1
|
Blay JY, Penel N, Valentin T, Anract P, Duffaud F, Dufresne A, Verret B, Cordoba A, Italiano A, Brahmi M, Henon C, Amouyel T, Ray-Coquard I, Ferron G, Boudou-Rouquette P, Tlemsani C, Salas S, Rochwerger R, Faron M, Bompas E, Ducassou A, Gangloff D, Gouin F, Firmin N, Piperno-Neumann S, Rios M, Ropars M, Kurtz JE, Le Nail LR, Bertucci F, Carrere S, Llacer C, Watson S, Bonvalot S, Leroux A, Perrin C, Gantzer J, Pracht M, Narciso B, Monneur A, Lebbe C, Hervieu A, Saada-Bouzid E, Dubray-Longeras P, Fiorenza F, Chaigneau L, Nevieres ZM, Soibinet P, Bouché O, Guillemet C, Spano JP, Ruzic JC, Isambert N, Vaz G, Meeus P, Karanian M, Ngo C, Coindre JM, De Pinieux G, Le Loarer F, Ducimetiere F, Chemin C, Morelle M, Toulmonde M, Le Cesne A. Improved nationwide survival of sarcoma patients with a network of reference centers. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:351-363. [PMID: 38246351 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the impact of the implementation of a network of reference centers for sarcomas (NETSARC) on the care and survival of sarcoma patients in France since 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) since 2010. Its aims are to improve the quality of diagnosis and care of sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics, treatments, and outcomes are collected in a nationwide database. The objective of this analysis was to compare the survival of patients in three periods: 2010-2012 (non-exhaustive), 2013-2015, and 2016-2020. RESULTS A total of 43 975 patients with sarcomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), or connective tissue tumors of intermediate malignancy were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010 (n = 9266 before 2013, n = 12 274 between 2013 and 2015, n = 22 435 in 2016-2020). Median age was 56 years, 50.5% were women, and 13.2% had metastasis at diagnosis. Overall survival was significantly superior in the period 2016-2020 versus 2013-2015 versus 2010-2012 for the entire population, for patients >18 years of age, and for both metastatic and non-metastatic patients in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.0001). Over the three periods, we observed a significantly improved compliance to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) nationwide: the proportion of patients biopsied before surgery increased from 62.9% to 72.6%; the percentage of patients presented to NETSARC MDTBs before first surgery increased from 31.7% to 44.4% (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with R0 resection on first surgery increased (from 36.1% to 46.6%), while R2 resection rate decreased (from 10.9% to 7.9%), with a better compliance and improvement in NETSARC centers. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of the national reference network for sarcoma was associated with an improvement of overall survival and compliance to guidelines nationwide in sarcoma patients. Referral to expert networks for sarcoma patients should be encouraged, though a better compliance to CPGs can still be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon.
| | - N Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - T Valentin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - P Anract
- Department of Orthopedics, Hôpital Cochin Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris
| | - F Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - A Dufresne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - B Verret
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - A Cordoba
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - A Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - M Brahmi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Henon
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - T Amouyel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - G Ferron
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | | | - C Tlemsani
- Department of Orthopedics, Hôpital Cochin Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris
| | - S Salas
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - R Rochwerger
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - M Faron
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - E Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes St. Herblain
| | - A Ducassou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - D Gangloff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - F Gouin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - N Firmin
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - S Piperno-Neumann
- INSERM U1194, IRCM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris
| | - M Rios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy
| | - M Ropars
- Department of Orthopedics, CHU Rennes, Rennes
| | | | | | - F Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille
| | - S Carrere
- Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - C Llacer
- Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - S Watson
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - S Bonvalot
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - A Leroux
- INSERM U1194, IRCM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier
| | - C Perrin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes
| | - J Gantzer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy
| | - M Pracht
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes
| | - B Narciso
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tours
| | - A Monneur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille
| | - C Lebbe
- Department of Dermatology, INSERM U976 University Paris Diderot Saint Louis Hospital, Paris; Department of CIC, INSERM U976 University Paris Diderot Saint Louis Hospital, Paris
| | - A Hervieu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon
| | - E Saada-Bouzid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice
| | - P Dubray-Longeras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand
| | - F Fiorenza
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, CHU Limoges, Limoges
| | - L Chaigneau
- Department of Medicine, CHU Besancon, Besancon
| | | | - P Soibinet
- Department of Medicine, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen
| | - O Bouché
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Reims, Reims
| | - C Guillemet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre J Godinot Reims, Reims
| | - J P Spano
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétriere, Paris
| | - J C Ruzic
- Departement d'oncologie, CHU, La Reunion
| | - N Isambert
- Service d'oncologie, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - G Vaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - P Meeus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Karanian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Ngo
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - J M Coindre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | | | - F Le Loarer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - F Ducimetiere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Chemin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Morelle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Toulmonde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - A Le Cesne
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gouin F, Michot A, Jafari M, Honoré C, Mattei JC, Rochwerger A, Ropars M, Tzanis D, Anract P, Carrere S, Gangloff D, Ducoulombier A, Lebbe C, Guiramand J, Waast D, Marchal F, Sirveaux F, Causeret S, Gimbergues P, Fiorenza F, Paquette B, Soibinet P, Guilloit JM, Le Nail LR, Dujardin F, Brinkert D, Chemin-Airiau C, Morelle M, Meeus P, Karanian M, Le Loarer F, Vaz G, Blay JY. Improved Metastatic-Free Survival after Systematic Re-Excision Following Complete Macroscopic Unplanned Excision of Limb or Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1365. [PMID: 38611043 PMCID: PMC11010862 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether re-excision (RE) of a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of limb or trunk should be systematized as adjuvant care and if it would improve metastatic free survival (MFS) are still debated. The impact of resection margins after unplanned macroscopically complete excision (UE) performed out of a NETSARC reference center or after second resection was further investigated. METHODS This large nationwide series used data from patients having experienced UE outside of a reference center from 2010 to 2019, collected in a French nationwide exhaustive prospective cohort NETSARC. Patient characteristics and survival distributions in patients reexcised (RE) or not (No-RE) are reported. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was conducted to adjust for classical prognosis factors. Subgroup analysis were performed to identify which patients may benefit from RE. RESULTS Out of 2371 patients with UE for STS performed outside NETSARC reference centers, 1692 patients were not reviewed by multidisciplinary board before treatment decision and had a second operation documented. Among them, 913 patients experienced re-excision, and 779 were not re-excised. Characteristics were significantly different regarding patient age, tumor site, size, depth, grade and histotype in patients re-excised (RE) or not (No-RE). In univariate analysis, final R0 margins are associated with a better MFS, patients with R1 margins documented at first surgery had a better MFS as compared to patients with first R0 resection. The study identified RE as an independent favorable factor for MFS (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.53-0.93; p = 0.013). All subgroups except older patients (>70 years) and patients with large tumors (>10 cm) had superior MFS with RE. CONCLUSIONS RE might be considered in patients with STS of limb or trunk, with UE with macroscopic complete resection performed out of a reference center, and also in originally defined R0 margin resections, to improve LRFS and MFS. Systematic RE should not be advocated for patients older than 70 years, or with tumors greater than 10 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francois Gouin
- Surgery Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France (G.V.)
| | - Audrey Michot
- Surgery Department, Institut Bergonié, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Mehrdad Jafari
- General and Digestive Oncologic Surgery, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Charles Honoré
- Surgery Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Camille Mattei
- Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery Department, Hôpital Nord, Hopital de la Conception, APHM, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Alexandre Rochwerger
- Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery Department, Hôpital Nord, Hopital de la Conception, APHM, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Mickael Ropars
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, CHU de Rennes, 35033 Rennes, France;
| | - Dimitri Tzanis
- Surgery Department, Institut Curie, PSL University, 75248 Paris, France;
| | - Philippe Anract
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Sébastien Carrere
- Surgery Department, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | | | - Agnès Ducoulombier
- Senology Surgery Department, Onco-Gynécologique et Reconstructrice, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06100 Nice, France
| | - Céleste Lebbe
- Reconstructive et Esthetic Plastic Surgery, Hôpital Saint Louis, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Guiramand
- Surgery Department, Institut Paoli Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Denis Waast
- Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery Clinic, CHU Nantes, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - Frédéric Marchal
- Surgery Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, UMR 7039, 54000 Nancy, France
| | | | - Sylvain Causeret
- Surgery Department, Centre George-François Leclerc, 21079 Dijon, France;
| | - Pierre Gimbergues
- Surgery Department, Centre Jean Perrin, 63011 Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Fabrice Fiorenza
- Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery Department, CHU Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Brice Paquette
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Jean Minjoz University Hospital, 25000 Besançon, France;
| | - Pauline Soibinet
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Godinot, 51100 Reims, France
| | - Jean-Marc Guilloit
- Visceral et Digestive Surgery Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen, France
| | - Louis R. Le Nail
- Onco-Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hôpital Trousseau, CHRU de Tours, 37000 Tours, France
| | - Franck Dujardin
- Medical Oncology and Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, 76038 Rouen, France
| | - David Brinkert
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, CHU de Strasbourg, 67200 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Claire Chemin-Airiau
- Clinical Research and Innovation Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Magali Morelle
- Clinical Research and Innovation Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Meeus
- Surgery Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France (G.V.)
| | - Marie Karanian
- Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - François Le Loarer
- Anatomo-Pathology Surgery Department, Institut Bergonié, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Gualter Vaz
- Surgery Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France (G.V.)
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, 69008 Lyon, France
- Department of Medicine, Léon Bérard Center, Unicancer, 69008 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laboudie P, Hallé A, Anract P, Hamadouche M. Low rate of periprosthetic femoral fracture with the Hueter anterior approach using stems cemented according to the 'French paradox'. Bone Joint J 2024; 106-B:67-73. [PMID: 38423110 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b3.bjj-2023-0843.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Aims The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the incidence of early periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) associated with Charnley-Kerboull (CK) femoral components cemented according to the 'French paradox' principles through the Hueter anterior approach (HAA) in patients older than 70 years. Methods From a prospectively collected database, all short CK femoral components implanted consecutively from January 2018 to May 2022 through the HAA in patients older than 70 years were included. Exclusion criteria were age below 70 years, use of cementless femoral component, and approaches other than the HAA. A total of 416 short CK prostheses used by 25 surgeons with various levels of experience were included. All patients had a minimum of one-year follow-up, with a mean of 2.6 years (SD 1.1). The mean age was 77.4 years (70 to 95) and the mean BMI was 25.3 kg/m2 (18.4 to 43). Femoral anatomy was classified according to Dorr. The measured parameters included canal flare index, morphological cortical index, canal-calcar ratio, ilium-ischial ratio, and anterior superior iliac spine to greater trochanter (GT) distance. Results Among the 416 THAs, two PFFs (0.48% (95% confidence interval 0.13 to 1.74)) were observed, including one Vancouver type B2 fracture 24 days postoperatively and one intraoperative Vancouver type B1 fracture. Valgus malalignment and higher canal bone ratio were found to be associated with PFF. Conclusion This study demonstrated that short CK femoral components cemented according to the French paradox were associated with a low rate of early PFF (0.48%) in patients aged over 70 years. Longer follow-up is warranted to further evaluate the rate of fracture that may occur during the bone remodelling process and with time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Laboudie
- Department of Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre (HUPC), Site Cochin-Port Royal, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Aurélien Hallé
- Department of Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre (HUPC), Site Cochin-Port Royal, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Department of Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre (HUPC), Site Cochin-Port Royal, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Moussa Hamadouche
- Department of Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre (HUPC), Site Cochin-Port Royal, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saliba I, Dagher T, Valentin E, Cannell S, Moussellard HP, Anract P, Feruglio S, Vialle R, Bauer T, Hardy A. The Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI) is a valid and reliable measure to assess psychological readiness before returning to sport following peroneal tendon pathology surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2024; 32:542-549. [PMID: 38372173 DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to validate a scale that could help surgeons evaluate patients' psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS) after peroneal tendon pathology surgery. METHODS The Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI) scale, which had previously been validated in ankle ligament reconstruction patients, was adapted to evaluate the psychological preparedness for RTS in athletic patients who underwent peroneal tendinopathy surgery. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Foot Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM) scores were employed as patient-related outcome measurement (PROM) instruments. RESULTS This study included 57 patients. There was a strong correlation between ALR-RSI and both FAOS and FAAM (r = -0.68 and 0.74, respectively). ALR-RSI was considerably higher in patients who returned to sports than in those who did not. The mean score was 72.9 ± 19.0 in patients who returned to the same preinjury level, 48.5 ± 24.0 in those who returned to a lower level and 53.6 ± 31.1 in patients who changed their athletic activity (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, ALR-RSI showed at least a similar discrimination ability when compared to FAOS and FAAM. The test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95. The Cronbach's α statistic used to measure the internal consistency was high (0.95). A Youden index of 0.65 was observed for a cut-off score of 68 points. CONCLUSION ALR-RSI is a valid instrument for assessing psychological readiness to RTS in an athletic population following peroneal tendon surgery. When compared to the most commonly used PROMs, it was strongly correlated and demonstrated at least similar discrimination capacity. This could assist surgeons in identifying athletes who will have poor postoperative results and advising them on their capability to RTS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Saliba
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Tanios Dagher
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Eugenie Valentin
- Department of Orthopedic surgery, Clinique Du Sport, Paris, France
| | - Stuart Cannell
- Department of Orthopedics, Robert Debré Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Philippe Anract
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Sylvain Feruglio
- Laboratoire d'informatique de Sorbonne Université (LIP6), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Raphael Vialle
- Department of Orthopedics, Armand Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Bauer
- Department of Orthopedics, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Hardy
