Phenotyping coronary plaque by computed tomography in premature coronary artery disease

AIMS

Premature coronary artery disease (CAD) is an aggressive disease with multiple recurrences mostly related to new coronary lesions. This study aimed to compare coronary plaque characteristics of individuals with premature CAD with those of incidental plaques found in matched individuals free of overt cardiovascular disease, using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 1552 consecutive individuals who underwent CCTA, 106 individuals with history of acute or stable obstructive CAD ≤45 years were matched by age, sex, smoking status, cardiovascular heredity, and dyslipidaemia with 106 controls. CCTA were analysed for Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System score, plaque composition, and high-risk plaque (HRP) features, including spotty calcification, positive remodelling, low attenuation, and napkin-ring sign. The characteristics of 348 premature CAD plaques were compared with those of 167 incidental coronary plaques of matched controls. The prevalence of non-calcified plaques was higher among individuals with premature CAD (65.1 vs. 30.2%, P < 0.001), as well as spotty calcification (42.5 vs. 17.9%, P < 0.001), positive remodelling (41.5 vs. 9.4%, P < 0.001), low attenuation (24.5 vs. 3.8%, P < 0.001), and napkin-ring sign (1.9 vs. 0.0%). They exhibited an average of 2.2 (2.7) HRP, while the control group displayed 0.4 (0.8) HRP (P < 0.001). Within a median follow-up of 24 (16, 34) months, individuals with premature CAD and ischaemic recurrence (n = 24) had more HRP [4.3 (3.9)] than those without ischaemic recurrence [1.5 (1.9)], mostly non-calcified with low attenuation and positive remodelling.

CONCLUSION

Coronary atherosclerosis in individuals with premature CAD is characterized by a high and predominant burden of non-calcified plaque and unusual high prevalence of HRP, contributing to disease progression with multiple recurrences. A comprehensive qualitative CCTA assessment of plaque characteristics may further risk stratify our patients, beyond cardiovascular risk factors.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Transcatheter Aortic Valve or Dedicated Devices: Current Evidence and Future Prospects

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a novel and evolving field dedicated to addressing the therapeutic challenges posed by patients at high surgical risk with mitral valve disease. TMVR can be categorized into two distinct fields based on the type of device and its specific indications: TMVR with transcatheter aortic valves (TAV) and TMVR with dedicated devices. Similar to aortic stenosis, TMVR with TAV requires a rigid support structure to secure the valve in place. As a result, it is indicated for patients with failing bioprothesis or surgical rings or mitral valve disease associated with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC), which furnishes the necessary foundation for valve anchoring. While TMVR with TAV has shown promising outcomes in valve-in-valve procedures, its effectiveness remains more contentious in valve-in-ring or valve-in-MAC procedures. Conversely, TMVR with dedicated devices seeks to address native mitral regurgitation, whether accompanied by MAC or not, providing an alternative to Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER) when TEER is not feasible or expected to yield unsatisfactory results. This emerging field is gradually surmounting technical challenges, including anchoring a valve in a non-calcified annulus and transitioning from the transapical route to the transeptal approach. Numerous devices are presently undergoing clinical trials. This review aims to furnish an overview of the supporting evidence for TMVR using TAV in each specific indication (valve-in-valve, valve-in-ring, valve-in-MAC). Subsequently, we will discuss the anticipated benefits of TMVR with dedicated devices over TEER, summarize the characteristics and clinical results of TMVR systems currently under investigation, and outline future prospects in this field.

ESC/EAS guidelines for the detection, prevention, and treatment of individuals at risk of a first myocardial infarction: effect of 5 years of updates and the new SCORE2

Aims

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has released three consecutive guidelines within 5 years addressing cardiovascular prevention, risk scores, and cholesterol treatment. This study aims to evaluate whether the 2021 ESC guidelines improved the eligibility of individuals for primary prevention statin therapy before their first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and for intensive lipid-lowering treatments in secondary prevention.

Methods and results

The cardiovascular risk category of 2757 consecutive individuals admitted for a first STEMI was evaluated to assess whether they would have been eligible for primary prevention statins according to 2021 vs. 2019 and 2016 ESC guidelines. Eligibility for intensive lipid-lowering therapy in secondary prevention was assessed according to the real-life follow-up low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the expected follow-up LDL-C. More individuals would have been eligible for primary prevention statins according to 2021 and 2019 vs. 2016 guidelines (61.8% vs. 38.7% vs. 23.6%, P &lt; 0.01), a finding observed in both men (62.3% vs. 35.0% vs. 24.9%, P &lt; 0.01) and women (60.2% vs. 50.7% vs. 19.3%, P = 0.18). Only 27% of individuals reached the LDL-C objective of 55 mg/L in secondary prevention: using the ESC stepwise approach, 61.7% were eligible for higher doses of statins, 26.2% for ezetimibe, and 12.1% for a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor (PCSK9i). Based on expected LDL-C reductions, eligibility for a PCSK9i in secondary prevention was greater with 2021 vs. 2016 guidelines (44.5% vs. 22.5%, P &lt; 0.01).

