1
|
Kandels J, Stöbe S, Kogel A, Hepp P, Riepenhof H, Droste JN, Stoeggl T, Marshall RP, Rudolph U, Laufs U, Fikenzer S, Hagendorff A. Effect of maximum exercise on left ventricular deformation and its correlation with cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in competitive athletes. Echo Res Pract 2023; 10:17. [PMID: 37789500 PMCID: PMC10548575 DOI: 10.1186/s44156-023-00029-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global myocardial work index (GWI) allow early detection of subclinical changes in left ventricular (LV) systolic function. The aim of the study was to investigate the immediate effects of maximum physical exercise by different exercise testing methods on early post exercise LV deformation parameters in competitive athletes and to analyze their correlation with cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. METHODS To reach maximum physical exercise, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was performed by semi-recumbent ergometer in competitive handball players (n = 13) and by treadmill testing in competitive football players (n = 19). Maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) indexed to body weight (relative VO2max) was measured in all athletes. Transthoracic echocardiography and blood pressure measurements were performed at rest and 5 min after CPET in all athletes. GLS, GWI and their changes before and after CPET (ΔGLS, ΔGWI) were correlated with (relative) VO2max. RESULTS In handball and football players, GLS and GWI did not differ significantly before and after CPET. There were no significant correlations between GLS and relative VO2max, but moderate correlations were found between ΔGWI and relative VO2max in handball (r = 0.631; P = 0.021) and football players (r = 0.592; P = 0.008). Furthermore, handball (46.7 ml/min*kg ± 4.7 ml/min*kg vs. 37.4 ml/min*kg ± 4.2; P = 0.004) and football players (58.3 ml/min*kg ± 3.7 ml/min*kg vs. 49.7 ml/min*kg ± 6.8; P = 0.002) with an increased ΔGWI after CPET showed a significant higher relative VO2max. CONCLUSION Maximum physical exercise has an immediate effect on LV deformation, irrespective of the used testing method. The correlation of relative VO2max with ΔGWI in the early post exercise period, identifies ΔGWI as an echocardiographic parameter for characterizing the current individual training status of athletes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kandels
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - S Stöbe
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - A Kogel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - P Hepp
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie Und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - H Riepenhof
- RasenBallsport Leipzig GmbH, Cottaweg 3, 04177, Leipzig, Germany
- Center for Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, BG Klinikum Hamburg, 21033, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J N Droste
- Center for Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, BG Klinikum Hamburg, 21033, Hamburg, Germany
- Red Bull Athlete Performance Center, 5303, Salzburg, Austria
| | - T Stoeggl
- Red Bull Athlete Performance Center, 5303, Salzburg, Austria
- Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Universität Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - R P Marshall
- RasenBallsport Leipzig GmbH, Cottaweg 3, 04177, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - U Rudolph
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - U Laufs
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - S Fikenzer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - A Hagendorff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kandels J, Metze M, Hagendorff A, Marshall RP, Hepp P, Laufs U, Stöbe S. The impact of upright posture on left ventricular deformation in athletes. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 39:1123-1131. [PMID: 36869240 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-023-02820-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
Besides LV ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global myocardial work index (GWI) are increasingly important for the echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) function in athletes. Since exercise testing is frequently performed on a treadmill, we investigated the impact of upright posture on GLS and GWI. In 50 male athletes (mean age 25.7 ± 7.3 years) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and simultaneous blood pressure measurements were performed in upright and left lateral position. LVEF (59.7 ± 5.3% vs. 61.1 ± 5.5%; P = 0.197) was not affected by athletes' position, whereas GLS (- 11.9 ± 2.3% vs. - 18.1 ± 2.1%; P < 0.001) and GWI (1284 ± 283 mmHg% vs. 1882 ± 247 mmHg%; P < 0.001) were lower in upright posture. Longitudinal strain was most frequently reduced in upright posture in the mid-basal inferior, and/or posterolateral segments. Upright posture has a significant impact on LV deformation with lower GLS, GWI and regional LV strain in upright position. These findings need to be considered when performing echocardiography in athletes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kandels
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - M Metze
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - A Hagendorff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - R P Marshall
- RasenBallsport Leipzig GmbH, Cottaweg 3, 04177, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - P Hepp
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - U Laufs
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - S Stöbe
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Theopold J, Schöbel T, Henkelmann R, Melcher P, Hepp P. Möglichkeiten der Navigation bei der Versorgung von Verletzungen des Akromioklavikulargelenks. Arthroskopie 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s00142-022-00549-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
4
|
Fikenzer S, Uhe T, Lavall D, Rudolph U, Falz R, Busse M, Hepp P, Laufs U. Correction to: Response to the letter to the editor by Kampert et al. entitled "Impact of wearing a facial covering on aerobic exercise capacity in the COVID‑19 Era: is it more than a feeling?". Clin Res Cardiol 2021; 111:356. [PMID: 34797408 PMCID: PMC8603339 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-021-01966-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Fikenzer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - T Uhe
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - D Lavall
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - U Rudolph
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - R Falz
- Institut für Sportmedizin und Prävention, Universität Leipzig, Marschner Str. 29, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| | - M Busse
- Institut für Sportmedizin und Prävention, Universität Leipzig, Marschner Str. 29, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| | - P Hepp
- Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - U Laufs
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fikenzer S, Kogel A, Hepp P, Lavall D, Stoebe ST, Rudolph U, Laufs U, Hagendorff A. SARS-CoV2 infection: functional and morphological cardiopulmonary changes in elite handball players. Eur Heart J 2021. [PMCID: PMC8574533 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is increasing evidence of cardiac involvement in SARS-COV-2 infections. This may not only apply to symptomatic infections but may also affect asymptomatic athletes. This study aimed to characterize the possible acute cardiac involvement of SARS-COV-2 infection in athletes both morphologically and functionally. Methods and results Eight elite handball players (27±3.5 y) with past SARS-COV-2 infection were retrospectively analyzed and compared with four uninfected team-mates (22±2.6 y). Athletes were examined 19±7 d after positive PCR-test. Echocardiographic assessment of the global longitudinal strain under resting conditions was not significantly changed after SARS-CoV2 infection (−17.7% vs. −18.1%) but magnetic resonance imaging showed minor signs of acute inflammation/edema in all patients (T2-mapping: +4.1ms) without reaching the Lake-Louis criteria. Spiroergometric analysis showed a significant reduction in VO2max (−292 ml/min, −7.0%), oxygen-pulse (−2.4 ml/beat, −10.4%), and respiratory minute volume (VE) (−18.9 l/min, −13.8%) in athletes with a history of SARS-CoV2 infection (p<0.05, respectively). The parameters were unchanged in the control group. Conclusion SARS-CoV2 infection caused functional impairment of cardiopulmonary performance primarily under stress in elite athletes. It seems reasonable to screen athletes after SARS-CoV2 infection at least with spiroergometry to mark performance limitations and to ensure an optimal return to competition. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Fikenzer
- University hospital Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Germany
| | - A Kogel
- University hospital Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Germany
| | - P Hepp
- University hospital Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Germany
| | - D Lavall
- University hospital Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Germany
| | - S T Stoebe
- University hospital Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Germany
| | - U Rudolph
- University hospital Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Germany
| | - U Laufs
- University hospital Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Germany
| | - A Hagendorff
- University hospital Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Souleiman F, Henkelmann R, Theopold J, Fakler J, Spiegl U, Hepp P. Intraoperative 3D imaging in intraarticular tibial plateau fractures - Does it help to improve the patients' outcomes? J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16:295. [PMID: 33952284 PMCID: PMC8097962 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02424-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In tibial plateau fractures (TPF) the restoration of an anatomical joint surface as well as an exact subchondral screw position for postoperative stability is crucial for the outcome. The aim of this study was to determine whether the additional use of an intraoperative 3D imaging intensifier (3D) might help to improve the outcome of complex TPF. METHODS We performed a retrospective case-control study of a level 1 trauma center. Patients with AO/OTA 41 B3 and C-TPF operated on using a 3D imaging intensifier between November 2015 and December 2018 (3D group) were included. The outcomes of this patients were compared to patients operated without 3D imaging between January 2005 to December 2014 (2D group). The comparison of the groups was performed by matched pair analysis. The functional outcome of both groups was measured by KOOS and Lysholm Score after a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Operation time, infections and postoperative revisions were registered. RESULTS In total, 18 patients were included in the 3D group (mean age: 51.0± 16.4 years; 12 females) and an equal number of matching partners from the 2D group (mean age: 50.3± 15.2 years; 11 females) were found (p=0.82; p=0.79). We found 9x B3, 2x C1, 1x C2, 6x C3 fractures according to AO/OTA for each group (p=1.00) with comparable ASA score (p=0.27). The mean operation time was 127.9± 45.9 min and 116.1± 45.7 min for the 3D and 2D group (p=0.28). The mean follow-up time was 20.9± 10.7 months for the 3D and 55.5± 34.7 months for the 2D group (p< 0.001). For the 3D group a mean Lysholm overall score of 67.4± 26.8 and KOOS overall score of 72.6± 23.5 could be assessed. In contrast, a mean Lysholm overall score of 62.0± 21.4 and KOOS overall score of 65.8± 21.6 could be measured in the 2D group (p=0.39; p=0.31). Thereby, functional outcome of the 3D group showed a significant higher KOOS Sport/Rec sub score of 54.7± 35.0 in comparison to the 2D group with 26.7± 31.6 (p= 0.01). Postoperative revisions had to be performed in 27.8% of cases in both groups (p=1.00). Due to the 3D imaging an intraoperative revision was performed in 33.3% (6/18). CONCLUSION In our study we could show that re-reduction of the fracture or implant re-positioning were performed in relevant numbers based on the 3D imaging. This was associated with a midterm clinical benefit in regard to better KOOS Sport/Rec scores. TRIAL REGISTRATION AZ 488 /20-ek.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Souleiman
