Text Messaging to Enhance Mindfulness-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment: Program Development Through Qualitative Research

Background

Mindfulness-based programs show promise for promoting smoking cessation in diverse populations. Mobile health strategies could increase treatment engagement and in-the-moment support, thus enhancing the effects of mindfulness-based smoking cessation interventions. However, most mobile health programs have been developed without sufficient input from the target population.

Objective

By eliciting input from the target population, predominantly low socioeconomic status (SES) African American adult smokers, throughout the development of an SMS (short message service) text messaging program that teaches mindfulness for smoking cessation, we aimed for the resulting program to be optimally effective and consistent with participants’ needs and preferences.

Methods

Two qualitative studies (N=25) were conducted with predominantly low SES, African American adult smokers. In Study 1 (initial qualitative input; n=15), participants engaged in focus groups to provide suggestions for program development. In Study 2 (abbreviated trial; n=10), participants received a 1-week version of the SMS text messaging program and provided feedback through in-depth interviews.

Results

In Study 1, participants suggested that the SMS text messaging program should be personalized and interactive (ie, involve two-way messaging); provide strategies for coping with cravings and recovering from smoking lapses; involve relatively short, to-the-point messages; and include pictures. In Study 2, participants were highly engaged with the texts, indicated that the program was useful, and provided additional suggestions for improvement.

Conclusions

Eliciting feedback from the target population throughout the intervention development process allowed for iterative revisions to increase feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness. Overall, SMS text messaging appears to be a feasible, appealing way to provide in-the-moment personalized support and encourage mindfulness among low-income African American smokers.

Mechanisms underlying mindfulness-based addiction treatment versus cognitive behavioral therapy and usual care for smoking cessation

OBJECTIVE

To examine cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying mindfulness-based addiction treatment (MBAT) versus cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and usual care (UC) for smoking cessation.

METHOD

Participants in the parent study from which data were drawn (N = 412; 54.9% female; 48.2% African American, 41.5% non-Latino White, 5.4% Latino, 4.9% other; 57.6% annual income <$30,000) were randomized to MBAT (n = 154), CBT (n = 155), or UC (n = 103). From quit date through 26 weeks postquit, participants completed measures of emotions, craving, dependence, withdrawal, self-efficacy, and attentional bias. Biochemically confirmed 7-day smoking abstinence was assessed at 4 and 26 weeks postquit. Although the parent study did not find a significant treatment effect on abstinence, mixed-effects regression models were conducted to examine treatment effects on hypothesized mechanisms, and indirect effects of treatments on abstinence were tested.

RESULTS

Participants receiving MBAT perceived greater volitional control over smoking and evidenced lower volatility of anger than participants in both other treatments. However, there were no other significant differences between MBAT and CBT. Compared with those receiving UC, MBAT participants reported lower anxiety, concentration difficulties, craving, and dependence, as well as higher self-efficacy for managing negative affect without smoking. Indirect effects of MBAT versus UC on abstinence occurred through each of these mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas several differences emerged between MBAT and UC, MBAT and CBT had similar effects on several of the psychosocial mechanisms implicated in tobacco dependence. Results help to shed light on similarities and differences between mindfulness-based and other active smoking cessation treatments. (PsycINFO Database Record

Do participants in genome sequencing studies of psychiatric disorders wish to be informed of their results? A survey study

Objective

As large-scale genome sequencing technology advances, concerns surrounding the reporting of individual findings to study volunteers have grown and fueled controversy. This is especially true in mental health research, where the clinical importance of sequencing results is particularly unclear. The ethical, legal, and social issues are being widely debated, but less is known about the attitudes of actual study volunteers toward sequencing studies or what they wish to learn about their DNA sequence and its health implications. This study provides information on psychiatric research volunteers’ attitudes, beliefs, and concerns with respect to participation in DNA sequencing studies and reporting of individual results.

Method

We conducted a pilot study using a questionnaire that we developed to assess what information volunteers in an ongoing family study of bipolar disorder would like to receive if they underwent genome sequencing, what they would do with that information, and what concerns they may have.

Results

Almost all of the respondents were willing to participate in genome sequencing. Most respondents wished to be informed about all their health-related genetic risks, including risks for diseases without known prevention or treatment. However, few respondents felt well informed about the nature of genome sequencing or its implications for their health, insurability, or offspring.

Conclusions

Despite generally positive attitudes toward genome sequencing among study volunteers, most are not fully aware of the special issues raised by genome sequencing. The attitudes of study volunteers should be considered in the debate about the reporting of individual findings from genome sequencing.

Tolerance of deviations in eye and mouth position

OBJECTIVE

To develop and refine a technique for measuring the tolerance for deviations in facial appearance.

DESIGN

A psychophysical method was administered using photocopies of altered facial photographs to measure tolerances for deviations in eye position and mouth angulation and judges' reaction time.

METHODS

Stimulus photos were displayed as Kodachrome slides to 76 individuals grouped by their familiarity with craniofacial anomalies, i.e. dental professionals, orthodontic and craniofacial patients, also a group of normal patients.

RESULTS

(1) Tolerance for deviation of facial appearance varies inversely with the magnitude of the physical deviations from normal; (2) tolerance varies directly as a function of assumed familiarity with deviation; (3) response and reaction time varied inversely with the tolerance for facial deviation.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in tolerance and reaction time were found among the groups and depended on whether an isolated feature was judged or if the feature was judged in the context of the whole face.

Comparison of perceptions of computer-animated left- and right-facing profiles

PURPOSE

Although scientific publications differ in displaying left- or right-facing profiles, there are few systematic studies of the possible effects of directional biases and laterality on patients' and clinicians' perceptions of treatment need, outcomes, and satisfaction. As part of a research program to quantitate the physical bases of the perceived zone of acceptability and most-pleasing facial profiles, responses to computer-animated left- and right-facing soft-tissue profile images were compared and related to eye and hand preference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standardized left-facing, soft-tissue profile images were captured in color and digitized. The right-facing profile was created by reversing the left profile image to display a mirror image. Using imaging and customized morphing software, retrusive and protrusive extremes were created, from which transitional frames were developed to display five features of the soft-tissue profile: upper lip, chin, bimaxillary position, lower face height, and mandible. One left- and one right-facing profile for a Class II division 1 female, and Class III male were randomly presented to 24 subjects who were asked to indicate: 1) acceptability by pressing a mouse button and releasing the button when the images were no longer acceptable; and 2) most-pleasing image by pressing the mouse button once.

RESULTS

No differences were found between left- and right-profile images for zone of acceptability, midpoint of the zone of acceptability, or most pleasing; nor was there any relation to laterality measures. However, consistently higher intercorrelations among the features for the zone of acceptability were found for the left- than for the right-facing profiles for retrusive to protrusive and protrusive to retrusive excursions measured in millimeters (p < .001). The bimaxillary position accounted for most of the variance in judgments of acceptability with greater influence on the left than on the right profile.

CONCLUSION

With the increasing use of computer-imaging in dental practices, the influence of psychophysical and other environmental variables on perception must be considered.