Prognostic impact of late gadolinium enhancement at the right ventricular insertion points in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy

AIMS

To evaluate the baseline characteristics and the prognostic implications associated with late gadolinium enhancement limited to the right ventricular insertion points (IP-LGE) or present at both the right ventricular insertion points and the left ventricle (IP&LV-LGE) in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a retrospective observational multicentre cohort study including 1165 consecutive patients with DCM evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance. The primary endpoint included appropriate defibrillator therapies, sustained ventricular tachycardia, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or sudden death. The secondary outcome encompassed heart failure hospitalizations, heart transplant, left ventricular assist device implantation, and end-stage heart failure death. IP-LGE was found in 72 patients (6%), who had clinical characteristics closer to LGE- than to LGE+ patients. During follow-up (median 36 months), none of the IP-LGE patients experienced the primary endpoint. The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was similar between IP-LGE and LGE- patients (P = 1), while IP-LGE had significantly lower cumulative incidence when compared with LGE+ patients (P < 0.001). When compared with IP-LGE patients, the cumulative incidence of the secondary endpoint was similar in LGE- cases (P = 0.86) but tended to be higher in LGE+ patients (P = 0.06). Both clinical characteristics and outcomes were similar between IP&LV-LGE patients and the rest of LGE+ cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of DCM patients, IP-LGE was associated with similar outcome when compared with LGE- patients and with significant lower risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death when compared with LGE+ cases. Patients with IP&LV-LGE had clinical characteristics and outcomes similar to the rest of LGE+ cases.

Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Death in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Matter of Sex or Scar?

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the association between sex and ventricular arrhythmias (VA) or sudden death (SD) in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, including analysis of potential confounders.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with DCM referred for cardiac magnetic resonance at 2 tertiary hospitals. The primary combined end point encompassed sustained VA, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and SD. We included 1165 patients with median follow-up of 36 months (interquartile range 20-58 months). The majority of patients (66%) were males. Males and females had similar left ventricular ejection fraction, but the prevalence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at cardiac magnetic resonance was significantly higher among males (48% vs 30%, P < .001). Males had higher cumulative incidence of the primary end point (8% vs 4%, P = .02), and male sex was a significant predictor of the primary end point at univariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.93, P = .02). However, LGE had a major confounding effect in the association between sex and the primary outcome: the hazard ratio of male sex adjusted for LGE was 1.29 (P = .37). LGE+ females had significantly higher cumulative incidence of the primary end point than LGE- males (13% vs 1.8%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with DCM, the prevalence of LGE is significantly higher among males, implying a major confounding effect in the association between male sex and VA or SD. LGE+ females have significantly higher risk than LGE- males. These data do not support the inclusion of sex into risk stratification algorithms for VA or SD in DCM.

Improved prediction of electrical storm in patients with prior myocardial infarction and implantaImproved prediction of electrical storm in patients with prior myocardiable cardioverter defibrillator

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Aims

To evaluate predictors of electrical storm (ES), including chronic total occlusion in an infarct-related coronary artery (infarct-related artery CTO, IRACTO), in a cohort of patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD).

Methods

Multicenter observational cohort study including 643 consecutive patients with prior MI and a first ICD implanted between 2005 and 2018 at three tertiary hospitals. All the patients included in the study had undergone a diagnostic coronary angiography before ICD implantation. The variable prior ventricular arrhythmias (VA+) was positive in patients with secondary prevention ICDs and in those with at least one appropriate ICD therapy after primary prevention implantation.

Results

During a median follow-up of 42 months 59 patients (9%) suffered ES. The presence of at least one IRACTO not revascularized (IRACTO-NR) was associated with a significantly higher cumulative incidence of ES (14.5% vs 4.8%, p&lt;0.001). IRACTO-NR maintained a significant association with ES after adjustment for potential confounders (HR 2.3, p=0.005) and was an independent predictor of ES together with VA+ and LVEF. The best cut-off of LVEF to predict ES was ≤38%. A risk-prediction model based on IRACTO-NR, VA+ and LVEF≤38% identified three categories of ES risk (low, intermediate and high), with progressively increasing cumulative incidence of ES (2.2%, 9% and 20%).

Conclusion

In a cohort of patients with prior MI and ICD, IRACTO-NR is an independent predictor of ES. A new risk-prediction model allowed the identification of three categories of risk, with potentially important clinical implications.

Risk Factors for CIED Infection After Secondary Procedures: Insights From the WRAP-IT Trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify risk factors for infection after secondary cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures.

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for CIED infection are not well defined and techniques to minimize infection lack supportive evidence. WRAP-IT (World-wide Randomized Antibiotic Envelope Infection Prevention trial), a large study that assessed the safety and efficacy of an antibacterial envelope for CIED infection reduction, offers insight into procedural details and infection prevention strategies.

