1
|
Gately L, Mesía C, Sepúlveda JM, Del Barco S, Pineda E, Gironés R, Fuster J, Hong W, Dumas M, Gill S, Navarro LM, Herrero A, Dowling A, de Las Peñas R, Vaz MA, Alonso M, Lwin Z, Harrup R, Peralta S, Long A, Perez-Segura P, Ahern E, Garate CO, Wong M, Campbell R, Cuff K, Jennens R, Gallego O, Underhill C, Martinez-Garcia M, Covela M, Cooper A, Brown S, Rosenthal M, Torres J, Collins IM, Gibbs P, Balana C. Correction to: A combined analysis of two prospective randomised studies exploring the impact of extended post-radiation temozolomide on survival outcomes in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2024; 166:417-418. [PMID: 38289531 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04581-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- L Gately
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - C Mesía
- Medical Oncology Service, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Sepúlveda
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Del Barco
- Medical Oncology Service, Institut Català d'Oncologia Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - E Pineda
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Gironés
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - J Fuster
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - W Hong
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - M Dumas
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S Gill
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - L M Navarro
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - A Herrero
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - A Dowling
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - R de Las Peñas
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
| | - M A Vaz
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Alonso
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain
| | - Z Lwin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - R Harrup
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - S Peralta
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain
| | - A Long
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - P Perez-Segura
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Ahern
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - C O Garate
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - M Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - R Campbell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC, Australia
| | - K Cuff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - R Jennens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Epworth Health, Richmond, VIC, Australia
| | - O Gallego
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Underhill
- Department of Medical Oncology, Border Medical Oncology, East Albury, NSW, Australia
| | | | - M Covela
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain
| | - A Cooper
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - S Brown
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - M Rosenthal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - J Torres
- Department of Medical Oncology, Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, VIC, Australia
| | - I M Collins
- Department of Medical Oncology, South West Regional Cancer Centre, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - P Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - C Balana
- Medical Oncology Service, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Badalona, Spain
- Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Institut Investigació Germans Trias I Pujol (IGTP), Badalona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gately L, Mesía C, Sepúlveda JM, Del Barco S, Pineda E, Gironés R, Fuster J, Hong W, Dumas M, Gill S, Navarro LM, Herrero A, Dowling A, de Las Peñas R, Vaz MA, Alonso M, Lwin Z, Harrup R, Peralta S, Long A, Perez-Segura P, Ahern E, Garate CO, Wong M, Campbell R, Cuff K, Jennens R, Gallego O, Underhill C, Martinez-Garcia M, Covela M, Cooper A, Brown S, Rosenthal M, Torres J, Collins IM, Gibbs P, Balana C. A combined analysis of two prospective randomised studies exploring the impact of extended post-radiation temozolomide on survival outcomes in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2024; 166:407-415. [PMID: 38153582 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04513-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal duration of post-radiation temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma remains unclear, with no published phase III randomised trials. Standard-of-care stipulates 6 months. However, in routine care, it is often extended to 12 months, despite lacking robust supporting data. METHODS GEINO14-01 (Spain) and EX-TEM (Australia) studies enrolled glioblastoma patients without progression at the end of 6 months post-radiation temozolomide. Participants were randomised 1:1 to six additional months of temozolomide or observation. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression free survival from date of randomisation (6mPFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. 204 patients were required to detect an improvement in 6mPFS from 50 to 60% (80% power). Neither study recruited sufficient patients. We performed a combined analysis of individual patient data. RESULTS 205 patients were recruited: 159 in GEINO14-01 (2014-2018) and 46 in EX-TEM (2019-2022). Median follow-up was 20.0 and 14.5 months. Baseline characteristics were balanced. There was no significant improvement in 6mPFS (57.2% vs 64.0%, OR0.75, p = 0.4), nor across any subgroups, including MGMT methylated; PFS (HR0.92, p = 0.59, median 7.8 vs 9.7 months); or OS (HR1.03, p = 0.87, median 20.1 vs 19.4 months). During treatment extension, 64% experienced any grade adverse event, mainly fatigue and gastrointestinal (both 54%). Only a minority required treatment changes: 4.5% dose delay, 7.5% dose reduction, 1.5% temozolomide discontinuation. CONCLUSION For glioblastoma patients, extending post-radiation temozolomide from 6 to 12 months is well tolerated but does not improve 6mPFS. We could not identify any subset that benefitted from extended treatment. Six months should remain standard-of-care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Gately
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - C Mesía
- Medical Oncology Service, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Sepúlveda
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Del Barco
- Medical Oncology Service, Institut Català d'Oncologia Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - E Pineda
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Gironés
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - J Fuster
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - W Hong
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - M Dumas
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S Gill
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - L M Navarro
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - A Herrero
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - A Dowling
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - R de Las Peñas
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
| | - M A Vaz
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Alonso
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain
| | - Z Lwin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - R Harrup
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - S Peralta
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain
| | - A Long
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - P Perez-Segura
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Ahern
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - C O Garate
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - M Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - R Campbell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC, Australia
| | - K Cuff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - R Jennens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Epworth Health, Richmond, VIC, Australia
| | - O Gallego
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Underhill
- Department of Medical Oncology, Border Medical Oncology, East Albury, NSW, Australia
| | | | - M Covela
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain
| | - A Cooper
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - S Brown
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - M Rosenthal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - J Torres
- Department of Medical Oncology, Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, VIC, Australia
| | - I M Collins
- Department of Medical Oncology, South West Regional Cancer Centre, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - P Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - C Balana
- Medical Oncology Service, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Badalona, Spain
- Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Institut Investigació Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Badalona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhong Y, Anton A, Xie O, Tan N, Maleki S, Parente P, Spain L, Gibbs P, Tran B. 160MO Concomitant medication (conmed) interactions with novel hormonal agents (NHAs) in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
|
4
|
Tie J, Cohen J, Lahouel K, Lo S, Wang Y, Wong R, Shapiro J, Harris S, Khattak A, Burge M, Horvath L, Karapetis C, Shannon J, Singh M, Yip D, Papadopoulos N, Tomasetti C, Kinzler K, Vogelstein B, Gibbs P. 318MO Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) dynamics, CEA and sites of recurrence for the randomised DYNAMIC study: Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) guided by ctDNA analysis in stage II colon cancer (CC). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
5
|
McKenzie J, Kosmider S, Wong R, To Y, Shapiro J, Dunn C, Burge M, Hong W, Caird S, Lim S, Wong H, Lee B, Gibbs P, Wong V. P-187 Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi) in patients with left-side, RAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer: Clinician use and outcomes for patients. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
6
|
Jalali A, Gard G, Banks S, Dunn C, Wong HL, Wong R, Lee M, Gately L, Loft M, Shapiro JD, Kosmider S, Tie J, Ananda S, Yeung JM, Jennens R, Lee B, McKendrick J, Lim L, Khattak A, Gibbs P. Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with Chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 2021; 46:100793. [PMID: 34565601 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2021.100793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in a real-world population from Victoria, Australia. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was undertaken. The characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving TAS-102 were assessed and compared to those enrolled in the registration study (RECOURSE). Across 13 sites, 107 patients were treated with TAS-102. The median age was 60 years (range: 31-83), compared to 63 for RECOURSE. Comparing registry TAS-102-treated and RECOURSE patients, 75% vs 100% were ECOG performance status 0-1, 74% vs 79% had initiated treatment more than 18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease and 36% vs 49% were RAS wild-type. Median time on treatment was 10.4 weeks (range: 1.7-32). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months compared to 2 months in RECOURSE, while median overall survival was the same at 7.1 months. Two patients (2.3%) had febrile neutropenia and there were no treatment-related deaths, where TAS-102 dose at treatment initiation was at clinician discretion.TRACC registry patients treated with TAS-102 were younger than those from the RECOURSE trial, with similar overall survival observed. Less strict application of RECIST criteria and less frequent imaging may have contributed to an apparently longer PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Jalali
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Latrobe Regional Hospital, VIC, Australia.