- Affiliation: Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - R Henkelmann
- Affiliation: Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - J Theopold
- Affiliation: Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - J Fakler
- Affiliation: Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - U Spiegl
- Affiliation: Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - P Hepp
- Affiliation: Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fikenzer S, Uhe T, Lavall D, Rudolph U, Falz R, Busse M, Hepp P, Laufs U. Response to the letter to the editor by Kampert et al. entitled “Impact of wearing a facial covering on aerobic exercise capacity in the COVID-19 Era: is it more than a feeling?”. Clin Res Cardiol 2020; 109:1597. [PMID: 32833179 PMCID: PMC7444170 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-020-01726-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
8
|
Bewarder Y, Kulenthiran S, Schaefer O, Lauder L, Ukena C, Marshall R, Hepp P, Laufs U, Stoebe S, Hagendorff A, Boehm M, Mahfoud F, Ewen S. Left ventricular longitudinal strain in professional athletes, a useful tool to detect an athletes hearts? Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Professional cyclists frequently present with physiological adaptations to endurance exercise with an increase in left ventricular wall thickness and mass. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is an early and sensitive echocardiographic method to detect left ventricular dysfunction. However, it is unclear whether GLS is able to differentiate between athlete's hearts or different pathological conditions of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Methods
A total of 87 professional athletes (37 professional cyclists, 29 professional soccer players, and 21 professional handball players) were compared to 125 patients with different forms of left ventricular hypertrophy (17 hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), 36 hypertensive heart disease (HHD), 35 severe aortic valve stenosis (AVS); 37 untrained individuals served as controls. Examinations were performed between October 2018 to October 2019. All subjects underwent echocardiographic examination, including GLS.
Results
In all 212 participants/patients included a preserved ejection fraction >50% (mean 61±7%) was detected. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in professional cyclists (165.5±37.1 g/m2) was increased when compared to professional soccer players (97.3±12.4 g/m2, p<0.001), professional handball players (92.2±15.8 g/m2, p<0.001) and healthy controls (94.3±20.7 g/m2, p<0.001), as well as to patients with HHD (129.2±30.0 g/m2, p<0.001), or AVS (140.1±35.4 g/m2, p=0.064), but not to patients with HOCM (159.7±39.4 g/m2, p=0.64). Professional cyclists (−21.0±3.5%) achieved higher average GLS values than professional soccer (−18.4 ± %, p=0.004) or handball players (−18.4 ± %, p=0.021), healthy controls (−19.0±3.0%, p=0.008), HOCM (−15.0±6.5%, p<0.001), HHD (−13.8±5.9%, p<0.001), and AVS (−16.0±7.0%, p<0.001) (Figure 1).
Conclusion
In professional cyclists, higher LVMI and average GLS values were detected compared to professional soccer and handball players with lower excessive endurance exercise, as well as untrained healthy controls. Average GLS can help to differentiate between athletes' hearts in professional cyclists compared to pathologic patterns in different diseases characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy with elevated LVMI.
Figure 1
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Bewarder
- Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | | | - O Schaefer
- Internal medicine practice, Quierschied, Germany
| | - L Lauder
- Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - C Ukena
- Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - R Marshall
- Team physician RB Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - P Hepp
- Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - U Laufs
- Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - S Stoebe
- Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - M Boehm
- Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - F Mahfoud
- Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - S Ewen
- Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
NK S, Fehm T, Ruckhäberle E, OT W, Hepp P. The effects of a music intervention on anxiety levels during port catheter surgery. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - T Fehm
- Heinrich-Heine-University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
| | - E Ruckhäberle
- Heinrich-Heine-University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
| | | | - P Hepp
- University Clinic Augsburg, Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fikenzer S, Uhe T, Lavall D, Rudolph U, Falz R, Busse M, Hepp P, Laufs U. Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. Clin Res Cardiol 2020; 109:1522-1530. [PMID: 32632523 PMCID: PMC7338098 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 177] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background Due to the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, medical face masks are widely recommended for a large number of individuals and long durations. The effect of wearing a surgical and a FFP2/N95 face mask on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity has not been systematically reported. Methods This prospective cross-over study quantitated the effects of wearing no mask (nm), a surgical mask (sm) and a FFP2/N95 mask (ffpm) in 12 healthy males (age 38.1 ± 6.2 years, BMI 24.5 ± 2.0 kg/m2). The 36 tests were performed in randomized order. The cardiopulmonary and metabolic responses were monitored by ergo-spirometry and impedance cardiography. Ten domains of comfort/discomfort of wearing a mask were assessed by questionnaire. Results The pulmonary function parameters were significantly lower with mask (forced expiratory volume: 5.6 ± 1.0 vs 5.3 ± 0.8 vs 6.1 ± 1.0 l/s with sm, ffpm and nm, respectively; p = 0.001; peak expiratory flow: 8.7 ± 1.4 vs 7.5 ± 1.1 vs 9.7 ± 1.6 l/s; p < 0.001). The maximum power was 269 ± 45, 263 ± 42 and 277 ± 46 W with sm, ffpm and nm, respectively; p = 0.002; the ventilation was significantly reduced with both face masks (131 ± 28 vs 114 ± 23 vs 99 ± 19 l/m; p < 0.001). Peak blood lactate response was reduced with mask. Cardiac output was similar with and without mask. Participants reported consistent and marked discomfort wearing the masks, especially ffpm. Conclusion Ventilation, cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and comfort are reduced by surgical masks and highly impaired by FFP2/N95 face masks in healthy individuals. These data are important for recommendations on wearing face masks at work or during physical exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Fikenzer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - T Uhe
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - D Lavall
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - U Rudolph
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - R Falz
- Institut für Sportmedizin und Prävention, Universität Leipzig, Marschner Str. 29, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| | - M Busse
- Institut für Sportmedizin und Prävention, Universität Leipzig, Marschner Str. 29, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| | - P Hepp
- Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - U Laufs
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Blum S, Fasching PA, Hildebrandt T, Lermann J, Heindl F, Born T, Lubrich H, Antoniadis S, Becker K, Tchartchian G, Bojahr B, Jentschke M, Fehmd T, Janni W, Hartung CP, Füger T, Renner SP, Germeyer A, Oppelt P, Enzelsberger SH, Fleisch M, Hepp P, Lange J, Fahlbusch C, Heusinger K, Burghaus S, Beckmann MW, Hein A. Das internationale Endometriose-Evaluationsprogramm (IEEP) – eine Studie für Kliniker, Forscher und Patientinnen. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Blum
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - P A Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - T Hildebrandt
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - J Lermann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - F Heindl
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - T Born
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - H Lubrich
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - S Antoniadis
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - K Becker
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - G Tchartchian
- Zertifiziertes Endometriosezentrum der Klinik für MIC, Berlin
| | - B Bojahr
- Zertifiziertes Endometriosezentrum der Klinik für MIC, Berlin
| | - M Jentschke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover
| | - T Fehmd
- Universitäts-Frauenklinik Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
| | - W Janni
- Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm
| | | | - T Füger
- MIC-Zentrum Frauenklinik Dr. Geisenhofer, München
| | - S P Renner
- Frauenklinik, Kliniken Böblingen, Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen, Böblingen
| | - A Germeyer
- Universitäts-Frauenklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - P Oppelt
- Universitätsklinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe & Gyn. Endokrinologie, Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Österreich
| | - S-H Enzelsberger
- Universitätsklinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe & Gyn. Endokrinologie, Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Österreich
| | - M Fleisch
- Landesfrauenklinik, Helios Universitätsklinikum, Wuppertal
| | - P Hepp
- Landesfrauenklinik, Helios Universitätsklinikum, Wuppertal
| | - J Lange
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenaus, Endometriosezentrum, Frankfurt/Main
| | - C Fahlbusch
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - K Heusinger
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - S Burghaus
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - M W Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - A Hein
