Comparing the Pathology, Clinical, and Demographic Characteristics of Younger and Older-Onset Multiple Sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Older people with multiple sclerosis (MS) have a less active radiological and clinical presentation, but many still attain significant levels of disability; but what drives worsening disability in this group?

METHODS

We used data from the UK MS Register to characterize demographics and clinical features of late-onset multiple sclerosis (LOMS; symptom onset at ≥50 years), compared with adult-onset MS (AOMS; onset 18-49 years). We performed a pathology study of a separate MS cohort with a later onset (n = 18, mean age of onset 54 years) versus AOMS (n = 23, mean age of onset 29 years).

RESULTS

In the Register cohort, there were 1,608 (9.4%) with LOMS. When compared with AOMS, there was a lower proportion of women, a higher proportion of primary progressive MS, a higher level of disability at diagnosis (median MS impact scale 36.7 vs. 28.3, p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of gait-related initial symptoms. People with LOMS were less likely to receive a high efficacy disease-modifying treatment and attained substantial disability sooner. Controlling for age of death and sex, neuron density in the thalamus and pons decreased with onset-age, whereas actively demyelinating lesions and compartmentalized inflammation was greatest in AOMS. Only neuron density, and not demyelination or the extent of compartmentalized inflammation, correlated with disability outcomes in older-onset MS patients.

INTERPRETATION

The more progressive nature of older-onset MS is associated with significant neurodegeneration, but infrequent inflammatory demyelination. These findings have implications for the assessment and treatment of MS in older people. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:471-486.

116 Evaluating the introduction of subcutaneous natalizumab to a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis

Conclusion

Subcutaneous natalizumab is a well-tolerated alternative to the intravenous infusion. In this cohort of patients, the majority were satisfied with switching, finding the SC injection more convenient, although some patients reported more pain especially when delivered in the arm. A major benefit to patients and staff is reduced delivery time, improving access to valuable infusion space. Monitoring will be reduced further to 15 minutes, once patients have received 6 injections.

135 The UK MS pregnancy register: baseline data from the first fifty enrolled patients

Background

We present baseline data on the first 50 participants recruited to the UK MS Pregnancy Register.

Methods

Data collected via questionnaires from consenting participants until 20th December 2021 were included.

Results

50 participants (all with relapsing remitting MS; mean age at diagnosis 28.0 years; mean age at recruitment 33.0 years) were included. Median EDSS was 2.5 (n=16). Gestation at recruitment ranged from 2 to 40 weeks. 78% had discussed their pregnancy in advance with their MS team. 90% of patients had ever taken DMT. Of the patients that stopped DMT (n=23), 16 reported stopping for pregnancy-related reasons. Of these, 39% stopped before pregnancy and 30% following conception. 15 women are continuing DMT during their current pregnancy, taking the following DMT: Glatiramer acetate (n=5), natalizumab (n=7), Peginterferon beta-1a (n=2), not recorded (n=1). In those with prior pregnancies, 61% (14/23) reported pregnancy loss with 1 case of a rare genetic condition in the baby. None of the prior pregnancy losses happened whilst on DMT. One participant reported previous PPH and foetal macrosomia and another reported previous pre-eclampsia.

Conclusions

These results show that a patient-facing pregnancy MS registry is feasible and can collect previous adverse pregnancy outcomes. Future results will inform clinicians and women about the safety of DMT and adjunctive medication during pregnancy and postpartum.

Comparison of switching to 6-week dosing of natalizumab versus continuing with 4-week dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (NOVA): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment with natalizumab once every 4 weeks is approved for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, but is associated with a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Switching to extended-interval dosing is associated with lower progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk, but the efficacy of this approach is unclear. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of natalizumab once every 6 weeks compared with once every 4 weeks in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