| | - G Gard
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia
| | - S Banks
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia
| | - C Dunn
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia
| | - H L Wong
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia
| | - R Wong
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, VIC, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, VIC, Australia
| | - M Lee
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, VIC, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, VIC, Australia
| | - L Gately
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia
| | - M Loft
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia
| | - J D Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cabrini Hospital, VIC, Australia
| | - S Kosmider
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, VIC, Australia
| | - J Tie
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia
| | - S Ananda
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Epworth Health, VIC, Australia
| | - J M Yeung
- Department of Surgery, Western Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Western Health Chronic Disease Alliance, Western Health, VIC, Australia
| | - R Jennens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Epworth Health, VIC, Australia
| | - B Lee
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Health, VIC, Australia
| | - J McKendrick
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Epworth Health, VIC, Australia
| | - L Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, VIC, Australia
| | - A Khattak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, WA, Australia
| | - P Gibbs
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
André T, Shiu K, Kim T, Jensen B, Jensen L, Punt C, Smith D, Garcia-Carbonero R, Alcaide García J, Gibbs P, De la Fouchardière C, Rivera Herrero F, Elez E, Bendell J, Le D, Yoshino T, Zhong W, Fogelman D, Marinello P, Diaz L. O-8 Final overall survival for the phase 3 KN177 study: Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
8
|
Filho JA, Murciano-Goroff Y, Gibbs P, Perez-Johnston R, Lai W, Rudin C, Li B, Ginsberg M. P47.06 Delta-Radiomics Features for Assessment of Individualized Therapeutic Response in Small Cell Lung Cancer – A Pilot Study. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.01.862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
9
|
Yoshino T, Kim T, Yong W, Shiu KK, Jensen BV, Jensen LH, Smith D, Garcia-Carbonero R, Alcaide-Garcia J, Gibbs P, Fouchardiere CDL, Rivera F, Elez E, Bendell J, Le D, Yang P, Farooqui M, Marinello P, Diaz L, Andre T. 112P Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
10
|
Evans N, Anton A, Wong R, Lok S, De Boer R, Malik L, Greenberg S, Yeo B, Nott L, Richardson G, Collins I, Torres J, Barnett F, Gibbs P, Devitt B. 51P Real world outcomes in elderly women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
11
|
Jensen A, Karunaratna N, Wong S, Shapiro J, Weickhardt A, Spain L, Azad A, Kwan E, Muthusamy A, Torres J, Parente P, Francis P, Parnis F, Goh J, Gibbs P, Tran B, Anton A. 226P Use of PSMA PET in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
12
|
Conduit C, Boer RH, Lok S, Gibbs P, Malik L, Loh Z, Yeo B, Greenberg S, Devitt B, Lombard J, Nottage M, Collins I, Torres J, Nolan M, Nott L. Real‐world impact of anti‐HER2 therapy‐related cardiotoxicity in patients with advanced HER2‐positive breast cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2020; 16:356-362. [DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C. Conduit
- Medical Oncology Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Australia
- Medical Oncology Royal Hobart Hospital Hobart Australia
| | - R. H Boer
- Medical Oncology Western Health Melbourne Australia
| | - S. Lok
- Medical Oncology Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Australia
| | - P. Gibbs
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research andMedical Oncology Melbourne Health Melbourne Australia
| | - L. Malik
- Medical Oncology Canberra Hospital Canberra Australia
| | - Z. Loh
- Medical Oncology Austin Health Melbourne Australia
| | - B. Yeo
- Medical Oncology Austin Health Melbourne Australia
- Medical Oncology Olivia Newton‐John Cancer Research Institute Melbourne Australia
| | - S. Greenberg
- Medical Oncology Western Health Melbourne Australia
| | - B. Devitt
- Medical Oncology Eastern Health Clinical School Melbourne Australia
| | - J. Lombard
- Medical Oncology Calvary Mater Newcastle Australia
| | - M. Nottage
- Medical Oncology Royal Brisbane Hospital Brisbane Australia
| | - I. Collins
- Deakin University Geelong Australia
- Medical Oncology South West Healthcare Warrnambool Australia
| | - J. Torres
- Medical Oncology Goulburn Valley Health Shepparton Australia
| | - M. Nolan
- Cardiology Western Health Melbourne Australia
| | - L. Nott
- Medical Oncology Royal Hobart Hospital Hobart Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nekolla K, Brieu N, Gavriel C, Widmaier M, Budco A, Medrikova D, Kanchev I, Testori M, Chan J, Dundee P, Anderson P, Lawrentschuk N, Wong LM, Phan P, Gibbs P, Harrison D, Baehner M, Caie P, Tran B, Schmidt G. Prognostic immunoprofiling of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients in a multicentre setting. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz239.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
14
|
Min ST, Roohullah A, Tognela A, Jalali A, Lee M, Wong R, Shapiro J, Burge M, Yip D, Nott L, Zimet A, Lee B, Dean A, Steel S, Wong HL, Gibbs P, Lim SHS. Patient demographics and management landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting: Real-world data in an Australian population. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz246.134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
15
|
Lee B, Lipton L, Cohen J, Tie J, Javed AA, Li L, Goldstein D, Burge M, Cooray P, Nagrial A, Tebbutt NC, Thomson B, Nikfarjam M, Harris M, Haydon A, Lawrence B, Tai DWM, Simons K, Lennon AM, Wolfgang CL, Tomasetti C, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Gibbs P. Circulating tumor DNA as a potential marker of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit following surgery for localized pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1472-1478. [PMID: 31250894 PMCID: PMC6771221 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In early-stage pancreatic cancer, there are currently no biomarkers to guide selection of therapeutic options. This prospective biomarker trial evaluated the feasibility and potential clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis to inform adjuvant therapy decision making. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients considered by the multidisciplinary team to have resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Pre- and post-operative samples for ctDNA analysis were collected. PCR-based-SafeSeqS assays were used to identify mutations at codon 12, 13 and 61 of KRAS in the primary pancreatic tumor and to detect ctDNA. Results of ctDNA analysis were correlated with CA19-9, recurrence-free and overall survival (OS). Patient management was per standard of care, blinded to ctDNA data. RESULTS Of 112 patients consented pre-operatively, 81 (72%) underwent resection. KRAS mutations were identified in 91% (38/42) of available tumor samples. Of available plasma samples (N = 42), KRAS mutated ctDNA was detected in 62% (23/37) pre-operative and 37% (13/35) post-operative cases. At a median follow-up of 38.4 months, ctDNA detection in the pre-operative setting was associated with inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS) [hazard ratio (HR) 4.1; P = 0.002)] and OS (HR 4.1; P = 0.015). Detectable ctDNA following curative intent resection was associated with inferior RFS (HR 5.4; P < 0.0001) and OS (HR 4.0; P = 0.003). Recurrence occurred in 13/13 (100%) patients with detectable ctDNA post-operatively, including in seven that received gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION ctDNA studies in localized pancreatic cancer are challenging, with a substantial number of patients not able to undergo resection, not having sufficient tumor tissue for analysis or not completing per protocol sample collection. ctDNA analysis, pre- and/or post-surgery, is a promising prognostic marker. Studies of ctDNA guided therapy are justified, including of treatment intensification strategies for patients with detectable ctDNA post-operatively who appear at very high risk of recurrence despite gemcitabine-based adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Lee
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
| | - L Lipton
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Australia
| | - J Cohen
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - J Tie
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne
| | - A A Javed
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - L Li
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - D Goldstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick
| | - M Burge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane
| | - P Cooray
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Melbourne
| | - A Nagrial
- Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Westmead
| | - N C Tebbutt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Melbourne
| | - B Thomson
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne
| | - M Nikfarjam
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Melbourne
| | - M Harris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton
| | - A Haydon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - B Lawrence
- Department of Medical Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - D W M Tai
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
| | - K Simons
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Centre for Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A M Lennon
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - C L Wolfgang
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - C Tomasetti
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore; Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - N Papadopoulos
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - K W Kinzler
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - B Vogelstein
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - P Gibbs
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Garlipp B, Gibbs P, Van Hazel GA, Jeyarajah R, Martin RCG, Bruns CJ, Lang H, Manas DM, Ettorre GM, Pardo F, Donckier V, Benckert C, van Gulik TM, Goéré D, Schoen M, Pratschke J, Bechstein WO, de la Cuesta AM, Adeyemi S, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Secondary technical resectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases after chemotherapy with or without selective internal radiotherapy in the randomized SIRFLOX trial. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1837-1846. [PMID: 31424576 PMCID: PMC6899564 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Secondary resection of initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) can prolong survival. The added value of selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) to downsize lesions for resection is not known. This study evaluated the change in technical resectability of CRLM with the addition of SIRT to FOLFOX‐based chemotherapy. Methods Baseline and follow‐up hepatic imaging of patients who received modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX6: fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (control arm) versus mFOLFOX6 (with or without bevacizumab) plus SIRT using yttrium‐90 resin microspheres (SIRT arm) in the phase III SIRFLOX trial were reviewed by three or five (of 14) expert hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons for resectability. Reviewers were blinded to one another, treatment assignment, extrahepatic disease status, and information on clinical and scanning time points. Technical resectability was defined as at least 60 per cent of reviewers (3 of 5, or 2 of 3) assessing a patient's liver metastases as surgically removable. Results Some 472 patients were evaluable (SIRT, 244; control, 228). There was no significant baseline difference in the proportion of technically resectable liver metastases between SIRT (29, 11·9 per cent) and control (25, 11·0 per cent) arms (P = 0·775). At follow‐up, significantly more patients in both arms were deemed technically resectable compared with baseline: 159 of 472 (33·7 per cent) versus 54 of 472 (11·4 per cent) respectively (P = 0·001). More patients were resectable in the SIRT than in the control arm: 93 of 244 (38·1 per cent) versus 66 of 228 (28·9 per cent) respectively (P < 0·001). Conclusion Adding SIRT to chemotherapy may improve the resectability of unresectable CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Garlipp
- Otto-von-Guericke-University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - P Gibbs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - G A Van Hazel
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - R Jeyarajah
- Methodist Richardson Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - R C G Martin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - C J Bruns
- University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - H Lang
- General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - D M Manas
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | | | - F Pardo
- Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - V Donckier
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Benckert
- Vivantes Klinikum Am Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - D Goéré
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - M Schoen
- Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - J Pratschke
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - W O Bechstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - S Adeyemi
- Statsxperts Consulting Limited, Hemel Hempstead, UK
| | - J Ricke
- Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie, Magdeburg, Germany.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - M Seidensticker
- Otto-von-Guericke-University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.,Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie, Magdeburg, Germany.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sud S, O'Callaghan C, Jonker C, Karapetis C, Price T, Tebbutt N, Shapiro J, Van Hazel G, Pavlakis N, Gibbs P, Jeffrey M, Siu L, Gill S, Wong R, Jonker D, Tu D, Goodwin R. Hypertension as a predictor of advanced colorectal cancer outcome and cetuximab treatment response. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 25:e516-e526. [PMID: 30607118 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.4069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Adrenergic receptor stimulation is involved in the development of hypertension (htn) and has been implicated in cancer progression and dissemination of metastases in various tumours, including colon cancer. Adrenergic antagonists such as beta-blockers (bbs) demonstrate inhibition of invasion and migration in colon cancer cell lines and have been associated with decreased mortality in colorectal cancer (crc). We examined the association of baseline htn and bb use with overall (os) and progression-free survival (pfs) in patients with pretreated, chemotherapy refractory, metastatic crc (mcrc). We also examined baseline htn as a predictor of cetuximab efficacy. Methods Using data from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group co.17 study [cetuximab vs. best supportive care (bsc)], we coded baseline htn and use of anti-htn medications, including bbs, for 572 patients. The chi-square test was used to assess the associations between those variables and baseline characteristics. Cox regression models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses of os and pfs by htn diagnosis and bb use. Results Baseline htn, bb use, and anti-htn medication use were not found to be prognostic for improved os. Baseline htn and bb use were not significant predictors of cetuximab benefit. Conclusions In chemorefractory mcrc, neither baseline htn nor bb use is a significant prognostic factor. Baseline htn and bb use are not predictive of cetuximab benefit. Further investigation to determine whether baseline htn or bb use have a similarly insignificant impact on prognosis in patients receiving earlier lines of treatment remains warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Sud
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - C O'Callaghan
- ncic Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| | - C Jonker
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - C Karapetis
- Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Bedford Park, SA
| | - T Price
- The Queen Elizabeth and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA
| | | | - J Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
| | | | - N Pavlakis
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St. Leonards, NSW
| | - P Gibbs
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - M Jeffrey
- Oncology Service, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, N.Z
| | - L Siu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - S Gill
- University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - R Wong
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - D Jonker
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - D Tu
- ncic Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| | - R Goodwin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jalali A, Lee M, Semira C, Banks S, Wong HL, Ananda S, Lipton L, Shapiro J, Cooray P, Clarke K, Burge M, Wong R, Shapiro J, McLachlan SA, Harris M, Croagh D, Tebbutt N, Gibbs P, Lee B. Use of folfirinox chemotherapy in an Australasian population of pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy432.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
19
|
Anton A, Wong S, Parente P, Azad A, Shapiro J, Weickhardt A, Torres J, Parnis F, Goh J, Semira C, Gibbs P, Tran B, Pezaro C. Examining skeletal-related events in Australian men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy434.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
20
|
Jorissen R, Faragher I, Jones I, Gibbs P, Sieber O. PO-065 Assessment of prognostic models for stage II/III colon cancer: a hospital-based prospective cohort study. ESMO Open 2018. [DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-eacr25.595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
