Public Perceptions toward Kratom (Mitragyna Speciosa) Use in Malaysia

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa), an indigenous medicinal plant of Southeast Asia, is believed to be harmful. We compared the perceptions toward kratom use among kratom users and non-users in Malaysia. 356 respondents (137 kratom users and 219 non-users) were recruited for this cross-sectional study. The majority of respondents were male (60%, n = 212/356), Malays (88%), and 51% were ≥37 years old. Non-users showed higher unadjusted odds of reporting a perception that kratom use can cause addiction (OR = 6.72, CI: 3.91-11.54, p < .0001), withdrawal symptoms (OR = 7.58, CI: 4.62-12.42, p < .0001), illicit drug use problems (OR = 10.12, CI: 6.14-16.68, p < .0001), impaired social-functioning (OR = 12.05, CI: 7.24-20.05, p < .0001), and health problems (OR = 10.44, CI: 6.32-17.24, p < .0001). Similarly, non-users viewed kratom policies differently from kratom users, displaying increased odds of reporting the belief that kratom use and sales must be regulated with stringent laws (OR = 5.75, CI: 3.61-9.18, p < .0001), and kratom should be regulated instead under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 to overcome kratom use problems (OR = 8.26, CI: 4.94-13.82, p < .0001). Because of the disconnect in kratom use perceptions and personal experiences between kratom users and non-users, hastily criminalizing kratom without investigating carefully its scientific merits can significantly impede future kratom research.

Late referral of cancer patients with malnutrition to dietitians: a prospective study of clinical practice

PURPOSE

Malnutrition (MN) in cancer is common but underdiagnosed. Dietitian referrals may not occur until MN is established. We investigated cancer patient characteristics (demographics, nutritional status, and nutrition barriers) on referral to oncology dietitians. We also examined referral practices and prevalence of missed referral opportunities.

METHODS

This was a naturalistic multi-site study of clinical practice. Data from consecutive referrals were collected in inpatient and outpatient settings. Demographics, nutritional status (weight, body mass index (BMI), weight loss in the preceding 3-6 months, oral intake, nutrition barriers), referral reasons, and use of screening were recorded. Missed opportunities for earlier referral were also noted.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were included (60% male, 51% inpatients). Half had gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancers. The majority were on antitumor treatment. Two-thirds had lost ≥ 5% body weight. Forty percent were overweight or obese. Seventy percent had ≥ 2 nutritional barriers. Most common nutrition barriers were anorexia, nausea, and early satiety. Greater weight loss and lower food intake were associated with ≥ 2 barriers. Weight loss was the most common referral reason. Screening was used in 35%. Referrals should have occurred sooner in nearly half (45%, n = 89).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer patients were referred late to a dietitian, with multiple nutritional barriers. Most referrals were for established weight loss (WL). WL may be masked by pre-existing obesity. Almost half had missed earlier referral opportunities; screening was infrequent. Over one-quarter should have been re-referred sooner. There is a clear need for clinician education. Future research should investigate the optimal timing of dietitian referral and the best nutrition screening tools for use in cancer.

The nutritional management of type 3c (pancreatogenic) diabetes in chronic pancreatitis

Type 3c diabetes mellitus (T3cDM), also known as pancreatogenic diabetes, refers to diabetes caused by disease of the exocrine pancreas. T3cDM is not commonly recognised by clinicians and frequently it is misclassified as T1DM, or more commonly, T2DM. T3cDM can be difficult to distinguish from T1DM and T2DM, and it often co-exists with the latter. The aim of this review is to describe T3cDM, along with its complications, diagnosis and management. We focus on the nutritional implications of T3cDM for those with chronic pancreatitis, and provide a practical guide to the nutritional management of this condition.

Use of record linkage between a statewide genetics service and a Birth Defects/Congenital Malformations Register to determine use of genetic counselling services

The Birth Defects/Congenital Malformations Register of the Victorian Department of Human Services contains detailed, confidential information on over 2,000 babies born with a birth defect each year in Victoria, Australia, representing approximately 3% of the annual number of births. For 1991 and 1993, the type of anomaly was categorised as warranting a high, moderate, or low need of referral for genetic counselling, depending on risk of recurrence and possible genetic cause. The Victorian Clinical Genetics Service at the Murdoch Institute, Melbourne, offers free, centralised genetic counselling services for the entire state. A comparison of case records between the two agencies has shown little difference in overall use of genetic counselling between 1991 (17%) and 1993 (16%). Rate of uptake in the "high need" category improved only slightly during that period, from 40% in 1991 to 43% in 1993. Utilization of genetic counselling services did not vary disproportionately with mother's country of birth, but was higher for older mothers. As was expected, rates were highest when a baby was born at the only hospital that provides on-site genetic counselling services. Even where a statewide genetic counselling service is in place, it is disappointing that over half of those judged at high need for genetic counselling are not making use of this service. This study will provide baseline information to which future studies can be compared. Using the same study methodology, it will be possible to examine whether the uptake rate increases in accordance with increased genetic services.

Validating a statewide data collection: differences in information technology resources between hospitals

The Victorian Perinatal Data Collection Unit (VPDCU) is a statewide data collection established to collect information on the health of mothers and their babies. A Perinatal Morbidity Statistics Form is required to be completed for every birth, then forwarded to the VPDCU. Many medical record departments are responsible for both forwarding the forms to the VPDCU and responding to queries on data accuracy. In 1996 we undertook to determine if we were receiving a perinatal form for every birth occurring at every hospital in the State with obstetric beds. Health information managers were requested to supply a listing of all babies born at their hospitals in 1995-129 hospitals responded. Overall 62,759 births were validated. The VPDCU had received a perinatal form for 99.6 per cent of these births, with 251 missing forms. Reasons why the VPDCU had not received the forms were investigated.