Conclusion

The 2021 ESC guidelines improved the detection and treatment of individuals at risk for a first myocardial infarction. In secondary prevention, 70% of patients kept LDL-C levels above 55 mg/dL: increasing the statin dose and adding ezetimibe were the most frequently recommended therapeutic actions.

Predictive Value of the Residual SYNTAX Score in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND

In hemodynamically stable patients, complete revascularization (CR) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a better prognosis in chronic and acute coronary syndromes.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the extent, severity, and prognostic value of remaining coronary stenoses following PCI, by using the residual SYNTAX score (rSS), in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) related to myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

The CULPRIT-SHOCK (Culprit Lesion Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) trial compared a multivessel PCI (MV-PCI) strategy with a culprit lesion-only PCI (CLO-PCI) strategy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who presented with MI-related CS. The rSS was assessed by a central core laboratory. The study group was divided in 4 subgroups according to tertiles of rSS of the participants, thereby isolating patients with an rSS of 0 (CR). The predictive value of rSS for the 30-day primary endpoint (mortality or severe renal failure) and for 30-day and 1-year mortality was assessed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among the 587 patients with an rSS available, the median rSS was 9.0 (interquartile range: 3.0 to 17.0); 102 (17.4%), 100 (17.0%), 196 (33.4%), and 189 (32.2%) patients had rSS = 0, 0 < rSS ≤5, 5 < rSS ≤14, and rSS >14, respectively. CR was achieved in 75 (25.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.3% to 30.5%) and 27 (9.3%; 95% CI: 6.2% to 13.3%) of patients treated using the MV-PCI and CLO-PCI strategies, respectively. After multiple adjustments, rSS was independently associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio per 10 units: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.01) and 1-year mortality (adjusted odds ratio per 10 units: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with multivessel disease and MI-related CS, CR is achieved only in one-fourth of the patients treated using an MV-PCI strategy. and the residual SYNTAX score is independently associated with early and late mortality.

Radial versus femoral artery access for percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease complicated by cardiogenic shock: Subanalysis from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial

BACKGROUND

The use and impact of transradial artery access (TRA) compared to transfemoral artery access (TFA) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remain unclear.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial where patients presenting with MI and multivessel disease complicated by CS were randomized to a strategy of culprit-lesion-only or immediate multivessel PCI. Arterial access was left at operator's discretion. Adjudicated outcomes of interest were the composite of death or renal replacement therapy (RRT) at 30 days and 1 year. Multivariate logistic models were used to assess the association between the arterial access and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the 673 analyzed patients, TRA and TFA were successfully performed in 118 (17.5%) and 555 (82.5%) patients, respectively. Compared to TFA, TRA was associated with a lower 30-day rate of death or RRT (37.3% vs 53.2%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.96), a lower 30-day rate of death (34.7% vs 49.7%; aOR: 0.56; 95% CI 0.33-0.96), and a lower 30-day rate of RRT (5.9% vs 15.9%; aOR: 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.97). No significant differences were observed regarding the 30-day risks of type 3 or 5 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding and stroke. The observed reduction of death or RRT and death with TRA was no longer significant at 1 year (44.9% vs 57.8%; aOR: 0.85; 95% CI 0.50-1.45 and 42.4% vs 55.5%, aOR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.46-1.32, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing PCI for acute MI complicated by CS, TRA may be associated with improved early outcomes, although the reason for this finding needs further research.

Identification of poor response to P2Y12 inhibitors in ACS patients with a new ELISA-based vasodilator-associated stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay

A new ELISA technique has been developed to measure the vasodilator-associated stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) platelet reactivity index (PRI) in clopidogrel-treated patients. This technique has not been evaluated in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients or in prasugrel-treated patients. We assessed the accuracy of ELISA-VASP to identify high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) in ACS patients in comparison with established platelet function tests. Platelet reactivity was measured in 240 ACS patients treated with clopidogrel (75 or 150 mg) or prasugrel (5 or 10 mg) using flow cytometry (FC-VASP) and the ELISA-VASP technique, light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and VerifyNow-P2Y12 assay (VN-P2Y12). When using the ELISA-VASP PRI, the rate of patients with HPR in the overall ACS population was 15.5%, including a 27% rate in clopidogrel-treated patients and a 4% rate in prasugrel-treated patients. There was a strong correlation between ELISA-VASP PRI and FC-VASP PRI (r = 0.83, r2 = 0.68 p < 0.0001) with an area under the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve to identify HPR (VASP-PRI >50% with FC-VASP) of 0.94, p<0.0001. The threshold of 60% for ELISA-VASP PRI provided the best accuracy (likelihood ratio= 23.67) to identify patients with HPR when compared to FC-VASP, LTA or VN-P2Y12 assays. In conclusion, ELISA-VASP is a fast, easy-to-use and specific test to identify HPR in ACS patients on thienopyridines. A 60% threshold value displays the best accuracy to identify HPR in these patients.

