Kajabwangu R, Ssedyabane F, Tusubira D, Maling S, Kakongi N, Turyakira E, Namuli A, Galiwango M, Randall TC. High Rate of Loss to Follow-Up Among Patients Undergoing Treatment for Premalignant Cervical Lesions at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Southwestern Uganda: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Cureus 2023;
15:e46542. [PMID:
37927695 PMCID:
PMC10625478 DOI:
10.7759/cureus.46542]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
For a cervical cancer control program to be effective in reducing the incidence of the disease, there should be high compliance to treatment and follow-up of women diagnosed with precursor lesions. Screening programs in low-resource countries such as Uganda are challenged by poor adherence to follow-up following treatment for premalignant cervical lesions. This study sought to describe the burden and factors associated with loss to follow-up among women undergoing treatment for premalignant cervical lesions at a tertiary hospital in southwestern Uganda.
METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort study. We reviewed the registers at the Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH) cervical cancer clinic for a period of four years from January 2017 to December 2020. Data on age, district of residence, diagnosis, date of diagnosis, date and type of initial treatment, and date of follow-up visit were collected. We also captured data on whether patients returned on the scheduled follow-up date or within three months after the scheduled follow-up date. We defined loss to follow-up as failure to return for follow-up either on the scheduled date or within three months after the scheduled date.
RESULTS
Out of the 298 patients who underwent treatment for premalignant cervical lesions in the study period, 227 (76.2%) did not return for follow-up at one year. At bivariate analysis, failure to attend the review visit at six weeks predicted the loss to follow-up at one year following treatment for premalignant lesions almost perfectly (risk ratio (RR)=2.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.18-3.71, p<0.001). Negative HIV serostatus and receiving thermocoagulation slightly increased the risk of getting lost to follow-up, while being more than 45 years old reduced the odds. At multivariate analysis, treatment with thermocoagulation (adjusted risk ratio (aRR)=1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36, p=0.03) was associated with loss to follow-up at one year.
CONCLUSION
The proportion of women who did not return for follow-up at one year following treatment for premalignant cervical lesions at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital is very high. There is a need to implement strategies such as telephone-aided reminders to prompt patients to return for follow-up following treatment for premalignant cervical lesions.
Collapse