The role of public engagement in the journey to ALARA

The 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' (ALARA) principle is one of the three fundamental elements of radiation protection. Noting that ionising radiation is both encountered naturally in the environment as part of everyday life, and artificially as part of a range of practices, the ALARA principle aims to provide a means of optimising radiation exposures. Historically, the stakeholders involved in the application of the ALARA process have primarily been assumed to be internal to an organisation, except for regulatory 'buy in'. However, could there be instances when the public should be a key stakeholder? This paper explores the area of perceived risk with reference to a particular case study in which the dredging of non-hazardous sediment in the UK near a now decommissioned nuclear power station raised substantial public concern about radiological exposure. This turned what was a straightforward construction activity into a complex public engagement and reassurance task, at a significant cost disproportionate to the level of radiological risk. Learning from this case study is used to highlight the key lessons learnt and the importance of public engagement, and how perceived risk and the associated societal stress could be incorporated into the ALARA process. The paper also highlights the ongoing work and guidance produced by the Society for Radiological Protection in the UK on the development of Guidance for Practitioners to support the Communication of Radiation Risk.

Virtual hospital-level care—feasibility, acceptability, safety and impact of a pilot Hospital-In-The-Home model for COVID-19 infection

Background

Hospital-in-the-Home (HITH) delivers hospital level care to patients in the comfort of their own home. Traditionally HITH involves clinicians travelling to patients' homes. We designed and implemented a virtual model of care leveraging a combination of virtual health modalities for children with COVID-19 in response to rising patient numbers, infection risk and pressures on protective equipment. In contrast to other models for COVID-19 infection in Australia at the time, our HITH service catered only for children who were unwell enough to meet criteria for hospitalisation (ie bed-replacement).

Aims

To measure the feasibility, acceptability, safety and impact of a virtual model of care for managing children with COVID-19 infection requiring hospital-level care.

Methods

Retrospective study of a new virtual model of care for all children admitted to the Royal Children's HITH service with COVID-19 infection between 7th October 2021 and 28th April 2022. The model consisted of at least daily video consultations, remote oximetry, symptom tracking, portal messaging and 24 h phone and video support. Patients were eligible if they met a certain level of severity (work of breathing, dehydration, lower oxygen saturations) without requiring intravenous fluids, oxygen support or intensive care. Online surveys were distributed to staff and consumers who experienced the model of care.

Results

331 patients were managed through the virtual HITH program with a mean length of stay of 3.5 days. Of these, 331 (100%) engaged in video consultations, 192 (58%) engaged in the patient portal and completed the symptom tracker a total of 634 times and communicated via a total of 783 messages. Consumer satisfaction (n = 31) was high (4.7/5) with the most useful aspect of the model rated as video consultation. Clinician satisfaction (n = 9) was also high with a net promoter score of 8.9. There were no adverse events at home. Eight children (2.4%) represented to hospital, 7 (2.1%) of whom were readmitted. The impact is represented by a total of 1,312 hospital bed-days saved in the seven-month period (2,249 bed-days per year). In addition, 1,480 home visits (travel time/ protective equipment/ infection risk) were avoided.

Conclusion

A virtual HITH program for COVID-19 in children is feasible, acceptable and safe and has a substantial impact on bed-days saved and nursing travel time. The implications for management of other acute respiratory viral illnesses that contribute to hospital bed pressure during winter months is immense. Virtual HITH is likely to be a key enabler of a sustainable healthcare system.

Communicating radiation risk: the role of public engagement in reaching ALARA

The ALARA (an acronym for 'as low as reasonably achievable') principle, keeping the likelihood of incurring exposure, the number of people exposed and the magnitude of their individual doses 'as low as reasonably achievable, taking into account economic and societal factors', is at the core of radiation protection. For many decades the principle has been an area of continuous development, with recent work highlighting the importance of engaging not only with the decision-makers in the ALARA process but all stakeholders who may incur an exposure. This paper considers a particular case study in which the dredging of non-hazardous sediment in the United Kingdom near a now decommissioned nuclear power station raised substantial public concern about radiological exposure. This turned what was a straightforward construction activity into a complex public engagement and reassurance task, at a significant cost disproportionate to the level of radiological risk. This paper highlights the key lessons learnt from the case study, including not only the importance of engaging the public as part of the ALARA process but also of considering the societal impact arising from stress and concerns if misinformation is allowed to promulgate. A discussion is included on the need to underpin any engagement with a clear plan, including pre-engagement, implementation and reinforcement of messages. In addition, the role of the radiation protection professional is considered in ensuring that all stakeholders are informed, so that ultimately they can come to their own decision on what is safe.