Point-of-care genetic profiling and/or platelet function testing in acute coronary syndrome

Our aim was to demonstrate that the sequential use of the Verigene® rapid CYP2C19 test for genetic profiling and the VerifyNowTM bedside test for platelet function measurement in ACS patients may optimise P2Y12 inhibition. “Rapid” (CYP2C19*1/*1 or CYP2C19*17 carriers, n=211) and “slow” metabolisers (CYP2C19*2 carriers, n=58) were first put on clopidogrel and prasugrel for ≥ 2 weeks, respectively. Patients with low platelet reactivity (PRU< 30) on prasugrel or high platelet reactivity (> 208 PRU) on clopidogrel were then switched to clopidogrel and prasugrel, respectively. Our objectives were (i) to demonstrate that the proportion of “rapid” metabolisers on 75 mg of clopidogrel within 30–208 (PRU) of P2Y12 inhibition is non-inferior to “slow” metabolisers on prasugrel 10 mg and (ii) to evaluate the same end-point after switching drugs. The proportion of “rapid” and “slow” metabolisers within 30–208 PRU of P2Y12 inhibition was 71 % and 56.9 %, respectively, an absolute difference of +14.1 % (95 % CI, –0.05 % to 28.28 %) with a non-inferiority margin greater than the predefined margin of –10 %. Among patients out of target, all but one “slow” metabolisers displayed low-on prasugrel platelet reactivity while the majority of “rapid” metabolisers (68 %) displayed high-on clopidogrel platelet reactivity. After switching, the proportion of patients within 30–208 PRU of P2Y12 inhibition was 83.6 % and 79.3 % in “rapid” and “slow” metabolisers, respectively (+4.3 %, 95 % CI –7.3 % to 15.9 %). In conclusion, this study demonstrates a loose relationship between genotype and platelet function phenotype approaches but that they are complementary to select prasugrel or clopidogrel MD in stented ACS patients.

Efficacy of ex vivo autologous and in vivo platelet transfusion in the reversal of P2Y12 inhibition by clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor: the APTITUDE study

BACKGROUND

Allogenic platelet transfusions (PT) are administered to treat excessive bleeding in patients on P2Y12 receptor inhibitors (RI). We assessed the effect of ex vivo and in vivo PT on platelet activation and aggregation in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the Antagonize P2Y12 Treatment Inhibitors by Transfusion of Platelets in an Urgent or Delayed Timing After Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Presentation-Acute Coronary Syndrome (APTITUDE-ACS) study, patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome or for elective percutaneous coronary intervention, receiving loading doses of clopidogrel (600 mg, n=13 or 900 mg, n=12), prasugrel 60 mg (n=10), or ticagrelor 180 mg (n=10) were included. PT was performed ex vivo by mixing platelet-rich plasma from blood sampling performed at baseline in increasing proportions with platelet-rich plasma sampled 4 hours after loading dose. The percentage restoration of residual platelet aggregation achieved with 80% proportion PT (residual platelet aggregation 80% PT mix/residual platelet aggregation baseline×100) significantly decreased with increasing potency of P2Y12 RI (83.9±11%, 73±14%, 66.3±15%, 40.9±19% for clopidogrel 600 mg, clopidogrel 900 mg, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, respectively; P for trend <0.0001). In the APTITUDE-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (APTITUDE-CABG) study, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-platelet reactivity index, a specific marker of the P2Y12 RI drug-effect, was assessed before and after in vivo PT administered for excessive bleeding in patients undergoing cardiac surgery while on a maintenance dose of aspirin and clopidogrel (n=45), prasugrel (n=6), or ticagrelor (n=3). When compared with baseline, there was a significant relative increase of 23.1% in platelet activation after PT transfusion (42.2±23.6% versus 56.6±18.2%; P=0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

PT restores platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome/percutaneous coronary intervention and in patients undergoing cardiac surgery on P2Y12 RI while bleeding with a less effect with increasing potency of P2Y12 inhibition.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.recherche-biomedicale.sante.gouv.fr/pro/comites/coordonnees.htm and http://www.cnil.fr/. Unique identifiers: No. 301111 and No. 1547216v0.

