Prevalence and factors associated with professional burnout in Polish oncologists-results of a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

High rates of burnout are observed among health care professionals worldwide, which could have negative consequences on personal and organizational levels. We aimed to evaluate the burnout prevalence and factors associated with burnout among oncologists in Poland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey was conducted using the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) and additional work/lifestyle questions. Descriptive statistics, parametric and nonparametric tests, and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with burnout.

RESULTS

A total of 228 physicians participated in the survey, including 168 medical oncologists, 43 radiation oncologists, and 17 from other specialties. Data collected from 211 medical and radiation oncologists were included in the final analyses. Most participants were female (71.6%) and ≤40 years of age (70.1%). A self-reported feeling of burnout was present in 65.9% of participants. Based on the MBI-HSS, 74.9% showed evidence of burnout with burnout subdomains as follows: depersonalization 37.0%; emotional exhaustion 64.5%; low accomplishment 43.1%. There were no differences in burnout rates based on specialization (oncology/haematology-75.6%, radiotherapy-72.1%), career stage, gender, or age groups. Lack of work-life balance was the only significant factor associated with the risk of burnout in the logistic regression (relative risk 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.3-5.4). Only 20.9% of physicians had access to psychological support in their workplace; however, 70.1% desired such support. Three main factors impacting burnout in cancer care workers were: bureaucracy and administrative duties overload, admissions of many patients, and poor work culture.

CONCLUSIONS

Burnout is common among medical and radiation oncologists in Poland. There is a high demand for psychological support and organizational changes in the workplace to reduce risk and mitigate the adverse effects of burnout among health care professionals.

An interpretable AI model for recurrence prediction after surgery in gastrointestinal stromal tumour: an observational cohort study

Background

There are several models that predict the risk of recurrence following resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). However, assessment of calibration is not always feasible and when performed, calibration of current GIST models appears to be suboptimal. We aimed to develop a prognostic model to predict the recurrence of GIST after surgery with both good discrimination and calibration by uncovering and harnessing the non-linear relationships among variables that predict recurrence.

Methods

In this observational cohort study, the data of 395 adult patients who underwent complete resection (R0 or R1) of a localised, primary GIST in the pre-imatinib era at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (NY, USA) (recruited 1982-2001) and a European consortium (Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas, 80 sites) (recruited 1987-2011) were used to train an interpretable Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based model called Optimal Classification Trees (OCT). The OCT predicted the probability of recurrence after surgery by capturing non-linear relationships among predictors of recurrence. The data of an additional 596 patients from another European consortium (Polish Clinical GIST Registry, 7 sites) (recruited 1981-2013) who were also treated in the pre-imatinib era were used to externally validate the OCT predictions with regard to discrimination (Harrell's C-index and Brier score) and calibration (calibration curve, Brier score, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test). The calibration of the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) GIST nomogram was used as a comparative gold standard. We also evaluated the clinical utility of the OCT and the MSK nomogram by performing a Decision Curve Analysis (DCA).

Findings

The internal cohort included 395 patients (median [IQR] age, 63 [54-71] years; 214 men [54.2%]) and the external cohort included 556 patients (median [IQR] age, 60 [52-68] years; 308 men [55.4%]). The Harrell's C-index of the OCT in the external validation cohort was greater than that of the MSK nomogram (0.805 (95% CI: 0.803-0.808) vs 0.788 (95% CI: 0.786-0.791), respectively). In the external validation cohort, the slope and intercept of the calibration curve of the main OCT were 1.041 and 0.038, respectively. In comparison, the slope and intercept of the calibration curve for the MSK nomogram was 0.681 and 0.032, respectively. The MSK nomogram overestimated the recurrence risk throughout the entire calibration curve. Of note, the Brier score was lower for the OCT compared to the MSK nomogram (0.147 vs 0.564, respectively), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was insignificant (P = 0.087) for the OCT model but significant (P < 0.001) for the MSK nomogram. Both results confirmed the superior discrimination and calibration of the OCT over the MSK nomogram. A decision curve analysis showed that the AI-based OCT model allowed for superior decision making compared to the MSK nomogram for both patients with 25-50% recurrence risk as well as those with >50% risk of recurrence.

