NSAIDs for Pain Control During the Peri-Operative Period of Hip Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Hip fracture (HF) mostly affects older adults and is responsible for increased morbidity and mortality. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are part of the peri-operative multimodal analgesic management, but their use could be associated with adverse events in older adults. This systematic review aimed to assess outcomes associated with NSAIDs use in the peri-operative period of HF surgery.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases (PubMed/EMBASE/Cochrane Central) were used to search for clinical trials and observational studies assessing efficacy, safety and impact of NSAIDs use on non-specific post-operative outcomes, such as functional status and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

Among the 1320 references initially identified, four provided data on efficacy, four on safety and six on non-specific post-operative outcomes (three randomized controlled clinical trials, three observational studies). Mean study population ages ranged from 68 to 87 years. Two studies found that NSAIDs were effective on pain control, but two studies found conflicting results on opioid sparing. No increased risk of acute kidney injury was observed, while results concerning bleeding risk and delirium were conflicting. No study has found any effect of NSAIDs use on walk recovery. Quality of evidence was high for pain control, but low to very low for all the other studied outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NSAIDs may be effective for pain control in the peri-operative period of HF surgery. However, safety data were conflicting with low levels of certainty. Further studies are needed to assess their benefit-risk balance in this context. The research protocol was previously registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021237649).

Arterial hypertension associated with PARPi: A meta-analysis of 41 placebo randomized controlled trials combined with a World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance study

BACKGROUND

Arterial hypertension has been recently reported from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi).

OBJECTIVE

In a context of increasing use of PARPi, it is crucial to properly assess risk and incidence of this adverse event for clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov up to January 4, 2023 with an ongoing surveillance up to June 7, 2023. RCTs comparing PARPi to placebo in adult patients with solid tumors were included if hypertension was reported. The primary outcome was the summary risk ratio (RR, with 95% CIs) of any hypertension of PARPi class in placebo RCTs. Secondary outcomes were the summary risk and incidence of hypertension of each individual PARPi. To provide clinical features of PARPi-associated hypertension, we independently queried the WHO's pharmacovigilance database, up to September 1, 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 41 placebo RCTs (n = 15 264 adult patients) were included. PARPi class was not associated with an increased risk of hypertension compared with placebo. In individual analyses, the risk of hypertension was lower with olaparib than placebo (RR 0.77 [95% CI: 0.68-0.86], P < 0.01; I2  = 19%, χ2 P = 0.26). Niraparib monotherapy increased the risk of any (RR 2.84 [95% CI: 1.76-4.57], P < 0.01; I2  = 66%, χ2 P = 0.01) hypertension with a summary incidence of 19.87% (95% CI: 15.23-25.50). In real-life setting, niraparib-associated hypertension occurs within 20 days and was serious in 66%. Co-prescription of at least one antihypertensive or therapy-induced hypertension was reported in 20.5% or 14.4% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a context of extensive assessment of niraparib in combination, these data reinforce the need of a close monitoring of this adverse event to preserve its clinical benefit on patients' survival.

Comparative analysis of response to treatments and molecular features of tumor-derived organoids versus cell lines and PDX derived from the same ovarian clear cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In the era of personalized medicine, the establishment of preclinical models of cancer that faithfully recapitulate original tumors is essential to potentially guide clinical decisions.

METHODS

We established 7 models [4 cell lines, 2 Patient-Derived Tumor Organoids (PDTO) and 1 Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX)], all derived from the same Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma (OCCC). To determine the relevance of each of these models, comprehensive characterization was performed based on morphological, histological, and transcriptomic analyses as well as on the evaluation of their response to the treatments received by the patient. These results were compared to the clinical data.

RESULTS

Only the PDX and PDTO models derived from the patient tumor were able to recapitulate the patient tumor heterogeneity. The patient was refractory to carboplatin, doxorubicin and gemcitabine, while tumor cell lines were sensitive to these treatments. In contrast, PDX and PDTO models displayed resistance to the 3 drugs. The transcriptomic analysis was consistent with these results since the models recapitulating faithfully the clinical response grouped together away from the other classical 2D cell culture models. We next investigated the potential of drugs that have not been used in the patient clinical management and we identified the HDAC inhibitor belinostat as a potential effective treatment based on PDTO response.