21
|
Jones NE, Burnett CA, Salamon S, Landers J, Wende H, Lazzarini L, Gibbs P, Pickles M, Johnson BRG, Evans DJ, Archibald SJ, Francesconi MG. Fluoride doped γ-Fe2O3nanoparticles with increased MRI relaxivity. J Mater Chem B 2018; 6:3665-3673. [DOI: 10.1039/c8tb00360b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Fluoride doping in γ-Fe2O3nanoparticles induces large increases in magnetic anisotropy and relaxivities,r1andr2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. E. Jones
- School of Mathematics and Physical Sciences-Chemistry, University of Hull
- Hull
- UK
| | - C. A. Burnett
- Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill
- Coventry
- UK
| | - S. Salamon
- Faculty of Physics and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CENIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen
- 47057 Duisburg
- Germany
| | - J. Landers
- Faculty of Physics and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CENIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen
- 47057 Duisburg
- Germany
| | - H. Wende
- Faculty of Physics and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CENIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen
- 47057 Duisburg
- Germany
| | - L. Lazzarini
- IMEM-CNR Parco Area delle Scienze 37/A
- 43124 Parma
- Italy
| | - P. Gibbs
- Centre for MR Investigation, University of Hull, Royal Infirmary
- Hull HU3 2JZ
- UK
| | - M. Pickles
- Centre for MR Investigation, University of Hull, Royal Infirmary
- Hull HU3 2JZ
- UK
| | - B. R. G. Johnson
- School of Physics & Astronomy, E C Stoner Building, University of Leeds
- Leeds
- UK
| | - D. J. Evans
- School of Mathematics and Physical Sciences-Chemistry, University of Hull
- Hull
- UK
| | - S. J. Archibald
- School of Mathematics and Physical Sciences-Chemistry, University of Hull
- Hull
- UK
- Positron Emission Tomography Research Centre, University of Hull
- Hull
| | - M. G. Francesconi
- School of Mathematics and Physical Sciences-Chemistry, University of Hull
- Hull
- UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wasan H, van Hazel G, Heinemann V, Sharma N, Taieb J, Ricke J, Peeters M, Findlay M, Virdee P, Love S, Moschandreas J, Dutton P, Gebski V, Gray A, Sharma R, Gibbs P. Overall survival in the FOXFIRE-SIRFLOX-FOXFIRE global prospective randomized studies of first-line SIRT in patients with mCRC. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx659.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
23
|
Gray A, Wolstenholme J, Fusco F, Chau I, Dunham L, Love S, Roberts A, Moschandreas J, Virdee P, Lewington V, Wilson G, Tait P, Khan N, Berry D, Wotherspoon A, Morgan B, Wasan H, Van Hazel G, Gibbs P, Sharma R. Quality of life in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with first-line selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT): Results from the FOXFIRE prospective randomized studies. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx393.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
24
|
Wasan H, Sharma R, Heinemann V, Sharma N, Taieb J, Ricke J, Peeters M, Findlay M, Virdee P, Love S, Moschandreas J, Dutton P, Gebski V, Gray A, Price D, Bower G, Montazeri A, Gibbs P, Van Hazel G. FOXFIRE-SIRFLOX-FOXFIRE global prospective randomised studies of first-line selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: KRAS mutation and tumour site analysis. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx440.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
25
|
Rohr UP, Herrmann P, Ilm K, Zhang H, Lohmann S, Reiser A, Muranyi A, Smith J, Burock S, Osterland M, Leith K, Singh S, Brunhoeber P, Bowermaster R, Tie J, Christie M, Wong HL, Waring P, Shanmugam K, Gibbs P, Stein U. Prognostic value of MACC1 and proficient mismatch repair status for recurrence risk prediction in stage II colon cancer patients: the BIOGRID studies. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:1869-1875. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
|
26
|
Day D, Kanjanapan Y, Kwan E, Yip D, Lawrentschuk N, Davis ID, Azad AA, Wong S, Rosenthal M, Gibbs P, Tran B. Benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy and the prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Intern Med J 2016; 46:1291-1297. [DOI: 10.1111/imj.13202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 07/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- D. Day
- Department of Medical Oncology; The Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Y. Kanjanapan
- Department of Medical Oncology; The Canberra Hospital; Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
| | - E. Kwan
- Department of Medical Oncology; The Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - D. Yip
- Department of Medical Oncology; The Canberra Hospital; Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
| | - N. Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology; Austin Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - I. D. Davis
- Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - A. A. Azad
- Department of Medical Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - M. Rosenthal
- Department of Medical Oncology; The Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - P. Gibbs
- Department of Medical Oncology; The Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Biogrid Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - B. Tran
- Department of Medical Oncology; The Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Biogrid Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vaz-Velho M, Duarte G, Gibbs P. Note. Occurrence of Listeria spp. in salmon-trout (Onchorhyncus mykiss) and salmon (Salmo salar) / Nota. Presencia de Listeria spp. en trucha asalmonada (Onchorhyncus mykiss) y salmón (Salmo salar). FOOD SCI TECHNOL INT 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/108201329800400207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Salmon-trout ( Onchorhyncus mykiss) and salmon ( Salmo salar) are the main raw materials in the cold-smoked fish industry. It is important to prevent the contamination of these ready-to-eat products with Listeria monocytogenes and other ( Listeria spp.) because the temperature used in the cold-smoking process is not sufficient to inactivate these organisms. The presence of Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes in the cold-smoked salmon and salmon-trout processing chains of three Portuguese factories examined was already confirmed in previous studies. Thus, it was important to ascertain the possible sources of contamination, the raw material being the most important one. All the Portuguese cold-smoking fish factories use fresh salmon-trout from two trout farms in the north of Portugal and Norwegian salmon which arrives by lorry every week under refrigeration, imported always by the same company; 88 samples of salmon and salmon-trout were analysed; 67 environmental samples from the two trout farms were also examined. The overall frequency ( n = 40) of Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes in salmon was 12 and 0% respectively. The overall frequency (n = 48) of Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes in salmon-trout was 6.3 and 2.1% respec tively. Listeria was not found in the environmental samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Vaz-Velho
- Escola Superior de Tecnología e Gestão. Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo. Portugal, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa-Porto. Portugal
| | - G. Duarte
- Escola Superior de Biotecnologia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa-Porto. Portugal
| | - P. Gibbs
- Leatherhead Food Research Association, Surrey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kirby R, da Silva M, Capell C, Vaz-Pires P, Gibbs P, Davies A, Jehanno D, Thuault D, Nychas G, Luten J. Note. Reaction of Bacteria Associated with Fish Spoilage to Chemical and Physical Stress. FOOD SCI TECHNOL INT 2016. [DOI: 10.1106/xbyd-ldnf-8ngy-44hg] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
A cocktail made up of six bacteria isolated from fish was subjected to various heats (30 °C and 60 °C, 20 s) and chemical preservative stresses, alone and in combination. The chemical preservatives tested were potassium sorbate (PS, 1%), trisodium phosphate (TSP, 10%) and tetrasodium pyrophosphate (TSPP, 3%). Heating the bacteria at 60 °C for 20 s resulted in an average reduction of 2.0 log cfu/mL in the total number. The results showed amarked synergistic effect of heat treatment prior to chemical additives, especially for TSPP and sorbate; no significant effect was evident when chemicals were applied alone. The effect was increased by the application of chemical preservatives, before heating, in the decreasing order TSP, TSPP and sorbate; reductions obtained were more than 5.0, 4.0 and 3.0 log cfu/mL, respectively. The synergistic effect observed was dependent on the type of chemical additives used and also on the order of the treatments. Bacteria identified as Shewanella putrefaciens and Pseudomonas putida were more resistant to heat treatment and Brochothrix thermosphacta and Lactobacillus plantarum were more resistant to TSP treatment. These bacteria in the cocktail showed high sensitivity to combined TSP/heat treatment; bacterial cells identified as Enterobacter spp. were the most resistant to this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - C. Capell
- Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200 Porto, Portugal
| | - P. Vaz-Pires
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, 2, 4099-003 Porto, Portugal
| | | | - A. Davies
- Leatherhead Food Research Association, LFRA, UK
| | | | - D. Thuault
- Centre de Recherche et de Développement Agro-Alimentaire, Adria, France
| | - G. Nychas
- Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Itap, Greece
| | - J. Luten
- Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research, Rivo DLO, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Heinemann V, van Hazel G, Sharma N, Findlay M, Ricke J, Peeters M, Gebski V, Van Buskirk M, Gibbs P. O-014 Evaluation of depth of response within a volumetric model in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the SIRFLOX study. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw198.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
30
|
van Hazel G, Heinemann V, Sharma N, Findlay M, Ricke J, Peeters M, Gebski V, Van Buskirk M, Gibbs P. P-063 Effect of age on treatment effect and tolerability of SIRT when added to mFOLFOX chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) – results from the SIRFLOX study. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw199.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
31
|
Moeslein F, Heinemann V, Sharma N, Findlay M, Ricke J, Dowling R, Price D, Gebski V, van Buskirk M, Gibbs P, van Hazel G. SIRFLOX: Differences in site of first progression between mFOLFOX6 ± bevacizumab (bev) versus mFOLFOX6 ± bev + selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in first-line patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
32
|
Ananda S, Wong H, Faragher I, Jones IT, Steele M, Kosmider S, Desai J, Tie J, Field K, Wong R, Tran B, Bae S, Gibbs P. Survival impact of the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Intern Med J 2016; 46:166-71. [DOI: 10.1111/imj.12916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2015] [Revised: 09/13/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Ananda
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - H. Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Research; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute,; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - I. Faragher
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - I. T. Jones
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - M. Steele
- Department of Surgery; Eastern Health- Box Hill Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. Kosmider
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - J. Desai
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Research; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute,; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - J. Tie
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Research; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute,; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - K. Field
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - R. Wong
- Department of Surgery; Eastern Health- Box Hill Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - B. Tran
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Research; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute,; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. Bae
- Research; BioGrid Australia; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - P. Gibbs
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Research; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute,; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Research; BioGrid Australia; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gibbs P, Tie J, Ghosh P, Muranyi A, Brunhoeber P, Singh S, LaFluer B, Xu C, Leith K, Tran B, Desai J, Martinez R, Goel A, Waring P, Hu S, Teichgraeber V, Rohr U, Ridder R, Shanmugam K. 2160 GIV as a novel marker of recurrence risk in MMR proficient stage II colon cancer. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31081-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
34
|
van Hazel G, Heinemann V, Sharma N, Findlay M, Ricke J, Peeters M, Perez D, Robinson B, Strickland A, Ferguson T, Rodrigez J, Kroening H, Wolf I, Ganju V, Walpole E, Boucher E, Tichler T, Gebski V, Van Buskirk M, Gibbs P. O-019 SIRFLOX: Randomized trial comparing first-line mFOLFOX6 ± bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 + selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) ± bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) – analysis by presence or absence of extra-hepatic metastases and bevacizumab treatment. Ann Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv235.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
35
|
Tie J, Kinde I, Wang Y, Wong HL, Roebert J, Christie M, Tacey M, Wong R, Singh M, Karapetis CS, Desai J, Tran B, Strausberg RL, Diaz LA, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Gibbs P. Circulating tumor DNA as an early marker of therapeutic response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:1715-22. [PMID: 25851626 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 459] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 03/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early indicators of treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) could conceivably be used to optimize treatment. We explored early changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels as a marker of therapeutic efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This prospective study involved 53 mCRC patients receiving standard first-line chemotherapy. Both ctDNA and CEA were assessed in plasma collected before treatment, 3 days after treatment and before cycle 2. Computed tomography (CT) scans were carried out at baseline and 8-10 weeks and were centrally assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria. Tumors were sequenced using a panel of 15 genes frequently mutated in mCRC to identify candidate mutations for ctDNA analysis. For each patient, one tumor mutation was selected to assess the presence and the level of ctDNA in plasma samples using a digital genomic assay termed Safe-SeqS. RESULTS Candidate mutations for ctDNA analysis were identified in 52 (98.1%) of the tumors. These patient-specific candidate tissue mutations were detectable in the cell-free DNA from the plasma of 48 of these 52 patients (concordance 92.3%). Significant reductions in ctDNA (median 5.7-fold; P < 0.001) levels were observed before cycle 2, which correlated with CT responses at 8-10 weeks (odds ratio = 5.25 with a 10-fold ctDNA reduction; P = 0.016). Major reductions (≥10-fold) versus lesser reductions in ctDNA precycle 2 were associated with a trend for increased progression-free survival (median 14.7 versus 8.1 months; HR = 1.87; P = 0.266). CONCLUSIONS ctDNA is detectable in a high proportion of treatment naïve mCRC patients. Early changes in ctDNA during first-line chemotherapy predict the later radiologic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Tie
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne Department of Medical Oncology, Western Hospital, Melbourne Department of Medical Oncology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - I Kinde
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - Y Wang
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - H L Wong
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne Department of Medical Oncology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne
| | | | - M Christie
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne Department of Medical Oncology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Tacey
- Melbourne EpiCentre, Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne
| | - R Wong
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne
| | - M Singh
- Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Barwon Health, Geelong
| | - C S Karapetis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - J Desai
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne Department of Medical Oncology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - B Tran
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne Department of Medical Oncology, Western Hospital, Melbourne Department of Medical Oncology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - L A Diaz
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - N Papadopoulos
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - K W Kinzler
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - B Vogelstein
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - P Gibbs