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schaal NK, Hepp P, Heil M, Wolf OT, Hagenbeck C, Fleisch M, Fehm T. Perioperative anxiety and length of hospital stay after caesarean section - A cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 248:252-256. [PMID: 32283431 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The caesarean section is one of the most frequently performed surgeries. Due to growing economic challenges, hospitals are encouraged to improve their cost-efficiency. One factor that influences hospital costs of caesarean sections is a prolonged hospital stay. STUDY DESIGN The aim of the current prospective study was to investigate psychosocial factors, with an emphasis on anxiety, and sociodemographic factors that are associated with longer hospital stay after caesarean sections with no medical complications. Data of 195 women who gave birth by caesarean section was analyzed. As possible predictors anxiety levels measured pre-, peri- and postoperative as well as age, parity (primiparous/multiparous), repeated caesarean (yes/no), BMI (<30/ ≥30), STAI-Trait scores, duration of surgery, PH arterial and Apgar 5 min. were entered into a backward linear regression with duration of hospital stay as the dependent factor. RESULTS The analysis revealed that higher age, primiparity as well as higher anxiety scores during the postoperative phase are significant factors associated with prolonged hospital stay. The significant model explains 22.1 % of the variance. CONCLUSION The results should sensitize the medical team to these risk factors in order to improve patients' recovery and shorten hospital stays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N K Schaal
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - P Hepp
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, HELIOS University Clinic, Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, Germany; Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinic, Augsburg, Germany
| | - M Heil
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - O T Wolf
- Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - C Hagenbeck
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Fleisch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, HELIOS University Clinic, Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, Germany
| | - T Fehm
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ernsten L, Hepp P, Fehm T, Schaal NK. [Perioperative music-induced analgesia : Comparison of the effect of music on pain between preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative application]. Schmerz 2019; 33:100-105. [PMID: 30411138 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-018-0338-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite suitable analgesia procedures and interventions only approximately 24% of inpatients with strong to very strong pain receive adequate treatment. Besides opioids, which are associated with numerous side effects and risks, non-pharmacological approaches are increasingly being used. In this context, one of the oldest known methods are music interventions; however, the state of evidence is heterogeneous and there are no explicit manuals and recommendations for the effective implementation of music interventions. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to determine the optimal time point at which perioperative music interventions can most effectively relieve pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS A PubMed search was conducted and publications investigating the effect of music during the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative stages of various interventions were identified. RESULTS During the preoperative phase, only positive effects of music on pain relief have been reported but availability of data is sparse. During the intraoperative stage of a medical intervention the effect of music seems to be mediated by the type of anesthesia procedure and sedation depth. Only patients who can consciously perceive the music seem to profit from it. Positive alleviating effects on subjective pain perception and analgesia needs were shown in the postoperative stage. CONCLUSION Music is a non-pharmacological method to alleviate pain, which is free of side effects. Important considerations for the use of music interventions for relief of acute pain associated with surgery are discussed taking into account numerous mediating factors, which influence the efficacy of the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Ernsten
- Institut für Experimentelle Psychologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - P Hepp
- Landesfrauenklinik, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Universität Witten-Herdecke, Wuppertal, Deutschland
| | - T Fehm
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - N K Schaal
- Institut für Experimentelle Psychologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hepp P, Hutter S, Hofmann S, Kuhn C, Jeschke U. Die Expression von Histone H3 Lysin 9 Acetylierungen ist in GDM Plazentas signifikant erniedrigt und kann nicht durch Calcitriol Gabe behoben werden. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- P Hepp
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, München
| | - S Hutter
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, München
| | - S Hofmann
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, München
| | - C Kuhn
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, München
| | - U Jeschke
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, München
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schaal NK, Fehm T, Wolf OT, Gielen P, Hagenbeck C, Heil M, Fleisch M, Hepp P. Comparing the course of anxiety in women receiving their first or repeated caesarean section: A prospective cohort study. Women Birth 2019; 33:280-285. [PMID: 31176587 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Around 30% of births are through caesarean section and repetition rates for receiving a caesarean section are high. AIM The aim of the prospective study was to compare the course of anxiety in women undergoing their first caesarean section and women experiencing a repeated caesarean section. PARTICIPANTS 304 women with an indication for an elective caesarean section took part. 155 received their first caesarean section and 149 received a repeated caesarean section. METHODS In order to measure the course of anxiety on the day of the caesarean section subjective anxiety levels were measured and saliva samples for cortisol determination were taken at admission, during skin closure and two hours after the surgery. Blood pressure and heart rate were documented at skin incision and skin closure. RESULTS Women experiencing their first caesarean section displayed significantly higher anxiety levels compared to women with a repeated caesarean section. Scores of the STAI-State and visual analogue scale for anxiety differed significantly at admission (p=.006 and p<.001) and heart rate and alpha amylase levels were significantly higher at skin closure (p=.027 and p=.029). CONCLUSION The results show that previous experience with a caesarean section has a soothing effect. The study aims to sensitize surgeons, anesthetists, nurses and midwives when treating women receiving a caesarean section and encourage them to incorporate soothing interventions, especially for women receiving their first caesarean section to reduce anxiety levels and consequently improve postoperative recovery and patients' satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N K Schaal
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - T Fehm
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - O T Wolf
- Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - P Gielen
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - C Hagenbeck
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Heil
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Fleisch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, HELIOS University Clinic, Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, Germany
| | - P Hepp
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, HELIOS University Clinic, Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Janni W, Rack BK, Friedl TW, Müller V, Lorenz R, Rezai M, Tesch H, Heinrich G, Andergassen U, Harbeck N, Schochter F, De Gregorio A, Tzschaschel M, Huober J, Hepp P, Fehm TN, Schneeweiss A, Lichtenegger W, Blohmer J, Hauner D, Beckmann MW, Häberle L, Fasching PA, Hauner H. Abstract GS5-03: Lifestyle Intervention and Effect on Disease-free Survival in Early Breast Cancer Pts: Interim Analysis from the Randomized SUCCESS C Study. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-gs5-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Recent trials have provided evidence that obesity and a low level of physical activity are not only associated with a higher risk of developing breast cancer, but also with an increased risk for recurrence and reduced survival in breast cancer patients (pts). The SUCCESS C study is the first randomized Phase III trial to evaluate the effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention program, focusing on both physical activity and healthy diet following adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free survival in women with early breast cancer.
Methods:
SUCCESS C is a German multicenter, 2×2 factorial design, randomized phase III study comparing disease-free survival (DFS) in pts with HER2-negative early breast cancer treated with either 3 cycles of epirubicine, fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide chemotherapy followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel (FEC-D) or 6 cycles of docetaxel-cyclophosphamide (DC). The second randomization compares DFS in pts with a body mass index (BMI) of 24—40 kg/m2 receiving either a telephone-based individualized lifestyle intervention (LI) program aiming at moderate weight loss for 2 years (LI arm) or general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle alone (non-LI arm). DFS according to lifestyle intervention was analyzed using both univariable cox regressions and multivariable cox regressions adjusted for age (years, continuous), BMI (kg/m2, continuous), menopausal status (premenopausal, postmenopausal), tumor size (pT1, pT2, pT3/pT4), nodal stage (pN0, pN1, pN2, pN3), hormone receptor status (positive, negative), grading (G1, G2, G3), histological type (ductal, lobular, other) and chemotherapy randomization (FEC-D, DC). Median follow-up was 64.2 months.
Results:
Overall, 2292 of the 3643 pts recruited for the SUCCESS C study were randomized for the lifestyle intervention program (1146 pts in both the non-LI arm and the LI arm). The Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no difference in DFS between the two treatment arms (LI vs. non-LI) in univariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 — 1.28, p = 0.922) and in adjusted multivariable cox regression (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.70 — 1.18, p = 0.48). At the 2-year follow up, pts in the LI arm lost on average 1.0 kg weight compared to the start of the LI program, while pts in the non-LI arm gained on average 0.95 kg (p < 0.001). Overall, 1477 pts completed the 2-year LI program (non-LI arm: 80.7%, 925 of 1146 pts; LI arm: 48.2%, 552 of 1146 pts; p < 0.001). Pts that completed the 2-year LI program had a significant better DFS than non-completers (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.27 — 0.45, p < 0.001). Among completers, pts in the LI arm had a significantly better DFS than pts in the non-LI arm both in univariable analysis (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35 — 0.82, p = 0.004) and in adjusted multivariable cox regression (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33 — 0.78, p = 0.002).
Conclusions:
This explorative and non-planned interim analysis indicates that the completion of a systematic telephone life style intervention program may positively impact patient outcome in early breast cancer.
