[Practice of French urologists concerning the checklist of the operating room]

INTRODUCTION

In 2018, the French High Authority of Health (HAS) included a "time-out" phase in the latest version of the checklist for the operating room in order to improve the safety of operated patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the practice of French urologists concerning the check list (CL) of the operating room.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A survey of 30 items was developed by the committee of accreditation of the French Association of Urology (AFU) and other contributors. It was centered on the characteristics of the urologists, the details of application of the CL, and the evaluation of the current version. After validation, the questionnaire was emailed as an online form in July 2021 for all the members of the AFU and AFUF.

RESULTS

Overall, 369 form the 1700 contacted urologists responded to the survey. The majority were more than 40 years old (70.11%) and less than 20 year of experience (54.49%). The engagement in individual or team accreditation was observed in 222 (60.7%) and 145 (39.84%) urologists, respectively. Almost half of them were present at the beginning of the CL (47.18%), and prescribed postoperative medication with the anesthesiologist (55.56%). The CL has modified the practice in 47.54%, however, with greater administrative burden, and 80% preferred that the AFU adapts the CL to the urology field.

CONCLUSION

The practice of CL between urologists is variable. On multivariate analysis, the engagement in team accreditation was the only variable to influence the practice of time out.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Cluster randomized trial to evaluate the impact of team training on surgical outcomes

Background

The application of safety principles from the aviation industry to the operating room has offered hope in reducing surgical complications. This study aimed to assess the impact on major surgical complications of adding an aviation-based team training programme after checklist implementation.

Methods

A prospective parallel-group cluster trial was undertaken between September 2011 and March 2013. Operating room teams from 31 hospitals were assigned randomly to participate in a team training programme focused on major concepts of crew resource management and checklist utilization. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of any major adverse event, including death, during the hospital stay within the first 30 days after surgery. Using a difference-in-difference approach, the ratio of the odds ratios (ROR) was estimated to compare changes in surgical outcomes between intervention and control hospitals.

Results

Some 22 779 patients were enrolled, including 5934 before and 16 845 after team training implementation. The risk of major adverse events fell from 8·8 to 5·5 per cent in 16 intervention hospitals (adjusted odds ratio 0·57, 95 per cent c.i. 0·48 to 0·68; P < 0·001) and from 7·9 to 5·4 per cent in 15 control hospitals (odds ratio 0·64, 0·50 to 0·81; P < 0·001), resulting in the absence of difference between arms (ROR 0·90, 95 per cent c.i. 0·67 to 1·21; P = 0·474). Outcome trends revealed significant improvements among ten institutions, equally distributed across intervention and control hospitals.

Conclusion

Surgical outcomes improved substantially, with no difference between trial arms. Successful implementation of an aviation-based team training programme appears to require modification and adaptation of its principles in the context of the the surgical milieu. Registration number: NCT01384474 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

The effect of abdominal ventral rectopexy on faecal incontinence and constipation in patients with internal intra-anal rectal intussusception

AIM

Optimal treatment of anal incontinence in a patients with a normal anal sphincter is controversial, as is the role of intra-anal rectal intussusception in anal incontinence. We evaluated the results of abdominal ventral rectopexy on anal continence in such patients.

METHOD

Forty consecutive patients with incontinence and intra-anal rectal intussusception without a sphincter defect were treated by abdominal ventral mesh rectopexy without sigmoidectomy. The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS), patient satisfaction and constipation before and after surgery and recurrence were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean CCI scores were 13.2 (=/-4.25) preoperatively and 3 (±3.44) postoperatively (P<0.0001). Patient assessment was reported as 'cured' in 26 (65%), 'improved' in 13 (32.5%) and 'unchanged' in one (2.5%) patient. Constipation was induced in two (5%) patients and was cured in 13 of 20 (65%) patients who were constipated before surgery. One case of recurrent prolapse occurred after a mean follow-up of 38 months.

CONCLUSION

Intra-anal rectal intussusception may be associated with anal incontinence. For these patients, abdominal ventral mesh rectopexy appears to be an adequate treatment.

[Check-list "Patient Safety" in the operating room: one year experience of 40,000 surgical procedures at the university hospital of Nice]

OBJECTIVES

The implementation of the check-list "Safe surgery saves live" (CL) has proven effective to reduce morbidity and perioperative mortality. Since 1st January 2010 it is a requirement of the HAS as part of the process of certification of hospitals. The CL has been established on all the operating rooms of our hospital after the onset of a near accident.

METHODS

The CL has been computerized to facilitate its adoption by professionals. An internal benchmarking was immediately implemented to allow each surgical specialty to benchmark themselves with other teams. We conducted an audit concerning the CL and periodic assessments in order to learn more precisely concerning the expectations and feelings of medical and nursing teams.

RESULTS

Nearly 40 000 CL were collected in the patient record. The completeness of information of some items seems to reflect the difficulty for professionals to realize the difference between traceability and information sharing within the team on the implementation of a protocol. This audit has confirmed the difficulty in sharing information orally.

