at 37 degrees C. The same mix of sealer on a glass slab was stored within the same environment. After 1 to 8 wk the teeth were fractured longitudinally to expose the gutta-percha-sealer interface. Evaluation, both clinical and in vitro, was qualitative under a microscope with a needle tip. The degree of set was categorized as: (a) unset (smearable), (b) partially set (indented easily, but not smearable), or (3) set (not easily indentable). There were inconsistencies in setting times within and between groups. In canals most of three (AH26, Sealapex, and Tubuliseal) were partially set after 1 wk; set was complete after 4 wk. Roth's was very slow; most were unset after 8 wk. Sealers on the glass slab set much more rapidly. In conclusion, under clinical conditions, sealers set slowly (particularly Roth's) and were more delayed than when tested in vitro.