- Department of Orthopedic surgery, Clinique Du Sport, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Saliba I, Cannell S, Valentin E, Dagher T, Bauer T, Anract P, Feruglio S, Vialle R, Moussellard HP, Hardy A. Validation of the Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sports after Injury (ALR-RSI) Score as a Tool to Assess Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport in an Active Population After Ankle Fracture Surgery: A Cross-sectional Study. J Foot Ankle Surg 2024; 63:295-299. [PMID: 38151113 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2023.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Ankle injuries account for 15% to 25% of all sports injuries resulting in significant pain and loss of function. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to validate a scale to help surgeons quantify the psychological readiness to Return To Sport (RTS) in patients undergoing ankle fracture surgery. ALR-RSI was used to assess the psychological readiness for RTS in athletic patients who underwent ankle fracture fixation between January 2020 and January 2021. Participants filled out ALR-RSI and 2 Patient-Related Outcome Measurement (PROM) tools: Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS). A total of 93 patients were included. There was a strong correlation between ALR-RSI and both OMAS and SEFAS, with Pearson coefficients of r = 0.58 and 0.53, respectively. ALR-RSI was significantly higher in the RTS group than in those who no longer practiced their main preinjury sport. Moreover, the discriminant validity of ALR-RSI (AUC = 0.81) was better than that of the SEFAS and OMAS (AUC = 0.64 and 0.65, respectively, p = .001). The intra-class correlation coefficient ρ of 0.94 showed excellent reproducibility. At an optimal cutoff value of 76.7, ALR-RSI had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 75% with a Youden index of 0.56. In conclusion, ALR-RSI was a valid and reproducible tool to evaluate the psychological readiness for RTS in an active population after an ankle fracture. This score could help surgeons identify athletes who may have unfavorable postoperative outcomes and provide support on the ability to RTS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lebleu J, Pauwels A, Poilvache H, Anract P, Belbachir A. Severe Postoperative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: Risk Factors, Insights and Implications for Pain Management via a Digital Health Approach. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7695. [PMID: 38137764 PMCID: PMC10744303 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Up to 25% of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty report chronic pain postoperatively. Early identification of high-risk individuals can enhance pain management strategies. This retrospective analysis investigates the incidence of severe postoperative pain and its associated risk factors among 740 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. Utilizing a digital application, patients provided comprehensive data encompassing pre- and postoperative pain levels, analgesic usage, and completed a chronic pain risk assessment. Participants were categorized into two distinct groups based on their pain status at three months post-op: Group D+ (14%), characterized by pain scores exceeding 40/100 and/or the utilization of level 2 or 3 analgesics, and Group D- (86%), who did not meet these criteria. An analysis of pain trajectories within these groups revealed a non-linear progression, with specific patterns emerging amongst those predisposed to chronic pain. Notably, patients with a trajectory towards chronic pain exhibited a plateau in pain intensity approximately three weeks post-surgery. Significant preoperative risk factors were identified, including elevated initial pain levels, the presence of comorbidities, pain in other body areas, heightened joint sensitivity and stiffness. This study highlights the utility of digital platforms in enhancing patient care, particularly through the continuous monitoring of pain. Such an approach facilitates the early identification of potential complications and enables timely interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hervé Poilvache
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, CHIREC, 1420 Braine-l’Alleud, Belgium
| | - Philippe Anract
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hopital Cochin, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Anissa Belbachir
- Service d’Anesthésie, Réanimation et Médecine Périopératoire, Hopital Cochin, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bonvalot S, Cozic N, Le Cesne A, Blay JY, Penel N, Fau M, Chevreau C, Anract P, Waast D, Laurence V, Watson S, Duffaud F, Gouin F, Taieb S, Kind M, Lam L. ASO Visual Abstract: Initial Active Surveillance Strategy for Patients with Peripheral Sporadic Primary Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis: A Multicentric Phase II Observational Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8671-8672. [PMID: 37814181 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14396-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nathalie Cozic
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Nicolas Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Magali Fau
- Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Denis Waast
- Department of Orthopedics, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | | - Sarah Watson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Florence Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU la Timone, Marseilles, France
| | | | - Sophie Taieb
- Department of Radiology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Michèle Kind
- Department of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Laurent Lam
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bonvalot S, Cozic N, Le Cesne A, Blay JY, Penel N, Fau M, Chevreau C, Anract P, Waast D, Laurence V, Watson S, Duffaud F, Gouin F, Taieb S, Kind M, Lam L. Initial Active Surveillance Strategy for Patients with Peripheral Sporadic Primary Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis: A Multicentric Phase II Observational Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8653-8659. [PMID: 37777684 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14341-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stabilization or spontaneous regressions are demonstrated in more than half of patients affected by primary desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF) in retrospective studies. The objective of this phase II study was to prospectively assess the behavior of primary sporadic DT managed by active surveillance (AS). METHODS This prospective, multicenter, observational study (NCT01801176) included patients ≥18 years of age with primary sporadic DF located in an extremity or the abdominal/thoracic wall. At inclusion, all patients were initially placed on AS. Follow-up was based on clinical and radiological evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and then every 6 months for 3 years. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, as evaluated by a Central Review Board. RESULTS Between 2012 and 2015, 100 patients were enrolled. The female/male ratio was 8 and the median age was 34 years (interquartile range [IQR] 30.8-43.9). Median follow-up was 46.6 months (IQR 36.8-61.1) and the 3-year PFS was 53.4% (95% confidence interval 43.5-63.1%). At progression (48 patients), 23 patients received active treatment. Fifty-eight patients (58%) presented with spontaneous tumor regression (decrease > 0% compared with the initial size) during the first 3 months (n = 35, 35%) or after an initial progression (n = 23, 23%), of whom 26 (26%) had partial responses (PRs). The median time to PR was 31.7 months (25.3-not available). CONCLUSIONS These data support the use of AS as the primary approach to select patients with peripheral DF who require aggressive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nathalie Cozic
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Nicolas Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Magali Fau
- Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Denis Waast
- Department of Orthopedics, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | | - Sarah Watson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Florence Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU La Timone, Marseilles, France
| | | | - Sophie Taieb
- Department of Radiology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Michèle Kind
- Department of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Laurent Lam
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boukebous B, Dumaine V, Cladière-Nassif V, Anract P, Biau D. What to improve: Results of fixed-hinge knee endoprosthesis reconstructions over 40 years in a single tumor center. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2023; 109:103682. [PMID: 37690605 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over the past decades, numerous structural changes in implants, medical treatments, and surgical techniques have been made for Malignant Bone Tumors (MBT) around the knee. However, the overall care improvement is still unclear. The method is crucial when analyzing outcomes in surveys involving tumors, and a thorough assessment of the mortality is mandatory because death acts as competing event. The aims of this study were: 1) a comprehensive and longitudinal assessment of the revisions with an extensive follow-up and adequate methods; 2) a complete mortality review to consider competing risks. HYPOTHESIS The hypothesis was that some prosthesis's structural improvements were made while the surgical toll increased as well as an improvement of mortality was also expected. MATERIAL AND METHODS Analyses were performed on 248 patients with MBT (mean follow-up was 8.7 years, surgeries between 1972 and 2017). Three prosthesis models were successively used over time: 120 Guepar (older model), 42 Tornier, and 86 Stanmore (more recent model). The primary outcome was the assessment of revisions sorted out according to Henderson: type-1 soft-tissue failures or instability, type-2 aseptic loosening, type-3 structural failures, type-4 periprosthetic infections, type-5 tumoral progression. Death and amputations were considered as competing events. An extensive assessment of mortality was performed by merging the dataset with the French register of Deaths (INSEE). Cumulative probabilities were computed at 2, 5, 10, and 15 years and compared with Gray's tests. RESULTS The overall 5-year survival was, 80% (95% CI: 73-87) for Guepar, 69% (95% CI: 56-84) for Tornier, and 71% (95% CI: 62-82) for Stanmore (p=0.4). The 5-year cumulative risks for type-1 were 5% (95% CI: 1-9), 9% (95% CI: 0-18), and 17% (95% CI: 9-25) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.01). The 15-year cumulative risks for type-2 were 22% (95% CI: 15-39), 8% (95% CI: 0-17) and 8% (95% CI: 2-14) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.10). Ten patients had an implant failure, nine Guepar, and one Tornier. The 5-year cumulative risks for type-4 were 7% (95% CI: 2-12), 19% (95% CI: 7-31), and 12% (95% CI: 5-18) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.08). There were 29 tumoral progressions; the 15-year risks were 16% (95% CI: 2-22), 2% (95% CI: 0-7%), and 12% (95% CI: 4-19%) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.08). No difference whatsoever was found between the proximal tibial and distal femur. CONCLUSION There were some improvements in prosthesis design (forged steel instead of cast steel) and probably also in cemented stem fixation, but not in prosthetic joint infection and local recurrence over forty years. The overall mortality did not change significantly over the last 40 years amongst this specific cohort of patients who benefited from a hinge reconstruction prosthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III; comparative case series with sensibility analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baptiste Boukebous
- Inserm, équipe ECAMO, CRESS (Centre of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS), UMR 1153, université Paris-Cité, 1, Parvis Notre-Dame - place Jean-Paul II, 75004 Paris, France; Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, Beaujon/Bichat, université Paris-Cité, AP-HP, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018 Paris, France.
| | - Valérie Dumaine
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, Cochin, université Paris-Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 74014 Paris, France
| | - Victoire Cladière-Nassif
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, Cochin, université Paris-Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 74014 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Inserm, équipe ECAMO, CRESS (Centre of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS), UMR 1153, université Paris-Cité, 1, Parvis Notre-Dame - place Jean-Paul II, 75004 Paris, France; Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, Cochin, université Paris-Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 74014 Paris, France
| | - David Biau
- Inserm, équipe ECAMO, CRESS (Centre of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS), UMR 1153, université Paris-Cité, 1, Parvis Notre-Dame - place Jean-Paul II, 75004 Paris, France; Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, Cochin, université Paris-Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 74014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cottias P, Gaujac N, Bouché PA, Anract P. Unusual entrapment symptomatology treated in 115 cases by neurolysis of the common fibular nerve at the fibular head combined with neurolysis of the posterior tibial nerve at the tarsal tunnel. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2023; 109:103485. [PMID: 36435376 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Entrapment of the common fibular nerve (CFN) at the head of the fibula and entrapment of the posterior tibial nerve (PTN) at the tarsal tunnel are the most common nerve entrapment syndromes in the lower limb. Our aim was to study the results of combined neurolysis of the CFN and PTN for chronic lower limb pain. We hypothesized that combined neurolysis allowed a reduction of this chronic pain. MATERIAL AND METHOD This bi-centric retrospective study took place from January 2015 to November 2018, with a single senior surgeon. The inclusion criteria were all patients operated on for an idiopathic entrapment syndrome with neurolysis of the PTN at the tarsal tunnel, combined with neurolysis of the CFN at the head of the fibula. The primary endpoint was the pain evolution assessed on a numerical analogue scale (NAS) preoperatively and postoperatively on D+21, and at the last follow-up. The secondary endpoint was to determine the prognostic factors on the clinical outcome of neurolysis. RESULTS One hundred and fifteen neurolysis were included, comprising 64 women and 38 men with a mean age of 57±17.6 years. The preoperative pain (NAS0) was evaluated at 6±2.4 points. At D+21 postoperatively, there was a significant reduction in pain (NASD+21: 3±2.6 points, p<0.01). Similarly, at the last follow-up (with a mean follow-up of 37±8.4 months), there was a significant reduction in pain (NASLFU: 2±2.5, p<0.01). A history of systemic inflammatory disease was the only factor associated with a less significant decrease in pain at D+21, according to a multivariate analysis (p<0.01). There were 14 complications (12%) not requiring revision surgery. CONCLUSION This study is the first to demonstrate the efficacy of combined neurolysis of the CFN at the head of the fibula and the PTN at the tarsal tunnel, in the treatment of idiopathic nerve entrapment syndrome of the lower limb. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV; Retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Cottias
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, centre hospitalo-universitaire Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014 Paris, France; Centre chirurgical de Rémusat, 21, rue Rémusat, 75016 Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Gaujac
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, centre hospitalo-universitaire Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Alban Bouché
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, centre hospitalo-universitaire Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, centre hospitalo-universitaire Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lebleu J, Pauwels A, Anract P, Parratte S, Van Overschelde P, Van Onsem S. Digital Rehabilitation after Knee Arthroplasty: A Multi-Center Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13050824. [PMID: 37240994 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Rehabilitation for total knee replacement (TKA) often involves in-person therapy sessions, which can be time consuming and costly. Digital rehabilitation has the potential to address these limitations, but most of these systems offer standardized protocols without considering the patient's pain, participation, and speed of recovery. Furthermore, most digital systems lack human support in case of need. The aim of this study was to investigate the engagement, safety, and clinical effectiveness of a personalized and adaptative app-based human-supported digital monitoring and rehabilitation program. In this prospective multi-center longitudinal cohort study, 127 patients were included. Undesired events were managed through a smart alert system. Doctors were triggered when there was a suspicion of problems. The drop-out rate, complications and readmissions, PROMS, and satisfaction were collected through the app. There was only 2% readmission. Doctor actions through the platform potentially avoided 57 consultations (85% of alerts). The adherence to the program was 77%, and 89% of the patients would recommend the use of the program. Personalized human-backed-up digital solutions can help to improve the rehabilitation journey of patients after TKA, lower healthcare-related costs by lowering the complication and readmission rate, and improve patient reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Philippe Anract
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hopital Cochin, 75679 Paris, France
| | - Sébastien Parratte
- International Knee and Joint Centre, Abu Dhabi 46705, United Arab Emirates
- Locomotion Institute, Aix Marseille University, 13009 Marseille, France
| | | | - Stefaan Van Onsem
- Orthopaedics Department, AZ Alma Eeklo, Ringlaan 15, 9900 Eeklo, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bensaid S, Contejean A, Morand P, Enser M, Eyrolle L, Charlier C, Kernéis S, Anract P, Biau D, Canouï E. Surgical site infection after pelvic bone and soft tissue sarcoma resection: Risk factors, microbiology, and impact of extended postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. J Surg Oncol 2023. [PMID: 37010035 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic bone and/or soft tissue sarcoma removal surgeries are associated with a high rate of surgical site infection (SSI). The recommended antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) duration is 24-48 h. We aimed to assess the impact of extended ABP (5 days) on the SSI rate and describe the microbiology of SSI in bone and/or soft tissue pelvic sarcomas. METHODS We retrospectively included all consecutive patients who underwent pelvic bone and/or soft tissue sarcoma removal surgery between January 2010 and June 2020. RESULTS We analyzed 146 patients with pelvic bone (45, 31%) or soft tissue (101, 69%). Sixty patients (41%) developed SSI. SSI occurred in 13/28 (46.4%) in the extended ABP group versus 47/118 (39.8%) in the standard group (p = 0.53). In multivariable analysis, risk factors for SSI were surgery duration (OR: 1.94 [1.41-2.92] per h), stay in postoperative ICU for more than 2 days (12.0 [2.8-61.3]), and shred or autologous skin flap (39.3 [5.8-409.5]). Extended ABP was not associated with SSI. SSI were mainly polymicrobial with Enterobacterales (57.4%) and Enterococcus (45%). CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION Pelvic bone and/or soft tissue sarcoma removal surgery is highly prone to postoperative infection. Extending the ABP to 5 days does not reduce the level of SSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Bensaid
- Équipe Mobile d'Infectiologie, AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Adrien Contejean
- Équipe Mobile d'Infectiologie, AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Morand
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Service de bactériologie, AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Centre de référence infection ostéo-articulaires complexes (CRIOAC), AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Maya Enser
- Centre de référence infection ostéo-articulaires complexes (CRIOAC), AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Service d'anesthésie, AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Luc Eyrolle
- Centre de référence infection ostéo-articulaires complexes (CRIOAC), AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Service d'anesthésie, AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Charlier
- Équipe Mobile d'Infectiologie, AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Centre de référence infection ostéo-articulaires complexes (CRIOAC), AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Institut Pasteur, Inserm U1117, Biology of Infection Unit, Paris, France
| | - Solen Kernéis
- Équipe Mobile d'Infectiologie, AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Centre de référence infection ostéo-articulaires complexes (CRIOAC), AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Centre de référence infection ostéo-articulaires complexes (CRIOAC), AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Service d'orthopédie, AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - David Biau
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Centre de référence infection ostéo-articulaires complexes (CRIOAC), AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Service d'orthopédie, AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Etienne Canouï