Citation Format: Janni W, Rack BK, Friedl TW, Müller V, Lorenz R, Rezai M, Tesch H, Heinrich G, Andergassen U, Harbeck N, Schochter F, De Gregorio A, Tzschaschel M, Huober J, Hepp P, Fehm TN, Schneeweiss A, Lichtenegger W, Blohmer J, Hauner D, Beckmann MW, Häberle L, Fasching PA, Hauner H. Lifestyle Intervention and Effect on Disease-free Survival in Early Breast Cancer Pts: Interim Analysis from the Randomized SUCCESS C Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Janni
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - BK Rack
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - TW Friedl
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - V Müller
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - R Lorenz
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - M Rezai
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - H Tesch
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - G Heinrich
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - U Andergassen
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - N Harbeck
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - F Schochter
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - A De Gregorio
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - M Tzschaschel
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - J Huober
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - P Hepp
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - TN Fehm
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - A Schneeweiss
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - W Lichtenegger
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - J Blohmer
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - D Hauner
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - MW Beckmann
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - L Häberle
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - PA Fasching
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| | - H Hauner
- University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Gynecological Clinic Lorenz/Hecker/Wesche, Braunschweig, Germany; Breast Center of Düsseldorf, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany; Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany; HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte and Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany; University Hospit
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schaal NK, Fehm T, Wolf OT, Gielen P, Hagenbeck C, Heil M, Fleisch M, Hepp P. Comparing the course of anxiety in women receiving their first compared to repeated caesarean section: a prospective study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- NK Schaal
- Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Department of Experimental Psychology, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - T Fehm
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - OT Wolf
- Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - P Gielen
- Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Department of Experimental Psychology, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - C Hagenbeck
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - M Heil
- Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Department of Experimental Psychology, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - M Fleisch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, HELIOS University Clinic, Wuppertal, Deutschland
| | - P Hepp
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, HELIOS University Clinic, Wuppertal, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hepp P, Hagenbeck C, Gilles J, Wolf OT, Goertz W, Janni W, Balan P, Fleisch M, Fehm T, Schaal NK. Effects of music intervention during caesarean section on anxiety and stress of the expectant mother – A prospective, controlled, randomized study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- P Hepp
- Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Landesfrauenklinik, Wuppertal, Deutschland
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - C Hagenbeck
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - J Gilles
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - OT Wolf
- Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - W Goertz
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Musikerambulanz, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - W Janni
- Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Frauenklinik, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - P Balan
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - M Fleisch
- Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Landesfrauenklinik, Wuppertal, Deutschland
| | - T Fehm
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - NK Schaal
- Heinrich-Heine- Universität Düsseldorf, Experimentelle Psychologie, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Frosch KH, Hepp P. Arthroskopisch gestützte Frakturversorgung. Arthroskopie 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s00142-017-0174-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
20
|
Abstract
Necrotising fasciitis is a rare infection with a high mortality rate. Clinical manifestation may be influenced by an underlying disease state. We report a case of a 70-year-old man with an anaplastic large-cell lymphoma who presented with inconclusive signs of necrotising fasciitis following a neutropenic phase after chemotherapy. Surgical exploration did not reveal the typical macroscopic features of necrotising fasciitis. Microbiological investigations revealed Escherichia coli. The lack of massive tissue inflammation, probably due to the neutropenia in our patient, has not been described by other authors. Diagnostic uncertainties owing to masked or uncharacteristic signs in immune compromised patients may lead to a delayed surgical debridement, of which clinicians should be aware.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Kunz
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Leipzig , Germany
| | - F Seidel
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Leipzig , Germany
| | - L Weidhase
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Leipzig , Germany
| | - P Hepp
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig , Germany
| | - S Strocka
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig , Germany
| | - T Gradistanac
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Leipzig , Germany
| | - S Petros
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Leipzig , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kreuzer V, Hepp P, Brandi L, Fehm T, Beyer I. Anti-NMDA-Rezeptor-Enzephalitis assoziiert mit ovariellen Teratomen – Diagnose und Therapie einer seltenen Autoimmunerkrankung. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
22
|
Hepp P, Kreimer U, Stevens F, Porn A, Fleisch M, Hampl M. Ist die Defektrekonstruktion per lokalem Lappen bei jungen (< 50J.) Patientinnen mit Vulvakarzinom sicher? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
23
|
Binder S, Lux J, Bizjak G, Fehm T, Hepp P. Spontane Uterusruptur mit Hemihysterektomie in der 19. SSW bei Uterus bicornis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
24
|
Hagenbeck C, Märthesheimer S, Schaal N, Burghardt B, Stevens F, Kreuzer V, Gilles J, Balan P, Goertz W, Wolf OT, Fehm T, Hepp P. Musikbegleittherapie bei Sectio caesarea und ihre Auswirkungen auf Angst: eine Pilotstudie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
25
|
Theopold J, Pieroh P, Scharge ML, Marquaß B, Hohmann T, Josten C, Hepp P. Improved accuracy of K-wire positioning into the glenoid vault by intraoperative 3D image intensifier-based navigation for the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016; 102:575-81. [PMID: 27132036 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2015] [Revised: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This article aimed to show that navigation, based on an intraoperative mobile 3D image intensifier, can improve the accuracy of central K-wire placement into the glenoid vault for glenoid component. HYPOTHESIS The navigated k-wire placement is more accurate and shows a smaller deviation angle to the standard centerline compared to the classical "free hand technic". METHODS In 34 fresh frozen sheep scapulae, 17 K-wire placements using the navigation (group 1) were compared with 17 using standard "face plane technique" (group 2). The relation to glenoid standard and alternative centerlines (CL) and the position within the glenoid vault were analyzed. RESULTS In groups 1 and 2 the angle between the K-wire and standard CL was 2.2° and 4.7°, respectively (P=0.01). The angle between the K-wire and alternative CL was 14.4° for group 1 and 17.2° for group 2 (P=0.02). More navigated K-wire positions were identified within a 5mm corridor along the glenoid vault CL (52 vs. 39; P=0.004). DISCUSSION Intraoperative 3D image intensifier-based navigation was more accurate and precise than standard K-wire placement. TYPE OF STUDY AND LEVEL OF PROOF Basic science study, evidence level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Theopold
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
| | - P Pieroh
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Grosse Steinstrasse 52, 06097 Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - M L Scharge
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
| | - B Marquaß
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
| | - T Hohmann
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Grosse Steinstrasse 52, 06097 Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - C Josten
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
| | - P Hepp
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Henkelmann R, Krause JT, Frosch KH, Lill H, Schoepp C, Seybold D, Josten C, Hepp P. Outcome nach Infektion operativ versorgter Tibiakopffrakturen – ein systematischer Review und erste retrospektive Analyse. Zentralbl Chir 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
27
|
Spiegl UJ, Euler SA, Millett PJ, Hepp P. Summary of Meta-Analyses Dealing with Single-Row versus Double-Row Repair Techniques for Rotator Cuff Tears. Open Orthop J 2016; 10:330-338. [PMID: 27708735 PMCID: PMC5041206 DOI: 10.2174/1874325001610010330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2015] [Revised: 05/16/2015] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Several meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials have been performed to analyze whether double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) provides superior clinical outcomes and structural healing compared to single-row (SR) repair. The purpose of this study was to sum up the results of meta-analysis comparing SR and DR repair with respect on clinical outcomes and re-tear rates. Methods: A literature search was undertaken to identify all meta-analyses dealing with randomized controlled trials comparing clinical und structural outcomes after SR versus DR RCR. Results: Eight meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria: two including Level I studies only, five including both Level I and Level II studies, and one including additional Level III studies. Four meta-analyses found no differences between SR and DR RCR for patient outcomes, whereas four favored DR RCR for tears greater than 3 cm. Two meta-analyses found no structural healing differences between SR and DR RCR, whereas six found DR repair to be superior for tears greater than 3 cm tears. Conclusion: No clinical differences are seen between single-row and double-row repair for small and medium rotator cuff tears after a short-term follow-up period with a higher re-tear rate following single-row repairs. There seems to be a trend to superior results with double-row repair in large to massive tear sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U J Spiegl