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne Department of Medical Oncology, Western Hospital, Melbourne Department of Medical Oncology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, New York, USA Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Field K, Shapiro J, Wong HL, Tacey M, Nott L, Tran B, Turner N, Ananda S, Richardson G, Jennens R, Wong R, Power J, Burge M, Gibbs P. Treatment and outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia: defining differences between public and private practice. Intern Med J 2015; 45:267-74. [DOI: 10.1111/imj.12643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2014] [Accepted: 11/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K. Field
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - J. Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Faculty of Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - H.-L. Wong
- Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Faculty of Medicine; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - M. Tacey
- Department of Statistics; Melbourne EpiCentre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - L. Nott
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Hobart Hospital; Hobart Australia
| | - B. Tran
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Faculty of Medicine; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - N. Turner
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. Ananda
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - G. Richardson
- Department of Medical Oncology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - R. Jennens
- Department of Medical Oncology; Epworth Health; Hobart Australia
| | - R. Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology; Box Hill Hospital; Hobart Australia
| | - J. Power
- Department of Medical Oncology; Launceston Hospital; Launceston Tasmania Australia
| | - M. Burge
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Brisbane Hospital; Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - P. Gibbs
- Department of Medical Oncology; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Faculty of Medicine; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sammour T, Jones IT, Gibbs P, Chandra R, Steel MC, Shedda SM, Croxford M, Faragher I, Hayes IP, Hastie IA. Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: Analysis of a large prospective clinical database. J Surg Oncol 2015; 111:891-8. [PMID: 25712421 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2014] [Accepted: 01/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery have been shown to be equivalent to those of open surgery, but only in the setting of randomized controlled trials on highly selected patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether this finding is generalizable to real world practice. METHODS Analysis of prospectively collected data from the BioGrid Australia database was undertaken. Overall and cancer specific survival rates were compared with cox regression analysis controlling for the confounders of age, sex, BMI, ASA score, hospital site, year surgery performed, procedure, tumor stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Between 2003 and 2009, 1,106 patients underwent elective colon cancer resection. There were differences between the laparoscopic and open cohorts in BMI, procedure, post-operative complication rate, and tumor stage. When baseline confounders were accounted for using cox regression analysis, there was no difference in 5 year overall survival (χ(2) test 1.302, P = 0.254), or cancer specific survival (χ(2) test 0.028, P = 0.866). CONCLUSION This large prospective clinical study validates previous trial results, and confirms that there is no difference in oncological outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Sammour
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Shah M, Shankar A, Gee I, Nash K, Hoare M, Gibbs P, Davies S, Alexander GJM. A retrospective 15-year review: survival advantage after switching to sirolimus in hepatitis C virus infected liver graft recipients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 41:379-92. [PMID: 25496225 DOI: 10.1111/apt.13049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2014] [Revised: 11/05/2014] [Accepted: 11/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of sirolimus-based immune suppression in liver transplantation, particularly in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients, remains contentious. There is some evidence that sirolimus retards hepatic fibrosis, is renal sparing and may be of benefit in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. Sirolimus has not been adopted by many transplant centres because of persistent concerns regarding an increased risk of hepatic artery thrombosis, graft loss and death with de novo sirolimus. AIM To review the impact of switching to sirolimus monotherapy in HCV-infected liver recipients with respect to survival, graft loss and hepatic fibrosis. METHODS A retrospective review of 190 patients from a single centre undergoing first liver transplantation for HCV over 15 years. 113 patients were switched from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based therapy to low-dose sirolimus monotherapy at a median of 15 months after transplantation for HCV-related fibrosis (72%), renal impairment (14%) or high-risk HCC (5%). RESULTS Patients switched to sirolimus had improved survival (P < 0.001) and slower progression to cirrhosis (P = 0.001). In patients with HCC (n = 91), sirolimus duration rather than strategy was an independent predictor of survival (P = 0.001) and extended time to HCC recurrence (33 vs. 16 months). Patients switched for renal dysfunction showed improvement in serum creatinine (140-108 μmol/L, P = 0.001). Those remaining on CNI-therapy were more likely to develop post-transplant diabetes (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION These data suggest selective switching to low-dose sirolimus monotherapy in HCV-positive liver recipients improves clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Daniel ES, Gibbs P, Guerrieri M, Faragher I. The role of tissue diagnosis prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16:783-7. [PMID: 24786681 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer, with diagnostic work-up routinely including a biopsy confirming invasive carcinoma. For the occasional patient where initial biopsies reveal only dysplasia, or even normal epithelium, repeat biopsy is currently advised, but this may delay therapy and repeat biopsy has potential adverse effects. The study aimed to determine, in the setting of clinical findings and imaging demonstrating locally advanced rectal cancer, whether the absence of a tissue diagnosis prior to commencing chemoradiation compromises patient outcome. METHOD A review was conducted of our database, including comprehensive treatment and outcome details, in which consecutive patients with colorectal cancer have been enrolled since 1997 at a single institution. All records for patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer were reviewed to identify patients for whom treatment was initiated before a tissue diagnosis was obtained, and to assess any consequences of this. RESULTS Of 254 patients who had received neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer, 16 (6.3%) were found to have had neoadjuvant therapy without a tissue diagnosis of invasive cancer. Compared with cases where a tissue diagnosis had been obtained, median age (59 vs 63 years, P = 0.497), sex (75% vs 71.3% male, P = 0.955) and tumour location (56.3% vs 73.5% < 8 cm, P = 0.230) were similar. Of these, 14 (87.5%) had adenocarcinoma identified on histopathology review of the surgical specimen. Three patients were considered to have had complete pathological responses with mucin lakes within the muscularis propria (n = 2) or lymph nodes (n = 1) or fibrosis (n = 3). One of these had no mucin evident and only fibrosis; thus final pathological proof of invasive cancer was present in 15 (93.5%) patients. There were no local recurrences, but three of the 16 (18.8%) cases developed distant recurrence. CONCLUSION For the small number of cases without a confirmatory tissue diagnosis before chemoradiation, no adverse consequences were identified. In particular the initial diagnosis was confirmed in 15 out of 16 cases following pathological examination of the operative specimen. We would suggest that, where clinical and radiological features support a diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer, proceeding directly to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the absence of a biopsy demonstrating invasive cancer may not be unreasonable, particularly where repeat biopsy would delay the commencement of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E S Daniel
- Colorectal Unit, Western Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gibbs P, Ghosh P, Waring P, Lafleur B, Muranyi A, Singh S, Brunhoeber P, Tie J, Tran B, Desai J, Martinez R, Janssen K, Goel A, Hu S, Teichgräber V, Rohr U, Ridder R, Shanmugam K. Giv As a Novel Prognostic Marker in Stage Ii Colon Cancer. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu333.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
41
|