CONCLUSIONS

PDX and PDTO appear to be the most relevant models, but only PDTO seem to present all the necessary prerequisites for predictive purposes and could constitute relevant tools for therapeutic decision support in the context of these particularly aggressive cancers refractory to conventional treatments.

Atrial Fibrillation Incidence Associated With Exposure to Anticancer Drugs Used as Monotherapy in Clinical Trials

Background

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with anticancer drugs in cancer patients remains incompletely defined.

Objectives

The primary outcome was the annualized incidence rate of AF reporting associated with exposure to 1 of 19 anticancer drugs used as monotherapy in clinical trials. The authors also report the annualized incidence rate of AF reported in the placebo arms of these trials.

Methods

The authors systematically searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase 2 and 3 cancer trials studying 19 different anticancer drugs of interest used as monotherapy, up to September 18, 2020. The authors performed a random-effects meta-analysis to compute summary AF annualized incidence rate with its 95% CI using log transformation and inverse variance weighting.

Results

A total of 191 clinical trials (47.1% were randomized) of 16 anticancer drugs across 26,604 patients were included. Incidence rates could be calculated for 15 drugs administered singly as monotherapy. Summary annualized incidence rates of AF reporting associated with exposure to 1 of the 15 anticancer drugs used as monotherapy were derived; these ranged from 0.26 to 4.92 per 100 person-years. The 3 highest annualized incidence rates of AF reporting were found for ibrutinib 4.92 (95% CI: 2.91-8.31), clofarabine 2.38 (95% CI: 0.66-8.55), and ponatinib 2.35 (95% CI: 1.78-3.12) per 100 person-years. Summary annualized incidence rate of AF reporting in the placebo arms was 0.25 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 0.10-0.65).

Conclusions

AF reporting is not a rare event associated with anticancer drugs in clinical trials. A systematic and standardized AF detection should be considered in oncological trials, particularly those studying anticancer drugs associated with high AF rates. (Incidence of atrial fibrillation associated with anticancer drugs exposure in monotherapy, A safety meta-analysis of phase 2 and 3 clinical trials; CRD42020223710).

Association between road traffic accidents and drugs belonging to the antiseizure medications class: A pharmacovigilance analysis in VigiBase

AIMS

Due to their central mechanism of action, antiseizure medications (ASMs) could lead to adverse effects likely to impair driving skills. Their extended use to neuropsychiatric disorders makes it a class of drugs to monitor for their road traffic accidental (RTA) potential. We aimed to assess the reporting association between ASMs and RTAs using the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase).

METHODS

We performed a disproportionality analysis to compute adjusted reporting odds ratios to evaluate the strength of reporting association between ASMs and RTAs. A univariate analysis using the reporting odds-ratio was used to assess drug-drug interactions between ASMs and RTAs.

RESULTS

There were 1 341 509 reports associated with at least 1 ASM in VigiBase of whom 2.91‰ were RTAs reports. Eight ASMs were associated with higher reporting of RTAs compared to others (ranging from 1.35 [95% confidence interval 1.11-1.64] for lamotrigine to 4.36 [95% confidence interval 3.56-5.32] for cannabis). Eight significant drug-drug interactions were found between ASMs and the onset of RTA, mainly involving CYP450 induction.

CONCLUSION

A significant safety signal between RTAs and some ASMs was identified. Association of several ASMs might further increase the occurrence of RTA. ASMs prescription in patients with identified risk factors of RTA should be considered with caution. Study number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04480996.