- Équipe Mobile d'Infectiologie, AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- Centre de référence infection ostéo-articulaires complexes (CRIOAC), AP-HP, APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kubicek P, Cesne AL, Lervat C, Toulmonde M, Chevreau C, Duffaud F, Le Nail LR, Morelle M, Gaspar N, Vérité C, Castex MP, Penel N, Saada E, Causeret S, Bertucci F, Perrin C, Bompas E, Orbach D, Laurence V, Piperno-Neumann S, Anract P, Rios M, Gentet JC, Mascard É, Pannier S, Blouin P, Carrère S, Chaigneau L, Soibinet-Oudot P, Corradini N, Boudou-Rouquette P, Ruzic JC, Lebrun-Ly V, Dubray-Longeras P, Varatharajah S, Lebbe C, Ropars M, Kurtz JE, Guillemet C, Lotz JP, Berchoud J, Cherrier G, Ducimetière F, Chemin C, Italiano A, Honoré C, Desandes E, Blay JY, Gouin F, Marec-Bérard P. Management and outcomes of adolescent and young adult sarcoma patients: results from the French nationwide database NETSARC. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:69. [PMID: 36670431 PMCID: PMC9854049 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10556-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The initial management of patients with sarcoma is a critical issue. We used the nationwide French National Cancer Institute-funded prospective sarcoma database NETSARC to report the management and oncologic outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) patients with sarcoma at the national level. PATIENTS AND METHODS NETSARC database gathers regularly monitored and updated data from patients with sarcoma. NETSARC was queried for patients (15-30 years) with sarcoma diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 for whom tumor resection had been performed. We reported management, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in AYA treated in French reference sarcoma centers (RSC) and outside RSC (non-RSC) and conducted multivariable survival analyses adjusted for classical prognostic factors. RESULTS Among 3,227 patients aged 15-30 years with sarcoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2017, the study included 2,227 patients with surgery data available, among whom 1,290 AYAs had been operated in RSC, and 937 AYAs in non-RSC. Significant differences in compliance to guidelines were observed including pre-treatment biopsy (RSC: 85.9%; non-RSC 48.1%), pre-treatment imaging (RSC: 86.8%; non-RSC: 56.5%) and R0 margins (RSC 57.6%; non-RSC: 20.2%) (p < 0.001). 3y-OS rates were 81.1% (95%CI 78.3-83.6) in AYA in RSC and 82.7% (95%CI 79.4-85.5) in AYA in non-RSC, respectively. Whereas no significant differences in OS was observed in AYAs treated in RSC and in non-RSC, LRFS and PFS were improved in AYAs treated in RSC compared to AYAs treated in non-RSC (Hazard Ratios (HR): 0.58 and 0.83, respectively). CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the importance for AYA patients with sarcoma to be managed in national sarcoma reference centers involving multidisciplinary medical teams with paediatric and adult oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Kubicek
- grid.418191.40000 0000 9437 3027Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Angers, France ,grid.418116.b0000 0001 0200 3174Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- grid.14925.3b0000 0001 2284 9388Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cyril Lervat
- grid.452351.40000 0001 0131 6312Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Maud Toulmonde
- grid.476460.70000 0004 0639 0505Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christine Chevreau
- grid.417829.10000 0000 9680 0846Institut Claudius Régaud IUCT Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Magali Morelle
- grid.418116.b0000 0001 0200 3174Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Nathalie Gaspar
- grid.14925.3b0000 0001 2284 9388Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cécile Vérité
- grid.476460.70000 0004 0639 0505Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Nicolas Penel
- grid.452351.40000 0001 0131 6312Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Esma Saada
- grid.417812.90000 0004 0639 1794Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Sylvain Causeret
- grid.418037.90000 0004 0641 1257Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - François Bertucci
- grid.418443.e0000 0004 0598 4440Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Christophe Perrin
- grid.417988.b0000 0000 9503 7068Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Emmanuelle Bompas
- grid.418191.40000 0000 9437 3027Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Daniel Orbach
- grid.418596.70000 0004 0639 6384SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children and AYA with Cancer), PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Laurence
- grid.418596.70000 0004 0639 6384SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children and AYA with Cancer), PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Piperno-Neumann
- grid.418596.70000 0004 0639 6384SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children and AYA with Cancer), PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- grid.411784.f0000 0001 0274 3893Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Maria Rios
- grid.452436.20000 0000 8775 4825Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | - Éric Mascard
- grid.412134.10000 0004 0593 9113Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
| | | | - Pascale Blouin
- grid.411777.30000 0004 1765 1563CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - Sébastien Carrère
- grid.418189.d0000 0001 2175 1768Centre Val d’Aurelle ICM, Montpellier, France
| | - Loïc Chaigneau
- grid.411158.80000 0004 0638 9213CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Céleste Lebbe
- grid.413328.f0000 0001 2300 6614Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Mickaël Ropars
- grid.411154.40000 0001 2175 0984CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- grid.512000.6Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg-Europe ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Cécile Guillemet
- grid.418189.d0000 0001 2175 1768Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Claire Chemin
- grid.418116.b0000 0001 0200 3174Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Antoine Italiano
- grid.14925.3b0000 0001 2284 9388Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France ,grid.476460.70000 0004 0639 0505Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Charles Honoré
- grid.14925.3b0000 0001 2284 9388Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Emmanuel Desandes
- CHRU Nancy, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et en Statistique Sorbonne-Paris Cité (CRESS), UMR 1153, INSERM, Université de Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- grid.418116.b0000 0001 0200 3174Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - François Gouin
- grid.418116.b0000 0001 0200 3174Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France ,grid.277151.70000 0004 0472 0371CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Perrine Marec-Bérard
- grid.418116.b0000 0001 0200 3174Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France ,Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tlemsani C, Larousserie F, De Percin S, Audard V, Hadjadj D, Chen J, Biau D, Anract P, Terris B, Goldwasser F, Pasmant E, Boudou-Rouquette P. Biology and Management of High-Grade Chondrosarcoma: An Update on Targets and Treatment Options. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24021361. [PMID: 36674874 PMCID: PMC9862566 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
This review provides an overview of histopathology, clinical presentation, molecular pathways, and potential new systemic treatments of high-grade chondrosarcomas (CS), including grade 2−3 conventional, dedifferentiated, and mesenchymal CS. The diagnosis of CS combines radiological and histological data in conjunction with patient clinical presentations. Conventional CS is the most frequent subtype of CS (85%) and represents about 25% of primary bone tumors in adults; they can be categorized according to their bone location into central, peripheral, and periosteal chondrosarcomas. Central and peripheral CS differ at the molecular level with either IDH1/2 mutations or EXT1/2 mutations, respectively. CDKN2A/B deletions are also frequent in conventional CS, as well as COL2A1 mutations. Dedifferentiated CS develops when low-grade conventional CS transforms into a high-grade sarcoma and most frequently exhibits features of osteosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Their molecular characteristics are similar to conventional CS. Mesenchymal CS is a totally different pathological entity exhibiting recurrent translocations. Their clinical presentation and management are different too. The standard treatment of CSs is wide en-bloc resection. CS are relatively radiotherapy resistant; therefore, doses >60 Gy are needed in an attempt to achieve local control in unresectable tumors. Chemotherapy is possibly effective in mesenchymal chondrosarcoma and is of uncertain value in dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Due to resistance to standard anticancer agents, the prognosis is poor in patients with metastatic or unresectable chondrosarcomas. Recently, the refined characterization of the molecular profile, as well as the development of new treatments, allow new therapeutic options for these rare tumors. The efficiency of IDH1 inhibitors in other malignancies suggests that these inhibitors will be part of IDH1/2 mutated conventional CS management soon. Other treatment approaches, such as PIK3-AKT-mTOR inhibitors, cell cycle inhibitors, and epigenetic or immune modulators based on improving our understanding of CS molecular biology, are emerging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Tlemsani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
- INSERM U1016-CNRS UMR8104, Cochin Institute, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Frédérique Larousserie
- Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Sixtine De Percin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Virginie Audard
- Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Djihad Hadjadj
- INSERM U1016-CNRS UMR8104, Cochin Institute, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Jeanne Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - David Biau
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Benoit Terris
- Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - François Goldwasser
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Eric Pasmant
- INSERM U1016-CNRS UMR8104, Cochin Institute, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
- Department of Genetics, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
- INSERM U1016-CNRS UMR8104, Cochin Institute, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, APHP.Centre, 75014 Paris, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-1-58-41-23-30; Fax: +33-1-58-41-14-34
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Akoum J, Corvol MT, Tahiri K, Anract P, Biau D, Borderie D, Étienne F, Rannou F, Nguyen C. Netrin-1 Secreted by Human Osteoarthritic Articular Chondrocytes Promotes Angiogenesis in Vitro. Cartilage 2022; 13:94-104. [PMID: 36321743 PMCID: PMC9924986 DOI: 10.1177/19476035221121791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Netrin-1 expression in articular cartilage is correlated with osteoarthritic changes. We aimed to investigate the contribution of Netrin-1 secreted by human osteoarthritic articular chondrocytes to angiogenesis process in vitro. DESIGN Human articular chondrocytes were extracted from non-osteoarthritic (n = 10) and osteoarthritic (n = 22) joints obtained from surgical specimens and incubated for 24 hours. Medium conditioned by non-osteoarthritic and osteoarthritic articular chondrocytes were collected. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were treated with control and conditioned medium and assessed using assays for cell adherence, migration, and tube formation. Netrin-1 expression and secretion was compared between non-osteoarthritic and osteoarthritic chondrocytes by qPCR, Western blot, and ELISA. The role of chondrocyte-secreted Netrin-1 on HUVEC functions was assessed by immunological neutralization using an anti-Netrin-1 monoclonal antibody. RESULTS As compared with medium conditioned by non-osteoarthritic chondrocytes, medium conditioned by osteoarthritic chondrocytes permitted tube formation by HUVEC. Both non-osteoarthritic and osteoarthritic chondrocytes expressed Netrin-1 at the RNA and protein levels. At the RNA level, Netrin-1 expression did not differ between non-osteoarthritic and osteoarthritic chondrocytes. At the protein level, Netrin-1 appeared as a full protein of 64 kDa in non-osteoarthritic chondrocytes and as two cleaved proteins of 55 kDa and 64 kDa in osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Immunological neutralization of endogenous Netrin-1 reduced the pro-angiogenic and pro-inflammatory transcriptional profile of HUVEC treated with the medium conditioned by osteoarthritic chondrocytes, as well as their capacities to form tubes. CONCLUSIONS Medium conditioned by osteoarthritic chondrocytes permits tube formation by HUVEC in vitro. This permissive effect is mediated by Netrin-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joulnar Akoum
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, Toxicité
Environnementale, Cibles Thérapeutiques, Signalisation Cellulaire et Biomarqueurs
(T3S), UFR Sciences Fondamentales et Biomédicales, Campus Saint-Germain-des-Prés,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Thérèse Corvol
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, Toxicité
Environnementale, Cibles Thérapeutiques, Signalisation Cellulaire et Biomarqueurs
(T3S), UFR Sciences Fondamentales et Biomédicales, Campus Saint-Germain-des-Prés,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Khadija Tahiri
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, Toxicité
Environnementale, Cibles Thérapeutiques, Signalisation Cellulaire et Biomarqueurs
(T3S), UFR Sciences Fondamentales et Biomédicales, Campus Saint-Germain-des-Prés,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Faculté de Santé, UFR de Médecine,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France,Service d’Orthopédie, Hôpital Cochin,
Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris,
France
| | - David Biau
- Faculté de Santé, UFR de Médecine,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France,Service d’Orthopédie, Hôpital Cochin,
Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris,
France,INSERM UMR 1153, Centre de Recherche
Épidémiologie et Statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Cité, Paris,
France
| | - Didier Borderie
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, Toxicité
Environnementale, Cibles Thérapeutiques, Signalisation Cellulaire et Biomarqueurs
(T3S), UFR Sciences Fondamentales et Biomédicales, Campus Saint-Germain-des-Prés,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France,Faculté de Santé, UFR de Pharmacie,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France,Service de Diagnostic Biologique
Automatisé, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre-Université
Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - François Étienne
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, Toxicité
Environnementale, Cibles Thérapeutiques, Signalisation Cellulaire et Biomarqueurs
(T3S), UFR Sciences Fondamentales et Biomédicales, Campus Saint-Germain-des-Prés,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - François Rannou
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, Toxicité
Environnementale, Cibles Thérapeutiques, Signalisation Cellulaire et Biomarqueurs
(T3S), UFR Sciences Fondamentales et Biomédicales, Campus Saint-Germain-des-Prés,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France,Faculté de Santé, UFR de Médecine,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France,Service de Rééducation et de
Réadaptation de l’Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Hôpital Cochin,
Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris,
France
| | - Christelle Nguyen
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, Toxicité
Environnementale, Cibles Thérapeutiques, Signalisation Cellulaire et Biomarqueurs
(T3S), UFR Sciences Fondamentales et Biomédicales, Campus Saint-Germain-des-Prés,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France,Faculté de Santé, UFR de Médecine,
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France,Service de Rééducation et de
Réadaptation de l’Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Hôpital Cochin,
Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris,
France,Christelle Nguyen, Service de Rééducation
et de Réadaptation de l’Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis,
Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris
Cité, 27, Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, Paris 75014, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bouché PA, Gaujac N, Wassermann V, Auberger G, Anract P. Is the osteosynthesis of lateral malleolar fractures by pin/cerclage effective? A retrospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022; 108:103376. [PMID: 35907625 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lateral malleolar fractures are present in about 90% of ankle fractures. The standard treatment is plate osteosynthesis. Although the plates are thin, the risk of cicatricial complications is not insignificant and can lead to cutaneous or even infectious complications and the latter can cause functional repercussions. We therefore aimed to evaluate a technique consisting of osteosynthesis of the lateral malleolus using two cerclages and two intramedullary pins. HYPOTHESIS Our hypothesis is that the use of osteosynthesis by pin/cerclage of the lateral malleolus makes it possible to have objective reduction criteria, similar to the reference treatment. METHODS This is a retrospective study of patients who had an interligamentous spiral fracture of the lateral malleolus. One group of patients had internal fixation of the lateral malleolus fracture by pins, and the other by plate. Our primary outcome was to compare the reduction of the fracture of the lateral malleolus between the two techniques using the "Dime sign", the measurement of the talocrural angle and respect for Shenton's line. RESULTS A total of 118 lateral malleolar fractures were included: 56 patients (47.5%) in the "pin" group and 62 patients (52.5%) in the "plate" group. The mean age of the patients was 46.6 years (17.4) with an average body mass index of 25.2kg/m2 (4.8) and 55.1% of the patients were women. We found a difference in the reduction criteria between the two groups by looking at Shenton's line: 73.2% (41/56) of postoperative X-rays in the "pin" group respected Shenton's line, compared to 90.3% (56/62) in the "plate" group (p=0.02). We did not find any difference regarding the "Dime sign" and the talocrural angle. CONCLUSION Our study shows the superiority of plate osteosynthesis for lateral malleolar fractures compared to pin/cerclage osteosynthesis, regarding one of the three radiological criteria for reduction. No significant difference was found in the one-year rates of complications and of hardware removal, between the two groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, retrospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Alban Bouché
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - Nicolas Gaujac
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Vincent Wassermann
- Orthopaedic Department, Polyclinic Notre-Dame, 345, avenue Pierre Brossolette, 83300 Draguignan, France
| | - Guillaume Auberger
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bouché PA, Corsia S, Biau D, Anract P, Briot K, Leclerc P, Auberger G, Cailleaux PE. Does delayed weight bearing in the surgical management of fractures of the upper end of the femur in the elderly lead to more complications? A prospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022; 108:103381. [PMID: 35914733 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fractures of the upper end of the femur (FUEF) lead to increased mortality and dependence in the elderly. However, mechanical complications after surgery persist in up to 20% of cases, which may justify a delayed resumption of full weight bearing to protect the osteosynthesis during consolidation. HYPOTHESIS Our hypothesis was that the late resumption of weight bearing in an elderly population after a FUEF would be limited by a higher frequency of medical complications. METHODS This was a prospective monocentric study including patients aged 80 or over with an isolated FUEF requiring osteosynthesis. The operator decided on the discharge. The primary endpoint was to show a difference in a medical complication score created for this study (APRETAR), between a group with, and a group without, weight bearing delayed by 45 days. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2019, 254 patients (88±5.6 years, 77.6% women) were included, and of these, 70 (27.6%) had delayed weight bearing. The mean APRETAR at 45 days was greater in the delayed weight bearing group (5.9±8.6 vs. 5.7±11.0; p<0.001). One-year mortality was 12.6% (32 patients), with no difference between the two groups (p=0.51). The level of dependence was significant (IADL at 2.2±1.7), with some comorbidities (Charlson at 2.9±2.2 and CIRS-G at 6.5±4.3) and all comparable across the two groups but with low cognitive levels, especially in the group with delayed weight bearing (MMSE 15.9±10.7 vs. 21±6.9; p<0.001). CONCLUSION This prospective study shows that delaying weight bearing in the elderly population, even for mechanical problems with FUEF, statistically increases medical complications but in a clinically acceptable manner. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II, Prospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Alban Bouché
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique - hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université de Paris, faculté de médecine Paris-Centre, 75006 Paris, France.
