The role of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the first-line treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutation

Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Among lung cancers, 80% are classified as nonsmall- cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are mostly diagnosed at an advanced stage (either locally advanced or metastatic disease). In the last years, the discovery of the pivotal role in tumorigenesis of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) has provided a new class of targeted therapeutic agents: the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Since the first reports of an association between somatic mutations in EGFR exons 19 and 21 and response to EGFR-TKIs, treatment of advanced NSCLC has changed dramatically. Histologic profile, clinical characteristics, and mutational profile of lung carcinoma have all been reported as predictive factors of response to EGFR-TKIs and other targeted therapies. In advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations, the use of EGFR TKIs in first-line treatment has provided an unusually large progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with a negligible toxicity when compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy in phase III randomized trials. Considering the findings regarding the excellent benefit and better safety profile of EGFR TKIs in EGFR mutation positive patients, these targeted therapeutic agents can be now considered as first-line treatment in this setting of patients. This review will discuss the new evidences in the role of EGFR-TKIs in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC and their implication in the current clinical decision-making.

Sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or with gemcitabine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is a small-molecule multitargeted kinase inhibitor that blocks the activation of C-RAF, B-RAF, c-KIT, FLT-3, RET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), VEGFR-3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor β. The aim of this multicenter, randomized phase II study was to evaluate clinical activity and safety of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or gemcitabine in unselected untreated elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The trial was designed to select the most promising sorafenib-containing combination in previously untreated elderly (≥70 years) stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients, with performance status of zero to two. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following combinations: gemcitabine, 1200 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8, every 21 days, for a maximum of six cycles, plus sorafenib, 800 mg/day, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm 1); or erlotinib, 150 mg/day, plus sorafenib, 800 mg/day, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm 2). A selection design was applied with 1-year survival rate as the primary end point of the study, requiring 58 patients.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were randomly allocated to the study (31 patients in arm 1 and 29 patients in arm 2). After a median follow-up of 15 months, 10 patients [32%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 49%] in arm 1 and 13 patients (45%, 95% CI 27% to 63%) in arm 2 were alive at 1 year. Median overall survival was 6.6 and 12.6 months in arm 1 and arm 2, respectively. Observed toxic effects were consistent with the expected drug profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of erlotinib and sorafenib was feasible in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and was associated with a higher 1-year survival rate than the other arm. According to the selection design, this combination warrants further investigation in phase III trials.

Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

In the last decade the treatment of advanced-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer has substantially improved. If in the early 90s there was still concern about the real efficacy of chemotherapy over best suppotive care alone in the advanced setting, constant developments in clinical research have demonstrated the survival advantage of active anti-cancer drugs not only in the first-line setting, but, lately, even in patients with recurrent disease after failure of two previous chemotherapy lines. With the premises of high throughput technologies, translational research is aiming to characterize patients and tumors on a molecular basis. With pharmacogenomics it would then be possible to accurately predict patient outcome and tailor the treatment strategy according to the geno-phenotype of single patients.

New antiangiogenetic agents and non-small cell lung cancer

New blood vessel formation, known as angiogenesis is a fundamental event in the process of tumor growth and metastatic dissemination. Due to its central role in tumor angiogenesis, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor have been a major focus of basic research and drug development in the field of oncology, including the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approaches targeting VEGF include monoclonal antibodies and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). Bevacizumab (Avastin) is an anti-VEGF recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody. A very recent randomized phase III trial demonstrated a statistically significant advantage in median survival favouring the combination of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC. This study represents the first evidence of superior efficacy of targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone in the treatment of NSCLC. ZD6474 is an orally bioavailable inhibitor of VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase. First evidences of antitumor activity and its excellent toxicity profile make it a promising targeted agent for the treatment of NSCLC. A recent phase I/II study examined the combination of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-TKI erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with non-squamous stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Data on antitumor activity of this combination have to be considered very promising. Clinical trials of multiple targeted therapy may represent the second generation studies in the treatment of NSCLC.

Chemotherapy of advanced NSCLC in special patient population

The elderly and patients with Performance Status (PS) of 2, constitute the so-called special patient population. The tolerability of chemotherapy in this population is globally worse, and treatment approaches should be different. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is currently recommended as the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its role in special patient population is controversial. The best treatment for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC is still debated. In the first randomized study dedicated to elderly NSCLC patients, single-agent vinorelbine showed superiority over supportive care alone, both in terms of survival and quality of life. In a large randomized trial, gemcitabine plus vinorelbine failed to show any advantage over either agent alone. Subset analyses suggest that the efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy is similar in fit older and younger patients, with an acceptable increase in toxicity for elderly patients. However, the role of platin-based chemotherapy needs to be defined in prospective randomised trials. With the current evidence, single-agent chemotherapy with a third-generation drug (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, taxanes) should be the recommended option for non-selected elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Also for PS2 patients there is no consensus on standard treatment. On the basis of current evidence, chemotherapy treatment appears justified for patients with advanced NSCLC and PS2. Single-agent chemotherapy (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, taxanes) could be the preferred option, although carboplatin-based or low-dose cisplatin-based doublets may represent alternative options. Stronger evidence is expected from new clinical research specifically focused on PS2 patients. High priority should be given to the evaluation of tolerability and efficacy of platinum-based combinations and role of new targeted therapies.