We did a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b trial (NOVA) at 89 multiple sclerosis centres across 11 countries in the Americas, Europe, and Western Pacific. Included participants were aged 18-60 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and had been treated with intravenous natalizumab 300 mg once every 4 weeks with no relapses for at least 12 months before randomisation, with no missed doses in the previous 3 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a randomisation sequence generated by the study funder and contract personnel with interactive response technology, to switch to natalizumab once every 6 weeks or continue with once every 4 weeks. The centralised MRI reader, independent neurology evaluation committee, site examining neurologists, site backup examining neurologists, and site examining technicians were masked to study group assignments. The primary endpoint was the number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at week 72, assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of assigned treatment and had at least one postbaseline MRI, relapse, or neurological examination or efficacy assessment. Missing primary endpoint data were handled under prespecified primary and secondary estimands: the primary estimand included all data, regardless of whether participants remained on the assigned treatment; the secondary estimand classed all data obtained after treatment discontinuation or study withdrawal as missing. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Study enrolment is closed and an open-label extension study is ongoing. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2018-002145-11, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03689972.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 26, 2018, and Aug 30, 2019, 605 patients were assessed for eligibility and 499 were enrolled and assigned to receive natalizumab once every 6 weeks (n=251) or once every 4 weeks (n=248). After prespecified adjustments for missing data, mean numbers of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at week 72 were 0·20 (95% CI 0·07-0·63) in the once every 6 weeks group and 0·05 (0·01-0·22) in the once every 4 weeks group (mean lesion ratio 4·24 [95% CI 0·86-20·85]; p=0·076) under the primary estimand, and 0·31 (95% CI 0·12-0·82) and 0·06 (0·01-0·31; mean lesion ratio 4·93 [95% CI 1·05-23·20]; p=0·044) under the secondary estimand. Two participants in the once every 6 weeks group with extreme new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesion numbers (≥25) contributed most of the excess lesions. Adverse events occurred in 194 (78%) of 250 participants in the once every 6 weeks group and 190 (77%) of 247 in the once every 4 weeks group, and serious adverse events occurred in 17 (7%) and 17 (7%), respectively. No deaths were reported. There was one case of asymptomatic progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (without clinical signs) in the once every 6 weeks group, and no cases in the once every 4 weeks group; 6 months after diagnosis, the participant was without increased disability and remained classified as asymptomatic.

INTERPRETATION

We found a numerical difference in the mean number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at week 72 between the once every 6 weeks and once every 4 weeks groups, which reached significance under the secondary estimand, but interpretation of statistical differences (or absence thereof) is limited because disease activity in the once every 4 weeks group was lower than expected. The safety profiles of natalizumab once every 6 weeks and once every 4 weeks were similar. Although this trial was not powered to assess differences in risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, the occurrence of the (asymptomatic) case underscores the importance of monitoring and risk factor consideration in all patients receiving natalizumab.

FUNDING

Biogen.

088 Brainstem progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

Jonathan

hawken@wales.nhs.uk

69

011 UK variance in DMT advice and prescribing in MS and pregnancy

Background

There is limited evidence to guide DMT prescribing prior to and during pregnancy, leading to wide variation in practice. In 2019, ABN consensus guidelines were published to address this. We set out to establish what impact these have had.

Methods

An online questionnaire was cascaded to UK MS neurologists. Individuals completed the ques- tionnaire anonymously.

Results

85 responses were obtained; 76 from DMT prescribers in a variety of settings. 74/76 (97%) were aware of the ABN guidelines. 74% reported a recent change in prescribing IFN-B and 70% in prescribing natalizumab around pregnancy, compared to 5% for alemtuzumab and 1% for teriflunomide and fingoli- mod. The ABN guidelines were the most commonly cited reason for change (58 individuals), followed by SmPC changes and influence from peers.

There was significant variation in natalizumab prescribing - 51% ‘normally continue to prescribe’ until 34/40, 12% stop when pregnancy confirmed and 11% stop prior to conception. 58% encourage breastfeeding on natalizumab whilst 34% discourage this.

Conclusions

There remains significant variation in advice given to women with MS considering pregnancy. This is most marked with higher efficacy DMT, where risk-benefit decision making is complex. Additional data and resources for women with MS, including a UK MS Pregnancy register, are urgently needed.

ruth.dobson@qmul.ac.uk

Subcutaneous cladribine to treat multiple sclerosis: experience in 208 patients

Objective:

To report on safety and effectiveness of subcutaneous cladribine (Litak®) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Methods:

Litak® was offered to MS-patients irrespective of disease course. Litak® 10 mg was administered for 3–4 days during week 1. Based on lymphocyte count at week 4, patients received another 0–3 doses at week 5. A second course was administered 11 months later. Follow-up included adverse events, relapses, expanded disability status scale (EDSS), 9-hole-peg and Timed-25-foot-walking tests, no-evidence-of-disease-activity (NEDA), no-evidence-of-progression-or-active-disease (NEPAD), MRI, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light chain (NfL), and lymphocyte counts.