Interpretation

We present the first prognostic models of recurrence risk in GIST that demonstrate excellent discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility on external validation. Additional studies for further validation are warranted. With further validation, these tools could potentially improve patient counseling and selection for adjuvant therapy.

Funding

The NCI SPORE in Soft Tissue Sarcoma and NCI Cancer Center Support Grants.

Combination Therapy With MDM2 and MEK Inhibitors Is Effective in Patient-Derived Models of Lung Adenocarcinoma With Concurrent Oncogenic Drivers and MDM2 Amplification

INTRODUCTION

Although targeted therapies have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), disease progression on single-agent targeted therapy against known oncogenic drivers is common, and therapeutic options after disease progression are limited. In patients with MDM2 amplification (MDM2amp) and a concurrent oncogenic driver alteration, we hypothesized that targeting of the tumor-suppressor pathway (by means of restoration of p53 using MDM2 inhibition) and simultaneous targeting of co-occurring MAPK oncogenic pathway might represent a more durably effective therapeutic strategy.

METHODS

We evaluated genomic next-generation sequencing data using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets platform to nominate potential targets for combination therapy in LUAD. We investigated the small molecule MDM2 inhibitor milademetan in cell lines and patient-derived xenografts of LUAD with a known driver alteration and MDM2amp.

RESULTS

Of 10,587 patient samples from 7121 patients with LUAD profiled by next-generation sequencing, 6% (410 of 7121) harbored MDM2amp. MDM2amp was significantly enriched among tumors with driver alterations in METex14 (36%, p < 0.001), EGFR (8%, p < 0.001), RET (12%, p < 0.01), and ALK (10%, p < 0.01). The combination of milademetan and the MEK inhibitor trametinib was synergistic in growth inhibition of ECLC5-GLx (TRIM33-RET/MDM2amp), LUAD12c (METex14/KRASG12S/MDM2amp), SW1573 (KRASG12C, TP53 wild type), and A549 (KRASG12S) cells and in increasing expression of proapoptotic proteins PUMA and BIM. Treatment of ECLC5-GLx and LUAD12c with single-agent milademetan increased ERK phosphorylation, consistent with previous data on ERK activation with MDM2 inhibition. This ERK activation was effectively suppressed by concomitant administration of trametinib. In contrast, ERK phosphorylation induced by milademetan was not suppressed by concurrent RET inhibition using selpercatinib (in ECLC5-GLx) or MET inhibition using capmatinib (in LUAD12c). In vivo, combination milademetan and trametinib was more effective than either agent alone in ECLC5-GLx, LX-285 (EGFRex19del/MDM2amp), L13BS1 (METex14/MDM2amp), and A549 (KRASG12S, TP53 wild type).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined MDM2/MEK inhibition was found to have efficacy across multiple patient-derived LUAD models harboring MDM2amp and concurrent oncogenic drivers. This combination, potentially applicable to LUADs with a wide variety of oncogenic driver mutations and kinase fusions activating the MAPK pathway, has evident clinical implications and will be investigated as part of a planned phase 1/2 clinical trial.

Abstract 6127: MDM2 inhibition in combination with MEK inhibition in pre-clinical models of lung adenocarcinomas with MDM2 amplification