SRP workshop on 'communication of radiation risk in the modern world'

Communicating radiation risk is an important part of radiation protection. However, achieving effective risk communication is challenging given the negative public perception of radiation and conflicting views presented by both the media and social media. Noting the importance of building capacity amongst radiation protection professionals to communicate radiation risk effectively, the Society for Radiological Protection (SRP) ran a half-day workshop at its Annual Conference on the 22nd May 2019 in Scarborough Spa, UK. A number of key factors were identified that should be considered when communicating with the public, post a nuclear or radiological incident, communicating with government and local authorities, and communicating with the public as part of public outreach. The following memorandum provides a summary of the points presented and discussed. It also outlines proposed future activities of the SRP, focused on further developing the communications aspect of radiation professionals' practice.

Integration of risks from multiple hazards into a holistic ALARA/ALARP demonstration

The principle of As Low As Reasonable Achievable (ALARA) stems from the field of radiological protection. In the UK, this principle has been incorporated into the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and rather than applying solely to radiological hazards, applies to all hazards in totality. Given that the current methods for assessing hazards are somewhat isolated, in that one hazard is assessed independently of another, it can be challenging to ensure a truly holistic view of the risks, and demonstrate they have been reduced to ALARA or As Low As Is Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) as required in the UK regulatory regime. The following paper presents a proposed framework for the integrated assessment of risks from multiple hazards. In addition, it presents an overview of some of the key challenges that may be encountered when producing a holistic ALARA demonstration.

Development of a radiation protection competency framework, a consultancies perspective

The UK nuclear industry is suffering heightened concerns of a skills gap. This has led to companies, and in particular consultancies recruiting increasing numbers of graduates and less experienced staff. The following paper provides an overview of an approach to developing a radiation protection based competency framework within a consultancy with the aim of supporting the identification of the required initiatives to support the development of staff, their careers, and the profession. It is hoped this will provide useful guidance for organisations that are embarking on establishing a training and development programme.

Consensus guidelines for the treatment of yeast infections in the haematology, oncology and intensive care setting, 2014

Pathogenic yeast forms are commonly associated with invasive fungal disease in the immunocompromised host, including patients with haematological malignancies and patients of haemopoietic stem cell transplants. Yeasts include the Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., Pneumocystis jirovecii and some lesser-known pathogens. Candida species remain the most common cause of invasive yeast infections (and the most common human pathogenic fungi). These guidelines present evidence-based recommendations for the antifungal management of established, invasive yeast infections in adult and paediatric patients in the haematology/oncology setting. Consideration is also given to the critically ill patient in intensive care units, including the neonatal intensive care unit. Evidence for 'pre-emptive' or 'diagnostic-driven antifungal therapy' is also discussed. For the purposes of this paper, invasive yeast diseases are categorised under the headings of invasive candidiasis, cryptococcosis and uncommon yeast infections. Specific recommendations for the management of Pneumocystis jirovecii are presented in an accompanying article (see consensus guidelines by Cooley et al. appearing elsewhere in this supplement).

Chemical toxicity and radiological health detriment associated with the inhalation of various enrichments of uranium

The occupational risks associated with the chemical toxicity of uranium can be overlooked during the processing, handling and storage of the material, as the radioactivity of the material is often used alone to assess the health consequences of exposure to uranium compounds. This note provides a summary of the current United Kingdom occupational standards for uranium based on radiation dose and/or chemical toxicity with a particular focus on intake via inhalation. A simple model is subsequently presented to allow a comparison to be drawn between the occupational exposure standard for chemical toxicity and radiological dose limit. Using these data a set of suggested limits on occupational exposure to airborne uranium is proposed that indicate where the legal annual radiological dose limit for workers or the Health and Safety Executive occupational exposure standard for chemical toxicity are at risk of being breached.

Taste-potentiated odor aversion learning based on amphetamine

This study sought to determine whether a taste can potentiate a conditioned odor aversion based on amphetamine as well as those based on lithium. A taste-potentiated odor aversion (TPOA) based on lithium was obtained in Experiment 1 only with a low concentration of an almond odor. This concentration was used in Experiment 2 where the taste, 0.1% saccharin, potentiated an odor aversion based on 1 mg/kg d-amphetamine. This was replicated in Experiment 3 where potentiation was found with doses of both 1 and 3 mg/kg amphetamine, and no effect of dose was detected. It was concluded that TPOA learning is not restricted to drugs such as lithium that produce conditioned unpalatability as well as conditioned aversions to a taste, because amphetamine does not produce conditioned unpalatability at the doses used here. Furthermore, because in Experiment 3 postconditioning extinction of the saccharin aversion removed the potentiation effect, it appears that this form of TPOA may depend on an association between the odor and taste, as proposed by within-compound theory.