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Germany
| | - S A Euler
- Department of Trauma Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - P Hepp
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Märthesheimer S, Hagenbeck C, Gilles J, Goertz W, Wolf OT, Fehm T, Schaal N, Hepp P. Musikbegleittherapie bei Sectio caesarea und ihre Auswirkungen auf Angst: eine Pilotstudie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
29
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The German diagnosis-related groups remuneration system (G-DRG) was implemented in 2004 and patient-related diagnoses and procedures lead to allocation to specific DRGs. This system includes several codes, such as case mix (CM), case mix index (CMI) and number of cases. Seasonal distribution of these codes as well as distribution of diagnoses and DRGs may lead to logistical consequences for clinical management. METHODS From 2004 to 2013 all the main diagnoses and DRGs for inpatients were recorded. Monthly and seasonal distributions were analyzed using ANOVA. RESULTS The average monthly number of cases was 265 ± 25 cases, the average CM was 388.50 ± 51.75 and the average CMI was 1.46 ± 0.15 with no significant seasonal differences (p > 0.1). Concussion was the most frequently occurring main diagnosis (3739 cases) followed by fractures of the humeral head (699). Significant distribution differences could be shown for humeral head fractures in monthly (p = 0.018) and seasonal comparisons (p = 0.006) with a maximum in winter. Radius (p = 0.01) and ankle fractures (p ≤ 0.001) also occurred most frequently in winter. Non-bony lesions of the shoulder were significantly less in spring (p = 0.04). The DRGs showed no evidence of a monthly or seasonal clustering (p > 0.1). CONCLUSION The significant clustering of injuries in specific months and seasons should lead to logistic consequences (e.g. operating room slots, availability of nursing and anesthesia staff). For a needs assessment the analysis of main diagnoses is more appropriate than DRGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N von Dercks
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Wiederherstellungs- und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
| | - R Melz
- Discipline Leader Static Analyses Eurofighter, Cassidian Air Systems, Manching, Deutschland
| | - P Hepp
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Wiederherstellungs- und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - J Theopold
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Wiederherstellungs- und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - B Marquass
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Wiederherstellungs- und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - C Josten
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Wiederherstellungs- und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Scholz C, Andergassen U, Hepp P, Schindlbeck C, Friedl TWP, Harbeck N, Kiechle M, Sommer H, Hauner H, Friese K, Rack B, Janni W. Obesity as an independent risk factor for decreased survival in node-positive high-risk breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 151:569-76. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3422-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2015] [Accepted: 05/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
31
|
Hepp P, Theopold J, Jarvers JS, Marquaß B, von Dercks N, Josten C. [Multiplanar reconstruction with mobile 3D image intensifier. Surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures]. Unfallchirurg 2015; 117:437-44. [PMID: 23703621 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-013-2367-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to analyze the applicability and advantages of the intraoperative use of a mobile 3D C-arm with multiplanar imaging for surgery of acute proximal humerus fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this study 20 patients (11 female, 9 male, median age 70 years, range 35-91 years) with dislocated proximal humerus fractures (6 with 2 segments, 10 with 3 segments and 4 with 4 segments) were included. Preoperatively 3D scanning was performed and a reevaluation of the fracture in comparison to the plain radiographs was performed. After operative treatment another scan was performed to evaluate technical complications. RESULTS In comparison to the multiplanar reconstructions fracture morphology could not be correctly detected in 5 out of the 20 cases with plain radiographs. The preoperative image quality of the multiplanar reconstructions showed a significantly better assessment in comparison to the image quality with osteosynthesis (p < 0.05). The screws had to be replaced in 5 of the 20 patients. CONCLUSION Intraoperative 3D imaging with mobile image intensifier enables an accurate analysis of fracture morphology. Furthermore a quasi real time preoperative planning, evaluation of reduction and implant position with immediate operative relevance can be realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Hepp
- Klinik für Unfall- Wiederherstellungs- und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hepp P, Schott S, Lermann J, Henzgen J. Aus dem Jungen Forum. Gyn und Ski 2015. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
33
|
Hepp P, Kollerbohm-Bergmann V, Rockmann S, Bolten M, Fehm T, Fleisch M. Introducing routine fetal scalp blood analysis (FSBA) for suspicious or pathologic fetal heart rate – effect on mode of delivery, fetal and maternal outcome. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1388100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
34
|
Kubiak A, Hepp P, Beyer I, Fleisch M. Case Report: Laparoskopische Enukleation eines zervikalen Myoms nach temporärem Clipping der Aa. uterinae. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1388290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
35
|
|
36
|
Hepp P, Lermann J, Schott S, Mögele M. Aus dem Jungen Forum. „Gyn und Ski 2014“. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
37
|
Fleisch MC, Hepp P, Kaleta T, Schulte Am Esch J, Rein D, Fehm T, Beyer I. Feasibility and first long-term results after laparoscopic rectal segment resection and vaginal specimen retrieval for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289:1241-7. [PMID: 24407554 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3146-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2013] [Accepted: 01/02/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radical resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), including bladder and bowel resection, provides relief from pain in symptomatic patients. The laparoscopic approach to treatment is well established for bowel resection but normally requires additional abdominal incisions for specimen retrieval. Here we describe our technique of laparoscopically assisted rectal resection and transvaginal specimen retrieval (LARRT) and provide follow-up information on pain scores and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective observational monocentric study on all DIE patients with rectal infiltration treated between 2008 and 2010 with LATRR at our department. Follow-up was obtained for at least 3 years, including baseline 1-year and 3-year pain scores. RESULTS We identified four patients undergoing LARRT available for follow-up. DIE was confirmed by histology in all cases. There were no intraoperative complications. Two patients had transient postoperative urinary retention, one patient developed recto-vaginal fistula and required transient colostomy. One patient suffered from persistent vaginal dryness. All patients, however, reported persistent pain relief, including at the end of follow-up period. CONCLUSION LARRT is a feasible variation of laparoscopic bowel resection for DIE with rectal infiltration. In our study it has promising results with respect to pain control. Larger studies will, however, be required to determine the safety of this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Fleisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heinrich-Heine-University Medical Centre, Moorenstr 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schochter F, Andergassen U, Neugebauer JK, Friedl TWP, Pestka A, Jueckstock JK, Jaeger B, Salmen JC, Hepp PGM, Heinrich G, Camara O, Decker T, Ober A, Fehm TN, Pantel K, Fasching PA, Schneeweis A, Beckmann MW, Janni W, Rack BK. Abstract P3-12-09: The prevalence and quantity of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) after adjuvant chemotherapy with and without anthracyclines in patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC). Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p3-12-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The use of anthracycline based chemotherapy in early breast cancer (EBC) patients has been well established. However, adverse effects like cardiotoxicity and efficacy in certain subgroups continue to be subjects of discussion. Based on data suggesting a limited benefit of anthracyclines in HER2-negative patients, the German SUCCESS C study randomly assigned patients with EBC to be treated with either anthracycline-containing or anthracycline-free chemotherapy. Since the prognostic value of CTCs in EBC has already been demonstrated in several trials, we compared the prevalence of CTCs after the completion of chemotherapy between both treatment arms.
Methods: The SUCCESS C trial was a randomized, open-label, Phase III study comparing disease free survival (DFS) in patients with HER2-negative EBC. Treatments were either 3 cycles epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel (FEC–DOC), or 6 cycles of an anthracycline-free regimen with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (DOC-C). The CTC status at chemotherapy cycle 6 was prospectively evaluated using the FDA-approved CellSearch System (Veridex, USA).
Results: Data on CTC status after chemotherapy are available for 1757 patients. Overall, CTCs were found in 220 (12.5%) patients (median 1, range 1 – 18 CTCs). One CTC was detected in 123 (55.9%), two CTCs in 53 (24.1%), three to five CTCs in 37 (16.8%), and more than five CTCs in 7 (3.2%) of these patients. Univariate analyses revealed that CTC prevalence was not significantly associated with tumor size (pT1, pT2, pT3, pT4), nodal stage (pN0, pN1, pN2, pN3), grading (G1, G2, G3), histological type (invasive ductal, invasive lobular, other), estrogen-receptor status, or progesterone-receptor status (Chi-square tests, all p > 0.1). There was no significant difference with respect to the prevalence of CTCs after chemotherapy between the two treatment arms (Chi-square test, p = 0.23), as CTCs were detected in 11.6% (103 out of 889) of patients treated with the anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen and in 13.5% (117 out of 868) of patients treated with the anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimen. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two treatment arms with regard to the number of CTCs detected after chemotherapy in CTC-positive patients (FEC-DOC: median = 1, range 1 – 18; DOC-C: median = 1, range 1 – 8; Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.30).
