1
|
Saba L, Brinjikji W, Spence JD, Wintermark M, Castillo M, Borst GJD, Yang Q, Yuan C, Buckler A, Edjlali M, Saam T, Saloner D, Lal BK, Capodanno D, Sun J, Balu N, Naylor R, Lugt AVD, Wasserman BA, Kooi ME, Wardlaw J, Gillard J, Lanzino G, Hedin U, Mikulis D, Gupta A, DeMarco JK, Hess C, Goethem JV, Hatsukami T, Rothwell P, Brown MM, Moody AR. Roadmap Consensus on Carotid Artery Plaque Imaging and Impact on Therapy Strategies and Guidelines: An International, Multispecialty, Expert Review and Position Statement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:1566-1575. [PMID: 34326105 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Current guidelines for primary and secondary prevention of stroke in patients with carotid atherosclerosis are based on the quantification of the degree of stenosis and symptom status. Recent publications have demonstrated that plaque morphology and composition, independent of the degree of stenosis, are important in the risk stratification of carotid atherosclerotic disease. This finding raises the question as to whether current guidelines are adequate or if they should be updated with new evidence, including imaging for plaque phenotyping, risk stratification, and clinical decision-making in addition to the degree of stenosis. To further this discussion, this roadmap consensus article defines the limits of luminal imaging and highlights the current evidence supporting the role of plaque imaging. Furthermore, we identify gaps in current knowledge and suggest steps to generate high-quality evidence, to add relevant information to guidelines currently based on the quantification of stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Saba
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.), University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - J D Spence
- Stroke Prevention and Atherosclerosis Research Centre (J.D.S.), Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Wintermark
- Department of Neuroradiology (M.W.), Stanford University and Healthcare System, Stanford, California
| | - M Castillo
- Department of Radiology (M.C.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - G J D Borst
- Department of Vascular Surgery (G.J.D.B.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Q Yang
- Department of Radiology (Q.Y.), Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - C Yuan
- Departments of Radiology (C.Y., J.S., N.B.)
| | - A Buckler
- Elucid Bioimaging (A.B.), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - M Edjlali
- Department of Neuroradiology (M.E.), Université Paris-Descartes-Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, IMABRAIN-INSERM-UMR1266, DHU-Neurovasc, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris, France
| | - T Saam
- Department of Radiology (T.S.), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Radiologisches Zentrum (T.S.), Rosenheim, Germany
| | - D Saloner
- Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.S., C.H.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - B K Lal
- Department of Vascular Surgery (B.K.L.), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - D Capodanno
- Division of Cardiology (D.C.), A.O.U. Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco," University of Catania, Italy
| | - J Sun
- Departments of Radiology (C.Y., J.S., N.B.)
| | - N Balu
- Departments of Radiology (C.Y., J.S., N.B.)
| | - R Naylor
- The Leicester Vascular Institute (R.N.), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - A V D Lugt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B A Wasserman
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (B.A.W.), Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - M E Kooi
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.E.K.), CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J Wardlaw
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (J.W.), United Kingdom Dementia Research Institute and Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J Gillard
- Christ's College (J.G.), Cambridge, UK
| | - G Lanzino
- Neurosurgery (G.L.) Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - U Hedin
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (U.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Vascular Surgery (U.H.), Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Mikulis
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging and the Functional Neuroimaging Laboratory (D.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Gupta
- Department of Radiology (A.G.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - J K DeMarco
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (J.K.D.), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - C Hess
- Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.S., C.H.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - J V Goethem
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences (J.V.G.), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - T Hatsukami
- Surgery (T.H.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - P Rothwell
- Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia (P.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, UK
| | - M M Brown
- Stroke Research Centre (M.M.B.), Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College of London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK
| | - A R Moody
- Department of Medical Imaging (A.R.M.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fisch U, von Felten S, Wiencierz A, Jansen O, Howard G, Hendrikse J, Halliday A, Fraedrich G, Eckstein HH, Calvet D, Bulbulia R, Becquemin JP, Algra A, Rothwell P, Ringleb P, Mas JL, Brown M, Brott T, Bonati L. Risk of Stroke before Revascularisation in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Pooled Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. J Vasc Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
3
|
Morris D, Bulbulia R, Pan H, Rothwell P, Mehta Z, Peto R, Halliday A. 5774A novel clinical risk score to identify people with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis with a higher risk of stroke. Eur Heart J 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx493.5774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
