The Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in a High-Risk Population Undergoing Colon Cancer Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced Recovery ERP protocols (ERP) have improved surgical outcomes in patients undergoing elective colon cancer (CC) surgery; however, efficacy in different populations may vary. We examined the impact of an ERP in a population with high rates of obesity and multiple comorbidities.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of factors associated with postoperative complications (PoC) and length of stay (LOS) following CC surgery from 2011 to 2019 in a 5-hospital healthcare system which serves a population with higher rates of obesity (body mass index ≥30kg/m2) and multi-comorbidities, as compared to published studies. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 408 elective CC surgery patients with complete oncologic surgical data were identified. Of these, 191 (46.81%) were under ERP. Factors independently associated with PoC included obesity (OR=1.66, P=.029), laparoscopic (OR=.52, P=.020), and hybrid (OR=.38, P=.012) versus open surgery and ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class ≥3 (OR=1.98, P=.006). ERP did not impact PoC but was associated with a reduction in LOS (β=-1.02 days, 95%CI: -1.75 - -.30, P=.006). ERP had an impact on LOS in both the non-obese and obese groups (P<.001 and P=.034, respectively). PoC significantly increased LOS (β=6.67 days, 95%CI: 5.41-7.03, P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Following elective CC surgery, obesity and medical comorbidities were associated with increased PoC and in turn, as expected, increased LOS. ERP was associated with a reduction in LOS in both obese and non-obese patients. In high-risk populations, application of ERP may be particularly important to optimize surgical outcomes following CC surgery.

Adherence to neoadjuvant therapy guidelines for locally advanced rectal cancers in a region with sociodemographic disparities

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCR) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We examined guideline adherence in a healthcare system serving a region with socioeconomic disparities and poor cancer outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of factors associated with guideline adherence.

RESULTS

63.1% of stage II/III LARC patients received NCR. Factors associated with adherence included white race (OR = 2.15, p = 0.024), private insurance (OR = 2.70, p = 0.005), employed status (OR = 2.30, p = 0.031), age at diagnosis (OR = 0.74, p = 0.032), appropriate local staging (OR = 9.17, p < 0.0001), and diagnosis later in the study period (OR per 1 year = 1.20, p = 0.006). By multivariate analysis, private insurance (OR = 2.51, p = 0.023), younger age (OR per 10 years = 0.72, p = 0.048) and appropriate local staging (OR = 6.67, p < 0.0001) were associated with adherence.

CONCLUSION

Guideline adherence for LARC in our system is low and is impacted by employment, race and insurance status. Standard of care compliance remains an important target for improvement efforts in this underserved region of the nation's Mid-South.

What Is the Utility of Restaging Imaging for Patients With Clinical Stage II/III Rectal Cancer After Completion of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Prior to Proctectomy?

BACKGROUND

In the United States, patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer typically receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (chemo/XRT) over a 5-6 week period followed by a 6-10 week break prior to proctectomy. In the current study, we evaluate the utilization of restaging studies performed and detection of disease progression during this window.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer was performed. Medical records were analyzed to collect clinicopathologic data and the performance and results of preoperative, early postoperative, and first surveillance CT and/or PET/CT in patients completing long course neoadjuvant chemo/XRT and undergoing proctectomy.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2017, 176 patients with clinical stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma completed neoadjuvant chemo/XRT and underwent proctectomy. Preoperative restaging with CT CAP and/or CT/PET was performed in 72 (40.9%) patients with no detection of disease progression. Of the 104 patients without preoperative restaging, 1 had intraoperative detection of liver metastases and 31 had early postoperative reimaging (within 30 days of proctectomy) of which 2 had detection of new pulmonary metastases. Among 72 patients with no preoperative or early postoperative reimaging, first surveillance imaging was available in 47 and detected new metastases in 8 (17%).

DISCUSSION

In patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer who undergo long course neoadjuvant chemo/XRT, perioperative reimaging with CT CAP and/or PET/CT detects new metastases in a small percentage of patients. A multi-institutional, prospective analysis using standardized staging protocols is warranted to better determine the value of preoperative restaging in these patients.

Neoadjuvant therapy guideline adherence for locally advanced rectal cancers in a region with sociodemographic disparities

71

Background: Quality and practice guidelines from the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCR) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We examined guideline adherence in a healthcare system serving a region with significant socioeconomic disparities and poor cancer outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients from 2005-2014 with stage II and III rectal cancer in our local 5- hospital healthcare system in the Mid-South region of the US. We examined the associations between guideline adherence and patient demographic, socioeconomic, and clinicopathologic data. Results: Of 157 stage II/III RC patients, 96 (61.1%) received NCR. By univariate analysis, factors associated with receipt of NCR included white race versus non-white (OR = 2.14, p = 0.024), private insurance versus no or public insurance (OR = 2.70, p = 0.005), employed status versus unemployed (OR = 2.29, p = 0.031), age at diagnosis (OR = 0.74, p = 0.032), and appropriate local staging with EUS or MRI (OR = 6.67, p = < 0.0001). Those who were diagnosed and treated later in the study period were more likely to get NCR (OR per 1 year = 1.20, p = 0.006). In addition, receipt of NCR was protective against death at time of follow up (OR = 0.41, p = 0.009). By multivariate analysis, those with private insurance (OR = 2.51, p = 0.023), younger age at diagnosis (OR per 10 years = 1.39, p = 0.048) and with appropriate local staging (OR = 6.67, p < 0.0001) were more likely to have received NCR. Conclusions: Guideline adherence for LARC in our system, which serves a population with socioeconomic disparities, is relatively low. Sociodemographic factors such as employment and race influenced receipt of NCR, while insurance status and age were independent determinants. Despite some increase in compliance over time, adherence to NCR for LARC remains lower than expected and represents an important target for improvement efforts.