The eventual development of resistance to single-agent targeted therapies in lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) is inevitable, and new strategies are needed. We hypothesize that combination therapies aimed at a known driver and a distinct targetable alteration could prolong time on oral targeted therapy. In an analysis of 7636 patients with LUAD who underwent MSK-IMPACT large panel NGS testing, 5.5% (416/7636) harbored MDM2 amplification (MDM2amp), a known mechanism of TP53 inactivation. MDM2amp was over-represented among tumors with alterations in METex14 (34.4%, p&lt;0.001), EGFR (10%, p&lt;0.001), RET (11%, p&lt;0.05), and ALK (9.9%, p&lt;0.002). The small molecule MDM2 inhibitor milademetan (mila) caused growth inhibition as a single-agent in MDM2amp patient-derived cell lines with concurrent kinase alterations including ECLC5-GLx (MDM2amp/TRIM33::RET/TP53 wildtype (WT)) and LUAD12c (MDM2amp/METex14/KRASG12S/TP53 WT). Mila also caused growth inhibition in a cell line with KRASG12C and WT TP53 without MDM2amp (SW1573 (KRASG12C/TP53WT)), but not in cell lines with TP53 mutations (LUAD-002AS1 (KIF5B::RET/TP53P128fs, H1792 (KRASG12C/TP53 splice site mut)). Treatment of ECLC5-GLx and LUAD12c with mila resulted in restoration of ERK phosphorylation, confirming a previous report of ERK activation upon MDM2 inhibition. At 48 hours, ERK phosphorylation was suppressed by concurrent mila and MEK inhibition using trametinib (tram). In contrast, ERK phosphorylation was not suppressed by concurrent mila and KIF5B::RET inhibition using selpercatinib (in ECLC5-GLx) or MET inhibition using capmatinib (in LUAD12c). The combination of mila+tram was synergistic in slowing growth of ECLC5-GLx, LUAD12c, and SW1573 cells, and increased expression of pro-apoptotic proteins PUMA and BIM, beyond that achieved by either agent alone. In ECLC5-GLx, mila+tram also caused increased apoptotic cells measured by Annexin-V compared to either agent alone (combination p&lt;0.01 compared to mila, p&lt;0.001 compared to tram). In vivo, combination mila+tram was more effective than mila or tram alone in ECLC5-GLx (p&lt;0.0001 and p&lt;0.0001, respectively), LX-285 (EGFRex19del/MDM2amp) (p&lt;0.0001 and p&lt;0.0001, respectively), and L-13BS1 (model resistant to capmatinib) (METex14/MDM2amp) (p&lt;0.05 and p&lt;0.0001, respectively). These results suggest that combined MDM2/MEK inhibition is effective in patient-derived LUAD models harboring MDM2amp. This combination, potentially applicable to LUADs with a wide variety of oncogenic driver mutations and kinase fusions will be investigated as part of a phase 1/2 clinical trial.

Citation Format: Arielle Elkrief, Vladimir Markov, Álvaro Quintanal-Villalonga, Rebecca Caeser, Pawel Sobczuk, Emily Cheng, Alexander Drilon, Gregory J. Riely, William W. Lockwood, Elisa de Stanchina, Charles M. Rudin, Igor Odintsov, Romel Somwar. MDM2 inhibition in combination with MEK inhibition in pre-clinical models of lung adenocarcinomas with MDM2 amplification [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6127.

Career and Professional Development for Young Oncologists

Young oncologists around the globe face many challenges when it comes to their career and professional development. Aspects such as time management, work-life balance, career progression, and educational opportunities are only some of them. Professional societies have identified these challenges in this professional group and designed programs to tackle them specifically. The importance of this strategy cannot be overstated, as young oncologists, defined by most societies as oncologists under 40 years of age, compose almost 50% of the oncology workforce. On the other hand, recent surveys have shown that many young oncologists are considering alternative career paths due to burnout issues aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic, on top of all other challenges. The virtual setting that has been forcedly introduced into our professional life has shortened distances between professionals and might have contributed to more accessible access to information and opportunities that some young oncologists could not profit from due to their traveling constraints. On the other hand, this virtual setting has shown us the asymmetries in opportunities for these professionals. Knowledgeable of all this, we summarize in this article some of the career and professional development offers available to all young oncologists, which we consider could help them deal with current and future challenges.

Angiotensin-(1-7) can promote cell migration and tumor growth of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney malignancy, accounting for 3% of all cancers. Despite significant advances in targeted therapies and immunotherapy, many patients with RCC develop resistance to available drugs. Angiotensin-(1-7) (Ang-(1-7)) is a heptapeptide and a member of the renin-angiotensin system which regulates the cardiovascular and the renal system. It has been proposed as a potential anticancer agent for the treatment of various types of cancers, but data regarding its efficiency against RCC are conflicting. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of Ang-(1-7) in RCC models in vitro and in vivo. We performed a series of in vitro experiments investigating the effects of Ang-(1-7) on cell viability and migration in Caki-1 and Caki-2 cell lines. In addition, we carried out an in vivo study in xenografts of Caki-1 cells in nude mice. In results: Ang-(1-7) or A779, an antagonist of its receptor MasR (Mas receptor), showed no effect on cell viability. Ang-(1-7) promoted cell migration in a dose-dependent manner by inducing the activation of MasR. It also promoted tumor growth in vivo, and this effect was not inhibited by the blockade of MasR. No effects on cell proliferation or tumor vessel density were observed. The results suggest that Ang-(1-7) can exert protumorigenic activity in RCC, however, further research on other RCC models is needed to better recapitulate the heterogeneity of the disease.

