Evaluation of acoustic pulse technology as a non-antibiotic therapy for bovine intramammary infections: Assessing bacterial cure vs. recovery from inflammation

Introduction

The spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major threat to human and animal health. Therefore, new solutions are needed to prevent returning to a world without effective antibiotics. Mastitis in dairy cows is a major reason for antimicrobial use in food animal production, and mastitis-causing bacteria have the potential to develop AMR. In this study, acoustic pulse technology (APT) was explored as an alternative to antimicrobials for the treatment of mastitis in dairy cows. APT involves the local transmission of mechanical energy through soundwaves which stimulate anti-inflammatory and angiogenic responses in the udder. These responses promote udder recovery and enhance resistance to bacterial infections.

Methods

We examined 129 Israeli dairy cows with mastitis in this prospective, controlled study to assess the efficiency of APT treatment on cure and recovery rates. An accurate diagnosis of suspected or confirmed infectious mastitis was made from cows having clinical signs of mastitis and/or somatic cell count (SCC) of above 400,000 cells/mL. The cows were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n = 29), cows with no bacterial findings (NBF); Group 2 (n = 82), cows with clinical signs of mastitis or SCC >400,000 cells/mL in the most recent test; and Group 3 (n = 18), cows with chronic mastitis (two or more tests with SCC >400,000 cells/mL within 3 months). All the cows received APT treatment, which involved 400 pulses on two sides of the infected quarter, delivered in three phases over 3 days. The cure for the mammary gland was indicated by the absence of bacterial growth in post-treatment cultures and recovery by a decrease in SCC to < 250,000 cells/mL in two of three post-treatment tests.

Results and discussion

In Group 2, cure and recovery rates were 67.1 and 64.6%, respectively, and were not significantly different between Gram-negative and Gram-positive infections. A similar recovery rate was found in NBF cows. However, in cows with chronic mastitis, both the cure and recovery rates were significantly lower (22.2 and 27.8%, respectively). These results have important implications for dairy farmers, as APT treatment could lead to substantial savings of up to $15,106/year in a 100-cow herd, considering the national estimated prevalence of mastitis and the cost of individual treatment. APT should be further investigated as a viable and sustainable alternative to antimicrobial therapy for mastitis, offering economic benefits to dairy producers and the possibility of preventing AMR.