A streamlined pathway for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the BENCHMARK study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is significant potential to streamline the clinical pathway for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementing BENCHMARK best practices on the efficiency and safety of TAVI in 28 sites in 7 European countries.

METHODS

This was a study of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable valves before and after implementation of BENCHMARK best practices. Principal objectives were to reduce hospital length of stay (LoS) and duration of intensive care stay. Secondary objective was to document patient safety.

RESULTS

Between January 2020 and March 2023, 897 patients were documented prior to and 1491 patients after the implementation of BENCHMARK practices. Patient characteristics were consistent with a known older TAVI population and only minor differences. Mean LoS was reduced from 7.7 ± 7.0 to 5.8 ± 5.6 days (median 6 vs. 4 days; P < .001). Duration of intensive care was reduced from 1.8 to 1.3 days (median 1.1 vs. 0.9 days; P < .001). Adoption of peri-procedure best practices led to increased use of local anaesthesia (96.1% vs. 84.3%; P < .001) and decreased procedure (median 47 vs. 60 min; P < .001) and intervention times (85 vs. 95 min; P < .001). Thirty-day patient safety did not appear to be compromised with no differences in all-cause mortality (0.6% in both groups combined), stroke/transient ischaemic attack (1.4%), life-threatening bleeding (1.3%), stage 2/3 acute kidney injury (0.7%), and valve-related readmission (1.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Broad implementation of BENCHMARK practices contributes to improving efficiency of TAVI pathway reducing LoS and costs without compromising patient safety.

Assessment of hydro-saline retention in bullous pemphigoid patients treated with super-potent topical corticosteroids

INTRODUCTION

Super-potent topical corticosteroids (CS) are the mainstay of treatment for bullous pemphigoid. Since super-potent topical CS have systemic effects due to their transcutaneous absorption, we assessed whether super-potent CS were responsible for hydro-saline retention (HSR) in bullous pemphigoid patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2015 to 2017, patients with newly-diagnosed bullous pemphigoid treated using clobetasol propionate cream at a starting daily dose of 20 to 40 g were subsequently included in a prospective study. HSR was assessed by longitudinally measuring extracellular water (ECW) volume using bioimpedance analysis (BodyStat QuadScan 4000®) from Day 0 to Day 30 after the initiation of topical CS. Other parameters related to HSR such as weight, blood pressure, natriuresis and proteinuria, were also recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (14 men and 15 women) of mean age 81.8 ± 9.3 years were included and analysed. The mean ECW volume decreased from Day 0 to Day 7 (18.1 ± 4.2 vs 16.7 ± 2.7, p = 0.0094) and was maintained from Day 7 to Day 30 (16.8 ± 2.8 vs 17.0 ± 3.4 L; p = 0.8040). Patient weight loss at Day 30 (69.9 ± 13.6 vs 72.5 ± 14.2 kg, p = 0.0085) was closely correlated with the decrease in ECW volume (r = 0.6740, p < 0.0001). No significant changes in natriuresis, 24-hour proteinuria or blood pressure were observed from Day 0 to Day 30.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of HSR in bullous pemphigoid patients treated with super-potent topical CS. Conversely, ECW volume decreased from Day 0 to Day 30, which was correlated with patient weight loss.

Impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment of psoriasis with systemic therapies in France: Results from the PSOBIOTEQ cohort

BACKGROUND

The nature of the COVID-19 pandemic led to concerns among patients and physicians about the potential impact of immunosuppressive treatments for chronic diseases such as psoriasis on the risk of severe COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

To describe treatment modifications and determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection among psoriasis patients during the first wave of the pandemic, and identify the factors associated with these events.

METHODS

Data from PSOBIOTEQ cohort relating to the first COVID-19 wave in France (March to June, 2020), as well as a patient-centred COVID-19 questionnaire, were used to evaluate the impact of lockdown on changes (discontinuations, delays or reductions) in systemic therapies, and to determine the incidence of COVID-19 cases among these patients. Logistic regression models were used to assess associated factors.