The long-term analysis of prognostic role of mutational status in primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)

e23517

Background: Radical surgery is the primary treatment for GIST, but up to 50% of patients relapse, mainly in form of hepatic and peritoneal metastases. GISTs are a group of tumors with various pathological and molecular features as well as different clinical courses. The aim of the study was the long-term analysis of prognostic role of mutational status in primary GIST after radical resection. Methods: The material consisted of a group of 304 patients with primary GIST diagnosed till 04/2012, with known mutational status and treated surgically with curative intend without adjuvant imatinib. Data were collected prospectively as part of the GIST clinical register. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was calculated from the date of GIST resection to the date of local recurrence, distant metastatic disease or last follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of resection to the date of last follow-up or death. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to asses impact of mutational status on RFS and OS. Results: The primary tumor (PT) locations were: gastric (57.6%) vs non-gastric (42.4%). The median of tumor size was 7cm (0.5-33 cm). Mitotic index was ≤5 in 54.3%, > 5 in 45.7%. Mutations in KIT gene exon 11 were as follow: del 557-558 in 22.7% or other (point mutations, other deletions or insertions) in 40.1% with similar rates in gastric and non-gastric GIST. KIT gene exon 9 dup 502-503 (7.2%) were more common in non-gastric vs gastric GIST (16.3% vs 0.6%). PDGFR D842V was observed in 26 patients (8.6%) while other mutations in PDGFRA gene in 17 (5.6%). The median follow-up was 25.1 months. Disease recurrence was observed in 124 cases (40.8%) resulting in median RFS of 84.4 (95%CI 48.3-120.5) months. The negative independent risk factors for RFS in univariate analysis were: primary tumor location, tumor size, mitotic index and KIT exon 9 dup 502-503 mutation (P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis independent predictive factors for RFS were mitotic index > 5 (HR 4.38, 95%CI 2.82-6.78), PT location (HR 1.56, 95%CI 1.01-2.39). In multivariate analysis in patients with gastric GIST PDGFR D842V mutations were significantly correlated with better RFS (HR 0.16, 95%CI 0.04-0.61), what was not observed in non-gastric GIST. The median OS was 198.1 months. The negative independent risk factors for OS in univariate analysis were: primary tumor location, primary tumor size and KIT gene exon 9 dup 502-503 mutation. Mitotic index was also negative independent risk factors in a multivariate analysis (HR 1.70, 95%CI 1.15 -2.52). Conclusions: In the long-term analysis mutational status of primary resectable GIST is related to risk of relapse especially in gastric location, however it has no independent impact on overall survival. Genotype should be included in modern risk classification of GIST.

Systemic treatment of patients with inoperable and metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: A multicenter study