Clinical Outcome of First- vs Second-Generation DES According to DAPT Duration: Results of ARCTIC-Generation

There is an apparent benefit with extension of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) beyond 1 year after implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES). Assessment by a Double Randomization of a Conventional Antiplatelet Strategy vs a Monitoring-Guided Strategy for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation, and of Treatment Interruption vs Continuation One Year After Stenting (ARCTIC)-Generation assessed whether there is a difference of outcome between first- vs second-generation DES and if there is an interaction with DAPT duration in the ARCTIC-Interruption study. ARCTIC-Interruption randomly allocated 1259 patients 1 year after stent implantation to a strategy of interruption of DAPT (n = 624), in which aspirin antiplatelet treatment only was maintained, or DAPT continuation (n = 635) for 6 to 18 additional months. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or urgent revascularization. A total of 520 and 722 patients received a first- and a second-generation DES, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17 months (interquartile range, 15-18 months) after randomization, the primary endpoint occurred in 32 (6.2%) and 19 (2.6%) patients with first- and second-generation DES, respectively (hazard ratio: 2.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.31-4.07, P = 0.004). This was observed irrespective of the strategy of interruption or continuation of DAPT and timing of study recruitment. Major bleeding events occurred in 4 (0.8%) and 3 patients (0.4%) with first- and second-generation DES, respectively (hazard ratio: 1.79, 95% confidence interval: 0.40-8.02, P = 0.44). Results did not change after multiple adjustments for potential confounding variables. ARCTIC-Generation showed worse clinical outcome with first- vs second-generation DES, a difference that appeared to persist even with prolonged DAPT.

Intravenous Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Elderly Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of the Randomized ATOLL Trial

Elderly (≥75 years old) patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have higher ischemic and bleeding risk compared with those <75 years old. We investigated the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) enoxaparin versus IV unfractionated heparin (UFH) in elderly patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI. A prespecified analysis of the Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Angioplasty and Intravenous Enoxaparin or Unfractionated Heparin to Lower Ischemic and Bleeding Events at Short- and Long-term Follow-up (ATOLL) study was performed examining the 30-day outcomes in the elderly patients. Of the 165 elderly patients in the ATOLL study, 85 patients received IV enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg and 80 patients received IV UFH. Intravenous enoxaparin did not reduce the primary end point, the main secondary efficacy end point, major bleeding, major or minor bleeding, and all-cause mortality compared with IV UFH. The rate of minor bleeding (5.9% vs 22.8%, P _adjusted = .01) was significantly lower with IV enoxaparin compared with IV UFH. Intravenous enoxaparin appears to be a safe alternative to IV UFH in primary PCI of the elderly patients with STEMI.

Dual-antiplatelet treatment beyond 1 year after drug-eluting stent implantation (ARCTIC-Interruption): a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Optimum duration of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) after coronary stenting remains uncertain, with an unknown efficacy to safety ratio of extended treatment leading to discrepancies between international guidelines and clinical practice. We assessed whether DAPT continuation beyond 1 year after coronary stenting is beneficial.

METHODS

This analysis was a planned extension of the previously published ARCTIC-Monitoring trial, in which we randomly allocated 2440 patients to a strategy of platelet function testing with antiplatelet treatment adjustment or a conventional strategy after coronary stenting with drug-eluting stent (DES). We recruited patients (aged 18 years or older) scheduled for planned DES implantation at 38 centres in France. After 1 year of follow-up, patients without contraindication to interruption of DAPT were eligible for a second randomisation to this second phase of the study (ARCTIC-Interruption). Using a computer-generated randomisation sequence (1:1; stratified by centre), we allocated patients to a strategy of interruption of DAPT where the thienopyridine was interrupted and single aspirin antiplatelet treatment was maintained (interruption group) or a strategy of DAPT continuation for 6-18 months (continuation group). The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or urgent revascularisation, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00827411.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 4, 2011, and March 3, 2012, 1259 eligible patients were randomly allocated to treatment in ARCTIC-Interruption: 624 to the interruption group and 635 to the continuation group. After a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 15-18), the primary endpoint occurred in 27 (4%) patients in the interruption group and 24 (4%) patients in the continuation group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·17 [95% CI 0·68-2·03]; p=0·58). STEEPLE major bleeding events occurred more often in the continuation group (seven [1%] patients) compared with the interruption group (one [<0·5%] patient; HR 0·15 [0·02-1·20]; p=0·073). Major or minor bleedings were also more common in the continuation group compared with the interruption group (12 [2%] patients vs three [1%] patients; HR 0·26 [0·07-0·91]; p=0·04).

INTERPRETATION

Our finding suggests no apparent benefit but instead harm with extension of DAPT beyond 1 year after stenting with DES when no event has occurred within the first year after stenting. No conclusion can be drawn for high-risk patients who could not be randomised. The consistency between findings from all trials of such interruption suggests the need for a reappraisal of guidelines for DAPT after coronary stenting towards shorter duration of treatment.

FUNDING

Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks (ACTION Study Group), Fondation de France, Sanofi-Aventis, Cordis, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Fondation SGAM.