RESULTS

Among the 1751 respondents (89.3%), 282 patients (16.9%) changed their systemic treatment for psoriasis, with 46.0% of these changes being initiated by the patients themselves. Patients were more likely to experience psoriasis flare-ups during the first wave if they changed their treatment during this period (58.7% vs 14.4%; P < 0.0001). Changes to systemic therapies were less frequent among patients with cardiovascular diseases (P < 0.001), and those aged ≥ 65 years (P = 0.02). Overall, 45 patients (2.9%) reported having COVID-19, and eight (17.8%) required hospitalization. Risk factors for COVID-19 infection were close contact with a positive case (P < 0.001) and living in a region with a high incidence of COVID-19 (P < 0.001). Factors associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 were avoiding seeing a physician (P = 0.002), systematically wearing a mask during outings (P = 0.011) and being a current smoker (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation of systemic psoriasis treatments during the first COVID-19 wave (16.9%) - mainly decided by patients themselves (46.0%) - was associated with a higher incidence of disease flares (58.7% vs 14.4%). This observation and factors associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 highlight the need to maintain and adapt patient-physician communication during health crises according to patient profiles, with the aim of avoiding unnecessary treatment discontinuations and ensuring that patients are informed about the risk of infection and the importance of complying with hygiene rules.

Switches between biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the French cohort PSOBIOTEQ

BACKGROUND

Biologics are the cornerstone of treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and switches between biologics are frequently needed to maintain clinical improvement over time.

OBJECTIVES

The main purpose of this study was to describe precisely switches between biologics and how their pattern changed over time with the recent availability of new biologic agents.

METHODS

We included patients receiving a first biologic agent in the Psobioteq multicenter cohort of adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving systemic treatment. We described switches between biologics with chronograms, Sankey and Sunburst diagrams, assessed cumulative incidence of first switch by competing risks survival analysis and reasons for switching. We assessed the factors associated with the type of switch (intra-class - i.e. within the same therapeutic class - vs. inter-class) in patients switching from a TNF-alpha inhibitor using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 2153 patients was included. The cumulative incidence of switches from first biologic was 34% at 3 years. Adalimumab and ustekinumab were the most prescribed biologic agents as first and second lines of treatment. The main reason for switching was loss of efficacy (72%), followed by adverse events (11%). Patients receiving a TNF-alpha inhibitor before 2016 mostly switched to ustekinumab, whereas those switching in 2016 or after mostly switched to an IL-17 inhibitor. Patients switching from a first-line TNF-alpha inhibitor before 2016 were more likely to switch to another TNF-alpha inhibitor compared with patients switching since 2018. Patients switching from etanercept were more likely to receive another TNF-alpha inhibitor rather than another therapeutic class of bDMARD compared with patients switching from adalimumab.

CONCLUSION

This study described the switching patterns of biologic treatments and showed how they changed over time, due to the availability of the new biologic agents primarily IL-17 inhibitors.

Updated S2 K guidelines for the management of bullous pemphigoid initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV)

BACKGROUND

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease of the skin and mucous membranes. This disease typically affects the elderly and presents with itch and localized or, most frequently, generalized bullous lesions. A subset of patients only develops excoriations, prurigo-like lesions, and eczematous and/or urticarial erythematous lesions. The disease, which is significantly associated with neurological disorders, has high morbidity and severely impacts the quality of life.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY

The Autoimmune blistering diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology sought to update the guidelines for the management of BP based on new clinical information, and new evidence on diagnostic tools and interventions. The recommendations are either evidence-based or rely on expert opinion. The degree of consent among all task force members was included.

RESULTS

Treatment depends on the severity of BP and patients' comorbidities. High-potency topical corticosteroids are recommended as the mainstay of treatment whenever possible. Oral prednisone at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day is a recommended alternative. In case of contraindications or resistance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressive therapies, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate acid, may be recommended. The use of doxycycline and dapsone is controversial. They may be recommended, in particular, in patients with contraindications to oral corticosteroids. B-cell-depleting therapy and intravenous immunoglobulins may be considered in treatment-resistant cases. Omalizumab and dupilumab have recently shown promising results. The final version of the guideline was consented to by several patient organizations.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines for the management of BP were updated. They summarize evidence- and expert-based recommendations useful in clinical practice.

Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus with efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor: a phase II multicentre, open-label feasibility trial

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus are potentially life-threatening autoimmune disorders triggered by IgG autoantibodies against mucosal and epidermal desmogleins. There is an unmet need for fast-acting drugs that enable patients to achieve early sustained remission with reduced corticosteroid reliance.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate efgartigimod, an engineered Fc fragment that inhibits the activity of the neonatal Fc receptor, thereby reducing serum IgG levels, for treating pemphigus.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with mild-to-moderate pemphigus vulgaris or foliaceus were enrolled in an open-label phase II adaptive trial. In sequential cohorts, efgartigimod was dosed at 10 or 25 mg kg^-1 intravenously with various dosing frequencies, as monotherapy or as add-on therapy to low-dose oral prednisone. Safety endpoints comprised the primary outcome. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT03334058).