| | - Simon Corsia
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique - hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - David Biau
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique - hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université de Paris, faculté de médecine Paris-Centre, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique - hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université de Paris, faculté de médecine Paris-Centre, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Karine Briot
- Service de rhumatologie, hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université de Paris, faculté de médecine Paris-Centre, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Leclerc
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital de La Croix Saint-Simon, GH Diaconnesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Auberger
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital de La Croix Saint-Simon, GH Diaconnesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Cailleaux
- Université de Paris, faculté de médecine Paris-Nord & Inserm UMR-S 1132, 75006 Paris, France; Service de gériatrie aiguë, hôpital Louis-Mourier, assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 92700 Colombes, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Teissier V, Biau D, Hamadouche M, Talon D, Anract P. Time is Money! Influence on Operating Theater and Sterilization Times of Patient-specific Cutting Guides and Single-use Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Full Factorial Design of 136 Patients. Arthroplast Today 2022; 18:95-102. [PMID: 36312884 PMCID: PMC9596960 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-specific cutting guides (PSGs) and single-use disposable instrumentation (SUI) have emerged as potential beneficial innovations for total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PSG and SUI for total knee arthroplasty on operating room (OR) and sterilization times. Methods A monocentric, prospective, interventional, full factorial design study, including 136 patients, compared patient-specific (PSG, n = 68) to conventional cutting guides (n = 68) and SUI (n = 68) to conventional instrumentation (CVI, n = 68). In the OR, we recorded the number of instrument trays, operating time, and room occupancy time. In the central sterile services department, the total sterilization duration was assessed. The primary outcome was operating time and sterilization duration. Secondary outcomes were difference in the number of trays, Oxford Knee Score, and postoperative mechanical axis. Results The median operating time was 80 minutes (Q1-Q3: 73-90) and was significantly increased for SUI compared to that for CVI (+5 minutes, P = .0072). The median sterilization duration was 1261 minutes (Q1-Q3: 934-1603). It was significantly in favor of SUI (936 minutes) over CVI (1565 minutes) (+629 minutes, P < .0001). The total number of instrument trays was 404 for 136 patients: 252 for CVI and 152 for SUI (P < .0001) and 189 for PSG and 215 for conventional cutting guides (P = .0006). There was no significant difference in OKS (P = .86) nor in the postoperative alignment which was between 177° and 183° (75% patients, P = .24). Conclusions SUI lowers the number of instrument trays and sterilization duration. PSG is not associated with significant OR or sterilization time reduction. The use of SUI could reduce the risk of noncompliance of instrument trays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Teissier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hopital Cochin, APHP, Université Paris, Paris, France
- Corresponding author. Cochin Teaching Hospital, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014 Paris, France. Tel.: +33 6 89 21 58 27.
| | - David Biau
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hopital Cochin, APHP, Université Paris, Paris, France
| | - Moussa Hamadouche
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hopital Cochin, APHP, Université Paris, Paris, France
| | - Damien Talon
- Department of Pharmacy, Cochin Teaching Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hopital Cochin, APHP, Université Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gouin F, Stoeckle E, Honoré C, Ropars M, Jafari M, Mattei JC, Rochwerger A, Carrere S, Waast D, Ferron G, Machiavello JC, Anract P, Marchal F, Sirveaux F, Marco O, Guiramand J, Paquette B, Di Marco A, Causeret S, Guilloit JM, Soibinet P, Tzanis D, Gimbergues P, Fiorenza F, Dujardin F, Le Nail LR, Ruzic JC, Chemin-Airiau C, Morelle M, Meeus P, Karanian M, Le Loarer F, Vaz G, Blay JY. Overall survival in patients with re-excision of positive microscopic margins of limb and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma operated outside of a reference center: a nationwide cohort analysis. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1034. [PMID: 36192725 PMCID: PMC9531489 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10121-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This French nationwide NETSARC exhaustive prospective cohort aims to explore the impact of systematic re-excision (RE) as adjuvant care on overall survival (OS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and local and distant control (RFS) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with positive microscopic margins (R1) after initial resection performed outside of a reference center. Methods Eligible patients had experienced STS surgery outside a reference center from 2010 to 2017, and had R1 margins after initial surgery. Characteristics and treatment comparisons used chi-square for categorical variables and Kruskall-Wallis test for continuous data. Survival distributions were compared in patients reexcised (RE) or not (No-RE) using a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for subgroup analysis. Results A total of 1,284 patients had experienced initial STS surgery outside NETSARC with R1 margins, including 1,029 patients with second operation documented. Among the latter, 698 patients experienced re-excision, and 331 were not re-excised. Characteristics were significantly different regarding patient age, tumor site, tumor size, tumor depth, and histotype in the population of patients re-excised (RE) or not (No-RE). The study identified RE as an independent favorable factor for OS (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.23–0.56, p<0.0001), for LRFS (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.36–0.56, p<0.0001), and for RFS (HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.26–0.46, p<0.0001). Conclusion This large nationwide series shows that RE improved overall survival in patients with STS of extremities and trunk wall, with prior R1 resection performed outside of a reference center. RE as part of adjuvant care should be systematically considered. Level of evidence II Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10121-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Charles Honoré
- Surgery department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Mickael Ropars
- Orthopedic surgery department, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Mehrdad Jafari
- General and digestive oncologic surgery, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Jean Camille Mattei
- Ramsay Santé, Hôpital Privé Clairval, Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.,INSERM, MMG, Marseille, France.,Orthopedic and traumatologic surgery department, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.,Hopital de la Conception, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Alexandre Rochwerger
- INSERM, MMG, Marseille, France.,Hopital de la Conception, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Sébastien Carrere
- Surgery department, Institut de recherche en cancérologie, Montpellier, France
| | - Denis Waast
- Orthopedic and traumatologic surgery clinic, CHU, Nantes, France
| | | | | | - Philippe Anract
- Orthopedic surgery department, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Marchal
- Surgery department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, UMR 7039, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | | | - Oren Marco
- Reconstructive et esthetic plastic surgery, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | | | - Brice Paquette
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Jean Minjoz University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Antonio Di Marco
- Orthopedic surgery department, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sylvain Causeret
- Surgery department, Centre George-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Marc Guilloit
- Visceral et digestive surgery department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Dimitri Tzanis
- Surgery department, Institut Curie, PSL university, Paris, France
| | | | - Fabrice Fiorenza
- Orthopedic and traumatology surgery department, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Franck Dujardin
- Medical Oncology and Surgical Oncology department, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Louis R Le Nail
- Onco-orthopedic surgery department, Hôpital Trousseau, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France
| | | | | | - Magali Morelle
- Clinical research and innovation department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Meeus
- Surgery department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Marie Karanian
- Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - François Le Loarer
- Anatomo-pathology surgery department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Gualter Vaz
- Surgery department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Medical oncology Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.,University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.,Headquarters, Unicancer, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Penel N, Giraud A, Chemin C, Cantarel C, Ducimetiere F, Honoré C, Le Cesne A, Gouin F, Toulmonde M, Decanter G, Bonvalot S, Chevreau C, Anract P, Firmin N, Duffaud F, Kurtz J, Bompas E, Ropars M, Blay JY, Mathoulin-Pelissier S. 1515P Nationwide management of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in France, before (2019) versus during COVID-19 pandemic (2020). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
21
|
Chen TWW, Chiang RCJ, Le Cesne A, Hsieh YC, Italiano A, Yang YW, Penel N, Lee WC, Bompas E, Valentin T, Anract P, Firmin N, Duffaud F, Cheng AL, Ducimetiere F, Chan KA, Blay JY. Soft tissue sarcoma incidences and clinical characteristics are significantly different in France and Taiwan. Cancer 2022; 128:3360-3369. [PMID: 35796499 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of different soft tissue sarcoma (STS) histotypes among ethnic and geographic populations has not been comprehensively investigated. METHODS Data from 2013 to 2016 were obtained from national cancer registry databases in France and Taiwan. Liposarcoma (LPS), leiomyosarcoma (LMS), angiosarcoma (AS), synovial sarcoma (SS), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) were selected as index STSs to estimate the age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) and other clinical features between patients. RESULTS In total, 9398 patients (7148 from France and 2250 from Taiwan) were included. The ASRs of AS (5.4 vs. 2.8) and MPNST (2.0 vs. 1.0) were significantly higher in Taiwan; France had significantly higher ASRs for LPS (12.0 vs. 10.0), LMS (9.7 vs. 7.6), and SS (1.7 vs. 1.2). Patients in Taiwan with LMS or LPS were younger than their French counterparts. With regard to the distribution according to primary anatomic site, French patients had higher odds for extremity and truncal LMS (odds ratio [OR], 2.84; p < .001), AS (OR, 2.67; p < .001), MPNST (OR, 1.55; p = .027), and LPS (OR, 1.38; p < .001) and for breast AS (OR, 10.58; p < .001). Taiwanese patients had higher odds for liver AS (OR, 10.72; p < .001) and uterine LMS (OR, 3.21; p < .001). SS age and distribution according to primary anatomic site did not differ significantly between the French and Taiwanese populations. CONCLUSIONS Significant differences in the incidence and clinical characteristics of index STS suggested that geographic (environmental) and ethnicity factors likely play a vital role in the pathogenesis of STS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Wei-Wu Chen
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ruru Chun-Ju Chiang
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Taiwan Cancer Registry, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Alex Le Cesne
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute-Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Yu-Chun Hsieh
- Health Data Research Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Ya-Wen Yang
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Taiwan Cancer Registry, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nicolas Penel
- General Oncology Department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France
| | - Wen-Chung Lee
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Taiwan Cancer Registry, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | - Philippe Anract
- Department of Orthopedics, Assistance publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Nelly Firmin
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - Florence Duffaud
- Medical Oncology, Greater Paris University Hospitals, Marseilles, France
| | - Ann-Lii Cheng
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - K Arnold Chan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Crenn V, Quinette Y, Bouthors C, Missenard G, Viard B, Anract P, Boisgard S, Mascard E, Gouin F. Intercalary allograft reconstruction following femoral tumour resection: mid- and long-term results and benefits of adding a vascularised fibula autograft. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:195. [PMID: 35698130 PMCID: PMC9195446 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02650-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Bone healing in femoral reconstructions using intercalary allografts can be compromised in a tumour context. There is also a high revision rate for non-union, infection, and fractures in this context. The advantages and disadvantages of an associated vascularised fibula graft (VFG) are still a matter of debate. Methods In a multicentre study, we retrospectively analysed 46 allograft reconstructions, operated on between 1984 and 2017, of which 18 were associated with a VFG (VFG+) and 28 without (VFG−), with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We determined the cumulative probability of bone union as well as the mid- and long-term revision risks for both categories by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a multivariate Cox model. We also compared the MSTS scores. Results Significant differences in favour of VFG+ reconstruction were observed in the survival analyses for the probability of bone union (log-rank, p = 0.017) and in mid- and long-term revisions (log-rank, p = 0.032). No significant difference was observed for the MSTS, with a mean MSTS of 27.6 in our overall cohort (p = 0.060). The multivariate Cox model confirmed that VFG+ was the main positive factor for bone union, and it identified irradiated allografts as a major risk factor for the occurrence of mid- and long-term revisions. Conclusion Bone union was achieved earlier in both survival and Cox model analyses for the VFG+ group. It also reduced the mid- and long-term revision risk, except when an irradiated allograft was used. In case of a tumour, we thus recommend using VFG+ from a fresh-frozen allograft, as it appears to be a more reliable long-term option. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02650-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Crenn
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, CHU de Nantes, Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44000, Nantes, France. .,INSERM, UMR 1238, Phy-Os, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
| | - Yonis Quinette
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, CHU de Nantes, Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Charlie Bouthors
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, APHP/CHU Kremlin-Bicêtre, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Gilles Missenard
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, APHP/CHU Kremlin-Bicêtre, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Brice Viard
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, APHP/CHU Kremlin-Bicêtre, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, AP-HP/Hôpital Cochin, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Boisgard
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, CHU Gabriel Montpied, 58 rue Montalembert, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Eric Mascard
- Département de Chirurgie Orthopédique Pédiatrique, APHP/Hôpital Necker, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France
| | - François Gouin
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, CHU de Nantes, Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44000, Nantes, France.,INSERM, UMR 1238, Phy-Os, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.,Département de Chirurgie, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Corsia S, Bouché PA, Anract P, Biau D, Sabatier V. Resection and extemporaneous coverage of a soft tissue sarcoma with a pedicled groin flap in the trochanteric region: Technical note. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022; 108:103054. [PMID: 34536598 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The main issues pertaining to oncological surgery of the musculoskeletal system are tumour resection with sufficient margins, and the coverage of inherent defects. We report the use of a pedicled cutaneous groin flap as coverage for a trochanteric defect following an oncological resection of a grade III pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma in a 75-year-old patient. This flap is not routinely used in the coverage of a defect in this region. The interest of this original process lies in its technical ease, and in the possibility of lifting the flap directly after resection, without changing the set-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Corsia
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie, groupe hospitalier Cochin-Port Royal, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75004 Paris, France.