Reappraisal of thienopyridine pretreatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of pretreatment with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors compared with no pretreatment on efficacy and safety of treatment of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

DATA SOURCES

Two reviewers independently searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials, and BioMed Central databases for randomized placebo controlled trials and observational studies from August 2001 to March 2014.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY

Studies must have reported both all-cause mortality (primary efficacy endpoint) and major bleeding (safety endpoint) outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data on sample size, characteristics, drug dose and delay of administration, and outcomes were independently extracted and analyzed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A random-effect model was applied. The analysis was performed (i) in all patients independently of the management strategy and (ii) only in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

RESULTS

Of the 393 titles identified, seven (four randomized controlled trials, one observational analysis from a randomized controlled trial, and three observational studies) met the inclusion criteria. No study was identified for ticagrelor or cangrelor, and analyses were thus limited to thienopyridines. A total of 32,383 non-ST elevation ACS patients were included, 18,711 coming from randomized controlled trials. Of these, 55% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Pretreatment was not associated with a significant lower risk of mortality in all patients (odds ratio 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 1.07), P=0.24), in particular when considering only the randomized controlled trials (odds ratio 0.90 (0.71 to 1.14), P=0.39). Similar results were observed in the cohort of patients undergoing PCI. A significant 30-45% excess of major bleeding was consistently observed in all patients (odds ratio 1.32 (1.16 to 1.49), P<0.0001) and in those undergoing PCI, as well as in the subset analyses of randomized controlled trials of these two cohorts of patients. There was a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events in the analysis of all patients (odds ratio 0.84 (0.72 to 0.98), P=0.02), driven by the old clopidogrel studies (CURE and CREDO), but the difference was not significant for the cohort of patients undergoing PCI. Stent thrombosis, stroke, and urgent revascularization did not differ between groups (pretreatment v no pretreatment). The results were consistent for both thienopyridines and confirmed in sensitivity analyses.

LIMITATIONS

Analysis was not performed on individual patient's data.

CONCLUSION

In patients presenting with non-ST elevation ACS, pretreatment with thienopyridines is associated with no significant reduction of mortality but with a significant excess of major bleeding no matter the strategy adopted, invasive or not. Our results do not support a strategy of routine pretreatment in patients with non-ST elevation ACS.

Association of clopidogrel pretreatment with mortality, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Clopidogrel pretreatment is recommended for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and stable coronary artery disease who are scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but whether using clopidogrel as a pretreatment for PCI is associated with positive clinical outcomes has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of clopidogrel pretreatment vs no treatment with mortality and major bleeding after PCI.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases, and reference lists of qualifying articles. STUDY SELECTION Studies reporting clinical data on mortality and major bleeding were included. Of the 392 titles identified, 15 articles published between August 2001 and September 2012 met the inclusion criteria: 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 2 observational analyses of RCTs, and 7 observational studies.

DATA EXTRACTION

Quality of studies was assessed with the Ottawa Scale and the Jadad Score as appropriate. Results were independently extracted by 2 reviewers. A random-effect model was applied. Pretreatment was defined as the administration of clopidogrel before PCI or catheterization. The main analysis was performed on RCTs and confirmed by observational analyses and observational studies. Prespecified subgroups--clinical presentation and clopidogrel loading dose--were analyzed. The primary efficacy and safety end points were all-cause mortality and major bleeding. Secondary end points included major cardiac events.

RESULTS

Of the 37 814 patients included in the meta-analysis, 8608 patients had participated in RCTs; 10,945, in observational analyses of RCTs; and 18,261, in observational studies. Analysis of RCTs showed that clopidogrel pretreatment was not associated with a reduction of death (absolute risk, 1.54% vs 1.97%; OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.57-1.11; P = .17) but was associated with a lower risk of major cardiac events (9.83% vs 12.35%; OR, 0 .77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.89; P < .001). There was no significant association between pretreatment and major bleeding overall (3 .57% vs 3.08%; OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.93-1.50; P = .18). Analyses from observational analyses of RCTs and observational studies were consistent for all results.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients scheduled for PCI, clopidogrel pretreatment was not associated with a lower risk of mortality but was associated with a lower risk of major coronary events.

Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting

BACKGROUND

Patients' responses to oral antiplatelet therapy are subject to variation. Bedside monitoring offers the opportunity to improve outcomes after coronary stenting by individualizing therapy.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 2440 patients scheduled for coronary stenting at 38 centers to a strategy of platelet-function monitoring, with drug adjustment in patients who had a poor response to antiplatelet therapy, or to a conventional strategy without monitoring and drug adjustment. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or urgent revascularization 1 year after stent implantation. For patients in the monitoring group, the VerifyNow P2Y12 and aspirin point-of-care assays were used in the catheterization laboratory before stent implantation and in the outpatient clinic 2 to 4 weeks later.