Italian clinical research in non-small-cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer deaths in both men and women worldwide and has a poor prognosis. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents approximately 80% of all lung cancers. Surgery is the only curative treatment of NSCLC but only 15-20% of tumours can be radically resected with a survival of about 40% at 5 years. Considering these disappointing results NSCLC is one of the most frequent subjects of clinical research worldwide. Italy is playing an important role in the clinical research of NSCLC performing phase I, II and III trials, prevalently by cooperative groups, and achieving important results that contributed to define the standard treatment for NSCLC patients. In particular, Italy is leader in the clinical research of the treatment of advanced NSCLC elderly patients. Today, large controlled clinical trials are ongoing. In this paper we analyse and discuss the main trials performed by Italian groups in the fields of NSCLC.

Treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be considered typical of advanced age. Most cases of NSCLC are diagnosed in the advanced or locally advanced stage. It has been shown that combined chemo-radiotherapy is more efficient than either chemotherapy alone or radiation alone, for the therapeutic management of localized unresectable NSCLC. However, chemo-radiotherapy, even if given with sequential approach, in clinical practice can be contraindicated in elderly patients. In fact, this patient population often present at diagnosis with cardiovascular and/or pulmonary comorbidities that increase the risk of severe side effects from chemo-radiotherapy. The present review aims at focusing the currently available evidences on the treatment of elderly patients affected by locally advanced NSCLC and at giving future perspectives on this topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Very few specific prospective data are available on the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC in the elderly. Some phase II studies suggest that low-dose chemotherapy given concurrently with radiotherapy could be safely administered to this patient population. Retrospective analyses on full-dose sequential and concurrent chemo-radiation are to be considered globally ambiguous and at risk of selection bias.

SUMMARY

Only specifically designed prospective studies will elucidate the real role and feasibility of combined chemo-radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC in the elderly. Future perspectives on this topic include the evaluation of alternative schedules of chemo-radiotherapy, innovative radiation techniques more suitable to elderly patients, and the introduction of new, well-tolerated, molecularly targeted agents combined with standard treatments.

A randomised clinical trial of two docetaxel regimens (weekly vs 3 week) in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. The DISTAL 01 study

Docetaxel (75 mg m(-2) 3-weekly) is standard second-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with significant toxicity. To verify whether a weekly schedule (33.3 mg m(-2) for 6 weeks) improved quality of life (QoL), a phase III study was performed with 220 advanced NSCLC patients, < or =75 years, ECOG PS < or =2. QoL was assessed by EORTC questionnaires and the Daily Diary Card (DDC). No difference was found in global QoL scores at 3 weeks. Pain, cough and hair loss significantly favoured the weekly schedule, while diarrhoea was worse. DDC analysis showed that loss of appetite and overall condition were significantly worse in the 3-week arm in the first week, while nausea and loss of appetite were more severe in the weekly arm in the third week. Response rate and survival were similar, hazard ratio of death in the weekly arm being 1.04 (95% CI 0.77-1.39). A 3-weekly docetaxel was more toxic for leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and hair loss; any grade 3-4 haematologic toxicity was significantly more frequent in the standard arm (25 vs 6%). The weekly schedule could be preferred for patients candidate to receive docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, because of some QoL advantages, lower toxicity and no evidence of strikingly different effect on survival.

Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer in the Elderly

Breast cancer arises in about 48% of patients older than 65 years and more than 30% occurs in those over 70 years being the leading cause of cancer-related death in women older than 65. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly compared to their younger counterpart because of progressive reduction of organ function and comorbidities related to age. For this reason, the elderly have been excluded from or underrepresented in most cancer studies and, in clinical practice, they often receive inadequate and untested treatments. For adjuvant chemotherapy, a low percentage of patients over 70 years of age were included in few trials and always in a proportion much lower than the prevalence of cancer in that age group. Adjuvant chemotherapy, preferably including an anthracycline especially in patients with HER-2/neu-positive tumours, seems to be beneficial in older women who have substantial risk of dying of breast cancer. To date even if there is no specifically randomised study, single-agent chemotherapy probably might be considered a reasonable treatment for advanced breast cancer in the elderly. One of the actual main field of clinical research in the treatment of breast cancer is the role of targeted therapies. Chronologic age is a risk factor for toxicities such as myelosuppression and mucositis, and older patients may require more supportive care. In order to plan medical treatment in breast cancer elderly patients is mandatory to practice a comprehensive geriatric assessment that includes evaluation of comorbidities, functional dependence, socio-economic, emotional and cognitive conditions, an estimate of life expectancy and recognition of frailty. The authors review the literature regarding age-specific chemotherapeutic issues in the management of breast cancer elderly patients.