RESULTS

Adverse events were mostly mild and were reported by 16 of 19 (84%) patients receiving efgartigimod 10 mg kg^-1 and 13 of 15 (87%) patients receiving 25 mg kg^-1 , with similar adverse event profiles between dose groups. A major decrease in serum total IgG and anti-desmoglein autoantibodies was observed and correlated with improved Pemphigus Disease Area Index scores. Efgartigimod, as monotherapy or combined with prednisone, demonstrated early disease control in 28 of 31 (90%) patients after a median of 17 days. Optimized, prolonged treatment with efgartigimod in combination with a median dose of prednisone 0·26 mg kg^-1 per day (range 0·06-0·48) led to complete clinical remission in 14 of 22 (64%) patients within 2-41 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Efgartigimod was well tolerated and exhibited an early effect on disease activity and outcome parameters, providing support for further evaluation as a therapy for pemphigus.

European Guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology - Part II

This guideline has been initiated by the task force Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, including physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus-based guideline that systematically reviewed the literature on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until June 2019, with no limitations on language. While the first part of this guideline addressed methodology, as well as epidemiology, terminology, aetiology, clinical presentation and outcome measures in MMP, the second part presents the diagnostics and management of MMP. MMP should be suspected in cases with predominant mucosal lesions. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy to detect tissue-bound IgG, IgA and/or complement C3, combined with serological testing for circulating autoantibodies are recommended. In most patients, serum autoantibodies are present only in low levels and in variable proportions, depending on the clinical sites involved. Circulating autoantibodies are determined by indirect IF assays using tissue substrates, or ELISA using different recombinant forms of the target antigens or immunoblotting using different substrates. The major target antigen in MMP is type XVII collagen (BP180), although in 10-25% of patients laminin 332 is recognized. In 25-30% of MMP patients with anti-laminin 332 reactivity, malignancies have been associated. As first-line treatment of mild/moderate MMP, dapsone, methotrexate or tetracyclines and/or topical corticosteroids are recommended. For severe MMP, dapsone and oral or intravenous cyclophosphamide and/or oral corticosteroids are recommended as first-line regimens. Additional recommendations are given, tailored to treatment of single-site MMP such as oral, ocular, laryngeal, oesophageal and genital MMP, as well as the diagnosis of ocular MMP. Treatment recommendations are limited by the complete lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials.

European guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology - Part I

This guideline on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) has been elaborated by the Task Force for Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) with a contribution of physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus-based guideline encompassing a systematic review of the literature until June 2019 in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. This first part covers methodology, the clinical definition of MMP, epidemiology, MMP subtypes, immunopathological characteristics, disease assessment and outcome scores. MMP describes a group of autoimmune skin and mucous membrane blistering diseases, characterized by a chronic course and by predominant involvement of the mucous membranes, such as the oral, ocular, nasal, nasopharyngeal, anogenital, laryngeal and oesophageal mucosa. MMP patients may present with mono- or multisite involvement. Patients' autoantibodies have been shown to be predominantly directed against BP180 (also called BPAG2, type XVII collagen), BP230, laminin 332 and type VII collagen, components of junctional adhesion complexes promoting epithelial stromal attachment in stratified epithelia. Various disease assessment scores are available, including the Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (MMPDAI), the Autoimmune Bullous Skin disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS), the 'Cicatrising Conjunctivitis Assessment Tool' and the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS). Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including DLQI, ABQOL and TABQOL, can be used for assessment of quality of life to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and monitor disease course.

International multicentre observational study to assess the efficacy and safety of a 0·5 mg kg-1 per day starting dose of oral corticosteroids to treat bullous pemphigoid

BACKGROUND

European guidelines propose a 0·5 mg kg^-1 per day dose of oral prednisone as initial treatment for bullous pemphigoid (BP). We assessed the safety and efficacy of this regimen depending on BP extent and general condition of the patients.