RESULTS

In the monitoring group, high platelet reactivity in patients taking clopidogrel (34.5% of patients) or aspirin (7.6%) led to the administration of an additional bolus of clopidogrel, prasugrel, or aspirin along with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during the procedure. The primary end point occurred in 34.6% of the patients in the monitoring group, as compared with 31.1% of those in the conventional-treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 to 1.29; P=0.10). The main secondary end point, stent thrombosis or any urgent revascularization, occurred in 4.9% of the patients in the monitoring group and 4.6% of those in the conventional-treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.52; P=0.77). The rate of major bleeding events did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed no significant improvements in clinical outcomes with platelet-function monitoring and treatment adjustment for coronary stenting, as compared with standard antiplatelet therapy without monitoring. (Funded by Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks and others; ARCTIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00827411.).

Impact of transfer time on mortality in acute coronary syndrome with ST-segment elevation treated by angioplasty

BACKGROUND

In primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), conflicting data exist on the relative importance of patient presentation time (time from symptom onset (SO) to first medical contact [FMC]) and transfer time (time from FMC to sheath insertion).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of transfer time on mortality in an unselected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population treated with pPCI.

METHODS

In a well-organized urban network, using mobile intensive care units (MICU) whenever possible, the impact of transfer time on inhospital mortality was evaluated in 703 unselected consecutive STEMI patients transferred for pPCI.

RESULTS

Our STEMI population included patients with cardiogenic shock (5.3%) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (3.7%). Longer transfer times were found to be associated with a stepwise increase in mortality ranging from 2.99% in the first quartile (Q1) up to 8.65% in the fourth quartile (Q4) (P=0.005). This result was noted in patients presenting early (≤2h of SO, 0.96% for Q1 vs. 9.8% for Q4, P=0.006) but not in late presenters (>2h of SO, 7.00% for Q1 vs. 7.8% for Q4, P=0.85). After adjustment for confounding variables such as the severity of patients, the relationship between mortality and transfer time was no longer apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

In a well-organized urban network dedicated to pPCI, including unselected STEMI patients, transfer time does not appear to be a major contributor to mortality. The relationship of transfer time to mortality seems to be dependent on presentation time and patients' clinical severity.

Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline and Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 1996 to May 2011.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised and non-randomised studies comparing enoxaparin with unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention and reporting on both mortality (efficacy end point) and major bleeding (safety end point) outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION

Sample size, characteristics, and outcomes, extracted independently and analysed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

23 trials representing 30,966 patients were identified, including 10,243 patients (33.1%) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction, 8750 (28.2%) undergoing secondary percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis, and 11,973 (38.7%) with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome or stable patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 13,943 patients (45.0%) received enoxaparin and 17,023 (55.0%) unfractionated heparin. Enoxaparin was associated with significant reductions in death (relative risk 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.76; P<0.001), the composite of death or myocardial infarction (0.68, 0.57 to 0.81; P<0.001), and complications of myocardial infarction (0.75, 0.6 to 0.85; P<0.001), and a reduction in incidence of major bleeding (0.80, 0.68 to 0.95; P=0.009). In patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the reduction in death (0.52, 0.42 to 0.64; P<0.001) was particularly significant and associated with a reduction in major bleeding (0.72, 0.56 to 0.93; P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Enoxaparin seems to be superior to unfractionated heparin in reducing mortality and bleeding outcomes during percutaneous coronary intervention and particularly in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Clinical, angiographic, and genetic factors associated with early coronary stent thrombosis

CONTEXT

Despite dual antiplatelet therapy, stent thrombosis remains a devastating and unpredictable complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

OBJECTIVE

To perform a sequential analysis of clinical and genetic factors associated with definite early stent thrombosis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Case-control study conducted in 10 centers in France between January 2007 and May 2010 among 123 patients undergoing PCI who had definite early stent thrombosis and DNA samples available, matched on age and sex with 246 stent thrombosis-free controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Accuracy of early stent thrombosis prediction by 23 genetic variants.

RESULTS

Among the 23 genetic variants investigated in 15 different genes, the significant determinants of early stent thrombosis were CYP2C19 metabolic status (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.99; 95% CI, 1.47-2.69), ABCB1 3435 TT genotype (adjusted OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.21-3.88), and ITGB3 PLA2 carriage (adjusted OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.95). Nongenetic independent correlates were acuteness of PCI (adjusted OR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.54-6.07), complex lesions (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type C) (adjusted OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.40-3.89), left ventricular function less than 40% (adjusted OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.09-4.70), diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.02-3.24), use of proton pump inhibitors (adjusted OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.29-3.75), and higher clopidogrel loading doses (adjusted OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.93). The discriminative accuracy of the clinical-only model was similar to that of a genetic-only model (area under the curve, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.67-0.78] vs 0.68 [95% CI, 0.62-0.74], respectively; P = .34). A combined clinical and genetic model led to a statistically significant increase in the discriminatory power of the model compared with the clinical-only model (area under the curve, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.83] vs 0.73 [95% CI, 0.67-0.78]; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

This case-control study identified 3 genes (CYP2C19, ABCB1, and ITGB3) and 2 clopidogrel-related factors (loading dose and proton pump inhibitors) that were independently associated with early stent thrombosis. Future studies are needed to validate the prognostic accuracy of these risk factors in prospective cohorts.