e21521

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an uncommon, aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer. The prognosis in the unresectable and metastatic setting is very poor. Distant metastases develop in more than 30%. Chemotherapy (CHT), the previous mainstay of treatment, is associated with the high response rates (RR) of limited duration. The main cytotoxic drugs have been platinum derivatives, taxoids, anthracyclines, and etoposide. The standard systemic treatment for this disease has changed in the last few years. Immunotherapy (IO) is currently the basis of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting. This study aimed to analyze outcomes for unresectable and metastatic MCC pts treated in routine clinical practice, mostly before the era of IO availability. Methods: We conducted the retrospective analysis of data from 36 MCC pts in unresectable (n= 23) and metastatic (n=13) settings treated in three oncological centers, diagnosed between 01/2010 and 12/2019, with data cut-off on 31/12/2020. The data collected included epidemiological and clinical information. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: The median patient age at diagnosis was 72 years (57-88); 58.3% were male. The most common primary tumor (PT) locations were lower limbs (41.7%), head and neck (30.6%), and upper limbs (16.7%). In 63.9% the PT was located in the sun-exposed skin. The most common location of distant metastases were nonregional lymph nodes (n=9) and lungs (n=3). Thirty-six pts received 1st line CHT with the median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.3 months (95%CI 2.88-7.7) and objective response of 61.1%, with 13.9% complete responses (CR). The most commonly used regimens were platinum-based and anthracycline-based regimens (n=26). Disease progression (PD) was observed in 91.7% of pts treated with 1st line CHT. Twenty-one pts received 2nd line therapy, IO (n=14), or CHT (n=7), with PD in 19 pts (90.6%), mPFS 2.83 months (95% CI 0.59-5.06) and RR of 33.3% (0% CR). 13 pts were treated with avelumab (AVE), all in the 2nd line, with RR of 38.5% (0% CR). The mPFS in the 2nd line was 5 months (95%CI 0-11.46) on AVE compared to 2.82 (95%CI 0.46-5.19) on CHT (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.25-1.70, p=0.378). During 1st line systemic therapy, 16 pts underwent palliative surgery (n=7, 19.4%) or received radiation therapy (RT) (n=9, 25%), and during 2nd line, one patient was treated with surgery, and five pts received RT. The median overall survival was 10.38 months (95% CI 2.90-17.87). Local treatment did not improve the treatment outcomes in the 1st (p=0.119) nor 2nd line (p=0.821). Conclusions: Our results confirm the poor prognosis of pts with unresectable and metastatic MCC. The response rates and median PFS for CHT in the 1st and 2nd line setting are consistent with historical data. The treatment with AVE in the 2nd line allows achieving better results, similar to the results reported in the clinical trials.

Treatment of patients with locally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma: A multicenter study

e21566

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer with a high risk of recurrence and poor prognosis. The treatment of locally advanced disease includes surgery (SUR) and radiotherapy (RTH) to achieve high locoregional control rates. The sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended procedure in cases without clinical nodal involvement. In selected cases, chemotherapy (CHT) may also be considered, but its role is not confirmed. This study aimed to analyze outcomes for locally advanced MCC pts treated in routine clinical practice. Methods: We conducted the retrospective analysis of data from 156 MCC pts treated with curative surgery in four oncological centers, diagnosed between 01/2010 and 12/2019, with data cut-off on 31/12/2020. The data collected included epidemiological and clinical information. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression. Results: The median patient age at diagnosis was 72 years (30-94); 50.6% were male. The primary tumor (PT) locations were lower limbs (33.3%), upper limbs (30.1%), and head and neck (28.2%). MCC with no PT was diagnosed in 3.9%. In 62.0% the PT was located in the sun-exposed skin. The median tumor size was 25 mm (4-170). Lymph node (LN) involvement (clinical or positive SLNB or LND) at diagnosis was found in 26.9% (n = 42). The scar excision was done in 50.0% (positive in 16.6%), SLNB in 36.5% (positive in 10.5 %), 51.9% of pts received perioperative treatment, including RTH- 86.4%, CHT- 21%. The relapse rate was 38.3% (35.8% local-regional, 11.1% distant). With the median follow-up of 2.2-years, the median disease-free survival (DFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) were not reached. The 1-year DFS, LRFS and DMFS rates were 65%, 68%, and 90%. The negative independent risk factors for DFS were male gender (HR 1.42, 95%CI 1.06-3.01), metastases in LN at diagnosis (HR 5.41, 95%CI 2.39-12.26), no SLNB in pts with no clinical metastases in LN (HR 5.45, 95%CI 2.41-12.3), and no perioperative RTH (HR 2.19, 95%CI 1.29-3.76). The median overall survival (OS) was 6.9 years (95%CI 4.64-9.15). The negative independent risk factors for OS were male gender (HR 1.95, 95%CI 1.16-3.27), age above 70 (HR 2.0, 95%CI 1.15-3.48), metastases in LN at diagnosis (HR 3.15, 95%CI 1.49-6.68), and no SLNB in pts with no clinical metastases in LN (HR 2.30, 95%CI 1.10-4.82). PT location, UV-exposure, and perioperative CHT or RTH were not independent risk factors for OS. Conclusions: Our results confirm that the MCC treatment should be done in an experienced multidisciplinary team. Male gender, nodal involvement at diagnosis, and no SLNB in pts without clinical metastases in LN are associated with poor prognosis in DFS and OS. The perioperative RTH improves the treatment outcomes and reduces disease progression risk but does not impact OS. Perioperative CHT does not affect pts survival.