Results:

In all, 208 patients received at least one course of treatment. Age at baseline was 44 (17–72) years and EDSS 0–8.5. Cladribine was generally well tolerated. One myocardial infarction, one breast cancer, and three severe skin reactions occurred without long-term sequelae. Two patients died (one pneumonia, one encephalitis). Lymphopenia grade 3 occurred in 5% and grade 4 in 0.5%. In 94 out of 116 pwMS with baseline and follow-up (BaFU) data after two treatment courses, EDSS remained stable or improved. At 18 months, 64% of patients with relapsing MS and BaFU data ( n = 39) had NEDA. At 19 months, 62% of patients with progressive MS and BaFU data ( n = 13) had NEPAD. Of n = 13 patients whose CSF-NfL at baseline was elevated, 77% were normalised within 12 months.

Conclusions:

Litak® was well tolerated. Effectiveness in relapsing MS appeared similar to cladribine tablets and was encouraging in progressive MS. Our data suggest cladribine may be safe and effective in MS-patients irrespective of their disease stage.

A single patient reported outcome measure for acquired brain injury, multiple sclerosis & Parkinson's disease

Objective

To determine psychometric properties of the PROMIS-10 and Standard Stroke Question Set (by International Consortium for Health Outcome Measures) presented as a new 15-item Patient Related Outcome (PRO), for patients with: acquired Brain Injury (ABI), Multiple sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Methods

In an eight centre, UK wide, cross-sectional study we approached patients during their routine follow-up to complete: a disease-specific instrument (European Brain Injury Questionnaire, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale, and Parkinson’s disease questionnaire); General Health questionnaire with a Quality of life measure (EQ-5D); and PRO. We validated the PRO using factor analysis to define the latent construct domains, then calculated the internal consistency (Cronbach’s-α), and construct validity (correlation).

Results

There were 340 patients with ABI (N = 91, median age = 55.1, 41% female), MS (N = 99, age = 58.9, 69%) and PD (N = 150, age = 74.5, 40%). Factor analysis suggested the PRO offered three domains of: physical health; functionality-capacity and mental health. All factors correlated strongly with the three disease-specific instruments, and the overall PRO had a large correlation with the EQ-5D (correlation>0.8) offering good construct validity and excellent internal consistency (∝>0.89).

Interpretation

The PRO offered promising psychometric properties and could be used in place of disease specific questionnaires for patients with ABI, MS, and PD. The PRO has three construct domains, describing patients’: mental health; physical health; and functional-capacity, and may be used in routine clinical practice. The PRO offered both relevance to each of the three separate neurological conditions and generalisability across all the conditions, increasing its utility.

Aboriginal community controlled health organisations address health equity through action on the social determinants of health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia

BACKGROUND

Indigenous populations globally are continually striving for better health and wellbeing due to experiencing significant health and social inequities. The social determinants of health are important contributors to health outcomes. Comprehensive primary health care that is governed and delivered by Indigenous people extends beyond the biomedical model of care to address the social determinants of health. Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) are known to provide culturally informed, holistic health services that directly and indirectly address the social determinants of health. The range and extent of their activities in addressing the social determinants of health, however, is not well documented.

METHODS

The most recent ACCHO annual reports were retrieved online or by direct correspondence. For coding consistency, a dictionary informed by the World Health Organization's Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health was developed. A document and textual analysis of reports coded ACCHO activities and the determinants of health they addressed, including intermediary determinants, socio-economic position and/or socio-political context. Summary statistics were reported. Representative quotes illustrating the unique nature of ACCHO service provision in addressing the social determinants of health were used to contextualise the quantitative findings.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven annual reports were collected between 2017 and 2018. Programs were delivered to population groups across the life span. Fifty three percent of reports identified programs that included work at the socio-political level and all annual reports described working to improve socioeconomic position and intermediary determinants of health through their activities. Culture had a strong presence in program delivery and building social cohesion and social capital emerged as themes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of the considerable efforts of the ACCHO sector, as a primary health care provider, in addressing the social determinants of health and health inequity experienced by Indigenous communities. For the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population, ACCHOs not only have an essential role in addressing immediate healthcare needs but also invest in driving change in the more entrenched structural determinants of health. These are important actions that are likely to have an accumulative positive effect in closing the gap towards health equity.