Conclusions: The comparable prevalence and number of CTCs after the completion of chemotherapy may indicate that anthracycline-free chemotherapy is not inferior to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in this study. This however, has to be confirmed by survival analyses, which will be available in 2014.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-12-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Schochter
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - U Andergassen
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - JK Neugebauer
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - TWP Friedl
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Pestka
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - JK Jueckstock
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B Jaeger
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - JC Salmen
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - PGM Hepp
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - G Heinrich
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - O Camara
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Decker
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Ober
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - TN Fehm
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Pantel
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - PA Fasching
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Schneeweis
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - MW Beckmann
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - W Janni
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - BK Rack
- University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Medical Office of Gynecology, Fürstenwalde, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Medical Office of Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany; St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical CenterHambur-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Fakler JKM, Hepp P, Marquaß B, von Dercks N, Josten C. [Is distal femoral replacement an adequate therapeutic option after complex fractures of the distal femur?]. Z Orthop Unfall 2013; 151:173-9. [PMID: 23619651 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modular distal femur replacements originally were developed for reconstructing a full weight-bearing and functional extremity after resection of primary bone tumours with large bony defects located in proximity to joints. The aim of this study was to examine the use of the modular distal femur replacements for complex fractures and severe post-traumatic sequelae of the distal femur in context to comparable studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fourteen patients with complex fractures or post-traumatic sequelae and extensive bone defects requiring distal femur replacement were analysed retrospectively. Median age of the patients at the time of distal femoral replacement was 77 years and median follow-up interval was 27 months. Median follow-up was 27.0 (IQB 13.5-37.5) months (range 10-49 months). RESULTS The indication for distal femur replacement was a periprosthetic fracture in three cases. Three further periprosthetic fractures were treated with a megaendoprosthesis after failure of osteosynthesis. In eight patients a megaendoprosthesis was implanted due to complications following ostheosynthesis for distal femoral fractures. Distal femoral arthroplasty was performed as a two-stage procedure in five patients with implant-associated infections. A lateral approach was used in six patients and a medial arthrotomy was conducted in eight patients. The median Knee Society score (KSS) improved significantly from 20.0 (IQB 7.5-30.0) points preoperatively to 80.0 (IQB 62.3-89.0) points at follow-up (p < 0.001). Complications requiring surgical intervention were documented in seven of 14 patients (50 %). In two patients wound-healing disorders and superficial infections necessitated surgery. In one patient a rupture of the patellar tendon was diagnosed. This patient subsequently also sustained a periprosthetic fracture. Another patient developed early aseptic loosening of the femoral component. The most common complication was a periprosthetic fracture in four patients. Three patients died for reasons not related to distal femoral replacement. CONCLUSION Distal femoral replacement is an important option in reconstituting a full weight-bearing and functional lower extremity after complex fractures and post-traumatic sequelae with massive bone destruction. Particularly elderly patients regain ambulatory ability in the vast majority of cases. The relatively high complication rate demands very thorough preoperative planning as well as prompt allocation of extensive surgical procedures in the case of an adverse event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K M Fakler
- Klinik für Unfall-, Wiederherstellungs- und Plastische Chirurgie, Wirbelsäulenzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Andergassen U, Kasprowicz NS, Hepp P, Schindlbeck C, Harbeck N, Kiechle M, Sommer H, Beckmann MW, Friese K, Janni W, Rack B, Scholz C. Participation in the SUCCESS-A Trial Improves Intensity and Quality of Care for Patients with Primary Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2013; 73:63-69. [PMID: 24771886 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2012] [Revised: 12/13/2012] [Accepted: 12/13/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The SUCCESS-A trial is a prospective, multicenter, phase III clinical trial for high-risk primary breast cancer. It compares disease-free survival after randomization in patients treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel (FEC-D) with that of patients treated with 3 cycles of FEC followed by 3 cycles of gemcitabine and docetaxel (FEC-DG). After a second randomization patients were treated with zoledronate for 2 or 5 years. A total of 251 centers took part in the trial and 3754 patients were recruited over a period of 18 months which ended in March 2007. In a questionnaire-based survey we investigated the impact of enrollment in the trial on patient care, the choice of chemotherapy protocol and access to current oncologic information as well as overall satisfaction in the respective centers. Analysis of the 78 questionnaires returned showed that 40 % of the centers had never previously enrolled patients with these indications in clinical studies. Prior to participating in the study, 4 % of the centers prescribed CMF or other protocols in patients with high-primary breast cancer risk, 46 % administered anthracycline-based chemotherapy and 50 % gave taxane-based chemotherapy. Around half of the participating centers noted that intensity of care and overall quality of care became even better and that access to breast cancer-specific information improved through participation in the trial. After their experience with the SUCCESS-A trial, all of the centers stated that they were prepared to enroll patients in clinical phase III trials again in the future. These data indicate that both patients and physicians benefit from clinical trials, as enrollment improves treatment strategies and individual patient care, irrespective of study endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Andergassen
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
| | - N S Kasprowicz
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
| | - P Hepp
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
| | | | - N Harbeck
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München ; Brustzentrum der Universität, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
| | - M Kiechle
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, München
| | - H Sommer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
| | | | - K Friese
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
| | - W Janni
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Ulm
| | - B Rack
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
| | - C Scholz
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Ulm
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hepp P, Tesch H, Forstbauer H, Rezai M, Beck T, Schrader I, Kleine-Tebbe A, Hucke J, Finas D, Soeling U, Zahm DM, Weiss E, Beckmann MW, Janni W, Rack B. Abstract P2-10-25: Prognostic value of relative change in tumor marker CA 27.29 in early stage breast cancer – The SUCCESS trial. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p2-10-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: MUC1 based tumor markers like CA27.29 (TM) in breast cancer are routinely used in metastatic disease as early marker for treatment efficacy. However, in early stage disease data is sparse. In this analysis, we looked at the impact of individual change in CA27.29 on prognosis instead of using a threshold.
Methods: The SUCCESS Trial compares FEC-docetaxel (Doc) vs. FEC-Doc-Gemcitabine (Doc-G) regime and two vs. five year treatment with Zoledronat in 3754 patients (pts) with primary breast cancer (N+ or high risk N0). We measured CA27.29 after surgery but before chemotherapy (CHT) as baseline and compared it to CA27.29 levels 2 years thereafter with the ST AIA-PACK Ca27.29 reagent using MUC-1 for AIA-600II (Tosoh Bioscience, Tessenderlo, Belgium).
Results: CA27.29 data is available of 2,015 pts. 119 pts (5.9%) had TM over the threshold of 32U/ml before CHT and 56 (2.8%) 2years thereafter. To examine the relative change of tumor marker, pts were divided into 3 groups:
increase: change >=5 U/ml; stable: change <±5U/ml; decrease: change > = −5 U/ml.
123 (6.1%) pts had increasing (>=5 U/ml), 1419 (70.4%) had stable, 473 (23.5%) had decreasing TM levels from before CHT to 2 years thereafter. The majority of pts with increasing TM (86 pts; 69.9%) had levels below the usual threshold of 32U/ml at all times. Patients with an increase >=5 U/ml had an 81% increased risk for recurrence (HR = 1.810 [CI: 1.111–2.948]) and reduced overall survival (HR = 1.020 [CI: 1.004–1.037]). In the multivariate analysis taking into account tumor size, nodal status, grading, age, hormonal and HER2/neu receptor status increasing CA27.29 levels were an independent prognostic marker.
Conclusions: An increase of the tumor marker CA27.29 2 years after CHT compared to pre-chemotherapy baseline was associated with a worse prognosis. By using this approach, more patients at risk for recurrence were detected than with the standard threshold approach. Therefore, the use of relative change could help to identify more patients at risk for relapse who might benefit from an intensified follow up.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-25.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Hepp
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - H Tesch
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - H Forstbauer
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - M Rezai
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - T Beck
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - I Schrader
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - A Kleine-Tebbe
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - J Hucke
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - D Finas
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - U Soeling
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - D-M Zahm
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - E Weiss
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - MW Beckmann
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - W Janni
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| | - B Rack
- University Düsseldorf; Praxis Prof. Tesch Frankfurt; Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Forstbauer & Dr. Ziske Troisdorf; Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf; Städtisches Klinikum Rosenheim; Henriettenstiftung Krankenhaus Hannover; DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick; Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal; Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Gemeinschaftspraxis Siehl & Söling; SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen; Universitätsfrauenklinik Munich
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hagenbeck C, Muschler B, Jaeger BAS, Jueckstock J, Andergassen U, Katzorke N, Hepp P, Melcher CA, Janni JW, Rack BK. Abstract P4-13-11: Prognostic factors in young breast cancer patients over time – a 40 year longitudinal analysis. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p4-13-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In younger patients (pts) breast cancer (BC) is associated with a worse prognosis compared to older pts. Only few data are available presenting the development of prognostic factors regarding a period of several decades. This 40 year (y) longitudinal comparison of the main prognostic factors was performed to investigate differences in younger women with primary BC in contrast to older women over time.
Patients and Methods: In this retrospective analysis a consecutive pts cohort of 4010 pts was analyzed. Pts were documented and treated for primary invasive breast cancer between 1963 and 2003 at two University Hospitals in Germany. To be eligible, pts were required to have identified tumor characteristics, including TNM-status. Pts with carcinoma in situ or distant metastases were excluded. The cohort was divided in two age groups, ≤40y and >40y. Furthermore to reveal trends and changes over the duration of 41 years the period of analysis was split into 3 time frames: 1963–1976, 1977–1989 and 1990–2003. We analyzed the main prognostic factors for BC including tumor size, grading, nodal status and HR-status in longitudinal comparison regarding the three time frames, respectively. During 1963–77 HR-status was determined in just 12.6% of pts. Thus, this time frame was excluded in the analysis of HR-status.