| | - Pierre-Alban Bouché
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie, groupe hospitalier Cochin-Port Royal, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75004 Paris, France; Service de biostatistique et information médicale, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, université Paris Diderot, ECSTRA team, UMR U1153, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie, groupe hospitalier Cochin-Port Royal, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75004 Paris, France
| | - David Biau
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie, groupe hospitalier Cochin-Port Royal, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75004 Paris, France
| | - Vincent Sabatier
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie, groupe hospitalier Cochin-Port Royal, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75004 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Thumser J, Cambon-Binder A, Even J, Babinet A, Anract P, Biau D. Sarcomas of the hand: A retrospective series of 26 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022; 108:102991. [PMID: 34144254 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Revised: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hand sarcomas frequently suffer from a delayed diagnosis, and the current guidelines for their management are often not followed. METHODS The objectives of our study were to determine: (1) the rate of inadequate initial treatments; (2) the rates of mortality, recurrence, and complementary excision in a cohort of patients with a sarcoma of the hand who were treated at our reference center between 2000 and 2015. RESULTS The series comprised 26 patients (mean age 40 years). Of the 20 patients not initially treated at a reference center, 17 had inadequate initial treatment. Of the six patients treated at our center, one had inadequate initial care. Significantly more patients had inadequate initial care outside a reference center (p=0.0045). The cumulative probabilities of recurrence or metastases at 5 years were 15% and 30%, respectively. Survival by cumulative incidence was 71% at 5 years and 56% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS Sarcomas of the hand are a deadly pathology. All diagnostic uncertainty warrants referral of the patient to a reference center. LEVEL OF PROOF IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joannie Thumser
- Hôpital privé Armand-Brillard, 3-5, avenue Watteau, 94130 Nogent-sur-Marne, France.
| | - Adeline Cambon-Binder
- Sorbonne University, Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Julien Even
- Clinique Internationale du Parc Monceau, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Babinet
- Paris-Descartes University, Orthopedic and Trauma Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Paris-Descartes University, Orthopedic and Trauma Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - David Biau
- Paris-Descartes University, Orthopedic and Trauma Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
de l'Escalopier N, Felden A, Anract P, Biau D. Acetabular reconstruction after advanced acetabular metastasis resection: Modified Harrington technique with a Kerboull reinforcement device. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022; 108:103232. [PMID: 35139404 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The surgical treatment of acetabular bone metastases rests on total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the event of major bone defects, the reconstruction may prove challenging. Two complicating factors are the need to obtain a mechanically stable acetabulum and the unfeasibility of using an autograft to increase the bone stock. The technique described in 1981 by Harrington involves implanting steel rods to reinforce the pelvis before sealing the prosthetic cup. We have now been using this technique for several years, and based on our accumulated experience we introduced several substantial modifications. The most important among them is the use of a Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device (KARD) in addition to the iliac pins. This reinforcement of the acetabulum, which is widely used for THA, serves as the basis for guiding the reconstruction, while also facilitating the sealing of the prosthetic cup. Furthermore, we use centrally threaded rods to avoid secondary displacement. Finally, we routinely use a dual-mobility cemented cup to decrease the risk of dislocation. Here, we describe our acetabular reconstruction technique based on a modified Harrington technique, which is used for acetabular reconstruction in patients with advanced acetabular metastases managed at our French referral centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas de l'Escalopier
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et oncologique, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - Arnaud Felden
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et oncologique, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et oncologique, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - David Biau
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et oncologique, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Housset V, Anract P, Babinet A, Auberger G, Biau D. Proximal femur versus acetabular extra-articular resection of the hip joint for primary malignant bone tumors: a retrospective comparative review of 33 cases. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:168. [PMID: 35643461 PMCID: PMC9145149 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02642-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Extra-articular resection (EAR) of the hip joint is prone to significant complications and morbidity. Thus, this study evaluates the cumulative incidences and main reasons of reoperation following EAR of primary malignant bone tumors (PMBT) of the hip to determine whether the outcomes are different between EAR of the pelvis and that of the proximal femur. Patients and methods Thirty-three patients presented with a PMBT of the proximal femur or pelvis were included in this study. Among all PMBTs, 58% originated from the pelvis and 42% were from the proximal femur. Twenty patients had chondrosarcomas (61%), 10 had osteosarcomas (30%), and 3 had sarcomas of another histological subtype (9%). Results The mean follow-up was of 76 months (range: 24–220 months). The cumulative probabilities of revision for any reason were 52% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30–70%) 5 years after surgery. The 5-year cumulative probabilities of revision were 13% (95% CI 4–27%), 24% (95% CI 10–42%), and 34% (95% CI 14–56%) for mechanical, infectious, and tumoral reasons, respectively. The 5-year cumulative probabilities of revision for any reason were 78% (95% CI 37–94%) and 14% (95% CI 2–38%) for the pelvis and proximal femur, respectively (p = 0.004). Posterior column preservation was significantly associated with more mechanical complications even after adjusting for the resection site (p = 0.043). Conclusion Half of patients undergoing EAR of the hip joint for PMBT of the proximal femur or acetabulum will require another operation. EAR of the pelvis is associated with significantly worse outcome than EAR of the proximal femur.
Collapse
|
27
|
Nguyen C, Boutron I, Roren A, Anract P, Beaudreuil J, Biau D, Boisgard S, Daste C, Durand-Zaleski I, Eschalier B, Gil C, Lefèvre-Colau MM, Nizard R, Perrodeau É, Rabetrano H, Richette P, Sanchez K, Zalc J, Coudeyre E, Rannou F. Effect of Prehabilitation Before Total Knee Replacement for Knee Osteoarthritis on Functional Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e221462. [PMID: 35262716 PMCID: PMC8908069 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Multidisciplinary prehabilitation before total knee replacement (TKR) for osteoarthritis may improve outcomes in the postoperative period. OBJECTIVE To compare multidisciplinary prehabilitation with usual care before TKR for osteoarthritis in terms of functional independence and activity limitations after surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective, open-label randomized clinical trial recruited participants 50 to 85 years of age with knee osteoarthritis according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria for whom a TKR was scheduled at 3 French tertiary care centers. Recruitment started on October 4, 2012, with follow-up completed on November 29, 2017. Statistical analyses were conducted from March 29, 2018, to March 6, 2019. INTERVENTIONS Four supervised sessions of multidisciplinary rehabilitation and education (2 sessions per week, at least 2 months before TKR, delivered to groups of 4-6 participants at each investigating center; session duration was 90 minutes and included 30 minutes of education followed by 60 minutes of exercise therapy) or usual care (information booklet and standard advice by the orthopedic surgeon) before TKR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The short-term primary end point was the proportion of participants achieving functional independence a mean (SD) of 4 (1) days after surgery defined as level 3 on the 4 functional tests. The midterm primary end point was activity limitations within 6 months after TKR assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the self-administered Western Ontario Questionnaire and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale. RESULTS A total of 262 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.6 [8.0] years; 178 women [68%]) were randomized (131 to each group). A mean (SD) of 4 (1) days after surgery, 34 of 101 (34%) in the experimental group vs 26 of 95 (27%) in the control group achieved functional independence (risk ratio, 1.4; 97.5% CI, 0.9-2.1; P = .15). At 6 months, the mean (SD) area under the curve for the Western Ontario Questionnaire and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale was 38.1 (16.5) mm2 in the experimental group vs 40.6 (17.8) mm2 in the control group (absolute difference, -2.8 mm2; 97.5% CI, -7.8 to 2.3; P = .31 after multiple imputation). No differences were found in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This randomized clinical trial found no evidence that multidisciplinary prehabilitation before TKR for osteoarthritis improves short-term functional independence or reduces midterm activity limitations after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01671917.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christelle Nguyen
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
- Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l’Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Centre–Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- INSERM UMRS-1124, Toxicité Environnementale, Cibles Thérapeutiques, Signalisation Cellulaire et Biomarqueurs (T3S), Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Boutron
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
- AP-HP Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Centre d’Épidémiologie Clinique, Paris, France
- METHODS Team, INSERM UMRS-1153, Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Roren
- Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l’Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Centre–Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- ECaMO Team, INSERM UMRS-1153, Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique, Paris, France
- Institut Fédératif de Recherche sur le Handicap, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
- ECaMO Team, INSERM UMRS-1153, Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique, Paris, France
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, AP-HP Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Johann Beaudreuil
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, AP-HP Nord-Université de Paris, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - David Biau
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
- ECaMO Team, INSERM UMRS-1153, Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique, Paris, France
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, AP-HP Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Boisgard
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Camille Daste
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
- Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l’Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Centre–Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- ECaMO Team, INSERM UMRS-1153, Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Durand-Zaleski
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
- AP-HP Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Centre d’Épidémiologie Clinique, Paris, France
- METHODS Team, INSERM UMRS-1153, Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique, Paris, France
| | - Bénédicte Eschalier
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité de Nutrition Humaine, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Charlotte Gil
- Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l’Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Centre–Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Martine Lefèvre-Colau
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
- Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l’Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Centre–Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- ECaMO Team, INSERM UMRS-1153, Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique, Paris, France
- Institut Fédératif de Recherche sur le Handicap, Paris, France
| | - Rémy Nizard
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, AP-HP Nord-Université de Paris, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - Élodie Perrodeau
- AP-HP Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Centre d’Épidémiologie Clinique, Paris, France
| | - Hasina Rabetrano
- L’unité de Recherche Clinique en Économie de la Santé, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France
| | - Pascal Richette
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
- Service de Rhumatologie, AP-HP Nord-Université de Paris, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - Katherine Sanchez
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
| | - Jordan Zalc
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Coudeyre
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité de Nutrition Humaine, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - François Rannou
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, Paris, France
- Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l’Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Centre–Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
- INSERM UMRS-1124, Toxicité Environnementale, Cibles Thérapeutiques, Signalisation Cellulaire et Biomarqueurs (T3S), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Boudou-Rouquette P, Martin E, Kempf E, Penel N, Toulmonde M, Bompas E, Duffaud F, Firmin N, Bertucci F, Kurtz JE, Chaigneau L, Isambert N, Saada-Bouzid E, Dubray-Longeras P, Larousserie F, Anract P, Chevreau C, Blay JY, Piperno-Neumann S. Rare bone sarcomas: A retrospective analysis of 145 adult patients from the French Sarcoma Group. Int J Cancer 2021; 150:825-836. [PMID: 34611903 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The benefit of chemotherapy (CT) in rare bone sarcomas is not documented in prospective studies. Our retrospective study from the French sarcoma network for bone tumors ResOs was performed in adult patients (pts) from 1976 to 2014, with histologically verified diagnosis of leiomyosarcomas (LMS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) or radiation-associated sarcomas of bone. The median follow-up was 4.7 years (95% CI: 3.7-6.5). Clinical features, treatment modalities and outcomes were recorded and analyzed from 145 pts (median age 53 years [range 20-87]). Site of disease was extremities (66%) or axial skeleton (34%), 111 (77%) presented with localized and potentially resectable disease. The most common histological subtypes were UPS (58%) and LMS (33%); 58% were high-grade tumors. Surgery was performed in 127 pts. In the 111 localized pts, 28 pts (25%) underwent upfront surgery or exclusive radiotherapy (RT; >50 Gy) without CT, whereas 83 pts (75%) received either neoadjuvant (n = 26) or adjuvant CT (n = 13) or both (n = 44). Neoadjuvant and adjuvant CT was mostly doxorubicin-based (95%/86%) and cisplatin-based (67%/63%). R0 resection was achieved in 59 pts, and a good histological response in 15 patients (25%). Adjuvant RT was performed in 24 (22%) pts. For the whole cohort (n = 145), the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 53% [42; 62]. In univariate analysis, age ≤ 60 was associated with a longer disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .0436). Neoadjuvant and adjuvant CT tended to be associated with better DFS (P = .056) with no significant impact on OS in this retrospective series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.,AP-HP, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM (Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine), Paris, France
| | - Elodie Martin
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.,Department of Biostatistics, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Emmanuelle Kempf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave-Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Nicolas Penel
- Clinical Research and Innovation Department, Head of the General Oncology Department, Oscar Lambret Cancer Center, Lille, France
| | - Maud Toulmonde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Emmanuelle Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France
| | - Florence Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France.,Department of Medical Oncology, Aix-Marseille Université (AMU), Marseille, France
| | - Nelly Firmin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - François Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Strasbourg, France
| | - Loïc Chaigneau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Regional du Cancer en Franche-Comté-University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Nicolas Isambert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Esma Saada-Bouzid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Pascale Dubray-Longeras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cellular Therapy and Clinic Hematology Unit for Adults, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Frédérique Larousserie
- AP-HP, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM (Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine), Paris, France.,Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.,Department of Pathology, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- AP-HP, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM (Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine), Paris, France.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, UCT-Oncopôle Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, LYRICAN, Universite de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bonvalot S, Lam L, Le Cesne A, Penel N, Blay JY, Michot A, Chevreau C, Anract P, Waast D, Piperno-Neumann S, Duffaud F, Malekzadeh K, Honoré C, Le Pechoux C, Cozic N. 1523MO Initial active surveillance strategy for patients with peripheral sporadic desmoids: A multicentre phase II observational trial. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
30
|
Chen TW, Chang RJ, Le Cesne A, Hsieh YC, Italiano A, Yang YW, Penel N, Lee WC, Bompas E, Valentin T, Anract P, Firmin N, Duffaud F, Chan K, Blay JY. 1544P Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) incidences and clinical characteristics are significantly different between different geographic and ethnic populations. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
31
|
Bouche PA, Gaujac N, Corsia S, Leclerc P, Anract P, Auberger G. Ankle CT scan allows better management of posterior malleolus fractures than X-rays. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2021; 32:1301-1309. [PMID: 34468840 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03104-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Undiagnosed and undertreated posterior malleolus fractures lead to early ankle instability and arthritis. A preoperative CT scan could improve the management of those fractures. This study assessed the benefits of a systematic ankle CT scanner to diagnose and manage posterior malleolus fracture. METHODS A monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted. Sixty consecutive patients with bimalleolar fractures were operated and underwent a preoperative CT scan. The mean age was 50.0 years old (18.6 years old) with a mean body mass index of 20.3 (kg/m2) (11.4 kg/m2) and 71.7% (43/60) of women. The primary outcome was the rate of posterior malleolus fragment diagnosed on X-rays and on CT scan. Secondly, interobserver and interobserver's agreement were compared between conventional X-rays and CT scan. RESULTS Thirty-five (58.3%) posterior fragment fractures were observed on X-rays and 53 (88.3%) on the preoperative CT scan (p < 0.01). The intraobserver reproducibility for X-rays was low (0.02 [- 0.23; 0.27]) and moderate for CT scan (0.45 [0.0; 0.84]). The interobserver reproducibility for X-rays was moderate (0.39 [0.15; 0.60]) and excellent for CT scan (0.78 [0.0; 1.0]). CONCLUSION A wide proportion of bimalleolar fractures are associated with posterior malleolus fractures and undiagnosed with standard X-rays. We advocate a systematic preoperative CT scan in the management of bimalleolar fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, retrospective cohort study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER 2218999v0, date of registration: 11/08/2020 (retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Alban Bouche
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, APHP Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
| | - Nicolas Gaujac
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, APHP Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Simon Corsia
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, APHP Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Leclerc
- Orthopaedic Department, Croix St Simon Hospital, 125 rue d'Avron, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, APHP Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Auberger
- Orthopaedic Department, Croix St Simon Hospital, 125 rue d'Avron, 75020, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cavaillon S, Toulmonde M, Wallet J, Robin Y, Honoré C, Duffaud F, Anract P, Rosset P, Carrere S, Lebbe C, Bompas E, Dubray-Longeras P, Bertucci F, Gantzer J, Chevreau C, Mesli N, Courreges JB, Chemin-Airiau C, Dufresne A, Penel N. 1530P Outcome of primary soft tissue or bone myoepithelial tumors (METs). Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