The role of new targeted therapies in small-cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading world-wide cause of cancer death. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20-25% of lung carcinomas. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment of SCLC. In limited disease, median survival is about 12-16 months with 4-5% of long-term survivors, in extensive disease median survival is 7-11 months. Improving the survival rate of patients with SCLC requires a better understanding of tumour biology and the subsequent development of novel therapeutic strategies. Several targeted agents have been introduced into clinical trials in SCLC and some phase III studies have already produced definitive results. Currently, the minority of these new agents offers a promise of improved outcomes, and negative results are more commonly reported than positive ones. To date, no targeted therapy has been approved for use in the treatment of patients with SCLC. This review will focus on the main novel biologic agents investigated in the treatment of SCLC.

Gefitinib in elderly and unfit patients affected by advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Elderly and poor performance status advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients often tolerate chemotherapy poorly. Special approaches are needed for these patient populations. Gefitinib (Iressa) was used in 59 elderly and/or unfit NSCLC pretreated patients participating in a compassionate use programme showing some activity and good tolerability.

Supportive care in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

The present study describes supportive care (SC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), evaluating whether it is affected by concomitant chemotherapy, patient's performance status (PS) and age. Data of patients enrolled in three randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy, conducted between 1996 and 2001, were pooled. The analysis was limited to the first three cycles of treatment. Supportive care data were available for 1185 out of 1312 (90%) enrolled patients. Gastrointestinal drugs (45.7%), corticosteroids (33.4%) and analgesics (23.8%) were the most frequently observed categories. The mean number of drugs per patient was 2.43; 538 patients (45.4%) assumed three or more supportive drugs. Vinorelbine does not produce substantial variations in the SC pattern, while cisplatin-based treatment requires an overall higher number of supportive drugs, with higher use of antiemetics (41 vs 27%) and antianaemics (10 vs 4%). Patients with worse PS are more exposed to corticosteroids (42 vs 30%). Elderly patients require drugs against concomitant diseases significantly more than adults (20 vs 7%) and are less frequently exposed to antiemetics (12 vs 27%). In conclusion, polypharmacotherapy is a relevant issue in patients with advanced NSCLC. Chemotherapy does not remarkably affect the pattern of SC, except for some drugs against side effects. Elderly patients assume more drugs for concomitant diseases and receive less antiemetics than adults.

Targeted therapies: focus on a new strategy for gastrointestinal tumors

In the last few years the knowledge of molecular oncology has led to the development of many new biological agents whose targets are extracellular or intracellular molecules involved in the main signalling pathways that play major roles in cancer development. These agents represent a new approach to gastrointestinal malignancies, as for many other types of tumors; preliminary data show that targeted therapy may enhance activity of chemotherapeutic agents (i.e. cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC)) or be active as monotherapy (i.e. imatinib in gastro-intestinal stromal tumors). Despite the encouraging preclinical results, the majority of these compounds have not yet produced convincing clinical results. However, these new agents raise a new challenge in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers, especially for CRC.

Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer in most developed nations. The most common type of lung cancer is of non-small cell histology, representing approximately 80% of the total. Despite aggressive treatments in early stages and improvement of polychemotherapy outcomes in advanced disease, the five years survival rate for lung cancer remains under 15%. Fortunately, our improved knowledge of tumor biology and mechanisms of oncogenesis suggests several new potential targets for clinical research in cancer therapy. A substantial body of evidence indicates that cyclooxigenase (COX)-2 and prostaglandins (PGs) play an important role in tumorigenesis. Mechanisms involved in COX-2 participation in tumorigenesis and tumor growth include xenobiotic metabolism, angiogenesis stimulation, inhibition of immune surveillance and inhibition of apoptosis. COX-2 is frequently overexpressed in bronchial premalignancy, lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and COX-2 overexpression is a marker of poor prognosis in surgically resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Treatment with COX-2 inhibitors reduces the growth of NSCLC cells in vitro and in xenograft studies. Recent studies have defined some of the mechanisms involved in COX-2 participation in NSCLC development and diffusion. These evidences support the hypothesis that selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) may prove beneficial in the prevention and treatment of NSCLC.

Chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be considered typical of advanced age. More than 50% of NSCLC patients are diagnosed over the age of 65 and approximately one-third of all patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are over the age of 70. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly as compared to their younger counterparts, because of the progressive reduction of organ function and comorbidities related to age. For this reason, these patients are often not considered eligible for aggressive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the standard medical treatment of advanced NSCLC. At present, for early stages of the disease there are no indications for adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Combined chemo-radiotherapy in locally advanced disease increases toxicity and seems to determine no survival advantage as compared to the radiation therapy alone. In advanced disease, single agent vinorelbine has proven to be active and well-tolerated, and compared to best supportive care, improves survival and perhaps even the quality of life. Gemcitabine is active and well tolerated as well. Taxanes are in advanced phase of evaluation. A phase III randomized trial showed that polychemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine does not improve any outcome as compared to single agent chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine. In clinical practice, single agent chemotherapy should remain the standard treatment. The two main research-lines to be explored in the near future are the introduction of biological agents in the treatment schemes and the development of specifically designed schedules of cisplatin-based regimens. However, practicing a multidimensional geriatric awsessment for individualized treatment choice in NSCLC elderly patients is mandatory.

Carboplatin + epirubicin +VP-16 + lenograstim followed by radiotherapy + carboplatin as radiosensitizer in limited small cell lung cancer. A multicenter phase II study

A phase II trial was undertaken to test the activity and toxicity of carboplatin (300 mg/m2, i.v. day 1) + epirubicin (75 mg/m2, i.v. day 1) + VP-16 (100 mg/m2, i.v. days 1 to 3) + lenograstim (5 mcg/kg, s.c. days 6 to 15) administered every 3 weeks for 4 cycles and subsequent chest irradiation (50 Gy) + daily carboplatin (25 mg/m2) in the first-line treatment of adults affected by limited small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-stage phase II design was used; the complete response (CR) rate after chest radiotherapy was the primary end-point. Twenty-three CRs were required out of 38 patients to consider the treatment worthy of further study. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was planned in case of CR. Patients aged < or = 70 were eligible if they had limited SCLC, a performance status not worse than 2 by the ECOG scale and no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

RESULTS

From January 1995 to April 1999, 33 patients were enrolled; the median age was 60 years. All the patients started chemotherapy; 23 patients received chest irradiation and concurrent daily carboplatin; 11 patients also received PCI. Toxicity was generally mild. Sixteen CRs (48.5%, 95% CI: 30.8-66.5) were recorded; the objective response rate was 72.7% (95% CI: 54.5-86.7). The median time-to-progression was 7.9 months (95% CI: 6.5-10.4). The median-survival was 10.7 months (95% CI: 9.2-16.1).

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy with carboplatin + epirubicin + VP-16 followed by chest irradiation plus concurrent daily carboplatin is well-tolerated but not sufficiently active to warrant further study in the treatment of patients with limited SCLC.

[Surgical treatment of pseudomembranous colitis. Considerations on a clinical case]

Pseudomembranous colitis is an uncommon pathology although the number of cases recorded has risen steadily over the past decades. It is closely correlated with antibiotic treatment and above all affects immunodepressed subjects. It is manifested by a wide variety of clinical symptoms, ranging from simple diarrhea to acute abdomen. The latter, although fortunately extremely rare, often requires surgical therapy.

[Late posttraumatic diaphragmatic hernia. A clinical case report]

On the basis of the observation of one case of delayed presentation of traumatic diaphragmatic rupture of the left side with a late diaphragmatic hernia, the authors examine the evolution of the occurrence of this pathology during the last 20 years. The clinical signs and the modality of presentation of the lesions of delayed diagnosis appear absolutely non specific. Incorrect interpretation of the X-ray or only intermittent hernial symptoms are frequent reasons for incorrect diagnosis. Also the initially non recognition of the possible manifestation of the diaphragmatic hernia following blunt or penetrating injuries is usually because the practitioner has not sought it. The diaphragmatic domes must be systematically explored during the laparotomy or thoracotomy performed for thoraco-abdominal trauma. Surgical treatment of long-standing post-traumatic diaphragmatic hernia is the same as that applicable in the recent hernias.

[Identification of the patient at risk of postoperative infectious complications: risk factors and their evaluation]

The authors report their results of a prospective study on 1182 patients who underwent surgical operation relatively on postoperative infections. Studied variables were: structural and anamnestic: sex, age, smoking, drinking; clinical: evidence of functional changes in various organs, as assessed upon clinical basis and laboratory results; pertinent to surgical intervention: entity, duration, anaesthesia; during and early-after-surgery complications (until discharge or within 30 days since intervention). Stepwise logistic regression model was applied to this set of preoperative and operative factors, four of which were found significantly correlate with postoperative infections: bacterial contamination during surgery, duration surgical intervention greater than 120', cholestasis, serum albumin.