No evidence for an association of voxel-based morphometry with short-term non-motor outcomes in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is an established therapy in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Motor and non-motor outcomes, however, show considerable inter-individual variability. Preoperative morphometry-based metrics have recently received increasing attention to explain treatment effects. As evidence for the prediction of non-motor outcomes is limited, we sought to investigate the association between metrics of voxel-based morphometry and short-term non-motor outcomes following STN-DBS in this prospective open-label study. Forty-nine PD patients underwent structural MRI and a comprehensive clinical assessment at preoperative baseline and 6-month follow-up. Voxel-based morphometry was used to assess associations between cerebral volume and non-motor outcomes corrected for multiple comparisons using a permutation-based approach. We replicated existing results associating volume loss of the superior frontal cortex with subpar motor outcomes. Overall non-motor burden, however, was not significantly associated with morphometric features, limiting its use as a marker to inform patient selection and holistic preoperative counselling.

Stratifying quality of life outcome in subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) improves quality of life (QoL), motor and non-motor symptoms (NMS). However, in previous studies, 43%-49% of patients did not experience clinically relevant postoperative QoL improvement. To inform individualised prediction of postoperative QoL improvement, we developed a stratification analysis of QoL outcomes based on preoperative non-motor total burden, severity of motor progression and motor response in levodopa challenge tests.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, international study with a 6-month follow-up. A distribution-based threshold identified 'QoL responders' in the PDQuestionnaire-8 Summary Index (PDQ-8 SI). After baseline stratification based on the NMS Scale, Hoehn and Yahr Scale and levodopa response assessed with the Unified PD Rating Scale-III, we compared postoperative QoL response between these strata. To assess the clinical usefulness and statistical feasibility of stratifications, we compared cumulative distribution function curves, respectively PDQ-8 within-stratum variation.

RESULTS

All main outcomes improved postoperatively. Based on the 8.1 points threshold for clinically meaningful PDQ-8 SI improvement, only 80/161 patients were classified as 'QoL responders'. The absolute risk reductions for QoL non-response among respective non-motor, motor progression and levodopa response strata were 23%, 8% and 3%, respectively. Only non-motor stratification reduced PDQ-8 within-stratum variation compared with the overall cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-motor stratification, but not motor progression or levodopa response stratification, is clinically useful and statistically feasible for personalised preoperative prediction of postoperative QoL outcome of STN-DBS for PD. Our findings highlight that non-motor assessments are necessary components of a case-based, holistic approach of DBS indication evaluations geared towards optimising postoperative QoL outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

GermanClinicalTrialsRegister: #6735.

Binaural acoustic stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease

Acoustic stimulation can improve motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) and might therefore represent a potential non-invasive treatment option. Scalp electroencephalography studies in healthy subjects indicate that specifically binaural beat stimulation (BBS) in the gamma frequency range is associated with synchronized cortical oscillations at 40 Hertz (Hz). Several studies suggest that oscillations in the gamma-frequency range (>30 Hz) serve a prokinetic function in PD. In this double-blind, randomized study, 25 PD patients were recruited. The study was conducted with (ON) and without dopaminergic medication (OFF). Each drug condition consisted of two phases (no stimulation and acoustic stimulation). The acoustic stimulation phase was divided into two blocks including BBS and conventional acoustic stimulation (CAS) as a control condition. For BBS, a modulated frequency of 35 Hz was used (left: 320 Hz; right: 355 Hz) and for CAS 340 Hz on both sides. We assessed effects on motor performance using Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and two validated commercially available portable devices (Kinesia ONE™ and Kinesia 360™) measuring motor symptoms such as dyskinesia, bradykinesia, and tremor. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed that BBS improved resting tremor on the side of the more affected limb in the OFF condition, as measured by wearables (F_(2,48) = 3.61, p = 0.035). However, BBS did not exert a general positive effect on motor symptoms as assessed via MDS-UPDRS (F_(2,48) = 1.00, p = 0.327). For CAS, we did not observe an improvement in specific symptoms but rather an overall beneficial effect on motor performance (MDS-UPDRS total score OFF medication: F_(2,48) = 4.17, p = 0.021; wearable scores: F_(2,48) = 2.46, p = 0.097). In this study, we found an improvement of resting tremor when applying BBS in the gamma frequency band OFF medication. Moreover, the positive effects of CAS underline the general positive potential for improvement of motor function by acoustically supported therapeutic approaches. However, more studies are needed to fully characterize the clinical relevance of BBS and to further optimize its ameliorating effects.

Presynaptic dopaminergic terminal imaging and non-motor symptoms assessment of Parkinson's disease: evidence for dopaminergic basis?

Parkinson's disease (PD) is now considered to be a multisystemic disorder consequent on multineuropeptide dysfunction including dopaminergic, serotonergic, cholinergic, and noradrenergic systems. This multipeptide dysfunction leads to expression of a range of non-motor symptoms now known to be integral to the concept of PD and preceding the diagnosis of motor PD. Some non-motor symptoms in PD may have a dopaminergic basis and in this review, we investigate the evidence for this based on imaging techniques using dopamine-based radioligands. To discuss non-motor symptoms we follow the classification as outlined by the validated PD non-motor symptoms scale.