Results: In 41 yrs, 747 (18.6%) pts were treated between 1963–76, 1722 pts (42.9%) in 1977–89 and 1541 pts (38.4%) in 1990–2003. Overall 358 pts were ≤40y and 3652 pts were over the age of 40.
A significant reduction of tumor size (metric assessment) at primary diagnosis was observed for both age groups (pts≤40y: p = 0.012; pts>40y: p < 0.0001) with no difference between the time frames, respectively (1963–76: p = 0.289; 1977–89: p = 0.647; 1990–2003: p = 0.937).
The number of node-positive pts significantly decreased in pts >40 y (p = 0.001) whereas no difference could be seen in pts aged ≤40 y (p = 0.991).
In both age groups the number of G2/3 tumors increased over the yrs (pts≤40y: p = 0.001; pts>40y: p < 0.0001). Between 1963–76 more G1-tumors were diagnosed in younger pts (p = 0.041) whereas in the two following periods significantly more G2/3 tumors (p = 0.001; p = 0.002) were observed in this group.
In young pts, 54.2% were HR-negative in 1977–89 and 47.6% in 1990–2003 (p = 0.323). In pts >40y 38.4% and 21.7% were HR-negative, respectively (p < 0.0001). Comparing the age groups, significantly more pts were HR-negative in the young patient group (p = 0.001 (1977–89) and p < 0.0001 (1990–2003)).
Conclusions: Concerning the large period of 40yrs, technical improvement and increasing awareness for BC are reasons for decreasing tumor size at the time of primary diagnosis. However, the rate of node-positive pts in the young patient group remained stable. Furthermore, the high percentage of HR-negative pts and the increasing number of pts with unfavorable tumor grade demonstrate more aggressive tumor types in younger pts. These data confirm the need to improve screening tools to early identify young women with the risk to develop breast cancer, and for personalized treatment approaches in these patients.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hagenbeck
- Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Freising Hospital, Freising, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - B Muschler
- Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Freising Hospital, Freising, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - BAS Jaeger
- Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Freising Hospital, Freising, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - J Jueckstock
- Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Freising Hospital, Freising, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - U Andergassen
- Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Freising Hospital, Freising, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - N Katzorke
- Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Freising Hospital, Freising, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - P Hepp
- Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Freising Hospital, Freising, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - CA Melcher
- Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Freising Hospital, Freising, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - JW Janni
- Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Freising Hospital, Freising, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - BK Rack
- Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany; Freising Hospital, Freising, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Marquaß B, Schiffner E, Theopold J, von Dercks N, Josten C, Hepp P. Ipsilaterale Begleitverletzungen an der oberen Extremität und des Schultergürtels nach proximalen Humerusfrakturen. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/s11678-012-0172-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
44
|
Hepp P, Klima S, von Dercks N, Marquass B, Jung H, Josten C. [Total knee arthroplasty in post-traumatic osteoarthritis]. Z Orthop Unfall 2012; 150:374-80. [PMID: 22918824 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1314995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to analyse the outcome and the complications after total knee arthroplasty in post-traumatic osteoarthritis in comparison to TKA in patients with degenerative osteoarthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a period of six years 43 patients with a post-traumatic osteoarthritis were treated with a total knee arthroplasty (group PT). 38 (88 %) patients (age median 55 years, 22 female, 16 male) were investigated clinically and radiologically after an average follow-up time of 2.7 years. The OKS (Oxford Knee Score, max. 48 points), the Knee Society Scores "function" (max. 100 points) and "knee" (max. 100 points) as well as the visual analogue scale (VAS, 0 to 10 points) were recorded preoperatively and at follow-up. For comparison we chose a matched-pair selection of patients with degenerative osteoarthritis and TKA (group DO, age median 63 years, 22 female, 16 male). For statistical analysis we used common parametric tests (Wilcoxon and U test) and a level of significance of 0.05. RESULTS In 19 patients (50 %) of the group PT the osteoarthritis was caused by a bone injury. Furthermore in 19 patients a meniscal and/or ligamentous injury led to osteoarthritis. Out of all patients of group PT, 10 patients showed a preoperative valgus malalignment higher than 10°. KSS knee and KSS function added up to 76.9 and 84.9 points. So they are significantly less than in the matched group (DO, knee: 86.1; function: 94.4). Similarly, the OKS is significantly less in group PT after follow-up (PT: 32.3; DO: 38.4, p ≤ 0.05) although the preoperative values are equal in both groups. The VAS value decreased significantly in both groups. Initial level of pain was significantly higher in the group DO compared to the group PT. Patients with osteoarthritis after trauma showed complications in 17 cases (^ = 44.7 %) that led to 28 revision operations (^ = 0.7 operations per knee). The group with valgus malalignment had a revision rate of 1.4 operations per knee. In the group DO 8 complications occurred (^ = 21,1 %) that led to 11 revision operations (^=0.3 per knee). The deviation from the "ideal" leg axis could be reduced from 3.8° varus to 1.7° varus in the group DO and from 1.3° valgus auf 1.2° valgus in the group PT. Patients with a preoperative valgus deviation > 10° were reduced from 13.6° (± 3.9°) valgus to 0.5° (± 9.2°) varus. CONCLUSION Patients after TKA because of post-traumatic osteoarthritis show worse results concerning function and condition compared to patients with degenerative osteoarthritis. Heterogeneous pathogenesis and high rates of revision operations underline the complexity of this group of patients. The treatment has to be adjusted to the patient's requirements as well to the pathoanatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Hepp
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Wiederherstellungs- und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Marquass B, Mahn T, Engel T, Gossner J, Theopold JD, von Dercks N, Racynski C, Rose T, Josten C, Hepp P. [Clinical and radiological mid-term results after autologous osteochondral transplantation under consideration of quality of life]. Z Orthop Unfall 2012; 150:360-7. [PMID: 22918823 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1314958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects remains a challenge in musculoskeletal surgery. Autologous osteochondral transplantation represents a possible solution for the repair of affected areas. However, some problems like degenerative changes of the transplanted cylinders and the surrounding cartilage or lack of cylinder integration to the surrounding cartilage arise with this method. Thus mid-term results respecting the quality of life are useful for assessment of the method. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS We investigated 22 patients with a mean follow-up of 88 ± 14.5 months after autologous osteochondral transplantation due to a full-thickness cartilage defect of the medial femoral condyle. Beside clinical scores we assessed at follow-up the quality of life using the SF-36 health survey and the EQ-5D. Furthermore, radiological changes were detected and MRI was performed in 21 patients. A control group of 19 patients, treated with microfracture, was matched in terms of BMI, gender and age. Exclusion criteria for this group were tibial kissing lesion, ligament instability, arthrosis and malalignment. RESULTS In a longitudinal comparison with results 13.5 months after operation, no difference in Lysholm score was found. In plain radiographs higher degrees of arthritic changes in the medial compartment compared to the unaffected knee were observed. MRI revealed a mean modified MOCART score of 41.2 ± 7.7 for the OAT group and of 39.4 ± 16.1 for the microfracture group, without being significant. For OAT patients all cylinders showed an osseous integration. However, cylinder oedema was found in 9 patients. Those patients had a higher intensity of pain on a visual analogue scale. Quality of life was better for OAT patients in the physical scale of SF-36, but not in the mental scale. CONCLUSION Autologous osteochondral transplantation has an unaltered significance in treating full-thickness cartilage defects and leads to satisfying mid-term results. The development of early arthritic changes might not be preventable by this method. Oedema of the transplanted cylinders is attended by higher pain intensity and might be an indirect sign of cartilage degeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Marquass
- Klinik für Unfall-, Wiederherstellungs- und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD), i.e., isolated tumor cells (ITC) in bone marrow, may be the source of potentially fatal overt distant metastases in solid tumors even years after primary treatment. MRD can be detected by immunohistochemical methods using antibodies directed against cytokeratins, cell-surface markers, or molecular PCR-based techniques. Among solid tumors, the clinical relevance of MRD has been most extensively studied in breast cancer patients. The highest level of evidence for the prognostic impact of MRD in primary breast cancer was reached by a pooled analysis comprising more than 4,000 patients, showing poor outcome in patients with MRD at primary therapy. Yet, clinical application of MRD detection is hampered by the lack of a standardized detection assay. Moreover, clinical trial results demonstrating the benefit of a therapeutic interference derived from bone marrow status are still missing. Recent results suggest that in addition to its prognostic impact, MRD can be used for therapy monitoring or as a potential therapeutic target after phenotyping of the tumor cells. Persisting MRD after primary treatment may lead to an indication for extended adjuvant therapy. In a pooled analysis bone marrow aspirates of 726 patients from academic breast cancer units in Oslo (n=356), Munich (n=228), and Tuebingen (n=142) were analyzed during recurrence-free follow-up at a mean interval of 31.7 months after primary diagnosis of breast cancer pT1-4, pN0-3 pM0. Persistent ITC was detected in 15.4% of the patients (n=112). The Kaplan-Meier estimate for mean distant relapse-free survival estimate was 163.6 months in patients with negative and 105.2 months in patients with positive BM status. Patients without evidence of persistent ITC had a significantly longer overall survival (165.6), than patients with positive bone marrow status (103.3 months, p < .0001). Given these inspiring results on ITC in the bone marrow, several trials currently analyze the prognostic relecance of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in peripheral blood in the adjuvant setting. Persisting MRD after primary treatment may lead to an indication for extended adjuvant therapy. However, until clinical consequences of MRD detection in solid tumors and particularly in breast cancer have been validated, the detection of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow should be performed mainly in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Janni
- Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Andergassen U, Zebisch M, Kölbl AC, Schindlbeck C, Jäger B, Hepp P, Janni W, Jeschke U, Friese K, Rack BJ. P1-07-24: Quantitative and Immunohistochemical Detection of Breast Cancer Cells in Blood Samples. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p1-07-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood are found in patients with epithelial carcinomas (breast cancer) and are often correlated with poor prognosis of the disease. In current models circulating tumor cells (CTCs) dissolved from the primary tumor are thought to be responsible for the occurrence of metastases. However, the detection of CTCs is still a technical challenge. In this study, two methods for tumor cell detection of patients’ samples are presented (Real-Time-PCR and immunohisto-chemical staining). Both are simple and known methods with a high sensitivity and a spread marker panel.