33
|
Moslemi A, Kierszbaum E, Descamps J, Sigonney F, Biau D, Anract P, Hardy A. Does using the direct anterior approach with a standard table for total hip arthroplasty reduce leg length discrepancies? Comparative study of traction table versus standard table. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107:102752. [PMID: 33316445 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Primary total hip replacement (THR) comes with a risk of leg length discrepancy (LLD), which occurs in 25 % of cases, especially when the surgery is done using an anterior approach on a traction table, since it is not easy to verify the lengths of the legs. By doing the anterior approach on a standard table an intraoperative visual evaluation of leg lengths can be done after the trial implants are in place. As far as we know, the ability to set the leg length has not been compared between procedures done on a standard table or a traction table. This led us to carry out a retrospective comparative study to determine whether using a standard table for anterior THR will 1) allow better control over leg length, 2) increase the risk of incorrect implant positioning, 3) increase the surgical complication rate. HYPOTHESIS Anterior THR on a standard table will allow better control over leg length than anterior THR on a traction table. MATERIAL AND METHODS This single center retrospective study included 266 THRs done between January 1, 2018 and November 2, 2019 for primary (n=219) or secondary (n=47) hip osteoarthritis. The 137 cases done with a traction table were compared to the 129 cases with a standard table. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, body mass index, indication and bilateral implants. They were not comparable in the surgeon experience (more junior surgeons in the standard table group [p<0.001]) and types of implants used (more cementless cups and stems in the standard table group [p=0.001]). Radiographs were used to measure the LLD, cup inclination, and femoral stem placement in the frontal plane. Any early complications were documented. The target was for the operated leg to be the same length as the contralateral leg, which was defined as within 10mm of each other. RESULTS The mean postoperative LLD was comparable between the traction table group 1.56±7.32 mm (min -15.6 max 17.2) and the standard table group 0.53±6.93 mm (min -16.4 max 13.7) (p=0.24). In the traction table group, 81 % (111/137) of patients had legs of the same length, versus 84 % (109/129) in the standard table group (p=0.7). Cup inclination was comparable with a mean of 40.4±7.1 degrees (min 23.4; max 58.5) in the traction table group versus 39.3±7.5 degrees (min 19.9; max 60.9) in the standard table group (p=0.21). The frontal position of the femoral stem was comparable between groups with a mean of 0.09±0.45 degrees (min -1; max 3.98) in the traction table group versus 0.08±0.59 degrees (min -4.97; max 1.93) in the standard table group (p=0.86). There were 5 complications (3.7 %) in the traction table group versus 11 (8.5 %) in the standard table group (p=0.16). CONCLUSION Use of a standard table to carry out THR by the direct anterior approach does not provide better control over leg length than using a traction table, subject to preoperative planning. When doing the procedure on a standard table, the implant placement is at least comparable, with a similar risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III; case matched study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aymane Moslemi
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, CHU de Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - Elliott Kierszbaum
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, CHU de Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Jules Descamps
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, CHU de Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - François Sigonney
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, CHU de Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - David Biau
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, CHU de Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, CHU de Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Hardy
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, CHU de Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sohier P, Rodrigues M, Anract P, Feydy A, Larousserie F. Parosteal osteosarcoma associated with a low-grade component mimicking well-differentiated liposarcoma: a case report. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50:243-248. [PMID: 32564106 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03509-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Parosteal osteosarcomas and well-differentiated liposarcomas are both well-differentiated locally aggressive tumors. They both have simple karyotypes with amplification of the 12q13-15 regions including MDM2 and CDK4 genes. In this report, we describe the case of a parosteal osteosarcoma intertwined with a low-grade component similar to a well-differentiated liposarcoma. The association of a bone component with an adipose component was initially overlooked. We describe the histological, imaging, and molecular characteristics of this tumor stressing the importance of radio-pathological correlation. To our knowledge, this is the second report of a parosteal osteoliposarcoma. Awareness of this rare presentation may allow radiologists and surgeons to recognize the peripheral fatty component as an integral part of the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sohier
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP.Centre - Université de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75694, Paris Cedex 14, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - M Rodrigues
- INSERM U509, Laboratoire de Pathologie Moléculaire des Cancers, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - P Anract
- Université de Paris, Paris, France.,Orthopaedic Surgery Departement, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP.Centre - Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - A Feydy
- Université de Paris, Paris, France.,Radiology B Department, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP.Centre - Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - F Larousserie
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP.Centre - Université de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75694, Paris Cedex 14, France. .,Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sigonney F, Lopes R, Bouché PA, Kierszbaum E, Moslemi A, Anract P, Stein A, Hardy A. The ankle ligament reconstruction-return to sport after injury (ALR-RSI) is a valid and reproducible scale to quantify psychological readiness before returning to sport after ankle ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28:4003-4010. [PMID: 32356045 PMCID: PMC7669765 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06020-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chronic ankle instability is the main complication of ankle sprains and requires surgery if non-operative treatment fails. The goal of this study was to validate a tool to quantify psychological readiness to return to sport after ankle ligament reconstruction. METHODS The form was designed like the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury scale and "Knee" was replaced by the term "ankle". The ankle ligament reconstruction-return to sport after injury (ALR-RSI) scale was filled by patients who underwent ankle ligament reconstruction and were active in sports. The scale was then validated according to the international COSMIN methodology. The AOFAS and Karlsson scores were used as reference questionnaires. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients (59 ankles) were included, 27 women. The ALR-RSI scale was strongly correlated with the Karlsson score (r = 0.79 [0.66-0.87]) and the AOFAS score (r = 0.8 [0.66-0.87]). A highly significant difference was found in the ALR-RSI between the subgroup of 50 patients who returned to playing sport and the seven who did not: 68.8 (56.5-86.5) vs 45.0 (31.3-55.8), respectively, p = 0.02. The internal consistency of the scale was high (α = 0.96). Reproducibility of the test-retest was excellent (ρ = 0.92; 95% CI [0.86-0.96]). CONCLUSION The ALR-RSI is a valid, reproducible scale that identifies patients who are ready to return to the same sport after ankle ligament reconstruction. This scale may help to identify athletes who will find sport resumption difficult. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Sigonney
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
| | - Ronny Lopes
- Orthopaedic Department, Pied Cheville Nantes Atlantique (Santé Atlantique Et Clinique Bretéché), Nantes, France
| | - Pierre-Alban Bouché
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Elliott Kierszbaum
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Aymane Moslemi
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Stein
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP Paris, Paris Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Hardy
- Clinique du Sport, 36 boulevard Saint-Marcel, 75005, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Boudou-Rouquette P, Gataa I, De Percin S, Tlemsani C, Biau D, Dumaine V, Audard V, Larousserie F, Anract P, Jouinot A, Goldwasser F. Abstract 3721: Relationship between insulin resistance and chemosensitivity of high grade bone sarcoma. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-3721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intercalated surgery is the standard of care for resectable high-grade bone sarcoma (BS) but identification of biomarkers for chemosensitivity prediction is still needed. Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) pathway was first linked with sarcoma biology approximately 30 years ago (El-Brady OM, 1990).
Methods: We recruited 138 pts with newly diagnosed primary localized or metastatic BS. We measured fasting blood glucose and insulin, body mass index (BMI). The HOMA-IR (Homeostasis Model Assessment) score ((Glucose (mmol/l) x Insulin) / 22.5), which has been proven to reliably detect insulin resistance IR was calculated, and patients with HOMA-IR > 2.6 were considered as IR. We collected characteristics usually associated with insulin resistance: age, obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension.
Results: Out of 138 pts, 50 (36%) were insulin resistant: HOMA-IR >2.6. Thirty-two IR patients (64%) had no cardiovascular risk factor. In univariate analysis, IR was associated with obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2)(22% vs 3%, p=0.0015), but not with age (median 36,8 vs 41 years, p=0.19). IR was more prevalent in Ewing sarcoma (14/29; 48%) and chondrosarcoma (7/16; 44%) followed by osteosarcoma (25/67; 37%) and other rare bone sarcomas (4/26; 15.3%), but not significantly (p=0.097). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery of Ewing tumor and osteosarcoma, pathologic tumor necrosis was higher in IR pts (88.9 vs 75%, p= 0.028).
Conclusion: Our results suggest that metabolic profile may help to discriminate best candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade bone sarcomas. Further studies are needed to confirm and explain these results.
Citation Format: Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette, Ithar Gataa, Sixtine De Percin, Camille Tlemsani, David Biau, Valerie Dumaine, Virginie Audard, Frédérique Larousserie, Philippe Anract, Anne Jouinot, François Goldwasser. Relationship between insulin resistance and chemosensitivity of high grade bone sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3721.
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Rupture of the patellar tendon is an infrequent pathology, and surgical repair with nonabsorbable sutures is the gold standard for management. Many surgeons augment the repair using one of many proposed methods: cerclage wires, Dall-Miles cables, autologous hamstring grafts, and tendon allografts. In this study, we propose the augmentation of patellar tendon repair using an artificial ligament. The questions to be assessed in this study are as follows: (1) measurement of functional results 1 year after surgery using the Lysholm score and (2) the incidence of both rerupture, and surgical complications within the first year postsurgery, the median knee range of motion at 3 months and 1-year postsurgery, patient satisfaction, and postsurgery patellar height, measured using the Caton-Deschamps Index. In our center, we performed 30 suture repairs of traumatic patellar tendon ruptures between 2015 and 2016. Tendon repair was always augmented using an artificial ligament (LT60, Orthomed). The results were evaluated 1 year after surgery. The 1-year postsurgery median Lysholm score was 96 (first quartile-third quartile [Q1-Q3]: 95-100). None of the following complications were reported: second surgery for any reason, new rupture, and superficial or deep infection. Radiological analysis showed a median Caton Index of 1 (Q1-Q3: 0.9-1) postsurgery. Excellent Lysholm scores were observed 1 year after synthetic ligament augmentation of patellar tendon sutures, with a low rate of complications compared with published studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Core
- David Biau et Philippe Anract: Orthopedic Surgery, Hopital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris Ringgold Standard Institution-Orthopedics, Paris, France
| | - Juliette Raffin
- Department of Pharmacy, Hopital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - David Jean Biau
- Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris Ringgold Standard Institution-Orthopedics, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kierszbaum E, Biau D, Moslemi A, Descamps J, Anract P, Hardy A. Anterior approach without traction table: A means of saving time and money in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture? A case-matched study with and without traction table. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020; 106:583-588. [PMID: 32253137 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The costs incurred by management of displaced femoral neck fracture are a public health issue. The anterior approach can be used for partial hip replacement, but costs in terms of equipment and time incurred by using a traction table have not to our knowledge been estimated in this indication. We therefore performed a case-control study, comparing (1) installation and deinstallation times (IT, DT) in partial hip replacement using a standard versus a traction table (ST, TT), and (2) operating times, limb-length radiography and intraoperative complications. HYPOTHESIS Performing the anterior approach on a standard table saves installation and deinstallation time and operating time, without leading to more intraoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comparative retrospective study included 102 patients (mean age, 84.8±8 years; 46 ST, 56 TT). Installation time (IT) was calculated between entry in the operating room and performance of the incision; operating time (OT) between incision and closure; and deinstallation time (DT) between closure and leaving the operating room. RESULTS Mean IT in ST (25.5±6.2min) was significantly shorter than in TT (33.9±6.2min) (p=1.1*10-9), as were DT (13±4.7 versus 17±3.4min) (p=4.1*10-6) and OT (73.5±15.9 versus 82.6±21.3minutes) (p=0.01). There were 4 intraoperative complications: 1 greater trochanter fracture in ST and 2 greater trochanter fractures and 1 proximal femoral fracture in TT. Limb-length discrepancy was comparable between ST (3.7±3.2mm (range, 0-15mm)) and TT (5.3±4.6mm (range, 0-20mm)) (p=0.06). DISCUSSION Patient installation on a standard table reduced installation, deinstallation and operating time compared to use of a traction table, without increasing the complications rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, case-control study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliott Kierszbaum
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, CHU Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - David Biau
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, CHU Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Aymane Moslemi
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, CHU Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Jules Descamps
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, CHU Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, CHU Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Hardy
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, CHU Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
de l'Escalopier N, Dumaine V, Auberger G, Babinet A, Courpied JP, Anract P, Hamadouche M. Dual mobility constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty: survivorship analysis in recurrent dislocation versus other indications at three to twelve-year follow-up. Int Orthop 2019; 44:253-260. [PMID: 31758218 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04445-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical, radiologic, and survival results of dual mobility (DM) sockets in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed for instability versus revision THAs performed for other reasons. METHODS From a computerized database, we identified 84 revision THAs using a modern DM socket performed in 81 patients with a mean age of 71 years. Indication for revision was recurrent dislocation in 47 hips, and other reasons in the remaining 37 hips. A survivorship analysis according to the actuarial method was carried out on the entire series using revision for any cause, revision for dislocation, and radiological cup loosening revised or not, as the end points. RESULTS Of the 81 patients, twelve died, six were lost to follow-up, eight had been revised, and 55 patients (58 hips) were unrevised and alive at a mean follow-up of 6.4 years. Dislocation occurred in four of the 47 (8.5%) hips for which indication for revision was dislocation versus one of the remaining 37 (2.7%) hips [odds ratio = 3.4 (0.4-31.3), p = 0.07]. According to our criteria, three acetabular components of which one was revised were considered as loosened. When using revision for dislocation as the end-point, the survival rate at seven years was 90.4 ± 5.3% (IC95%, 79.9-100) in the 47 hips for which the indication for revision was dislocation versus 100% in the remaining 37 hips (log-rank, p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS The current study indicated that DM sockets represent an interesting solution to prevent dislocation in revision THAs at mid-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas de l'Escalopier
- Clinical Orthopaedics Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre (HUPC), Site Cochin-Port Royal, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 5, 27 Rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
| | - Valérie Dumaine
- Clinical Orthopaedics Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre (HUPC), Site Cochin-Port Royal, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 5, 27 Rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Auberger
- Clinical Orthopaedics Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre (HUPC), Site Cochin-Port Royal, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 5, 27 Rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Babinet
- Clinical Orthopaedics Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre (HUPC), Site Cochin-Port Royal, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 5, 27 Rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Courpied
- Clinical Orthopaedics Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre (HUPC), Site Cochin-Port Royal, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 5, 27 Rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Clinical Orthopaedics Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre (HUPC), Site Cochin-Port Royal, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 5, 27 Rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Moussa Hamadouche
- Clinical Orthopaedics Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre (HUPC), Site Cochin-Port Royal, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 5, 27 Rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cottias P, Leclerc P, Zaoui A, Abouchaaya AM, Khallouk R, Anract P. Digastric olecranon osteotomy a new approach to the elbow: retrospective study of 24 Coonrad–Morrey® total elbow arthroplasty at 30-month follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019; 30:485-491. [DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02590-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
41
|
Nicolle R, Ayadi M, Gomez-Brouchet A, Armenoult L, Banneau G, Elarouci N, Tallegas M, Decouvelaere AV, Aubert S, Rédini F, Marie B, Labit-Bouvier C, Reina N, Karanian M, le Nail LR, Anract P, Gouin F, Larousserie F, de Reyniès A, de Pinieux G. Integrated molecular characterization of chondrosarcoma reveals critical determinants of disease progression. Nat Commun 2019; 10:4622. [PMID: 31604924 PMCID: PMC6789144 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12525-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Chondrosarcomas are primary cancers of cartilaginous tissue with highly contrasting prognoses. These tumors are defined by recurrent mutations in the IDH genes and other genetic alterations including inactivation of CDKN2A and COL2A1; however, these have no clinical value. Here we use multi-omics molecular profiles from a series of cartilage tumors and find an mRNA classification that identifies two subtypes of chondrosarcomas defined by a balance in tumor differentiation and cell cycle activation. The microRNA classification reveals the importance of the loss of expression of the 14q32 locus in defining the level of malignancy. Finally, DNA methylation is associated with IDH mutations. We can use the multi-omics classifications to predict outcome. We propose an mRNA-only classifier to reproduce the integrated multi-omics classification, and its application to relapsed tumor samples shows the progressive nature of the classification. Thus, it may be possible to use mRNA-based signatures to detect patients with high-risk chondrosarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémy Nicolle
- Programme Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs (CIT), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France.