4
|
Pendlebury S, Klaus S, Mehta Z, Rothwell P. O-054: Methodological factors in determining rates of dementia and cognitive impairment in TIA and stroke: Applicability of short cognitive tests. Eur Geriatr Med 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s1878-7649(15)30067-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
5
|
Pendlebury S, Haigh AM, Thomson R, Mehta Z, Rothwell P. O-071: Feasibility study of the long term impact of acute illness, hospitalisation and delirium on cognitive outcomes after TIA and stroke. Eur Geriatr Med 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s1878-7649(15)30084-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
6
|
Clifton A, Markus H, Kuker W, Rothwell P. E-050 The Rationale for the Vertebral artery Ischaemia Stenting trial (VIST). J Neurointerv Surg 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010870.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
7
|
|
8
|
Simoni M, Li L, Mehta Z, Rothwell P. BLOOD PRESSURE (BP) AND WHITE MATTER CHANGES IN TIA AND STROKE PATIENTS: ASSOCIATION WITH LONG-TERM MEAN BP VERSUS VARIABILITY. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012. [DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304200a.144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
9
|
Schulz U, Kennedy F, Kueker W, Clifton A, Rothwell P, Markus H. 1118 Outcome of endovascular treatment for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: experience in two neurosciences centres. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012. [DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-301993.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
10
|
Abbott A, Adelman M, Alexandrov A, Barnett H, Beard J, Bell P, Björck M, Blacker D, Buckley C, Cambria R, Comerota A, Connolly E, Davies A, Eckstein H, Faruqi R, Fraedrich G, Gloviczki P, Hankey G, Harbaugh R, Heldenberg E, Kittner S, Kleinig T, Mikhailidis D, Moore W, Naylor R, Nicolaides A, Paraskevas K, Pelz D, Prichard J, Purdie G, Ricco J, Riles T, Rothwell P, Sandercock P, Sillesen H, Spence J, Spinelli F, Tan A, Thapar A, Veith F, Zhou W. Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Should not Extend Reimbursement Indications for Carotid Artery Angioplasty/Stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 43:247-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2011] [Accepted: 12/05/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
11
|
Abbott AL, Adelman MA, Alexandrov AB, Barnett HJM, Beard J, Bell P, Björck M, Blacker D, Buckley CJ, Cambria RP, Comerota AJ, Sander E, Davies AH, Eckstein HH, Fraedrich G, Gloviczki P, Hankey GJ, Harbaugh RE, Heldenberg E, Kittner SJ, Kleinig TJ, Mikhailidis DP, Moore WS, Naylor R, Nicolaides A, Paraskevas KI, Pelz DM, Prichard JW, Purdie G, Ricco JB, Riles T, Rothwell P, Sandercock P, Sillesen H, Spence JD, Spinelli F, Tan A, Thapar A, Veith FJ, Zhou W. Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting. INT ANGIOL 2012; 31:85-89. [PMID: 22330629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
|
12
|
|
13
|
Marquardt L, Lovelock C, Rothwell P. Pre-morbid antiplatalet use is associated with larger haematoma volume and worse outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage: population-based study. Akt Neurol 2007. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-987870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
14
|
Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Stevenson M, De Nigris E, Thomas S, Gillard J, Berry E, Young G, Rothwell P, Roditi G, Gough M, Brennan A, Bamford J, Best J. Accurate, practical and cost-effective assessment of carotid stenosis in the UK. Health Technol Assess 2006; 10:iii-iv, ix-x, 1-182. [PMID: 16904049 DOI: 10.3310/hta10300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether less invasive imaging tests [ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and contrast-enhanced MRA (CEMRA)], alone or combined, could replace intra-arterial angiography (IAA), what effect this would have on strokes and deaths, endarterectomies performed and costs, and whether less invasive tests were cost-effective. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases covering the years 1980-2003 inclusive, updated to April 2004. Key journals from 1990 to the end of 2002. REVIEW METHODS The authors constituted a panel of experts in stroke, imaging, vascular surgery, statistics and health economic modelling. The accuracy of less invasive carotid imaging was systematically reviewed using Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) methodology, supplemented by individual patient data from UK primary research and audit studies. A systematic review of the costs of less invasive tests, outpatient clinics, endarterectomy and stroke was performed, along with a microcosting exercise. A model of the process of care following a transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/minor stroke was developed, populated with data from stroke epidemiology studies in the UK, effects of medical and surgical interventions, outcomes, quality of life and costs. A survey of UK stroke prevention clinics provided typical timings. Twenty-two different carotid imaging strategies were evaluated for short- and long-term outcomes, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and net benefit. RESULTS In 41 included studies (2404 patients, median age 60-65 years), most data were available on 70-99% stenosis. CEMRA was the most accurate [sensitivity 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 0.97; specificity 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96], compared with US, MRA and CTA, which were all similar (e.g. for US: sensitivity 0.89, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.92; specificity 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.89). Data for 50-69% stenoses and on combinations of tests were too sparse to be reliable. There was heterogeneity between studies for all imaging modalities except for CTA. The individual patient data (2416 patients) showed that the literature overestimated test