Materials and Methods For the implementation of both methods, different breast cancer cell lines have been used (Cama-1, MCF-7; ZR-75-1). For Real-Time-PCR, blood samples of a healthy donors were spiked with different cell counts (0, 10, 100, 1000, 10.000 and 100.000) per ml blood sample. Total RNA was isolated from the samples, reversely transcribed into cDNA and used for TaqMan Real-Time-PCR reaction with probes against CK8, 18 and 19, while 18S was used as reference. Relative Quantification Curves were drawn by Microsoft™ Excel®. For immunohistochemical staining, cytospins were prepared from spiked blood samples, fixed with acetone, air dried and stained with antibodies against Her2- and Thomsen-Friedenreich-Antigen (CD176). In a second staining step fluorescently labelled secondary antibodies were applied. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI, TF-Antigen was stained by Cy2 and Her2-Antigen by Cy3. The staining was controlled and documented by an epifluorescence microscope.
Results The curve of Relative Quantification for MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 cells shows an increasing slope starting from 1000 cells. For the Cama-1 cell line this trend is already seen from 10–100 cells. In ZR-75-1 all three genes analysed reveal this trend, whereas in Cama-1 and MCF-7 cells a strong increase in Relative Quantification is especially seen for CK8 and 18. In the immunohistochemical staining, the cells were considered as tumour cells if they showed staining with the antibody-combinations used. Stained cells were counted and recovery rates were determined. For ZR-75-1, 17 of 30 cells which were spiked in the blood samples were recovered. For MCF-7, 18 cells were found in average, and for Cama-1 23 cells were located per slide. The recovery rates calculated from these numbers are 56,6% and 60,0% for ZR-75-1 and MCF-7, for Cama-1 the recovery rate reaches 76,6%.
Conclusion It seems that Cama-1 cells are a better model than MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 for Real-Time PCR quantification of mamma carcinoma tumor cells in blood samples. MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 cells tend to react more likely immunologically with blood cells of the donor (agglutination between blood cells and cancer cells). The Cama-1 cell line shows also advantages in the detection of tumor cells using immunohistochemical staining. Therefore it will be necessary to test both methods on patient samples to proof their benefit.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-24.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Andergassen
- 1Ludwig-Maximilians-University Muenchen, Munich, Bayern, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, NRW, Germany; Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Bayern, Germany
| | - M Zebisch
- 1Ludwig-Maximilians-University Muenchen, Munich, Bayern, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, NRW, Germany; Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Bayern, Germany
| | - AC Kölbl
- 1Ludwig-Maximilians-University Muenchen, Munich, Bayern, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, NRW, Germany; Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Bayern, Germany
| | - C Schindlbeck
- 1Ludwig-Maximilians-University Muenchen, Munich, Bayern, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, NRW, Germany; Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Bayern, Germany
| | - B Jäger
- 1Ludwig-Maximilians-University Muenchen, Munich, Bayern, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, NRW, Germany; Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Bayern, Germany
| | - P Hepp
- 1Ludwig-Maximilians-University Muenchen, Munich, Bayern, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, NRW, Germany; Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Bayern, Germany
| | - W Janni
- 1Ludwig-Maximilians-University Muenchen, Munich, Bayern, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, NRW, Germany; Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Bayern, Germany
| | - U Jeschke
- 1Ludwig-Maximilians-University Muenchen, Munich, Bayern, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, NRW, Germany; Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Bayern, Germany
| | - K Friese
- 1Ludwig-Maximilians-University Muenchen, Munich, Bayern, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, NRW, Germany; Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Bayern, Germany
| | - BJ Rack
- 1Ludwig-Maximilians-University Muenchen, Munich, Bayern, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, NRW, Germany; Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Bayern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Salmen JC, Fasching PA, Hepp P, Jueckstock J, Haeberle L, Mohrmann S, Beckmann MW, Hartmann A, Wachter DL, Friese K, Janni W, Rack B. P4-02-07: Influence of the Progesterone Receptor on the Prognosis of Breast Cancer in Interaction with Other Prognostic Factors. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p4-02-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: The expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) and/or the progesterone receptor (PR) is a predictive factor for the response to endocrine treatment and to chemotherapy in primary breast cancer. Knowledge about the prognostic relevance of the PR is rare and partly controversial. Aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the prognostic relevance of PR.
Methods: Between 1995 and 2008, data from 5,144 patients with heterogeneously treated primary breast cancers have been collected in 3 German university hospitals.
The laboratories used immunhistochemical assays for the investigation of the ER and PR.
The PR-expression was correlated with patient and tumor characteristics.
For each outcome parameter overall survival (OS), distant disease free survival (DDFS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) cox proportional hazad models were built. Furthermore the effect of the PR status was analyzed according to tumor subgroups.
Results: PR status was associated with a more favourable OS, DDFS and LRFS in the univariate analysis. PR remained an independent prognostic factor for OS and DDFS but not for LRFS in the cox proportional hazard model.
For OS and DDFS the prognostic effect of PR seemed to be consistent among the subgroups and was significant for most of them. Comparing subgroups there was a difference between the HR for ER negatives and ER positives. In ER negative tumors the prognostic effect of the PR seemed to be larger (HR=0.40; 95%CI: 0.25−0.63) than in ER positives (HR=0.68; 95%CI: 0.53−0.87). For all other subgroups there seemed to be no interaction between PR status and the other prognostic factors.
Conclusion: PR positivity results into a similarly favourable prognosis in ER negative and ER positive patients. ER positivity alone seems not to be sufficient to define a group of patients with the most favourable prognosis. On the contrary, patients with ER positive, PR negative tumors have a signicantly deteriorated prognosis and seem to be a patient group, which should be investigated concerning drug resistance mechanisms.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JC Salmen
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - PA Fasching
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - P Hepp
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - J Jueckstock
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - L Haeberle
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - S Mohrmann
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - MW Beckmann
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hartmann
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - DL Wachter
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - K Friese
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - W Janni
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - B Rack
- 1Frauenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet, Duesseldorf, Germany; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles; LMU Muenchen, Frauenklinik Innenstadt Maistrasse 11, Muenchen, Germany; Frauenklinik des Universitaetsklinikums Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Andergassen U, Rack B, Hepp P, Wischnik A, Bauerfeind I, Sommer HL, Beck T, Beckmann MW, Janni W, Friese K. Prognostische Relevanz von CA27.29 in der Therapie von primärem Mammakarzinom im Rahmen der SUCCESS Studie. CA 27.29 vor adjuvanter Chemotherapie und 2 Jahren nach Therapie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2011. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1278550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
50
|
Jäger B, Hepp P, Rack B, Schindlbeck C, Andergassen U, Neugebauer J, Beck T, Schlag R, Hönig A, Bauerfeind I, Beckmann MW, Janni W, Friese K. Korrelation von CA27.29 und zirkulierenden Tumorzellen bevor, nach abgeschlossener Chemotherapie und nach zwei Jahre bei Patientinnen mit primärem Brustkrebs – Ergebnisse der SUCCESS Studie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2011. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1278568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|