Successful treatment of lithium toxicity with sodium polystyrene sulfonate: a retrospective cohort study

CONTEXT

Lithium (Li) is a first-line treatment for bipolar disorder but has a narrow therapeutic index. Treatment of Li toxicity includes supportive measures and hemodialysis in severe cases, but this modality is not always immediately available. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS, Kayexalate), a cation exchanger, has been promising in animal models and human reports to reduce absorption and enhance elimination of Li.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. All cases of chronic Li intoxication were reviewed in two adult-care hospitals from 2000 to 2009. A group comparison and a within-patient comparison were performed to compare the effect of SPS on the median Li half-life (T(1/2)). For this study, at least three serum Li levels were required for T(1/2) calculations.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients met inclusion requirements, 12 of whom had taken SPS. Median Li T(1/2) in the treated and control groups was 20.5 and 43.2 hours, respectively (p = 0.0006). In the 12 treated patients, Li T(1/2) during SPS was on average 48.9% shorter than without SPS. Furthermore, in one subject in whom urinary Li data were available, Li clearance with SPS was superior to Li renal clearance. Prolonged constipation was noted in one patient whereas mild hypokalemia was noted in six patients treated with SPS.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that SPS reduced Li T(1/2) and suggests that SPS is capable of promoting Li elimination in chronic intoxications. These results warrant a prospective trial looking at the use of SPS in the treatment of Li overdose as an adjunct to supportive measures and hemodialysis.

Patient safety in outpatient surgery: the viewpoint of the healthcare providers

The objective of this study is to understand the viewpoint of healthcare providers with regard to patient safety in outpatient surgery settings. Two methods were used to gather data from the healthcare providers: (1) questionnaire with open-ended questions about six predefined stages of the patient care process; (2) survey with closed questions. With the first method, the main quality and safety of care issues concerned communication to patients, coordination of reports and forms, patient and staff time pressures and standards of care. The first two stages of the outpatient surgery process, i.e. patient work-up prior to day of surgery and patient admission and preparation on the day of surgery, yielded many more comments than the other four stages. The results of the structured questionnaire show that, overall, the healthcare providers report high quality of care provided by themselves (98%) and their surgery centre (96%). With regard to patient safety (i.e. cancellations of surgeries, patient safety problems and serious mistakes), there was a clear difference in perceptions reported by the physicians vs. the nurses and other staff. Nurses and other staff were more likely to report patient safety problems than physicians. The combination of qualitative data from the initial questionnaire and the quantitative data from the structured questionnaire provides a rather complete view of the outpatient surgery staff perceptions of quality and safety of care. This research highlights the importance of getting input from the healthcare providers regarding the quality and safety of care rather than relying only on traditional measures about patient outcomes.