Virologic and immunologic monitoring of cytomegalovirus to guide preemptive therapy in solid-organ transplantation

Control of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection during the posttransplant period was investigated in 134 solid-organ transplant recipients by monitoring in parallel virologic and immunologic parameters for at least 1 year of follow-up. Virologic monitoring was achieved by determining HCMV DNAemia with real-time PCR, using the threshold of 300 000 DNA copies/mL blood as a cutoff for starting preemptive therapy. Immunologic monitoring included measurement of HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by cytokine flow cytometry, using HCMV-infected dendritic cells as a stimulus. HCMV infection was diagnosed in 110 (82%) and required treatment in 49 (36%) patients. At 12 months after transplantation 'protective' immunity (≥0.4 CD4+ and CD8+ HCMV-specific T cells/μL blood) was achieved in 115/129 (89%) patients. During the entire study period, 122 patients reconstituting HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell immunity at 60 days posttransplant onward were able to control HCMV infection, except for one patient who developed HCMV disease because of a rejection episode. Patients reconstituting HCMV-specific CD8+ only did not control HCMV infection. In conclusion, the presence of both HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells ≥ 0.4/μL blood appears to be protective against HCMV disease. This result does not apply to patients undergoing antirejection treatment, or reconstituting HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells only.

Inconsistent responses of cytomegalovirus-specific T cells to pp65 and IE-1 versus infected dendritic cells in organ transplant recipients

CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells specific for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and two immunodominant HCMV antigens (pp65 and IE-1) were monitored in 20 solid organ transplant recipients undergoing primary (n = 4) or reactivated (n = 16) HCMV infection during the first year after transplantation by using as a stimulator either HCMV-infected autologous dendritic cells (DCs) or pp65- or IE-1 peptide mixtures. Turnaround times for test performance were 7 days for infected DCs and 24 h for peptides. Using infected DCs, HCMV-specific T-cell restoration occurred in all patients for CD8(+) and in 18/20 (90%) for CD4(+) T-cell subpopulations, resulting in virus clearance from blood. Using peptide mixtures, T-cell responses were less frequently detected. In detail, 14 (70%) patients showed pp65-specific CD8(+) T cells and 10 (50%) patients IE-1-specific CD8(+) T cells, whereas pp65-specific CD4(+) T cells were detected in 14 (70%) patients, and IE-1-specific CD4(+) T cells in three (15%) patients only. Protection from HCMV infection was associated with the presence of a HCMV-specific T-cell response directed against multiple viral proteins, but not against pp65 or IE-1 only. In conclusion, the use of pp65 and IE-1 peptide mixtures for rapid monitoring of HCMV-specific T-cell responses in solid organ transplant recipients underestimates the actual T-cell immune response against HCMV.