| | - Mira Ayadi
- Programme Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs (CIT), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Anne Gomez-Brouchet
- Department of Pathology, CHU de Toulouse - Oncopole, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Lucile Armenoult
- Programme Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs (CIT), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Banneau
- Programme Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs (CIT), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Nabila Elarouci
- Programme Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs (CIT), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Matthias Tallegas
- Plateforme de Génétique Moléculaire des Cancers, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Anne-Valérie Decouvelaere
- Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- University of Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS 5286, INSERM U1052, Cancer Research Centre of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Sébastien Aubert
- Department of Pathology, CHU de Lille, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Françoise Rédini
- UMR1238 INSERM Université de Nantes, Sarcomes osseux et remodelage des tissus calcifiés, Faculté de médecine, NANTES, France
| | | | - Corinne Labit-Bouvier
- Department of Pathology, CHU de Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, MMG, Marseille, France
| | - Nicolas Reina
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Marie Karanian
- Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- University of Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS 5286, INSERM U1052, Cancer Research Centre of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Louis-Romée le Nail
- UMR1238 INSERM Université de Nantes, Sarcomes osseux et remodelage des tissus calcifiés, Faculté de médecine, NANTES, France
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, CHRU de Tours, Université de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - François Gouin
- Department of Surgery, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | | - Aurélien de Reyniès
- Programme Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs (CIT), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Gonzague de Pinieux
- UMR1238 INSERM Université de Nantes, Sarcomes osseux et remodelage des tissus calcifiés, Faculté de médecine, NANTES, France.
- Department of Pathology, CHRU de Tours, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gouin F, Stoeckle E, Bonvalot S, Honoré C, Decanter A, Anract P, Bompas E, Ferron G, Sirveaux F, Rochwerger A, Carrere S, Marco AD, Ropars M, Nail LL, Marco O, Guiramand J, Italiano A, Penel N, Cesne AL, Blay JY. Improved survival with secondary surgery in a reference center after a first R1 or R2 resection in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the limbs or trunk wall: An analysis 10931 patients (pts) in NETSARC. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz283.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
43
|
Dufresne A, Decanter G, Ferron G, Marco O, Stoeckle E, Meeus P, Gouin F, Sirveaux F, Rochwerger A, Bonvalot S, Honoré C, Anract P, Ropars M, Carrere S, Marco AD, Ducimetière F, Italiano A, Cesne AL, Penel N, Blay JY. Impact of abstention of diagnostic biopsy in sarcoma. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz283.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
44
|
Blay JY, Honoré C, Stoeckle E, Meeus P, Jafari M, Gouin F, Anract P, Ferron G, Rochwerger A, Ropars M, Carrere S, Marchal F, Sirveaux F, Di Marco A, Le Nail LR, Guiramand J, Vaz G, Machiavello JC, Marco O, Causeret S, Gimbergues P, Fiorenza F, Chaigneau L, Guillemin F, Guilloit JM, Dujardin F, Spano JP, Ruzic JC, Michot A, Soibinet P, Bompas E, Chevreau C, Duffaud F, Rios M, Perrin C, Firmin N, Bertucci F, Le Pechoux C, Le Loarer F, Collard O, Karanian-Philippe M, Brahmi M, Dufresne A, Dupré A, Ducimetière F, Giraud A, Pérol D, Toulmonde M, Ray-Coquard I, Italiano A, Le Cesne A, Penel N, Bonvalot S. Surgery in reference centers improves survival of sarcoma patients: a nationwide study. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1407. [PMID: 31168580 PMCID: PMC6683855 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
45
|
Piperno-Neumann S, Ray-Coquard I, Occean BV, Laurence V, Cupissol D, Perrin C, Penel N, Bompas E, Rios M, Le Cesne A, Italiano A, Anract P, de Pinieux G, Collard O, Bertucci F, Duffaud F, Le Deley MC, Delaye J, Brugieres L, Blay JY. Results of API-AI based regimen in osteosarcoma adult patients included in the French OS2006/Sarcome-09 study. Int J Cancer 2019; 146:413-423. [PMID: 31246277 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
In the OS2006 study, patients younger than 18 years were treated with a methotrexate-based regimen (MTX), patients older than 25 years with a doxorubicin-cisplatin-ifosfamide-based regimen (API-AI), whereas patients aged 18-25 years received either API-AI or MTX. We herein report the prespecified subgroup analysis of the outcome of 106 patients treated with API-AI. Preoperative chemotherapy combined three doxorubicin-ifosfamide-cisplatin (API) and two doxorubicin-ifosfamide (AI) courses. Postoperative chemotherapy was assigned by risk group: localised patients with a good histological response (<10% viable cells) received two AI and two cisplatin-ifosfamide (PI) courses; patients with synchronous metastases, poor histological response or unresectable primary received five cycles of etoposide-ifosfamide (EI). Of the 106 patients, 61 were randomised to receive or not zoledronate. Median age was 30 years (range 18-67), 66 (62%) patients were >25 years. The primary tumours were axial in 28 patients (26%), and 28 (26%) presented with metastases. Ninety-six patients (91%) had surgery, conservative in 82 (85%); 36 patients (38%, 95% CI 28-48%) were good responders. Toxicity was manageable, with no significant difference in severe acute toxicity between patients aged >25 years and those younger. With a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the 5-year event-free survival and overall survival rates were 46% (95% CI 36-56) and 57% (95% CI 47-67), respectively. The primary tumour size and initial metastases correlated with a higher risk of event. In these 106 osteosarcoma adult patients, API-AI proved feasible with no excess of toxicity, and favourable activity despite poor-prognosis factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Didier Cupissol
- Department of Medicine, Val d'Aurelle Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - Christophe Perrin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Nicolas Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, CHRU, Lille, France
| | - Emmanuelle Bompas
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Maria Rios
- Department of Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Olivier Collard
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire Lucien Neuwirth, St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - François Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Florence Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Marie-Cécile Le Deley
- Biostatistics Unit, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Paris-Saclay University, Paris-Sud University, CESP, INSERM, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Laurence Brugieres
- Department of Children and Adolescents Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Blay JY, Honoré C, Stoeckle E, Meeus P, Jafari M, Gouin F, Anract P, Ferron G, Rochwerger A, Ropars M, Carrere S, Marchal F, Sirveaux F, Di Marco A, Le Nail LR, Guiramand J, Vaz G, Machiavello JC, Marco O, Causeret S, Gimbergues P, Fiorenza F, Chaigneau L, Guillemin F, Guilloit JM, Dujardin F, Spano JP, Ruzic JC, Michot A, Soibinet P, Bompas E, Chevreau C, Duffaud F, Rios M, Perrin C, Firmin N, Bertucci F, Le Pechoux C, Le Loarer F, Collard O, Karanian-Philippe M, Brahmi M, Dufresne A, Dupré A, Ducimetière F, Giraud A, Pérol D, Toulmonde M, Ray-Coquard I, Italiano A, Le Cesne A, Penel N, Bonvalot S. Surgery in reference centers improves survival of sarcoma patients: a nationwide study. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1143-1153. [PMID: 31081028 PMCID: PMC6637376 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 sarcoma reference centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB) aiming to improve the outcome of sarcoma patients. Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB and expert pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma patients nationwide. In the present work, the impact of surgery in a reference center on the survival of sarcoma patients investigated using this national NETSARC registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients' characteristics and follow-up are prospectively collected and data monitored. Descriptive, uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were conducted in the entire series (N = 35 784) and in the subgroup of incident patient population (N = 29 497). RESULTS Among the 35 784 patients, 155 different histological subtypes were reported. 4310 (11.6%) patients were metastatic at diagnosis. Previous cancer, previous radiotherapy, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and Li-Fraumeni syndrome were reported in 12.5%, 3.6%, 0.7%, and 0.1% of patients respectively. Among the 29 497 incident patients, 25 851 (87.6%) patients had surgical removal of the sarcoma, including 9949 (33.7%) operated in a NETSARC center. Location, grade, age, size, depth, histotypes, gender, NF1, and surgery outside a NETSARC center all correlated to overall survival (OS), local relapse free survival (LRFS), and event-free survival (EFS) in the incident patient population. NF1 history was one of the strongest adverse prognostic factors for LRFS, EFS, and OS. Presentation to an MDTB was associated with an improved LRFS and EFS, but was an adverse prognostic factor for OS if surgery was not carried out in a reference center. In multivariate analysis, surgery in a NETSARC center was positively correlated with LRFS, EFS, and OS [P < 0.001 for all, with a hazard ratio of 0.681 (95% CI 0.618-0.749) for OS]. CONCLUSION This nationwide registry of sarcoma patients shows that surgical treatment in a reference center reduces the risk of relapse and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-Y Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth.