Treatment beyond progression with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma

e21541

Background: Immunotherapy (ITH) holds the possibility of tumor burden decrease after initial RECIST defined progression (PD). Clinical concept of treating of selected patients (pts) beyond PD is supported by this pseudoprogression phenomenon. The aim of this study was to evaluate real-life practice and outcomes related to treatment beyond progression (TBP) in melanoma patients. Methods: We evaluated advanced melanoma pts who started anti-PD1 treatment between 12/2015 and 12/2018 and identified pts who received TBP and had subsequent imaging to evaluate the tumor burden. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank, chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used for comparison between groups. Data cut-off was 02/2021. Results: Of 399 subsequent melanoma pts treated, 57 (14%) patients received TBP. Anti-PD1 was 1st line treatment in 61.4% and 2nd line - in 38.6% of patients. 71.9% patients were diagnosed with skin, 7.0% - mucosal and 21.1% with FPI melanoma and 47.4% were BRAF mutated, 56.1% were male and 12.3% had 3 or more metastatic sites at treatment initiation. In this cohort median time to 1st PD (TTFP) was 4.43 months(m), while to 2nd PD (TTSP) – 8.01 m. On TBP 26.3% pts achieved objective response (OR), and next 42.1% - SD. 1st PD was reported most often as increase in 3 or more targets or one new lesion – both 22.8%; and in 24.6% cases involved central nervous system. In 56.8% second PD was observed in the same targets as 1st PD. 61.4% patients received multimodal treatment of ITH combined with radiation therapy – in 49.1%, surgery - 5.3% and both - 7.0%. There was no correlation of TTSP with gender, ECOG, initial disease stage or TNM, BRAF mutation, number of metastatic sites or pattern of progression. Multimodal treatment resulted in 13.6 m TTSP, while ITH alone - 8.0 m (p = 0.056). 1st line OR correlated with DCR on TBP while TTFP > 6 m correlated with TTSP (HR = 0.53, 95%CI 0.28-0.99). Patients with 1st line CR – had median TTSP 16.4 m, with PR – 23.5 m, while those with PD – 5.1 m. Median OS after 1st PD was 26 months and correlated with OR on TBP. Conclusions: Selected clinically fit melanoma patients despite evidence of first radiographic progression may benefit from continued treatment with PD-1 inhibitors. Multidisciplinary treatment should be offered to these patients including radiosurgery or stereotactic radiotherapy of progressing loci. Molecular biomarkers of TTSP should be analyzed in prospective studies.

Molecular Biology of Osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most frequent primary bone cancer in children and adolescents and the third most frequent in adults. Many inherited germline mutations are responsible for syndromes that predispose to osteosarcomas including Li Fraumeni syndrome, retinoblastoma syndrome, Werner syndrome, Bloom syndrome or Diamond-Blackfan anemia. TP53 is the most frequently altered gene in osteosarcoma. Among other genes mutated in more than 10% of OS cases, c-Myc plays a role in OS development and promotes cell invasion by activating MEK-ERK pathways. Several genomic studies showed frequent alterations in the RB gene in pediatric OS patients. Osteosarcoma driver mutations have been reported in NOTCH1, FOS, NF2, WIF1, BRCA2, APC, PTCH1 and PRKAR1A genes. Some miRNAs such as miR-21, -34a, -143, -148a, -195a, -199a-3p and -382 regulate the pathogenic activity of MAPK and PI3K/Akt-signaling pathways in osteosarcoma. CD133+ osteosarcoma cells have been shown to exhibit stem-like gene expression and can be tumor-initiating cells and play a role in metastasis and development of drug resistance. Although currently osteosarcoma treatment is based on adriamycin chemoregimens and surgery, there are several potential targeted therapies in development. First of all, activity and safety of cabozantinib in osteosarcoma were studied, as well as sorafenib and pazopanib. Finally, novel bifunctional molecules, of potential imaging and osteosarcoma targeting applications may be used in the future.