METHODS

This analysis included 2,803 control patients from the WRAP-IT trial who received standard preoperative antibiotics but not the envelope (44 patients with major infections through all follow-up). A multivariate least absolute shrinkage and selection operator machine learning model, controlling for patient characteristics and procedural variables, was used for risk factor selection and identification. Risk factors consistently retaining predictive value in the model (appeared >10 times) across 100 iterations of imputed data were deemed significant.

RESULTS

Of the 81 variables screened, 17 were identified as risk factors with 6 being patient/device-related (nonmodifiable) and 11 begin procedure-related (potentially modifiable). Patient/device-related factors included higher number of previous CIED procedures, history of atrial arrhythmia, geography (outside North America and Europe), device type, and lower body mass index. Procedural factors associated with increased risk included longer procedure time, implant location (non-left pectoral subcutaneous), perioperative glycopeptide antibiotic versus nonglycopeptide, anticoagulant, and/or antiplatelet use, and capsulectomy. Factors associated with decreased risk of infection included chlorhexidine skin preparation and antibiotic pocket wash.

CONCLUSIONS

In WRAP-IT patients, we observed that several procedural risk factors correlated with infection risk. These results can help guide infection prevention strategies to minimize infections associated with secondary CIED procedures.

Improved Risk Stratification for Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Death in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden death in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains suboptimal.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to provide an improved risk stratification algorithm for VA and sudden death in DCM.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with DCM who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at 2 tertiary referral centers. The combined arrhythmic endpoint included appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies, sustained ventricular tachycardia, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and sudden death.

RESULTS

In 1,165 patients with a median follow-up of 36 months, LGE was an independent and strong predictor of the arrhythmic endpoint (hazard ratio: 9.7; p < 0.001). This association was consistent across all strata of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Epicardial LGE, transmural LGE, and combined septal and free-wall LGE were all associated with heightened risk. A simple algorithm combining LGE and 3 LVEF strata (i.e., ≤20%, 21% to 35%, >35%) was significantly superior to LVEF with the 35% cutoff (Harrell's C statistic: 0.8 vs. 0.69; area under the curve: 0.82 vs. 0.7; p < 0.001) and reclassified the arrhythmic risk of 34% of patients with DCM. LGE-negative patients with LVEF 21% to 35% had low risk (annual event rate 0.7%), whereas those with high-risk LGE distributions and LVEF >35% had significantly higher risk (annual event rate 3%; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients with DCM, LGE was found to be a significant, consistent, and strong predictor of VA or sudden death. Specific high-risk LGE distributions were identified. A new clinical algorithm integrating LGE and LVEF significantly improved the risk stratification for VA and sudden death, with relevant implications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator allocation.

Reduction in new cardiac electronic device implantations in Catalonia during COVID-19

Aims

During the COVID-19 pandemic, concern regarding its effect on the management of non-communicable diseases has been raised. However, there are no data on the impact on cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantation rates. We aimed to determine the impact of SARS-CoV2 on the monthly incidence rates and type of pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantations in Catalonia before and after the declaration of the state of alarm in Spain on 14 March 2020.

Methods and results

Data on new CIED implantations for 2017–20 were prospectively collected by nine hospitals in Catalonia. A mixed model with random intercepts corrected for time was used to estimate the change in monthly CIED implantations. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, an absolute decrease of 56.5% was observed (54.7% in PM and 63.7% in ICD) in CIED implantation rates. Total CIED implantations for 2017–19 and January and February 2020 was 250/month (>195 PM and >55 ICD), decreasing to 207 (161 PM and 46 ICD) in March and 131 (108 PM and 23 ICD) in April 2020. In April 2020, there was a significant fall of 185.25 CIED implantations compared to 2018 [95% confidence interval (CI) 129.6–240.9; P < 0.001] and of 188 CIED compared to 2019 (95% CI 132.3–243.7; P < 0.001). No significant differences in the type of PM or ICD were observed, nor in the indication for primary or secondary prevention.

Conclusions

During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, a substantial decrease in CIED implantations was observed in Catalonia. Our findings call for measures to avoid long-term social impact.

Genotype-phenotype correlation of LMNA variants involving the Arg541 residue: a case report with multimodality imaging and literature review

We present a case of atypical LMNA cardiomyopathy associated with the pathogenic variant p.Arg541Ser. The patient had early-onset severe ventricular arrhythmias but atrioventricular conduction was normal. Segmental motion abnormalities and a large transmural scar, mainly apical and lateral, were found at cardiac magnetic resonance, corresponding to areas of severe wall thinning at computed tomography and of low voltages at electroanatomic mapping. Ventricular tachycardia ablation was successful in controlling ventricular arrhythmias. Few other cases described patients with pathogenic variants in the Arg541 residue, and they displayed similar atypical features, suggesting a genotype-phenotype correlation which may have specific prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Antitachycardia pacing for shock prevention in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) carries an increased risk of sudden death due to ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a well-established therapy for treatment of VA. Monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (MVTs) are frequent in HCM patients and suitable for antitachycardia pacing (ATP) termination.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe ventricular tachycardia (VT) characteristics in a population of HCM patients with ICD and to study the effectiveness and safety of ATP for MVT.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the multicenter prospective observational UMBRELLA trial, which included all patients with HCM and ICD followed by the CareLink Monitoring System. All episodes of VA were collected and analyzed. ATP effectiveness and safety were described, and factors related to ATP effectiveness were studied with generalized estimating equation (GEE) models.

