Association between early cumulative fluid balance and successful liberation from invasive ventilation in COVID-19 ARDS patients — insights from the PRoVENT-COVID study: a national, multicenter, observational cohort analysis

Background

Increasing evidence indicates the potential benefits of restricted fluid management in critically ill patients. Evidence lacks on the optimal fluid management strategy for invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients. We hypothesized that the cumulative fluid balance would affect the successful liberation of invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Methods

We analyzed data from the multicenter observational ‘PRactice of VENTilation in COVID-19 patients’ study. Patients with confirmed COVID-19 and ARDS who required invasive ventilation during the first 3 months of the international outbreak (March 1, 2020, to June 2020) across 22 hospitals in the Netherlands were included. The primary outcome was successful liberation of invasive ventilation, modeled as a function of day 3 cumulative fluid balance using Cox proportional hazards models, using the crude and the adjusted association. Sensitivity analyses without missing data and modeling ARDS severity were performed.

Results

Among 650 patients, three groups were identified. Patients in the higher, intermediate, and lower groups had a median cumulative fluid balance of 1.98 L (1.27–7.72 L), 0.78 L (0.26–1.27 L), and − 0.35 L (− 6.52–0.26 L), respectively. Higher day 3 cumulative fluid balance was significantly associated with a lower probability of successful ventilation liberation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.77–0.95, P = 0.0047). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results.

Conclusions

In a cohort of invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 and ARDS, a higher cumulative fluid balance was associated with a longer ventilation duration, indicating that restricted fluid management in these patients may be beneficial.

Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04346342); Date of registration: April 15, 2020.

Graphical abstract

Exhaled Breath Profiles Before, During and After Exacerbation of COPD: A Prospective Follow-Up Study

Many patients with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) experience exacerbations. The diagnosis of an exacerbation is solely based on symptoms. We hypothesized that exhaled breath profiles, measured by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) or electronic nose (eNose), are different between stable disease and exacerbations and may have the potential to serve as biomarkers for COPD exacerbations. In this prospective follow-up study, breath samples were taken during stable COPD, during a subsequent exacerbation and after recovery. Samples were analyzed by GC-MS and eNose. CCQ symptom scores were associated with univariate outcomes of GC-MS and eNose using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). After multivariate modeling by Principal Component Analysis (PCA), paired student t-tests were performed. Sixty-eight patients were included, 31 had an exacerbation and 16 patients had breath sampled at all three time points. Significant differences were found in breathprints taken during exacerbation as compared to baseline and recovery for both GC-MS and eNose. Breath profiles obtained by GC-MS as well as by eNose showed a correct classification of 71% (10/14) for baseline vs exacerbation and of 78% (11/14) for exacerbation vs recovery. These results provide proof of principle that exhaled breath can serve as a noninvasive biomarker for the diagnosis of COPD exacerbations.