CONCLUSIONS

The CL is involved in developing a safety culture in the operating room and led to the establishment of a risk mapping in the operating room and the recovery room and participation in the program error prevention procedure and surgical site through international program "High 5s" whose purpose is to improve the safety of care.

Fecal continence following partial resection of the anal canal in distal rectal cancer: long-term results after coloanal anastomoses

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the influence of partial excision of the superior portion of the anal canal (AC) when necessary for tumor margin clearance in distal rectal cancer on fecal continence after coloanal anastomoses.

METHODS

Between 1977 to 1993, 209 patients with middle and lower third rectal cancers underwent complete rectal excision and coloanal anastomoses. For very low tumors, located at or below 5 cm from the anal verge (AV), varying portions of the superior segment of the AC were excised for tumor margin clearance. The magnitude of resections was inversely proportional to the height of the anastomosis from the AV. The patients were categorized into 3 groups according to their level of anastomoses from AV: group 1, patients with anastomoses from 0.5 to less than 2 cm from AV (1 to 2.5 cm of AC resected, i.e., major resection); group 2, anastomoses at 2 to less than 3 cm from AV (less than 1 cm of AC resected, i.e., minor resection); group 3, with anastomoses at 3 to 3.5 cm from AV (AC completely preserved). A standard questionnaire, physical examination, and anal manometry at intervals of 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were performed prospectively to assess anal continence.

RESULTS

The patients in the 3 categories were matched for age, gender, stage, presence or absence of a colonic J-pouch, preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgical technique. Fourteen patients with postoperative radiotherapy were excluded from the clinical assessment. Mean follow-up was 33.5 months. There were 43 patients in group 1, 75 in group 2, and 73 in group 3 for clinical assessment. In the first year, there was progressive improvement in anal continence in all 3 groups. At 2 years, 50% in group 1, 73% in group 2, and 62% in group 3 were fully continent. The proportion of patients fully continent in group 1 remained unchanged as compared to continued improvement for groups 2 and 3 following the first year. At 4 years, 50% in group 1, 80% in group 2, and 68% in group 3 were completely continent. The difference among the 3 groups was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

For distal rectal cancer, where tumor margin clearance necessitates partial resection of the superior portion of the AC, when limited to less than 1 cm, the proportion of patients remaining fully continent is similar to those with complete AC preservation. More substantial excisions of the AC can still result in satisfactory anal continence, such that following the fourth year, one half of the patients can expect to be fully continent.

Is rectal intussusception a cause of idiopathic incontinence?

PURPOSE

The cause of rectal intussusception in patients primarily dominated by symptoms of anal incontinence has not been fully elucidated, especially for patients with idiopathic incontinence.

METHODS

Between 1991 and 1996, 51 patients referred with a diagnosis of idiopathic incontinence were prospectively evaluated by standard questionnaire, clinical examination, defecography, and anal manometry. Fourteen female patients were identified with rectal intussusception and were treated by transabdominal rectopexy. Postoperatively, clinical assessment and anal manometry were performed at regular intervals.

RESULTS

Continence was improved after rectopexy (P < 0.01). The postoperative increases in the anal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, and maximum tolerated volume were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectopexy improved anal incontinence in patients with rectal intussusception. The cause of rectal intussusception in anal incontinence could not be explained by functional improvement of the internal anal sphincter tone or an increase in the maximum tolerated volume. Rectal intussusception may be a cause of idiopathic incontinence in patients; however, larger prospective studies are required to support this concept.

[Incidence of colorectal cancer in the Haute-Garonne Department. Evaluation of 2 years of registration (1982-1983)]

During a two-year period ending in 1983, 882 colorectal cancers (CRC) were diagnosed among 820,000 residents in the department of Haute-Garonne (France). The age-standardized incidences were 24.3 and 19.1 per 100,000 in men and 15.2 and 9.5 per 100,000 in women, for colon and rectal carcinomas respectively. The Haute-Garonne population-based registry showed one of the highest rates of risk of CRC in Europe. A relatively high incidence of rectal cancer, a marked male preponderance particularly in left-side colon cancers, and a higher mean age in female patients (67.1 +/- 11.6 and 70.2 +/- 11.9 (p less than 0.001] was observed. Distribution of CRC within the department was heterogeneous. Although there was no significant difference between urban and rural areas, some regions showed a higher incidence (the "Volvestre" in both sexes and the "Riviere" in women) whereas the "Pyrénées Centrales" showed a lower incidence in women only. CRC was often diagnosed at an advanced stage (Dukes A: 26.1 p. 100, Dukes B: 22.2 p. 100, Dukes C: 27.4 p. 100, visceral metastases: 24.4 p. 100 especially in women (p less than 0.02). Among symptom-free patients (4.5 p. 100) cancers limited to the colonic wall represented 71.4 p. 100 of cases. This suggests that prognosis of CRC could be improved by routine screening of healthy populations. Surgery was performed in 91 p. 100 of colonic cancers and 85 p. 100 of rectal cancers but was considered to be curative in only 55 p. 100 of all cases.