Therapy-related Myeloid Neoplasms Following PARP Inhibitors: Real-life Experience

PURPOSE

To provide insights into the diagnosis and management of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) following PARP inhibitors (PARPi).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In a French cancer center, we identified and described the profiles of 13 t-MN diagnosed among 37 patients with ovarian cancer referred to hematology consultation for cytopenia under PARPi. Next, we described these 13 t-MN post-PARPi among 37 t-MN post ovarian cancer according to PARPi exposure. Finally, we described 69 t-MN post-PARPi in a national cohort.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2021, cumulative incidence of t-MN was 3.5% (13/373) among patients with ovarian cancer treated with PARPi. At time of hematologic consultation, patients with t-MN had a longer PARPi exposure (9 vs. 3 months, P = 0.01), lower platelet count (74 vs. 173 G/L, P = 0.0005), and more cytopenias (2 vs. 1, P = 0.0005). Compared with t-MN not exposed to PARPi, patients with t-MN-PARPi had more BRCA1/2 germline mutation (61.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.03) but similar overall survival (OS). In the national cohort, most t-MN post-PARPi had a complex karyotype (61%) associated with a high rate of TP53 mutation (71%). Median OS was 9.6 months (interquartile range, 4-14.6). In multivariate analysis, a longer time between end of PARPi and t-MN (HR, 1.046; P = 0.02), olaparib compared with other PARPi (HR, 5.82; P = 0.003) and acute myeloid leukemia (HR, 2.485; P = 0.01) were associated with shorter OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large series, we described a high incidence of t-MN post-PARPi associated with unfavorable cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities leading to poor OS. Early detection is crucial, particularly in cases of delayed cytopenia.

Impact of automated methods for quantitative evaluation of immunostaining: Towards digital pathology

Introduction

We sought to develop a novel method for a fully automated, robust quantification of protein biomarker expression within the epithelial component of high-grade serous ovarian tumors (HGSOC). Rather than defining thresholds for a given biomarker, the objective of this study in a small cohort of patients was to develop a method applicable to the many clinical situations in which immunomarkers need to be quantified. We aimed to quantify biomarker expression by correlating it with the heterogeneity of staining, using a non-subjective choice of scoring thresholds based on classical mathematical approaches. This could lead to a universal method for quantifying other immunohistochemical markers to guide pathologists in therapeutic decision-making.

Methods

We studied a cohort of 25 cases of HGSOC for which three biomarkers predictive of the response observed ex vivo to the BH3 mimetic molecule ABT-737 had been previously validated by a pathologist. We calibrated our algorithms using Stereology analyses performed by two experts to detect immunohistochemical staining and epithelial/stromal compartments. Immunostaining quantification within Stereology grids of hexagons was then performed for each histological slice. To define thresholds from the staining distribution histograms and to classify staining within each hexagon as low, medium, or high, we used the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM).

Results

Stereology analysis of this calibration process produced a good correlation between the experts for both epithelium and immunostaining detection. There was also a good correlation between the experts and image processing. Image processing clearly revealed the respective proportions of low, medium, and high areas in a single tumor and showed that this parameter of heterogeneity could be included in a composite score, thus decreasing the level of discrepancy. Therefore, agreement with the pathologist was increased by taking heterogeneity into account.

Conclusion and discussion

This simple, robust, calibrated method using basic tools and known parameters can be used to quantify and characterize the expression of protein biomarkers within the different tumor compartments. It is based on known mathematical thresholds and takes the intratumoral heterogeneity of staining into account. Although some discrepancies need to be diminished, correlation with the pathologist’s classification was satisfactory. The method is replicable and can be used to analyze other biological and medical issues. This non-subjective technique for assessing protein biomarker expression uses a fully automated choice of thresholds (GMM) and defined composite scores that take the intra-tumor heterogeneity of immunostaining into account. It could help to avoid the misclassification of patients and its subsequent negative impact on therapeutic care.

Transverse myelitis following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a pharmacoepidemiological study in the World Health Organization's database

Background

Transverse myelitis (TM) has recently been associated by health authorities with Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson), one of the 5 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medicines Agency (EMA) labeled severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) vaccines. It is unknown whether a similar association exists for the other FDA or EMA labeled SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines (BNT162b2 [Pfizer/BioNTech], mRNA‐1273 [Moderna], ChAdOx1nCov‐19 [Oxford–AstraZeneca], and NVX‐CoV2373 [Novavax]). This study aimed to evaluate the association between SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine class and TM.