Field K, Wong HL, Shapiro J, Kosmider S, Tie J, Bae S, Yip D, McKendrick J, Nott L, Desai J, Harold M, Lipton L, Stefanou G, Lim L, Parente P, Gibbs P. Developing a national database for metastatic colorectal cancer management: perspectives and challenges. Intern Med J 2014; 43:1224-31. [PMID: 23834128 DOI: 10.1111/imj.12230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2013] [Accepted: 06/27/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The changing treatment landscape for metastatic colorectal cancer creates multiple potential treatment strategies. An Australian-centric database capturing comprehensive information across a range of treatment locations would create a valuable resource enabling multiple important research questions to be addressed. AIMS To establish a collection of a consensus dataset capturing treatment and outcomes at multiple public and private hospitals across Australia. METHODS An electronic database was developed by a panel of clinicians, to capture an agreed dataset for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer. Of particular interest were clinician decision-making, the impact of comorbidities and the frequency of major adverse events. RESULTS Since July 2009, data collection has been established at six public and eight private hospitals across three Australian states and territories. Successful linkage and analysis, with support from BioGrid Australia, of selected data on the initial 864 patients demonstrates that data can be captured from diverse sites, including public and private practice, that multiple factors impact on treatment delivered and outcomes achieved and that comprehensive data on rare but important adverse events can be captured. As a clinical research tool, the project has been highly successful, generating multiple presentations at national and international conferences related to a diverse range of research questions. CONCLUSIONS Multistate, project-specific data collection involving large numbers of patients is achievable. Providing invaluable insight into the routine clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of targeted therapies, this also creates a significant resource for research, including many questions not being addressed by clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Field
- Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wong HL, Field K, Harol M, Tran B, Tie J, Shapiro J, Wong R, Yip D, Nott L, Richardson G, McKendrick J, Gibbs P. P0183 Resection of colorectal cancer metastases in routine practice. Eur J Cancer 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.03.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
43
|
Goldstein J, Tran B, Ensor J, Gibbs P, Wong HL, Wong SF, Vilar E, Tie J, Broaddus R, Kopetz S, Desai J, Overman MJ. Multicenter retrospective analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Ann Oncol 2014; 25:1032-8. [PMID: 24585723 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 196] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype, present in 15% of early colorectal cancer (CRC), confers good prognosis. MSI-H metastatic CRC is rare and its impact on outcomes is unknown. We describe survival outcomes and the impact of chemotherapy, metastatectomy, and BRAF V600E mutation status in the largest reported cohort of MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review of 55 MSI-H metastatic CRC patients from two institutions, Royal Melbourne Hospital (Australia) and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (United States), was conducted. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Median age was 67 years (20-90), 58% had poor differentiation, and 45% had stage IV disease at presentation. Median overall survival (OS) from metastatic disease was 15.4 months. Thirteen patients underwent R0/R1 metastatectomies, with median OS from metastatectomy 33.8 months. Thirty-one patients received first-line systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease with median OS from the start of chemotherapy 11.5 months. No statistically significant difference in progression-free survival or OS was seen between fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan based chemotherapy. BRAF V600E mutation was present in 14 of 47 patients (30%). BRAF V600E patients demonstrated significantly worse median OS; 10.1 versus 17.3 months, P = 0.03. In multivariate analyses, BRAF V600E mutants had worse OS (HR 4.04; P = 0.005), while patients undergoing metastatectomy (HR 0.11; P = <0.001) and patients who initially presented as stage IV disease had improved OS (HR 0.27; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Patients with MSI-H metastatic CRC do not appear to have improved outcomes. BRAF V600E mutation is a poor prognostic factor in MSI-H metastatic CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Goldstein
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Brierley GV, Priebe IK, Purins L, Fung KYC, Tabor B, Lockett T, Nice E, Gibbs P, Tie J, McMurrick P, Moore J, Ruszkiewicz A, Burgess A, Cosgrove LJ. Serum concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are decreased in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Biomark 2014; 13:67-73. [PMID: 23838134 DOI: 10.3233/cbm-130345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the usefulness of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as a diagnostic biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS ELISA immunoassay was used to examine BDNF concentrations in the sera of two different retrospective cohorts consisting of CRC patients and age/gender matched controls. Cohort 1 consisted of 99 controls and 97 CRC patients, whereas cohort 2 consisted of 47 controls and 91 CRC patients. RESULTS In cohort 1, the median concentration of BDNF was significantly (p< 0.0001) lower in CRC patient samples (18.8 ng/mL, range 4.0-56.5 ng/mL) than control samples (23.4 ng/mL, range 3.0-43.1 ng/mL). This finding was validated in an independent patient cohort (CRC patients: 23.0 ng/mL, range 6.0-45.9 ng/mL; control patients: 32.3 ng/mL, range 14.2-62.4 ng/mL). BDNF concentrations did not differ significantly between Dukes' staging in the patient cohort, however patients with Stages A, B, C and D (p< 0.01 for each stage) tumours had significantly reduced BDNF levels compared to healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the ability of BDNF to discriminate between healthy controls and those with CRC. At 95% specificity, BDNF concentrations distinguished CRC patients with 25% and 18% sensitivity, respectively, in cohorts 1 and 2 (cohort 1: AUC=0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.87; cohort 2: AUC =0.69, 95% CI 0.61-0.76). CONCLUSION The serum levels of BDNF were significantly lower in colorectal cancer patients when compared to a control population, and this did not differ between different Dukes' stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Brierley
- CSIRO Preventative Health National Research Flagship, Adelaide BC, South Australia, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Christie M, Jorissen RN, Mouradov D, Sakthianandeswaren A, Li S, Day F, Tsui C, Lipton L, Desai J, Jones IT, McLaughlin S, Ward RL, Hawkins NJ, Ruszkiewicz AR, Moore J, Burgess AW, Busam D, Zhao Q, Strausberg RL, Simpson AJ, Tomlinson IPM, Gibbs P, Sieber OM. Different APC genotypes in proximal and distal sporadic colorectal cancers suggest distinct WNT/β-catenin signalling thresholds for tumourigenesis. Oncogene 2013; 32:4675-82. [PMID: 23085758 PMCID: PMC3787794 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2012.486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2012] [Revised: 08/20/2012] [Accepted: 09/04/2012] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Biallelic protein-truncating mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene are prevalent in sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). Mutations may not be fully inactivating, instead producing WNT/β-catenin signalling levels 'just-right' for tumourigenesis. However, the spectrum of optimal APC genotypes accounting for both hits, and the influence of clinicopathological features on genotype selection remain undefined. We analysed 630 sporadic CRCs for APC mutations and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) using sequencing and single-nucleotide polymorphism microarrays, respectively. Truncating APC mutations and/or LOH were detected in 75% of CRCs. Most truncating mutations occurred within a mutation cluster region (MCR; codons 1282-1581) leaving 1-3 intact 20 amino-acid repeats (20AARs) and abolishing all Ser-Ala-Met-Pro (SAMP) repeats. Cancers commonly had one MCR mutation plus either LOH or another mutation 5' to the MCR. LOH was associated with mutations leaving 1 intact 20AAR. MCR mutations leaving 1 vs 2-3 intact 20AARs were associated with 5' mutations disrupting or leaving intact the armadillo-repeat domain, respectively. Cancers with three hits had an over-representation of mutations upstream of codon 184, in the alternatively spliced region of exon 9, and 3' to the MCR. Microsatellite unstable cancers showed hyper-mutation at MCR mono- and di-nucleotide repeats, leaving 2-3 intact 20AARs. Proximal and distal cancers exhibited different preferred APC genotypes, leaving a total of 2 or 3 and 0 to 2 intact 20AARs, respectively. In conclusion, APC genotypes in sporadic CRCs demonstrate 'fine-tuned' interdependence of hits by type and location, consistent with selection for particular residual levels of WNT/β-catenin signalling, with different 'optimal' thresholds for proximal and distal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Christie