METHODS

In a prospective international study, we consecutively included all patients diagnosed with BP. Patients received a 0·5 mg kg^-1 per day dose of prednisone, which was then gradually tapered 15 days after disease control, with the aim of stopping prednisone or maintaining minimal treatment (0·1 mg kg^-1 per day) within 6 months after the start of treatment. The two coprimary endpoints were control of disease activity at day 21 and 1-year overall survival. Disease severity was assessed according to the Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) score.

RESULTS

In total, 198 patients were included between 2015 and 2017. The final analysis comprised 190 patients with a mean age of 80·9 (SD 9·1) years. Control of disease activity was achieved at day 21 in 119 patients [62·6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 55·3-69.5]; 18 of 24 patients (75%, 95% CI 53·3-90·2), 75 of 110 patients (68·8%, 95% CI 59·2-77·3) and 26 of 56 patients (46.4%, 95% CI 33·0-60·3) had mild, moderate and severe BP, respectively (P = 0·0218). A total of 30 patients died during the study. The overall Kaplan-Meier 1-year survival was 82·6% (95% CI 76·3-87·4) corresponding to 90·9%, 83·0% and 80·0% rates in patients with mild, moderate and severe BP, respectively (P = 0·5). Thresholds of 49 points for BPDAI score and 70 points for Karnofsky score yielded maximal Youden index values with respect to disease control at day 21 and 1-year survival, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A 0·5 mg kg^-1 per day dose of prednisone is a valuable therapeutic option in patients with mild or moderate BP whose general condition allows them to be autonomous.

Proof of concept for the clinical effects of oral rilzabrutinib, the first Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor for pemphigus vulgaris: the phase II BELIEVE study

Background

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition targets B‐cell and other non‐T‐cell immune cells implicated in the pathophysiology of pemphigus, an autoimmune disease driven by anti‐desmoglein autoantibodies. Rilzabrutinib is a new reversible, covalent BTK inhibitor demonstrating preclinical efficacy as monotherapy in canine pemphigus foliaceus.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral rilzabrutinib in patients with pemphigus vulgaris in a multicentre, proof‐of‐concept, phase II trial.

Methods

Patients with Pemphigus Disease Area Index severity scores 8–45 received 12 weeks of oral rilzabrutinib 400–600 mg twice daily and 12 weeks of follow‐up. Patients initially received between 0 and ≤ 0·5 mg kg⁻¹ prednisone‐equivalent corticosteroid (CS; i.e. ‘low dose’), tapered after control of disease activity (CDA; no new lesions, existing lesions healing). The primary endpoints were CDA within 4 weeks on zero‐to‐low‐dose CS and safety.

Results

In total, 27 patients with pemphigus vulgaris were included: nine newly diagnosed (33%) and 18 relapsing (67%); 11 had moderate disease (41%) and 16 moderate to severe (59%). The primary endpoint, CDA, was achieved in 14 patients (52%, 95% confidence interval 32–71): 11 using low‐dose CS and three using no CS. Over 12 weeks of treatment, mean CS doses reduced from 20·0 to 11·8 mg per day for newly diagnosed patients and from 10·3 to 7·8 mg per day for relapsing patients. Six patients (22%) achieved complete response by week 24, including four (15%) by week 12. Treatment‐related adverse events were mostly mild (grade 1 or 2); one patient experienced grade 3 cellulitis.

Conclusions

Rilzabrutinib alone, or with much lower CS doses than usual, was safe, with rapid clinical activity in pemphigus vulgaris. These data suggest that BTK inhibition may be a promising treatment strategy and support further investigation of rilzabrutinib for the treatment of pemphigus.

What is already known about this topic?

Standard pemphigus treatment relies on systemic high‐dose corticosteroids (CS), rituximab and/or immunosuppressives, which are limited by delayed onset of action and potential toxicities.

Immune‐mediated mechanisms that are fast acting on both the innate and adaptive immune systems, are steroid sparing, and have safety profiles well suited for chronic administration are greatly needed for patients with pemphigus.

What does this study add?

Rilzabrutinib is an oral Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor targeting B‐cell and other non‐T‐cell immune cells implicated in pemphigus pathophysiology.

Treatment with rilzabrutinib (with or without low‐dose CS) demonstrated rapid disease control and a well‐tolerated safety profile in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsing pemphigus vulgaris.

BELIEVE provides evidence for a promising treatment strategy via BTK inhibition, supporting further investigation of rilzabrutinib in other immune‐mediated diseases.

Linked Comment: A.M. Drucker and N.H. Shear. Br J Dermatol 2021; 185:691–692.

