1
|
Kamarck ML, Trimmer C, Murphy NR, Gregory KM, Manoel D, Logan DW, Saraiva LR, Mainland JD. Identifying candidate genes underlying isolated congenital anosmia. Clin Genet 2024; 105:376-385. [PMID: 38148624 PMCID: PMC10932857 DOI: 10.1111/cge.14470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
An estimated 1 in 10 000 people are born without the ability to smell, a condition known as congenital anosmia, and about one third of those people have non-syndromic, or isolated congenital anosmia (ICA). Despite the significant impact of olfaction for our quality of life, the underlying causes of ICA remain largely unknown. Using whole exome sequencing (WES) in 10 families and 141 individuals with ICA, we identified a candidate list of 162 rare, segregating, deleterious variants in 158 genes. We confirmed the involvement of CNGA2, a previously implicated ICA gene that is an essential component of the olfactory transduction pathway. Furthermore, we found a loss-of-function variant in SREK1IP1 from the family gene candidate list, which was also observed in 5% of individuals in an additional non-family cohort with ICA. Although SREK1IP1 has not been previously associated with olfaction, its role in zinc ion binding suggests a potential influence on olfactory signaling. This study provides a more comprehensive understanding of the spectrum of genetic alterations and their etiology in ICA patients, which may improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of this disorder and lead to better understanding of the mechanisms governing basic olfactory function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa L. Kamarck
- Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Luis R. Saraiva
- Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University; Doha, Qatar
| | - Joel D. Mainland
- Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ibarra-Soria X, Nakahara TS, Lilue J, Jiang Y, Trimmer C, Souza MA, Netto PH, Ikegami K, Murphy NR, Kusma M, Kirton A, Saraiva LR, Keane TM, Matsunami H, Mainland J, Papes F, Logan DW. Variation in olfactory neuron repertoires is genetically controlled and environmentally modulated. eLife 2017; 6. [PMID: 28438259 PMCID: PMC5404925 DOI: 10.7554/elife.21476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The mouse olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) repertoire is composed of 10 million cells and each expresses one olfactory receptor (OR) gene from a pool of over 1000. Thus, the nose is sub-stratified into more than a thousand OSN subtypes. Here, we employ and validate an RNA-sequencing-based method to quantify the abundance of all OSN subtypes in parallel, and investigate the genetic and environmental factors that contribute to neuronal diversity. We find that the OSN subtype distribution is stereotyped in genetically identical mice, but varies extensively between different strains. Further, we identify cis-acting genetic variation as the greatest component influencing OSN composition and demonstrate independence from OR function. However, we show that olfactory stimulation with particular odorants results in modulation of dozens of OSN subtypes in a subtle but reproducible, specific and time-dependent manner. Together, these mechanisms generate a highly individualized olfactory sensory system by promoting neuronal diversity. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21476.001 Smells are simply chemicals in the air that are recognized by nerves in our nose. Each nerve has a receptor that can identify a limited number of chemicals, and the nerve then relays this information to the brain. Animals have hundreds to thousands of different types of these nerves meaning that they can detect a wide array of smells. Smell receptors are proteins, and the genes that encode these proteins can be very different in two unrelated people. This could partly explain, for example, why some people find certain odors intense and unpleasant while others do not. However, having different genes for smell receptors does not by itself completely explain why some people are more sensitive than others to particular smells. The amounts of each nerve type in the nose might also differ between people and have an effect, but to date it has not been possible to accurately count them all. Ibarra-Soria et al. have now devised a new method to essentially count the number of each nerve type in the noses of mice from different breeds. The method makes use of a technique called RNA-sequencing, which can reveal which genes are active at any one time, and thus show how many nerves are producing each type of smell receptor. Ibarra-Soria et al. learned that different breeds of mice had remarkably different compositions of nerves in their noses. Further analysis revealed that this was due to changes to the DNA code near to the genes that encode the smell receptor. Next, Ibarra-Soria et al. sought to find out how the amount of each nerve type is controlled by giving mice water with different smells for weeks and looking how this affected their noses. These experiments revealed that a small number of the nerve types became more or less common after exposure to a smell. The altered nerves were directly involved in recognizing the smells, proving that the very act of smelling can change the make-up of nerves in a mouse’s nose. These results confirm that the diversity in the nose of each individual is not only dictated by the types of receptors found in there, but also by the number of each nerve type. The next challenge is to understand better how these differences change the way people perceive smells. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21476.002
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thiago S Nakahara
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Jingtao Lilue
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Yue Jiang
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
| | - Casey Trimmer
- Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Mateus Aa Souza
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Paulo Hm Netto
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Kentaro Ikegami
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
| | | | - Mairi Kusma
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Kirton
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Luis R Saraiva
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas M Keane
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Hiroaki Matsunami
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.,Department of Neurobiology, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
| | - Joel Mainland
- Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, United States.,Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Fabio Papes
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Darren W Logan
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.,Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
A novel density barrier material, Phase Lock Gel, has been formulated and optimized for use in enhancing the separation between aqueous and organic phases during organic extraction/ centrifugation of nucleic acids. Phase Lock Gel is inert, stable to heating, compatible with most enzymatic reactions of nucleic acids without sacrificing subsequent downstream applications, and can be easily and conveniently used with most plasmid DNA, genomic DNA, phage DNA and RNA organic extraction protocols. Use of Phase Lock Gel as an aqueous/organic phase barrier material can decrease processing time and improve nucleic acid recovery from organic extraction purifications by as much as 30%, all while minimizing user exposure to volatile organics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N R Murphy
- 5 Prime-->3 Prime, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Murphy NR, Leinbach SS, Hellwig RJ. A potent, cost-effective RNase inhibitor. Biotechniques 1995; 18:1068-73. [PMID: 7546711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The performance characteristics of a potent new RNase inhibitor have been evaluated, as have applications for its use in molecular biology. PRIME Inhibitor is a protein, not related to the commonly available human placental RNase inhibitors (HPRI). It has a high specific activity, enhanced temperature stability, broad reaction pH range and significantly greater cost-effectiveness than commercial HPRI. PRIME Inhibitor is suitable for use in in vitro transcription, in vitro translation, first- and second-strand cDNA synthesis, preparation of RNA and mRNA, and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
Collapse
|