Effect of body mass index on ischemic and bleeding events in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the START-ANTIPLATELET registry

Background

The protective effect of obesity on mortality in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients remains debated. We aimed at evaluating the impact of obesity on ischemic and bleeding events as possible explanations to the obesity paradox in ACS patients.

Methods

For the purpose of this sub-study, patients enrolled in the START-ANTIPLATELET registry were stratified according to Body Mass Index (BMI) into three groups: normal, BMI <25kg/m2; overweight, BMI: 25–29.9kg/m2; obese, BMI ≥30kg/m2. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical endpoints (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major bleeding.

Results

Patients were classified as follows: 410 (33.9%) normal, 538 (44.5%) overweight, 261 (21.6%) obese. Compared to the normal weight group, obese and overweight patients had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, but were younger, with a better left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and lower PRECISE-DAPT score. At one-year follow-up NACE was more frequently observed in normal than in overweight and obese patients (15.1%,8.6%,and9.6%, respectively; p=0.004), driven by a significantly higher rate of all-cause death (6.3%,2.6%, and 3.8%, respectively; p=0.008), while no significant differences were noted in terms of MI, stroke, and major bleeding. When correcting for confounding variables, BMI loses its power in independently predicting outcomes, failing to confirm the obesity paradox in a real-world ACS population.

Conclusions

Our study conflicts the obesity paradox in real-world ACS population, and suggest that the reduced mortality rate may be explained by a lower bleeding risk in obese patients allowing a more aggressive medical treatment, and by a better LVEF translating into a higher survival rate.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in high bleeding risk patients presenting with Acute Coronary Syndromes: insights from the multicenter START-ANTIPLATELET registry

Background

Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains debated. Although current guidelines recommend the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in these patients (according to the labeled indications), clopidogrel is frequently used in clinical practice based on a perceived advantage in terms of safety in the HBR population.

Purpose

We sought to investigate the use of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in consecutive HBR ACS patients and their impact on ischemic and bleeding events at 1 year.

Methods

ACS patients enrolled in the START-ANTIPLATELET registry with at least 1 HBR criterion were included in the present analysis and stratified according to DAPT type (clopidogrel versus ticagrelor). The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical endpoint (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and stroke, each individual component of NACE and MACE, and target vessel revascularization.

Results

Among a total of 1,209 patients with 1-year follow-up in the registry, 383 patients were considered at HBR, of whom 174 (45.4%) were on clopidogrel and 209 (54.6%) on ticagrelor. Clopidogrel was more likely to be administered in patients at increased ischemic and bleeding risk, while ticagrelor in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Mean DAPT duration was longer in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (10.40±4.29 versus 9.35±5.4; p-value=0.03). At 1-year follow-up, the risk of NACE and MACE events was significantly higher in the clopidogrel than in the ticagrelor group (NACE: HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.07–3.09; p-value=0.02; MACE: HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.04–3.24; p-value=0.03) (Figure). After multivariate adjustment for clinical and procedural characteristics, no difference in NACEs nor MACEs was observed between patients on clopidogrel versus ticagrelor (NACE: adjusted HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.71–2.27; p-value=0.42; MACE: adjusted HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.63–2.24; p-value=0.59) (Figure). Age, number of HBR criteria, and mean DAPT duration were independent predictors of NACEs.

Conclusions

In a real-world ACS registry, approximately 50% of patients are at HBR and frequently treated with clopidogrel. In HBR ACS patients, no difference was observed in ischemic and bleeding events between clopidogrel and ticagrelor after adjustment for potential confounders.

Kaplan-Meier curves at 1-year follow-up.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Myocardial constructive work is impaired in cardiac amyloidosis, eases the differential diagnosis and predicts the prognosis among patients with left ventricular hypertrophy

Background

Myocardial Work (MW) is a novel non-invasive echocardiographic method for myocardial performance assessment. MW is abnormal in patients with many forms of left ventricular hypertrophy [hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), hypertensive cardiomyopathy (HypCM), aortic stenosis (AS)] while little is known about cardiac amyloidosis (CA).

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the role of MW in myocardial performance assessment, diagnostic significance and prognostic relevance in CA patients.

Methods

25 patients with CA (10 AL pts and 15 ATTRwt pts) and 75 patients with LVH (25 HCM pts, 25 HypCMP pts, 25 pts mild AS pts) were enrolled. Beside routine measurements, deformation parameters [GLS (Global Longitudinal Strain), EFSR (Ejection Fraction on Strain Ratio), RRSR (Relative Regional Strain Ratio)], and MW parameters [MWI (Myocardial Work Index), GCW (Global Constructive Work), GWW (Global Wasted Work), GWE (Global Work Efficiency)] for LV function evaluation were analysed.

Results

LV and RV function evaluated with classical and novel parameters were significantly impaired in CA group (see table). Among all these parameters, GCW showed the best performance to discriminate CA from other forms of LVH (AUC 0.90; 95% CI: 0.80–0.99; P<0,0001), with a cut-off value <1141 mmHg% showing good sensitivity and specificity (90% and 82%, respectively). At Kaplan-Meier estimation of cardiovascular mortality there were 9 deaths in the CA group and none in LVH group, showed significantly higher mortality at follow-up (p=0,0001). At multivariate analysis GCW (β=1,006; 95% CI: 1,003–1,009; P<0,0001) was the only prognostic parameter associated with cardiovascular mortality.

Discussion

Myocardial performance was reduced in CA group. GCW was able to discriminate CA from other forms of LVH and showed to be an independent prognostic factor. In our pilot study GCW seems a promising novel diagnostic and prognostic factor in CA.

Kaplan-Meier curve

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None