Factors influencing multiple sclerosis disease-modifying treatment prescribing decisions in the United Kingdom: A qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

The proportion of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis prescribed disease modifying treatments (DMTs) in the United Kingdom (UK) is considered low compared with other countries. There are differences in DMT prescription rates between UK nations (England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland). Despite this, there has been little research into decision-making processes and prescribing practices.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate views and experiences of neurologists prescribing DMTs and MS specialist nurses to identify factors influencing prescribing.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with 18 consultant neurologists and 16 specialist nurses from diverse settings across the four UK nations. Data were analysed using thematic framework analysis.

RESULTS

Prescribing practices are influenced by organisational prescribing "cultures", informal "benchmarking" within peer networks, and prior experience with different DMTs. Health professionals differ in their perceptions of benefits and risks of DMTs and personal "thresholds" for discerning relapses and determining eligibility for DMTs. Prescribers in England felt most constrained by guidelines.

CONCLUSION

To achieve equity in access to DMTs for people with MS eligible for treatment, there is a need for public discussion acknowledging differences in health professionals' interpretations of "relapses" and guidelines and perceptions of DMTs, variation in organisational prescribing "cultures", and whether the prevailing culture sufficiently meets patients' needs.

Treatment effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with natalizumab, fingolimod, and interferon beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab, an anti-CD52 antibody, is proven to be more efficacious than interferon beta-1a in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, but its efficacy relative to more potent immunotherapies is unknown. We compared the effectiveness of alemtuzumab with natalizumab, fingolimod, and interferon beta in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated for up to 5 years.

METHODS

In this international cohort study, we used data from propensity-matched patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from the MSBase and six other cohorts. Longitudinal clinical data were obtained from 71 MSBase centres in 21 countries and from six non-MSBase centres in the UK and Germany between Nov 1, 2015, and June 30, 2016. Key inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of definite relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, exposure to one of the study therapies (alemtuzumab, interferon beta, fingolimod, or natalizumab), age 65 years or younger, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score 6·5 or lower, and no more than 10 years since the first multiple sclerosis symptom. The primary endpoint was annualised relapse rate. The secondary endpoints were cumulative hazards of relapses, disability accumulation, and disability improvement events. We compared relapse rates with negative binomial models, and estimated cumulative hazards with conditional proportional hazards models.

FINDINGS

Patients were treated between Aug 1, 1994, and June 30, 2016. The cohorts consisted of 189 patients given alemtuzumab, 2155 patients given interferon beta, 828 patients given fingolimod, and 1160 patients given natalizumab. Alemtuzumab was associated with a lower annualised relapse rate than interferon beta (0·19 [95% CI 0·14-0·23] vs 0·53 [0·46-0·61], p<0·0001) and fingolimod (0·15 [0·10-0·20] vs 0·34 [0·26-0·41], p<0·0001), and was associated with a similar annualised relapse rate as natalizumab (0·20 [0·14-0·26] vs 0·19 [0·15-0·23], p=0·78). For the disability outcomes, alemtuzumab was associated with similar probabilities of disability accumulation as interferon beta (hazard ratio [HR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·36-1·22], p=0·37), fingolimod (1·27 [0·60-2·70], p=0·67), and natalizumab (0·81 [0·47-1·39], p=0·60). Alemtuzumab was associated with similar probabilities of disability improvement as interferon beta (0·98 [0·65-1·49], p=0·93) and fingolimod (0·50 [0·25-1·01], p=0·18), and a lower probability of disability improvement than natalizumab (0·35 [0·20-0·59], p=0·0006).