Plain language summary available online

Supportive care in the acute phase of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: an international, multidisciplinary Delphi-based consensus

BACKGROUND

Supportive care is the cornerstone of management of adult and paediatric Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). However, consensus on the modalities of supportive care is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim in this international multicentric Delphi exercise was to establish a multidisciplinary expert consensus to standardize recommendations regarding supportive care in the acute phase of SJS/TEN.

METHODS

Participants were sent a survey via the online tool SurveyMonkey, consisting of 103 statements organized into 11 topics: multidisciplinary team composition, suspect drug management, infection prevention, fluid resuscitation and prevention of hypothermia, nutritional support, pain and psychological distress management, management of acute respiratory failure, local skincare, ophthalmological management, management of other mucosa, and additional measures. Participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). The results were analysed according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.

RESULTS

Forty-five participants from 13 countries (on three continents) participated. After the first round, a consensus was obtained for 82.5% of the 103 initially proposed statements. After the second round, a final consensus was obtained for 102 statements.

CONCLUSIONS

We have reached an international Delphi-based consensus on best supportive care practice for SJS/TEN. Our expert consensus should help guide physicians in treating patients with SJS/TEN and thereby improve short-term prognosis and the risk of sequelae.

Prevalence of comorbidities in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis in the French population

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis (Pso) are highly prevalent chronic inflammatory skin diseases. They share similarities regarding severity and impact on quality of life but display differences regarding risk factors, comorbidities, and pathogenesis.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to assess the prevalence of AD and Pso among the French population, along with associated comorbidities, and to compare these data with those of the age- and gender-adjusted French population with neither AD nor Pso.

METHODS

The survey was conducted by a polling institute between September 1 and November 30, 2016, with proportional quota sampling being applied to render the study population representative of the French population. In all, 20 012 individuals were selected from among 900,000 internet users aged≥15years.

RESULTS

Overall, 20,012 adults (48.8% men; 51.2% women) completed a digital questionnaire. The prevalence of AD was 4.65% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.36%-4.94%] and that of Pso was 4.42% [95% CI: 4.14%-4.71%]. More AD patients presented≥1 comorbidity compared to subjects without AD (57.04% vs. 49.2%, P<0.0001) and more Pso patients presented≥1 comorbidity compared to subjects without Pso (60.68% vs. 49.05%, P<0.0001). After adjustment for gender and age, hypertension and dyslipidemia, a greater prevalence of osteoarticular, respiratory and psychiatric diseases was noted in both AD and Pso patients, whereas increased prevalence of obesity was seen only in Pso patients. The prevalence of components of metabolic syndrome was higher among Pso than AD patients.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are required to consolidate these findings, to better characterize the entire spectrum of AD and Pso comorbidities, and to better identify determinants and risk factors, along with targeted therapies.

Engelures et infection COVID-19 : aucune preuve histologique et sérologique de lien de causalité chez 33 patients

Introduction

La maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), due au SRAS-CoV-2, a été déclarée pandémie mondiale le 11 mars 2020. Concomitamment, de nombreux cas d’engelures ont été signalés et l’hypothèse selon laquelle ces lésions étaient liées à l’infection à Covid-19, en tant que forme pauci-symptomatique, a rapidement émergé.

Matériel et méthodes

Etude prospective monocentrique réalisée au CHU de Rouen durant la période de confinement. Tous les patients se présentant pour des engelures étaient inclus. Un bilan biologique standard, immunologique et une sérologie étaient réalisés chez tous les patients à J0 et J14. Les patients présentant des lésions jugées particulièrement sévères bénéficiaient de biopsies cutanées pour histologie standard, IFD, IFI utilisant un sérum de patient contenant des Ac anti-SARS-CoV-2 et RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2.