High doses of clopidogrel to overcome genetic resistance: the randomized crossover CLOVIS-2 (Clopidogrel and Response Variability Investigation Study 2)

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses to high or standard clopidogrel loading doses (LDs) differ according to CYP2C19*2 allele.

BACKGROUND

CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles are associated with reduced responsiveness to standard clopidogrel doses.

METHODS

Young post-myocardial infarction patients heterozygous (wild type [wt]/*2, n = 43) or homozygous (*2/*2, n = 8) for the CYP2C19*2 genetic variant were matched with patients not carrying the variant (wt/wt, n = 58). All patients were randomized to a 300- or 900-mg clopidogrel LD. The relative reduction in residual platelet aggregation (RR-RPA, %) and the area under the plasma concentration time curve of active metabolite from baseline to 6 h after loading (AUC(0-6)) were compared according to both LD and CYP2C19*2 carriage.

RESULTS

The 300-mg LD led to a gene-dose effect for RR-RPA (-65.7% ± 35.9% in wt/wt vs. -48.0% ± 38.4% in wt/*2 vs. -14.6% ± 32.4% in *2/*2; overall p value = 0.003, p = 0.03 for wt/wt versus wt/*2, p = 0.04 for wt/*2 versus *2/*2) with minor effect in *2/*2 carriers. After the 900-mg LD, the effect of the CYP2C19*2 variant on platelet inhibition was fully compensated in wt/*2 carriers but not in *2/*2 carriers (-83.6% ± 25.8% in wt/wt vs.-77.2% ± 26.9% in wt/*2 vs. -29.5% ± 26.8% in *2/*2; overall p value = 0.0003, p = 0.20 for wt/wt versus wt/*2, p < 0.001 for wt/*2 versus *2/*2). A similar pattern was observed for the active metabolite AUC(0-6) according to carriage of CYP2C19*2 for both LDs. There was a significant correlation between PK and PD responses irrespective of the LD.

CONCLUSIONS

Carriers of CYP2C19*2 display significantly lower responses to clopidogrel with a gene-dose effect. Clopidogrel resistance can be overcome by increasing the dose in heterozygous carriers but not in homozygous carriers. (Clopidogrel and Response Variability Investigation Study 2 [CLOVIS-2]; NCT00822666).

FXIII-A Leu34 genetic variant in premature coronary artery disease: a genotype--phenotype case control study

The FXIII-A Leu34 genetic variant increases and accelerates fibrin stabilisation; however, its association with premature coronary artery disease (CAD) and thrombotic events remains controversial. FXIII Val34Leu genotype was determined in 242 young individuals (<45 years old) who survived a myocardial infarction (MI) and 242 healthy controls matched for age and gender. We evaluated its effect on long-term clinical outcome defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI and urgent revascularisation. In addition, fibrin clot stiffness (elastic modulus or EM) and response to rt-PA-mediated fibrinolysis (fibrinolysis rate) were measured ex vivo using the Hemodyne analyser and confocal microscopy as surrogate endpoint. FXIII-A Leu34 genetic variant was not associated with premature CAD (adj. odds ratio 0.83 [0.49-1.4]) nor did it influence clinical outcome in patients, during a median follow-up of 6.3 (± 2.4) years. Patients produced stiffer fibrin clots (median [IQR] EM = 20.3 [14.9-28.1] vs. 12.8 [9.6-17.1] kdynes/cm²; p<0.0001) and displayed reduced response to fibrinolysis with lower fibrinolysis rate (6.7 [3.4-11.0] vs. 9.0 [5.0-16.7] sec-¹ x 10(-4); p<0.0001) than healthy controls. Carriage of factor XIII-A Leu34 led to a stepwise decrease in fibrinolysis rate with a significant gene-dose-effect in patients (7.7 [4.1-12.2] vs. 4.8 [3.0-8.5] vs. 4.3 [2.4-8.1] sec-¹ x 10(-4), for wild-type, heterozygous and homozygous, p for trend = 0.003) and a non-significant trend in controls (p = 0.01). In conclusion, FXIII-A Leu34 is a polymorphism which provides a strong resistance to fibrinolysis with a gene-dose effect, but does not relate to premature CAD or to recurrent coronary events in this study.

Impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable atherothrombosis or multiple risk factors

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess whether the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events in stable patients with established atherothrombosis or multiple risk factors.

METHODS

We analysed the 23,728 European patients of the REACH Registry; 20,588 (86.8%) had established atherothrombotic disease and 3140 (13.2%) had multiple risk factors only. Aspirin (ASA) and/or NSAIDs use was determined at enrolment and ischemic events were recorded over two years of follow-up. cMACCE was defined as the composite of CV death, MI or stroke. Bleeding was defined as any bleeding leading to both hospitalisation and transfusion.

RESULTS

The mean age of population was 67.2±9.8years. At baseline, 1573 patients (6.6%) received NSAIDs and 15,395 (64.9%) received ASA. Four groups were defined: 1) no ASA/no NSAIDs, 2) ASA only, 3) NSAIDs only, 4) NSAIDs+ASA, with 7722 (32.5%), 14,433 (60.8%), 611 (2.6%) and 962 (4.1%) patients in these groups, respectively. Among the 22,028 (92.8%) with complete 2-year follow-up, 683 (3.2%) died from CV causes, while 395 (1.9%) had MI, 665 (3.1%) stroke, 1651 (7.6%) cMACCE and 199 (1.0%) bleeding. After adjustment, NSAID use was independently associated with an increased risk of stroke (OR 1.635; 95% CI 1.239-2.159, p<0.001), and a trend towards an increased bleeding rate (OR 1.554; CI 95% 0.960-2.51, p=0.07). No association was found between NSAID use and MI or MACCE.

CONCLUSIONS

In stable atherothrombosis patients, the use of NSAIDs appears to be independently associated with an increased cerebrovascular event risk.

Slow response to clopidogrel predicts low response

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the speed of response to clopidogrel loading predicts the final degree of response.

BACKGROUND

Fast inhibition of platelet aggregation is important in the setting of acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention, but its association with the final degree of inhibition is not well established.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of the ALBION study; early kinetic profiles of adenosine diphosphate 20 micromol/l maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) and DeltaMPA (with baseline sample as reference) were studied at 8 time points within the 24 h after clopidogrel loading (300, 600, or 900 mg) in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients. Low response was defined as DeltaMPA <10% over the first 24 h, fast response as DeltaMPA > or =10% at 1 h or before loading (the others being slow responders), and high post-treatment platelet reactivity as MPA > or =56.56% (fourth quartile). Inflammatory markers (PAC-1 and P-selectin) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) were also evaluated according to onset of action.

RESULTS

Fifty-five percent of patients were slow responders. Noncurrent smoking and body mass index > or =25 kg/m(2) were associated with slower and lower responses. High post-treatment platelet reactivity was more frequent in slow responders (28% vs. 14%, p < 0.0001). There was a clopidogrel dose-effect relationship on DeltaMPA, with a trend toward faster onset of platelet inhibition in the 900-mg loading dose group. Slow responders had a slower and lower decrease in PAC-1 and P-selectin and higher VASP index at 6 h (76.5% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.019) and 24 h (70.3% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Slow response to clopidogrel, within the first hour of administration, is a reliable marker of low response at 24 h and high post-treatment platelet reactivity.

Prasugrel compared with high-dose clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome. The randomised, double-blind ACAPULCO study

Compared with the approved dose regimen of clopidogrel (300-mg loading dose [LD], 75-mg maintenance dose [MD]), prasugrel has been demonstrated to reduce ischaemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In ACS, antiplatelet effects of a prasugrel MD regimen have not been previously compared with either a higher clopidogrel MD or after switching from a higher clopidogrel LD. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antiplatelet effect of a prasugrel 10-mg MD versus a clopidogrel 150-mg MD in patients with ACS who had received a clopidogrel 900-mg LD. Patients with non-ST elevation ACS, treated with aspirin and a clopidogrel 900-mg LD, were randomised within 24 hours post-LD to receive a prasugrel 10-mg or clopidogrel 150-mg MD. After 14 days of the initial MD, subjects switched to the alternative treatment for 14 days. The primary endpoint compared maximum platelet aggregation (MPA, 20 microM adenosine diphosphate [ADP]) between prasugrel and clopidogrel MDs for both periods. Responder analyses between treatments were performed using several platelet-function methods. Of 56 randomised subjects, 37 underwent PCI. MPA was 26.2% for prasugrel 10 mg and 39.1% for clopidogrel 150 mg (p<0.001). The prasugrel MD regimen reduced MPA from the post-900-mg LD level (41.2% to 29.1%, p=0.003). Poor response ranged from 0% to 6% for prasugrel 10 mg and 4% to 34% for clopidogrel 150 mg. Thus, in ACS patients a prasugrel 10-mg MD regimen resulted in significantly greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel at twice its approved MD or a 900-mg LD.