INTERPRETATION

Alemtuzumab and natalizumab seem to have similar effects on annualised relapse rates in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Alemtuzumab seems superior to fingolimod and interferon beta in mitigating relapse activity. Natalizumab seems superior to alemtuzumab in enabling recovery from disability. Both natalizumab and alemtuzumab seem highly effective and viable immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis. Treatment decisions between alemtuzumab and natalizumab should be primarily governed by their safety profiles.

FUNDING

National Health and Medical Research Council, and the University of Melbourne.

An observational study of alemtuzumab following fingolimod for multiple sclerosis

Objective:

To describe a series of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) who experienced significant and unexpected disease activity within the first 12 months after switching from fingolimod to alemtuzumab.

Methods:

Patients with relapsing MS treated sequentially with fingolimod then alemtuzumab who experienced significant subsequent disease activity were identified by personal communication with 6 different European neuroscience centers.

Results:

Nine patients were identified. Median disease duration to alemtuzumab treatment was 94 (39–215) months and follow-up from time of first alemtuzumab cycle 20 (14–21) months. Following first alemtuzumab infusion cycle, 8 patients were identified by at least 1 clinical relapse and radiologic disease activity and 1 by significant radiologic disease activity alone.

Conclusions:

We acknowledge the potential for ascertainment bias; however, these cases may illustrate an important cause of reduced efficacy of alemtuzumab in a vulnerable group of patients with MS most in need of disease control. We suggest that significant and unexpected subsequent disease activity after alemtuzumab induction results from prolonged sequestration of autoreactive lymphocytes following fingolimod withdrawal, allowing these cells to be concealed from the usual biological effect of alemtuzumab. Subsequent lymphocyte egress then provokes disease reactivation. Further animal studies and clinical trials are required to confirm these phenomena and in the meantime careful consideration should be given to mode of action of individual therapies and sequential treatment effects in MS when designing personalized treatment regimens.

SEVERE (BUT REVERSIBLE) CERVICAL CORD AND BRAIN IRIS REACTION AFTER DISCONTINUATION OF NATALIZUMAB IN PREGNANCY OF PATIENT WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Natalizumab is used to treat highly-active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. It is discontinued in certain clinical situations such as progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy (PML) and pregnancy. Here we describe a case of cerebral and cervical cord immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) causing florid CNS inflammation and severe disability in a pregnant patient after discontinuation of natalizumab. The patient was virtually symptom free prior to pregnancy but became bedbound, encephalopathic, hypertonic, and very ataxic after stopping natalizumab. She required 24 hour inpatient nursing care. After minimal response to steroids, clinical rescue was achieved by re-starting natalizumab during pregnancy and accepting a small risk to the foetus. The patient was delivered of a healthy baby girl some months later, and has made a virtually complete recovery. This difficult case highlights many of the dilemmas facing Neurologists as new, effective disease-modifying therapies come to clinic without the longitudinal data to guide decision-making.

Characterization of mammotrophs separated from the human pituitary gland

Human pituitary tissues from 27 patients and 7 persons post mortem were dissociated into single cell suspensions. On the average, 23% of the cells were mammotrophs. The concentration of prolactin in these suspensions averaged 3.8 ng/1,000 cells. After cell separation by velocity sedimentation at unit gravity, mammotrophs and other cell types were enriched twofold to threefold. The separated mammotrophs retained structural integrity at light and electron microscopic levels. In eight separation experiments, cells recovered from different gradient regions were assayed for intracellular prolactin levels. In cells from "normal" subjects, 8.5% of the prolactin recovered from the gradient was associated with large mammotrophs, whereas in patients with breast cancer, 28% of the hormone was associated with large mammotrophs. The number of mammotrophs recovered from this gradient region (beyond fraction 6) was doubled in breast cancer (2 expts). These mammotrophs showed areas of hypertrophied Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum. Culture of the separated cells from 1 patients with diabetes and 2 patients with breast cancer for 21 days showed that mammotrophs in the upper gradient fractions (diabetic) secreted seven times more hormone than those in the lower regions, whereas those mammotrophs from patients with breast cancer that fell to the lower gradient regions secreted 15 times more prolactin than did those in the upper regions. These data suggest that pituitaries of patients with breast cancer contain a small pool (10-20%) of hypertrophied mammotrophs that have the potential for significant secretory activity in vitro.