RESULTS

Among 251 patients followed for 47 months, 67 (26.7%) were implanted as secondary prevention. Fifty-six patients presented 326 episodes of VA (286 [87%] MVT). Mean cycle length was 312 ± 64 ms. Among 264 MVTs that received ICD therapy, 202 (76.5%) were ATP terminated. The first ATP burst was effective in 169 episodes (68.4%), and overall effectiveness of the first or second ATP burst was 73.8%. Multivariate GEE-adjusted analysis showed 2 variables related to ATP effectiveness: programming fast VT zone On vs Off (odds ratio [OR] 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-5.2; P = .03) and programming ≥2 ATP bursts vs 1 burst only (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2-3.4; P = .04; and OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.8-6.3; P = .02; respectively).

CONCLUSION

MVT is the predominant VA in HCM patients with ICD. ATP is highly effective in terminating the majority of MVTs, and its proved effectiveness should guide device selection and programming in order to avoid unnecessary high-energy shocks.

Shock Reduction With Antitachycardia Pacing Before and During Charging for Fast Ventricular Tachycardias in Patients With Implantable Defibrillators

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Fast ventricular tachycardias in the ventricular fibrillation zone in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator are susceptible to antitachycardia pacing (ATP) termination. Some manufacturers allow programming 2 ATP bursts: before charging (BC) and during (DC) charging. The aim of this study was to describe the safety and effectiveness of ATP BC and DC for fast ventricular tachycardias in the ventricular fibrillation zone in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in daily clinical practice.

METHODS

Data proceeded from the multicenter UMBRELLA trial, including implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients followed up by the CareLink monitoring system. Fast ventricular tachycardias in the ventricular fibrillation zone until a cycle length of 200ms with ATP BC and/or ATP DC were included.

RESULTS

We reviewed 542 episodes in 240 patients. Two ATP bursts (BC/DC) were programmed in 291 episodes (53.7%, 87 patients), while 251 episodes (46.3%, 153 patients) had 1 ATP burst only DC. The number of episodes terminated by 1 ATP DC was 139, representing 55.4% effectiveness (generalized estimating equation-adjusted 60.4%). There were 256 episodes terminated by 1 or 2 ATP (BC/DC), representing 88% effectiveness (generalized estimating equation-adjusted 79.3%); the OR for ATP effectiveness BC/DC vs DC was 2.5, 95%CI, 1.5-4.1; P <.001. Shocked episodes were 112 (45%) for ATP DC vs 35 (12%) for ATP BC/DC, representing an absolute reduction of 73%. The mean shocked episode duration was 16seconds for ATP DC vs 19seconds for ATP BC/DC (P=.07).

CONCLUSIONS

The ATP DC in the ventricular fibrillation zone for fast ventricular tachycardia is moderately effective. Adding an ATP burst BC increases the overall effectiveness, reduces the need for shocks, and does not prolong episode duration.

Late Gadolinium Enhancement and the Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmias or Sudden Death in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification for SCD in DCM needs to be improved.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. A systematic search of PubMed and Ovid was performed, and observational studies that analyzed the arrhythmic endpoint (sustained ventricular arrhythmia, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ICD] therapy, or SCD) in patients with DCM, stratified by the presence or absence of LGE, were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were included, accounting for 2,948 patients. The studies covered a wide spectrum of DCM, with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction between 20% and 43%. LGE was significantly associated with the arrhythmic endpoint both in the overall population (odds ratio: 4.3; p < 0.001) and when including only those studies that performed multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 6.7; p < 0.001). The association between LGE and the arrhythmic endpoint remained significant among studies with mean left ventricular ejection fractions >35% (odds ratio: 5.2; p < 0.001) and was maximal in studies that included only patients with primary prevention ICDs (odds ratio: 7.8; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Across a wide spectrum of patients with DCM, LGE is strongly and independently associated with ventricular arrhythmia or SCD. LGE could be a powerful tool to improve risk stratification for SCD in patients with DCM. These results raise 2 major questions to be addressed in future studies: whether patients with LGE could benefit from primary prevention ICDs irrespective of their left ventricular ejection fractions, while patients without LGE might not need preventive ICDs despite having severe left ventricular dysfunction.