| | - C Honoré
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus-Surgery, Villejuif
| | - E Stoeckle
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - P Meeus
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth
| | - M Jafari
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU, Lille
| | - F Gouin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth; Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie Nantes, Nantes; Department of Orthopedics, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - P Anract
- Department of Orthopedics, Hôpital Cochin-Saint-Vincent de Paul, Paris
| | - G Ferron
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Universitaire de Cancerologie de Toulouse, Claudius Regaud, Toulouse
| | - A Rochwerger
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Orthopedics, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - M Ropars
- Medical Oncology Department, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes; Department of Orthopedics, CHU, Rennes
| | - S Carrere
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier
| | - F Marchal
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy
| | - F Sirveaux
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy
| | - A Di Marco
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss & CHU Strasbourg, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg
| | - L R Le Nail
- Department of Orthopedics, CHU de Tours, Tours
| | - J Guiramand
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille
| | - G Vaz
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth
| | - J-C Machiavello
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice
| | - O Marco
- Oncology Unit, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris
| | - S Causeret
- Department of Surgery, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon
| | - P Gimbergues
- Department of Surgery, Centre Jean Perrin/ERTICa EA, Clermont-Ferrand
| | - F Fiorenza
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Limoges, Limoges
| | - L Chaigneau
- Medical Oncology Department, CHU Besancon, Besançon
| | - F Guillemin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut J Godinot Reims
| | - J-M Guilloit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen
| | - F Dujardin
- Department of Surgery, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen
| | - J-P Spano
- Medical Oncology Department, APHP La Pitié Salpetriere/Tenon/Bicetre, Paris
| | - J-C Ruzic
- Medical Oncology Department, CHU La Réunion, Saint-Pierre, La Réunion
| | - A Michot
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus-Surgery, Villejuif
| | - P Soibinet
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut J Godinot Reims
| | - E Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie Nantes, Nantes; Department of Orthopedics, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - C Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Universitaire de Cancerologie de Toulouse, Claudius Regaud, Toulouse
| | - F Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Orthopedics, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - M Rios
- Medical Oncology Department, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes; Department of Orthopedics, CHU, Rennes
| | - C Perrin
- Medical Oncology Department, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes; Department of Orthopedics, CHU, Rennes
| | - N Firmin
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier
| | - F Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille
| | - C Le Pechoux
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus-Surgery, Villejuif
| | - F Le Loarer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus-Surgery, Villejuif
| | - O Collard
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth
| | - M Karanian-Philippe
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth
| | - M Brahmi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth
| | - A Dufresne
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth
| | - A Dupré
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth
| | - F Ducimetière
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth
| | - A Giraud
- Department of Orthopedics, Hôpital Cochin-Saint-Vincent de Paul, Paris
| | - D Pérol
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth
| | - M Toulmonde
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Institut de Cancerologie L. Neuwirth
| | - A Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - A Le Cesne
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus-Surgery, Villejuif
| | - N Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU, Lille
| | - S Bonvalot
- Surgery Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gomez-Brouchet A, Mascard E, Siegfried A, de Pinieux G, Gaspar N, Bouvier C, Aubert S, Marec-Bérard P, Piperno-Neumann S, Marie B, Larousserie F, Galant C, Fiorenza F, Anract P, Sales de Gauzy J, Gouin F. Assessment of resection margins in bone sarcoma treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Literature review and guidelines of the bone group (GROUPOS) of the French sarcoma group and bone tumor study group (GSF-GETO/RESOS). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019; 105:773-780. [PMID: 30962172 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standardized reports are essential to meeting the bone sarcoma reference center certification requirements of the French National Cancer Institute (INCa). The usual classifications of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS), the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC/IUCC) TNM R classification and the American College of Pathologists, are inexact inasmuch as they fail to include chemotherapy impact on tumor cells in assessing surgical margins. This leads to inconsistent interpretation by teams managing bone sarcoma. The present literature analysis sought to assess the limitations of existing classifications for purposes of standardized reporting of the management of surgical specimens from patients with osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, by addressing the following questions: 1) What is the prognostic value of margins and chemotherapy response in the classifications? 2) What are the histologic changes induced by chemotherapy, with what impact on interpretation of margins? METHOD A PubMed literature analysis was performed, targeting the prognostic value of resection margin assessment, in September 2018. French bone pathology group (Groupe français des pathologistes osseux) and international guidelines on bone specimen management were referred to so as select items for a standardized report. Eight of the 523 articles retrieved met the study eligibility criteria. RESULTS Minimal distance between tumor and surgical margin, with a>2mm threshold, seemed to be the optimal parameter for predicting local recurrence. Good chemotherapy response and appendicular skeletal location were associated with lower risk of local recurrence. None of the available classifications take into account the microscopic changes induced by chemotherapy in interpreting resection margins. DISCUSSION To standardize practice, GROUPOS developed a standardized report for bone sarcoma specimens, considering the histopathologic changes in the tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The TNM R system was adapted and a threshold of>2mm was chosen as an acceptable limit to qualify surgical resection as safe (R0). R1 status (≤2mm) was subdivided into subgroups a, b and c, to include margin measurement in relation to the post-chemotherapy scar: R1a, resection within the scar; R1b, resection in healthy tissue,≤2mm from the scar and/or residual viable cells; and R1c, resection within the lesion in contact with viable cells or within coagulation necrosis areas. The GROUPOS members drew up this standardized report so as to ensure a common language, improving bone sarcoma management in specialized centers. Reliable data can thus be established for national and international multicenter studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Gomez-Brouchet
- Département de pathologie, IUCT-oncopole, CHU de Toulouse and université de Toulouse, 1, avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France.
| | - Eric Mascard
- Département de chirurgie orthopédique pédiatrique, hôpital-Necker, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Aurore Siegfried
- Département de pathologie, IUCT-oncopole, CHU de Toulouse and université de Toulouse, 1, avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - Gonzague de Pinieux
- Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques et université de Tours, CHRU de Tours, Avenue de la République, 37170 Chambray-lès-Tours, France
| | - Nathalie Gaspar
- Département de cancérologie de l'enfant et l'adolescent, Gustave-Roussy cancer campus, 114, rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Corinne Bouvier
- Département de pathologie, CHU la Timone, 278, rue Saint-Pierre, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Sébastien Aubert
- Université de lille - institut de pathologie, centre de biologie pathologie, 1, rue Philippe Marache, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Perrine Marec-Bérard
- Département d' oncologie pédiatrique, IHOPe/Centre Léon Bérard, 28, promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008 Lyon, France
| | | | - Béatrice Marie
- Département de Pathologie, CHU Nancy, 25, rue Lionnois, 54000 Nancy, France
| | - Frédérique Larousserie
- Service de pathologie et université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, hôpital Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Christine Galant
- Service d'anatomie pathologique des cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, 10, avenue Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Fabrice Fiorenza
- Département de chirurgie orthopédique, CHU de Limoges, 2, avenue Martin Luther King, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Département de chirurgie orthopédique, CHU de Cochin, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Sales de Gauzy
- Département de chirurgie orthopédique pédiatrique, hôpital-Mère-Enfant, CHU Toulouse, 330, avenue de Grande Bretagne, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - François Gouin
- Centre Léon-Bérard, CHU Nantes, Nantes/Inserm, UMR 1238, Phy-Os, université de Nantes, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon France
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Boudou-Rouquette P, Gataa I, Jouinot A, De Percin S, Bellesoeur A, Alexandre J, Dumaine V, Babinet A, Biau D, Audard V, Larousserie F, Anract P, Tlemsani C, Goldwasser F. Metabolic profile and neoadjuvant chemotherapy sensitivity in high-grade bone sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e22506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e22506 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intercalated surgery is the standard of care for resectable high-grade bone sarcoma (BS) but identification of biomarkers for chemosensitivity prediction is still needed. Methods: We recruited 121 pts with new primary localized or metastatic BS, measured fasting blood glucose and insulin, body mass index (BMI). The HOMA-IR (Homeostasis Model Assessment) score ((Glucose (mmol/l) x Insulin) / 22.5), which has been proven to reliably detect insulin resistance was calculated, and patients with HOMA-IR > 2.6 were considered as insulin resistant (IR). We collected characteristics usually associated with insulin resistance (IR): age, obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension. Results: Out of 121 pts, 48 (40%) were IR: HOMA-IR > 2.6. Thirty IR patients (62%) had no cardiovascular risk factor. In univariate analysis, IR was associated with obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2)(23% vs 3%, p = 0.0013), but not with age (median 38.4 vs 43.3 years, p = 0.15). IR was more prevalent in Ewing sarcoma (12/21; 57%) and chondrosarcoma (7/13; 54%) followed by osteosarcoma (25/61; 41%) and other rare bone sarcomas (4/26; 15.3%)(p = 0.037). After preoperative chemotherapy and surgery of Ewing tumor and osteosarcoma, pathologic tumor necrosis was higher in IR pts (85.8 vs 69.3%, p = 0.012). Using multivariate linear regression models, IR was independently associated with pathologic tumor necrosis (p = 0.042) but not with obesity (p = 0.55). Conclusions: Our results suggest that tumor-induced metabolic profile may help to discriminate best candidates for preoperative chemotherapy in high-grade bone sarcomas. Further studies are needed to confirm and explain these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette
- Department of Medical Oncology, ARIANE, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, CARPEM, Paris, France
| | - Ithar Gataa
- Department of Medical Oncology, ARIANE, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, CARPEM, France, Paris, France
| | - Anne Jouinot
- Department of Medical Oncology, ARIANE, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, CARPEM, France, Paris, France
| | - Sixtine De Percin
- Department of Medical Oncology, ARIANE, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, CARPEM, France, Paris, France
| | - Audrey Bellesoeur
- Department of Medical Oncology, ARIANE, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, CARPEM, Paris, France
| | - Jerome Alexandre
- Department of Medical Oncology, ARIANE, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, CARPEM, France, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Dumaine
- Department of Orthopedic surgery, Paris Descartes University, Cochin-Port-Royal Hospital, AP-HP, France, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Babinet
- Department of Orthopedic surgery, Paris Descartes University, Cochin-Port-Royal Hospital, AP-HP, France, Paris, France
| | - David Biau
- Chirurgie orthopédique - Hôpital Cochin-Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Virginie Audard
- Department of Pathology, Paris Descartes University, Cochin-Port-Royal Hospital, AP-HP, France, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Camille Tlemsani
- Department of Medical Oncology, ARIANE, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, CARPEM, Paris, France
| | - Francois Goldwasser
- Department of Medical Oncology, ARIANE, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, CARPEM, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gouin F, Stoeckle E, Bonvalot S, Honoré C, Decanter G, Anract P, Bompas E, Ferron G, Sirveaux F, Rochwerger R, Carrere S, DiMarco A, Ropars M, Le Nail LR, Marco O, Guiramand J, Italiano A, Le Cesne A, Penel N, Blay JY. Improved local relapse-free and overall survival with secondary surgery after a first R1 or R2 resection in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the limbs or trunk wall: An analysis 10,931 patients (pts) in NETSARC. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.11056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
11056 Background: We previously reported that secondary resection (2Surg) improved local relapse free (LRFS) but not overall survival (OS) in a retrospective series of pts with localized STS after unplanned 1st excision. Here we investigated the impact of 2Surg specifically after a first R1 or R2 resection in the 10931 pts with STS of the limb or trunk wall included in the nationwide NETSARC database from 2010 to 2017. Methods: NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDT), funded by the French NCI (INCa). Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB and second pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma pts. Statistics were performed with SPSS23.0. LRFS, metastasis-free survival (MFS), OS compared with the logrank test. Results: The series included 5598 (51.2%) males. Median age was 56.7. Tumor sites: 5295 (49.4%) lower limb, 3670 (33.6%) trunk wall. 1966 (18.0%) upper limb. As previously reported in the entire series, local RFS (LRFS) and RFS (p<0.001), but not OS, were superior for pts presented to a NETSARC MDT (NMDT), or operated in a NETSARC center (N=4417, 41%). LRFS & OS were best for pts presented to a NMDT AND operated in NETSARC centers; while the worst LRFS & OS were observed in pts presented in a NMDT but not operated there (p<0.001). Among the 2081 pts with a first R1 resection in whom 2Surg was documented, 1047 (50.3%) were reoperated. R1 reoperated pts had a superior LRFS, metastatic free survival (MFS) and OS (p<0.001). LRFS (p<0.001), MFS (p=0.05) and OS (p<0.001) were superior after 2Surg only in pts operated 1st outside a Netsarc center. There were 823 pts with a first surgery with R2 resection in whom 2Surg was documented: 619 (75.2%) were reoperated. R2 reoperated patients had a superior LRFS and OS (p=0.01). MFS was not different. LRFS (p<0.001) & OS (p<0.001) were superior after 2Surg only in pts operated 1st outside a Netsarc center. 2028 (%) pts had 2Surg. Pts for whom 2Surg was in a NetSARC center had a superior LRFS (p<0.001) and OS (p=0.01) when operated first outside a NETSARC center. Conclusions: In this nationwide series of limb or trunk wall STS, 2Surg after a R1 or R2 primary excision improves LRFS & OS when the pts were operated 1st outside a reference center. 2Surg in a NETSARC center was associated with a better LRFS and OS.
Collapse
|
50
|
Basse C, Italiano A, Penel N, Mir O, Chemin C, Toulmonde M, Duffaud F, Le Cesne A, Chevreau C, Maynou C, Anract P, Gouin F, Rios M, Firmin N, Kurtz JE, Kerbrat P, Piperno-Neumann S, Bertucci F, Rosset P, Isambert N, Bompas E, Dubray-Longeras P, Fiorenza F, Le Maignan C, Chaigneau L, Thyss A, Bouché O, Eymard JC, Delcambre Lair C, Adam J, Karanian M, Lebbé C, Dupré A, Meeus P, Brahmi M, Dufresne A, Ducimetière F, Ray-Coquard I, Blay JY. Sarcomas in patients over 90: Natural history and treatment-A nationwide study over 6 years. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:2135-2143. [PMID: 30924137 PMCID: PMC6767526 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors accounting for less than 1% of human cancers. While the highest incidence of sarcomas is observed in elderly, this population is often excluded or poorly represented in clinical trials. The present study reports on clinicopathological presentation, and outcome of sarcoma patients over 90 recorded in the Netsarc.org French national database. NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB), funded by the French National Cancer Institute to improve the outcome of sarcoma patients. Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB, second pathological review, and collection of sarcoma patient characteristics and follow‐up are collected in a database Information of patients registered from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, in NETSARC were collected, analyzed and compared to the younger population. Patients with sarcomas aged >90 have almost exclusively sarcomas with complex genomics (92.0% vs. 66.3%), are less frequently metastatic (5.3% vs. 14·7%) at diagnosis, have more often superficial tumors (39.8% vs. 14.7%), as well as limbs and head and neck sites (75.2% vs. 38.7%) (all p < 0.001). Optimal diagnostic procedures and surgery were less frequently performed in patients over 90 (p < 0.001). These patients were less frequently operated in NETSARC centers, as compared to those of younger age groups including aged 80–90. However, local relapse‐free survival, metastatic relapse‐free survival and relapse‐free survival were not significantly different from those of younger patients, in the whole cohort, as well as in the subgroup of operated patients. As expected overall survival was worse in patients over 90 (p < 0.001). Patients over 90 who were not operated had worse overall survival than younger patients (9.9 vs. 27.3 months, p < 0.001). Patients with STS diagnosed after 90 have distinct clinicopathological features, but comparable relapse‐free survival, unless clinical practice guidelines recommendations are not applied. Standard management should be proposed to these patients if oncogeriatric status allows. What's new? While the highest incidence of soft‐tissue sarcoma (STS) is observed in the elderly, this population is often excluded or poorly represented in clinical trials. Therefore, little is known about the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of STS in these patients. In this study, the authors analyzed numerous clinical characteristics of patients with sarcoma diagnosed at age 91 or older. They conclude that standard STS management and clinical practice guidelines should be followed for these patients if possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémence Basse
- Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nicolas Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, CHRU, Lille, France
| | - Olivier Mir
- Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery, University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Claire Chemin
- Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Maud Toulmonde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Florence Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Paris, France
| | | | - Carlos Maynou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, CHRU, Lille, France
| | - Philippe Anract
- Orthopaedic Department, Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - François Gouin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Maria Rios
- Department of Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Nelly Firmin
- Department of Medicine, Val d'Aurelle Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Medical Oncology & Orthopedy Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - François Bertucci
- Département of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Philippe Rosset
- Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
| | | | - Emmanuelle Bompas
- Medical Oncology Department, René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | - Fabrice Fiorenza
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Traumatology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Christine Le Maignan
- Department of Dermatology and INSERM Unité 976, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Loïc Chaigneau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jean Minjoz University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Antoine Thyss
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Institut Jean Godinot & Reims University Hospital, Reims, France
| | | | | | - Julien Adam
- Department of Medical Oncology, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Marie Karanian
- Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Céleste Lebbé
- Department of Dermatology and INSERM Unité 976, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Aurélien Dupré
- Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Meeus
- Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Mehdi Brahmi
- Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Armelle Dufresne
- Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|