Methods

This observational, cross‐sectional, pharmacovigilance cohort study examined individual case safety reports from VigiBase, the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database. We first conducted a disproportionality analysis with the information component (IC) using the reports of TM that occurred within 28 days following exposure to the FDA or EMA labeled SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines, from December 1, 2020 (first adverse event related to a SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine) to March 27, 2022. Second, we analyzed the clinical features of SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine‐associated TM cases reported in VigiBase.

Results

TM was significantly associated both with the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)‐based (n = 364; IC₀₂₅ = 0.62) and vector‐based (n = 136; IC₀₂₅ = 0.52) SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines that are authorized by the FDA or the EMA.

Conclusions

Findings from this observational, cross‐sectional pharmacovigilance study showed that mRNA‐based and vector‐based FDA/EMA labeled SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines can be associated with TM. However, because TM remains a rare event, with a previously reported rate of 0.28 cases per 1 million vaccine doses, the risk–benefit ratio in favor of vaccination against SARS‐CoV‐2 virus remains unchallenged. Rather, this study suggests that clinicians should consider the diagnosis of TM in patients presenting with early signs of spinal cord dysfunction after SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination. ANN NEUROL 2022

Cardiovascular immunotoxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a safety meta-analysis

AIMS 

The risk and incidence of cardiovascular (CV) immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients remain unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically reviewed all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including at least one ICI-containing arm and available CV adverse event (CVAE) data in cancer patients in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Medline, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, up to 31 August 2020 (CRD42020165672). The primary outcome was the summary risk of 16 different CVAEs associated with ICI exposure vs. controls (placebo and non-placebo) in RCTs. CVAEs with an increased risk associated with ICI exposure were considered as CV irAEs. Summary incidences of CV irAEs identified in our primary outcome analyses were computed using all RCTs including at least one ICI-containing arm. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to obtain Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and logit transformation and inverse variance weighting to compute summary incidences. Sixty-three unique RCTs with at least one ICI-containing arm (32 518 patients) were retrieved, among which 48 (29 592 patients) had a control arm. Among the 16 CVAEs studied, ICI use was associated with an increased risk of 6 CV irAEs including myocarditis, pericardial diseases, heart failure, dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, and cerebral arterial ischaemia with higher risks for myocarditis (Peto OR: 4.42, 95% CI: 1.56-12.50, P < 0.01; I2 = 0%, P = 0.93) and dyslipidemia (Peto OR: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.89-7.19, P < 0.01; I2 = 0%, P = 0.66). The incidence of these CVAEs ranged from 3.2 (95% CI 2.0-5.1) to 19.3 (6.7-54.1) per 1000 patients, in studies with a median follow-up ranging from 3.2 to 32.8 months.

CONCLUSION

In RCTs, ICI use was associated with six CV irAEs, not confined to myocarditis and pericarditis.

The lncRNA 'UCA1' modulates the response to chemotherapy of ovarian cancer through direct binding to miR-27a-5p and control of UBE2N levels

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the leading cause of death in patients with gynecologic cancers. Due to late diagnosis and resistance to chemotherapy, the 5‐year survival rate in patients with OC is below 40%. We observed that UCA1, a lncRNA previously reported to play an oncogenic role in several malignancies, is overexpressed in the chemoresistant OC cell line OAW42‐R compared to their chemotherapy‐sensitive counterpart OAW42. Additionally, UCA1 overexpression was related to poor prognosis in two independent patient cohorts. Currently, the molecular mechanisms through which UCA1 acts in OC are poorly understood. We demonstrated that downregulation of the short isoform of UCA1 sensitized OC cells to cisplatin and that UCA1 acted as competing endogenous RNA to miR‐27a‐5p. Upon UCA1 downregulation, miR‐27a‐5p downregulated its direct target UBE2N leading to the upregulation of BIM, a proapoptotic protein of the Bcl2 family. The upregulation of BIM is the event responsible for the sensitization of OC cells to cisplatin. In order to model response to therapy in patients with OC, we used several patient‐derived organoid cultures, a model faithfully mimicking patient’s response to therapy. Inhibition of UBE2N sensitized patient‐derived organoids to platinum salts. In conclusion, response to treatment in patients with OC is regulated by the UCA1/miR‐27a‐5p/UBE2N axis, where UBE2N inhibition could potentially represent a novel therapeutic strategy to counter chemoresistance in OC.

Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia in patients treated with PARP inhibitors: a safety meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and a retrospective study of the WHO pharmacovigilance database

BACKGROUND

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown efficacy and acceptable safety in a range of neoplasms, particularly in ovarian cancers. However, some concerns have emerged regarding rare and delayed adverse events including cases of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia, for which data are scarce. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia related to PARP inhibitors, via a systematic review and safety meta-analysis, and to describe clinical features of PARP inhibitor-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia cases reported in WHO's pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase).

METHODS

We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PARP inhibitor therapy versus control treatments (placebo and non-placebo) in adults (age ≥18 years) treated for cancer in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry with ongoing surveillance up to May 31, 2020. The date range for included studies was not restricted. By a stepwise method to capture all available adverse events, we first extracted data on myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia cases from ClinicalTrials.gov. If cases were not available, we extracted them from published manuscripts, or subsequently contacted corresponding authors or sponsors to provide data. RCTs without available data from ClinicalTrials.gov, publications, or corresponding authors or sponsors were excluded. The primary outcome was the summary risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia related to PARP inhibition versus placebo treatment in RCTs. We used a fixed-effects meta-analysis to obtain Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. In a separate observational, retrospective, cross-sectional pharmacovigilance study of VigiBase, cases of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia related to PARP inhibitor therapy were extracted on May 3, 2020, and clinical features summarised with a focus on median duration of PARP inhibitor exposure, median latency period between first drug exposure and diagnosis, and proportion of cases resulting in death. Our systematic review and safety meta-analysis were registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020175050. Our retrospective pharmacovigilance study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04326023.

FINDINGS

For our safety meta-analysis, initial searches identified 1617 citations, and 31 RCTs were systematically reviewed for eligibility. 28 RCTs with available adverse events were analysed (18 placebo and ten non-placebo RCTs), with 5693 patients in PARP inhibitor groups and 3406 patients in control groups. Based on the 18 placebo RCTs (n=7307 patients), PARP inhibitors significantly increased the risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia compared with placebo treatment (Peto OR 2·63 [95% CI 1·13-6·14], p=0·026) with no between-study heterogeneity (I²=0%, χ² p=0·91). The incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia across PARP inhibitor groups was 0·73% (95% CI 0·50-1·07; I²=0%, χ² p=0·87; 21 events out of 4533 patients) and across placebo groups was 0·47% (0·26-0·85; I²=0%, χ² p=1·00; three events out of 2774 patients). All 28 RCTs were rated as having unclear risk of bias. In VigiBase, 178 cases of myelodysplastic syndrome (n=99) and acute myeloid leukaemia (n=79) related to PARP inhibitor therapy were extracted. In cases with available data, median treatment duration was 9·8 months (IQR 3·6-17·4; n=96) and median latency period since first exposure to a PARP inhibitor was 17·8 months (8·4-29·2; n=58). Of 104 cases that reported outcomes, 47 (45%) resulted in death.

INTERPRETATION

PARP inhibitors increased the risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia versus placebo treatment. These delayed and often lethal adverse events should be studied further to improve clinical understanding, particularly in the front-line maintenance setting.

FUNDING

None.

Hazardous Drug Diversion of Valproate from a General Practitioner to his Patient's Dog

General practitioners are key stakeholders in good prescribing practices. More than half of patients have at least one unintended medication discrepancy upon hospital admission, some of which have the potential to cause severe discomfort or clinical deterioration. We report a case of a drug mistakenly administered to a 66-year-old man with cirrhosis and chronic alcoholism. Based on his regular prescription, he received 1 g/day of valproate during a hospitalization for cardiac valve surgery. This anticonvulsant was initially prescribed by his general practitioner for his epileptic dog and has been added to his own prescription to be covered by the French national health insurance. The aim of this article is to emphasize that general practitioners, physicians, and pharmacists have a major role to play in preventing the diversion of prescription drugs and limiting the risk of adverse drug events.