accuracy in routine practice and that, in general, tests perform with higher sensitivity and specificity in asymptomatic than in symptomatic arteries. In the cost-effectiveness model, on current UK timings, strategies allowed more patients to reach endarterectomy very quickly, and where those with 50-69% stenosis would be offered surgery in addition to those with 70-99%, prevented most strokes and produced greatest net benefit. This included most strategies with US as first or repeat test, and not those with IAA. However, the model was sensitive to less invasive test accuracy, cost and timing of endarterectomy. In patients investigated late after TIA, test accuracy is crucial and CEMRA should be used before surgery. CONCLUSIONS In the UK, less invasive tests can be used in place of IAA if radiologists trained in carotid imaging are available. Imaging should be carefully audited. Stroke prevention clinics should reduce waiting times at all stages to improve speed of access to endarterectomy. In patients presenting late after TIA, test accuracy is very important and US results should be confirmed by CEMRA, as patients with 50-69% stenosis are less likely to benefit. More data are required to define the accuracy of the less invasive tests, with improvements made in the data collection methods used and how data are presented. Consideration should also be given to the use of new technologies and randomised trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Wardlaw
- Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
|
17
|
Rothwell P. Principles of neuroepidemiology: Edited by Tracy Batchelor and Merit E Cudkowicz (Pp 374, pound65.00). Published by Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, 2001. ISBN 0750670428. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2002. [DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.73.4.464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
18
|
|
19
|
Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Brass LM, Makuch RW, Sarrel PM, Roberts RS, Gent M, Rothwell P, Sacco RL, Liu RC, Boden-Albala B, Horwitz RI. The stroke prognosis instrument II (SPI-II) : A clinical prediction instrument for patients with transient ischemia and nondisabling ischemic stroke. Stroke 2000; 31:456-62. [PMID: 10657422 DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.2.456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In 1991 we developed the Stroke Prognosis Instrument (SPI-I) to stratify patients with transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke by prognosis for stroke or death in 2 years. In this article we validate and improve SPI-I (creating SPI-II). METHODS To validate SPI-I, we applied it to 4 test cohorts and calculated pooled outcome rates. To create SPI-II, we incorporated new predictive variables identified in 1 of the test cohorts and validated it in the other 3 cohorts. RESULTS For SPI-I, pooled rates (all 4 test cohorts) of stroke or death within 2 years in risk groups I, II, and III were 9%, 17%, and 24%, respectively (P<0.01, log-rank test). SPI-II was created by adding congestive heart failure and prior stroke to SPI-I. Each patient's risk group was determined by the total score for 7 factors: congestive heart failure (3 points); diabetes (3 points); prior stroke (3 points); age >70 years (2 points); stroke for the index event (not transient ischemic attack) (2 points); hypertension (1 point); and coronary artery disease (1 point). Risk groups I, II, and III comprised patients with 0 to 3, 4 to 7, and 8 to 15 points, respectively. For SPI-I, pooled rates (3 cohorts excluding the SPI-II development cohort) of stroke or death within 2 years in risk groups I, II, and III were 9%, 17%, and 23%, respectively. For SPI-II, pooled rates were 10%, 19%, and 31%, respectively. In receiver operator characteristic analysis, the area under the curve was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.60) for SPI-I and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.65) for SPI-II, confirming the better performance of the latter. CONCLUSIONS Compared with SPI-I, SPI-II achieves greater discrimination in outcome rates among risk groups. SPI-II is ready for use in research design and may have a role in patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W N Kernan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8025, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Reading PJ, Newman PK, Kelly WF, Bateson MC, Rothwell P. Treatment of immobilisation hypercalcaemia in acute intermittent porphyria: experience from three cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997; 62:421-2. [PMID: 9120470 PMCID: PMC1074113 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.62.4.421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
22
|
Rothwell P. Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial--Italy. Lancet 1996; 347:392-3. [PMID: 8598714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
23
|
|
24
|
Abstract
The records of 82 patients who had undergone inpatient neurological investigation for unilateral motor symptoms, sensory symptoms, or both, without definite neurological signs, were reviewed. Diagnosis of a physical disorder was more frequent if symptoms were on the right side rather than on the left (odds ratio (OR) = 7.7, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.6-23), and in males than in females (OR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-8.3).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Rothwell
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rothwell P. Risk-factor epidemiology. Lancet 1994; 343:420-1. [PMID: 7905575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
26
|
Lal S, Griffiths A, Rothwell P. Out-patients and quality: the need for information. Health Serv Manage 1990; 86:231-5. [PMID: 10107165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
|
27
|
Rothwell P. Inadequacies in emergency admission communications. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 1989; 42:340. [PMID: 2619819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
28
|
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
32
|
|