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - R N Jorissen
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Mouradov
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Sakthianandeswaren
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Li
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - F Day
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - C Tsui
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - L Lipton
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - J Desai
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - I T Jones
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - S McLaughlin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western Hospital, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
| | - R L Ward
- Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - N J Hawkins
- Department of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - A R Ruszkiewicz
- Pathology Department, Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - J Moore
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - A W Burgess
- Epithelial Biology Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Busam
- J Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Q Zhao
- J Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - R L Strausberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Collaborative Laboratory for Cancer Biology and Therapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, New York, NY, USA
| | - A J Simpson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Collaborative Laboratory for Cancer Biology and Therapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, New York, NY, USA
| | - I P M Tomlinson
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, OX, UK
| | - P Gibbs
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - O M Sieber
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tie J, Gibbs P. Author reply. Intern Med J 2013; 43:844-5. [DOI: 10.1111/imj.12186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2013] [Accepted: 05/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
47
|
Dabare D, Macanovic J, Graetz K, Gibbs P. Advagraf ® and Myfortic ® in combination are associated with fewer gastrointestinal symptoms in kidney transplant recipients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013. [DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2013.95.5.e11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Affiliated to the Association of Surgeons in Training and the British Transplantation Society, the Carrel Club is the transplant trainee surgical society. The Carrel Club held a joint meeting with the Chapter of Transplant Surgeons, a subsidiary organisation of the British Transplantation Society, at the Manchester Hilton Hotel on 31 January and 1 February 2013. As part of the meeting, ten abstracts were presented. A selection is printed below. The winner of the Best Presentation award was Mr Mownah.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Dabare
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | | | - K Graetz
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - P Gibbs
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tran B, Keating CL, Ananda SS, Kosmider S, Jones I, Croxford M, Field KM, Carter RC, Gibbs P. Preliminary analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: demonstrating the potential value of comprehensive real world data. Intern Med J 2013; 42:794-800. [PMID: 21883782 DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02585.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The complexity and cost of treating cancer patients is escalating rapidly and increasingly difficult decisions are being made regarding which interventions provide value for money. BioGrid Australia supports collection and analysis of comprehensive treatment and outcome data across multiple sites. Here, we use preliminary data regarding the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) and stage-specific treatment costs for colorectal cancer (CRC) to demonstrate the potential value of real world data for cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). METHODS Data regarding the impact of NBCSP on stage at diagnosis were combined with stage-specific CRC treatment costs and existing literature. An incremental CEA was undertaken from a government healthcare perspective, comparing NBCSP with no screening. The 2008 invited population (n= 681,915) was modelled in both scenarios. Effectiveness was expressed as CRC-related life years saved (LYS). Costs and benefits were discounted at 3% per annum. RESULTS Over the lifetime and relative to no screening, NBCSP was predicted to save 1265 life years, prevent 225 CRC cases and cost an additional $48.3 million, equivalent to a cost-effectiveness ratio of $38,217 per LYS. A scenario analysis assuming full participation improved this to $23,395. CONCLUSIONS This preliminary CEA based largely on contemporary real world data suggests population-based faecal occult blood test screening for CRC is attractive. Planned ongoing data collection will enable repeated analyses over time, using the same methodology in the same patient populations, permitting an accurate analysis of the impact of new therapies and changing practice. Similar CEA using real world data related to other disease types and interventions appears desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Tran
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Tie J, Gibbs P. Treatment with unfunded drugs in oncology: the impact of access programmes and clinical trials. Intern Med J 2013; 43:23-31. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02750.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2011] [Accepted: 02/08/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J. Tie
- Department of Medical Oncology; the Royal Melbourne Hospital
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Hospital
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Biomarkers Laboratory; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
| | - P. Gibbs
- Department of Medical Oncology; the Royal Melbourne Hospital
- Department of Medical Oncology; Western Hospital
- Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Biomarkers Laboratory; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
- BioGrid Australia; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Todorov S, Favaro L, Gibbs P, Vaz-Velho M. Enterococcus faecium isolated from Lombo, a Portuguese traditional meat product: characterisation of antibacterial compounds and factors affecting bacteriocin production. Benef Microbes 2012; 3:319-30. [DOI: 10.3920/bm2012.0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Strain ST211CH, identified as a strain of Enterococcus faecium, isolated from Lombo produced a bacteriocin that inhibited the growth of Enterococcus spp., Listeria spp., Klebsiella spp., Lactobacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. The mode of action of the bacteriocin named as bacteriocin ST211Ch was bactericidal against Enterococcus faecalis ATCC19443. As determined by Tricine-SDS-PAGE, the approximate molecular mass of the bacteriocin was 8.0 kDa. Loss in antimicrobial activity was recorded after treatment with proteolytic enzymes. Maximum activity of bacteriocin ST211Ch was measured in broth cultures of E. faecium strain ST211Ch after 24 h; thereafter, the activity was reduced. Bacteriocin ST211Ch remained active after exposure to various temperatures and pHs, as well as to Triton X-100, Tween-80, Tween-20, sodium dodecyl sulfate, NaCl, urea and EDTA. Effect of media components on production of bacteriocin ST211Ch was also studied. On the basis of PCR reactions targeting different bacteriocin genes, i.e. enterocins, curvacins and sakacins, no evidences for the presence of these genes in the total DNA of E. faecium strain ST211Ch was obtained. The bacterium most probably produced a bacteriocin different from those mentioned above. Based on the antimicrobial spectrum, stability and mode of action of bacteriocin ST211CH, E. faecium strain ST211Ch might be considered as a potential candidate with beneficial properties for use in biopreservation to control food spoilage bacteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S.D. Todorov
- Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Departamento de Alimentos e Nutrição Experimental, Laboratório de Microbiologia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes 580 Bloco 14, 05508-900 São Paulo SP, Brasil
- Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Avenida do Atlântico, 4900-348 Viana do Castelo, Portugal
| | - L. Favaro
- Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
| | - P. Gibbs
- Leatherhead Food Research, Randalls Road, Leatherhead, Surrey KT22 7RY, United Kingdom
- Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, R. Dr. Ant. Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-070 Porto, Portugal
| | - M. Vaz-Velho
- Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Avenida do Atlântico, 4900-348 Viana do Castelo, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|