Utility of restaging patients with stage II/III rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemo/XRT: A systematic review

495

Background: In the US, patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer typically receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation (chemo/XRT) over 5-6 weeks followed by a 6-10 week break before proctectomy. As this chemotherapy is delivered at radio-sensitizing doses, there is essentially a 3-month window during which potential systemic disease is untreated. Evidence regarding the utility of restaging patients prior to proctectomy is limited. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies evaluating the utility of restaging patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after completion of long course chemo/XRT, and reporting changes in management after restaging. Studies that were non-English, included < 50 patients, or examining the diagnostic accuracy of specific imaging modalities were excluded. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Results: Eight studies were identified including a total of 1251 patients restaged between completion of chemo/XRT and proctectomy. All studies were retrospective (6 single institution, 2 multi-institution). Restaging identified new metastatic disease in 72 (6.0%) patients, with 4 studies reporting specific sites: liver (n = 28), lung (n = 8), adrenal (n = 1), bone (n = 1), and multiple sites (n = 7). Overall, progression (distant or local) was detected in 85 (6.8%) patients and resulted in a reported change in management in 71 (5.7%) patients. One study identified an association of high-grade tumors with progression (p ≤ 0.05), however, this was not reported in any other study. Moreover, tumor-related prognostic characteristics were inconsistently reported among studies, precluding meta-analysis. Conclusions: Although restaging between completion of neoadjuvant chemo/XRT and proctectomy detects disease progression in only a small percentage of patients, findings may alter the treatment plan. A multi-institutional collaboration with analysis of well-defined prognostic variables may better identify a group of patients most likely to benefit from restaging.

The Impact of Ostomy Creation after Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in a Newly Established Peritoneal Malignancy Program

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) has improved outcomes for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and often requires ostomy creation. We examined the impact of ostomy creation in a newly established peritoneal malignancy program. A retrospective review was performed of CRS-HIPEC procedures from 2011 to 2016. Those who did and did not receive an ostomy were compared. Fifty-eight patients underwent CRS-HIPEC and an ostomy was created in 25.9 per cent. Median peritoneal cancer index (14 vs 16, P = 0.63) and multivisceral resection rates (87.9 vs 100.0%, P = 0.17) were similar between groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that bowel resection (OR 210.65, P = 0.02) was significantly associated with ostomy creation. Advanced age was noted to be inversely associated with stoma formation (OR 0.04, P = 0.04). Progression-free survival was significantly lower in the ostomy group (18 vs 23 months, P = 0.03). Those with an ostomy experienced prolonged length of stay (13.3 ± 7.4 vs 9.5 ± 3.7, P = 0.01). At follow-up, 6/10 temporary ostomies had undergone reversal and three patients experienced morbidity after reversal. Ostomy creation may occur during CRS-HIPEC and carries potential for morbidity. Ostomy creation may contribute to postoperative length of stay. Patients should be counseled preoperatively on the potential impact of ostomy placement during CRS-HIPEC.

The Impact of Ostomy Creation after Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in a Newly Established Peritoneal Malignancy Program

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) has improved outcomes for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and often requires ostomy creation. We examined the impact of ostomy creation in a newly established peritoneal malignancy program. A retrospective review was performed of CRS-HIPEC procedures from 2011 to 2016. Those who did and did not receive an ostomy were compared. Fifty-eight patients underwent CRS-HIPEC and an ostomy was created in 25.9 per cent. Median peritoneal cancer index (14 vs 16, P = 0.63) and multivisceral resection rates (87.9 vs 100.0%, P = 0.17) were similar between groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that bowel resection (OR 210.65, P = 0.02) was significantly associated with ostomy creation. Advanced age was noted to be inversely associated with stoma formation (OR 0.04, P = 0.04). Progression-free survival was significantly lower in the ostomy group (18 vs 23 months, P = 0.03). Those with an ostomy experienced prolonged length of stay (13.3 ± 7.4 vs 9.5 ± 3.7, P = 0.01). At follow-up, 6/10 temporary ostomies had undergone reversal and three patients experienced morbidity after reversal. Ostomy creation may occur during CRS-HIPEC and carries potential for morbidity. Ostomy creation may contribute to postoperative length of stay. Patients should be counseled preoperatively on the potential impact of ostomy placement during CRS-HIPEC.

The Impact of Early Recurrence on Quality of Life after Cytoreduction with HIPEC

Improved oncological outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in highly selected patients have been well documented. The extensive nature of the procedure adversely affects quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study is to longitudinally evaluate QoL following CRS/HIPEC. This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with peritoneal malignancies undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Clinicopathological data, oncologic outcomes, and QoL were analyzed preoperatively and post-operatively at 2 weeks, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal instrument was used to determine changes in QoL after CRS/HIPEC and the impact of early recurrence (<12 months) on QoL. Thirty-six patients underwent CRS/HIPEC over 36 months. The median peritoneal cancer index score was 18 and the completeness of cytoreduction-0/1 rate was 97.2 per cent. Postoperative major morbidity was 16.7 per cent with one perioperative death. Disease-free survival was 12.6 months in patients with high-grade tumors versus 31.0 months in those with low-grade tumors (P = 0.03). QoL decreased postoperatively and improved to baseline in six months. Patients with early recurrence had a decrease in global QoL compared with preoperative QoL at 6 (P < 0.03) and 12 months (P < 0.05). This correlation was not found in patients who had not recurred. Patients who undergo CRS/HIPEC have a decrease in QoL that plateaus in 3 to 6 months. Early recurrence adversely impacts QoL at 6 and 12 months. This study emphasizes the importance of patient selection for CRS/HIPEC. The expected QoL trajectory in patients at risk for early recurrence must be carefully weighed against the potential oncological benefit of CRS/HIPEC.