Résultats

Trent trois patients (14 femmes, 19 hommes) d’âge moyen 23,4 ± 8,7 ans étaient inclus. Tous présentaient des papules érythémateuses et purpuriques localisées sur les orteils ± doigts (12 patients, 36,4 %). Le délai médian entre l’apparition des symptômes et la première consultation était de 8 jours (IQR 6,5–18 jours). Les engelures étaient la seule manifestation clinique dans 23 cas (69,7 %) ; dix patients (30,3 %) ont présenté d’autres symptômes : asthénie (n = 4), toux (n = 3), diarrhée (n = 3), fièvre (n = 2), myalgies (n = 2), céphalées (n = 1) et odynophagie (n = 1). Trois patients récemment testés avaient un résultat négatif en RT-PCR sinusale. La biologie était normale chez 26 patients. Une lymphopénie légère (moyenne de 1,15 ± 0,21 G/L) était observée chez 7 patients. La CRP et la VS étaient normales chez tous. Deux patients avaient des FAN positifs et trois patients avaient une cryoglobulinémie de type III. La biopsie réalisée chez 5 patients montrait un infiltrat lymphocytaire dermique superficiel autour des vaisseaux et des glandes eccrines dans tous les cas. L’IFD montrait des dépôts de fibrinogène et de C3 sur les cellules endothéliales dans tous les cas. L’IFI et la RT-PCR sur peau lésionnelle étaient négatives. La sérologie ALBIA-Spike S1 était négative en IgG pour les 33 sérums à J0 et J14, tandis que 1/33 était positif en IgM à J0 et J14. Aucune séroconversion n’était observée (Figure 2). Nos résultats étaient confirmés par la sérologie Abbott® SARS-CoV-2 IgG réalisé sur les sérums du 14e jour, sans séropositivité décelable.

Discussion

Les données actuelles ne permettent pas d’affirmer qu’il existe un lien entre ces engelures et l’infection par le SARS-CoV-2. Les caractéristiques cliniques et histologiques étaient celles des engelures idiopathiques. Les RT-PCR et IFI sur peau lésionnelle étaient négatives. Par 2 techniques sérologiques différentes et à 2 temps différents, un seul sérum contenait des IgM (3 %), correspondant au taux d’infection par le SRAS-CoV-2 dans la population française.

International validation of the Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index severity score and calculation of cut-off values for defining mild, moderate and severe types of bullous pemphigoid

BACKGROUND

The Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) score has been proposed to provide an objective measure of bullous pemphigoid (BP) activity.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to calculate BPDAI cut-off values defining mild, moderate and severe BP. We also aimed to assess the interrater reliability and correlation with the number of daily new blisters, and anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 antibodies.

METHODS

Severity scores were recorded by two blinded investigators. Anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 antibodies were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cut-off values defining mild, moderate and severe subgroups were calculated based on the 25th and 75th percentiles of the BPDAI score.

RESULTS

In total, 285 patients with BP were enrolled from 50 dermatology departments in Europe. Median BPDAI activity was 37·5 points (range 0-164). Cut-off values corresponding to the first and third quartiles of the BPDAI score were 20 and 57, respectively; thus, these values were used to define mild (≤ 19), moderate (≥ 20 and ≤ 56) and severe (≥ 57) BP. The median BPDAI score for patients with ≤ 10 daily new blisters was 26 [interquartile range (IQR) 17-45], and for patients with > 10 daily new blisters the median score was 55 (IQR 39-82). The BPDAI intraclass correlation coefficient measured at baseline was 0·97 and remained higher than 0·90 up to month 6. The improvement in the BPDAI score was correlated with the absolute decrease in anti-BP180 ELISA value (Spearman's rank r = 0·34, P < 0·004), but not with anti-BP230 antibodies (r = 0·17, P = 0·15).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests cut-off values of 20-57 for BPDAI to distinguish mild, moderate and severe BP, and confirms that it is a robust tool to assess BP severity precisely.

Epidemiological changes in cutaneous lymphomas: an analysis of 8593 patients from the French Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry

BACKGROUND

Primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCLs) are a heterogeneous group of T-cell (CTCL) and B-cell (CBCL) malignancies. Little is known about their epidemiology at initial presentation in Europe and about potential changes over time.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the frequency of PCLs in the French Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry (GFELC) and to describe the demography of patients.

METHODS

Patients with a centrally validated diagnosis of primary PCL, diagnosed between 2005 and 2019, were included.

RESULTS

The calculated incidence was unprecedently high at 1·06 per 100 000 person-years. The number of included patients increased yearly. Most PCL subtypes were more frequent in male patients, diagnosed at a median age of 60 years. The relative frequency of rare CTCL remained stable, the proportion of classical mycosis fungoides (MF) decreased, and the frequency of its variants (e.g. folliculotropic MF) increased. Similar patterns were observed for CBCL; for example, the proportion of marginal-zone CBCL increased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in PCL frequencies may be explained by the emergence of new diagnostic criteria and better description of the entities in the most recent PCL classification. Moreover, we propose that an algorithm should be developed to confirm the diagnosis of PCL by central validation of the cases.