Clinicopathological prognostic and predictive factors of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) survival and treatment efficacy

e22537

Background: MPNST accounts for about 5% of soft tissue sarcomas. It is known to have high metastatic potential and poor prognosis, but reported long-term outcomes vary widely across published series. Our study aimed to determine factors affecting clinical outcome in a large cohort of patients (pts) with MPNSTs treated at reference sarcoma center. Methods: 289 consecutive pts (144 woman and 145 man) referred, diagnosed and treated between 03/1998 and 04/2018 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier estimator and the log-rank test were used in survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to confirm the correlation. Results: Mean age at diagnosis was 50y (15-86). 39 (13.5%) pts were NF1 positive, 12 were primary diagnosed with metastatic disease. After median follow-up of 66.5 months (m) (95% confidence interval, CI 58.1 – 85.2) 151 pts continue treatment or follow-up. Median OS was 55.7m (39.3 - 148.9) in the whole group while 5y survival rate was 48.8% (CI: 42.8-55.7%). 37/167 pts with radical resection in reference center developed local recurrence, and 75/92 pts operated first in regional hospitals. Median DFS was 29.7m (CI: 16.1-58.3) in case of treatment in reference center and 4.1m (CI: 2.4-9.2) in case of regional hospital (p < 0.001).72 pts developed metastatic disease and were treated with chemotherapy. Median PFS on 1st line was 5.6m (CI: 3.3 - 8.1), There were no statistically significant differences in survival rates nor in response rates between doxorubicin- and ifosfamid-based regiments. Tumor size at diagnosis (HR:2.33, CI: 1.50-3.62), high grade (HR:3.31, CI:2.14-5.12) and R0 resection (HR:0.47, CI:0.30-0.72) were the strongest independent predictors of DFS and OS. (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy did not influenced LRFS in case of R0 resection but improved LRFS when complete resection was not feasible (HR: 0.22 CI: 0.08-0.58 p = 0.002). Conclusions: MPSNT is a highly aggressive tumor with poor prognosis. High quality surgery remains the mainstay of management for these patients, but multimodal treatment should be considered in majority of cases in MDT units. There is unmet need for new therapies in advanced/metastatic cases.

Renal cell carcinoma with intramyocardial metastases

Background

Cardiac metastases from renal cell carcinoma without vena caval involvement are extremely rare with a limited number of cases reported in the worldwide literature until now. Nevertheless, this rare location of metastasis may significantly influence patient treatment and prognosis. Cooperation between oncology, cardiology, and urology teams are indispensable in cases of patients suffering from intramyocardial tumors. For these individuals, treatment guidelines based on large-scale studies are unavailable and only case/case series analysis may provide clinicians with decision assistance.

Case presentation

In this paper, we report a case of a 50-year-old Caucasian male diagnosed with a 10.2 × 10.3 × 10.0 cm lower pole left renal mass in January 2002. He was subsequently treated with immunochemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and mTOR inhibitors (mTORIs) - that is sunitinib, everolimus, and sorafenib. In March 2012, contrast-enhancing tumors in the left myocardium (∅22 mm) and in the interventricular septum (∅26 mm) were seen on CT. Cardiology testing was conducted and the patient was treated with pazopanib with a profound response. Overall survival since the clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) diagnosis was 11 years 2 months and since diagnosis of multiple heart metastases was 1 year.

Conclusions

Cardiac metastases present a unique disease course in renal cell carcinoma. Cardiac metastases may remain asymptomatic, as in the case of this patient at the time of diagnosis. The most common cardiac presentation of renal cell carcinoma is hypertension, but other cardiac presentations include shortness of breath, cough, and arrhythmias. Targeted systemic therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be useful for this group of patients, but necrosis in the myocardium can result in tamponade and death. Regular cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scans are required for treatment monitoring.