Wellness and Coping of Physicians Who Worked in ICUs During the Pandemic: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional North American Survey

OBJECTIVES

Few surveys have focused on physician moral distress, burnout, and professional fulfilment. We assessed physician wellness and coping during the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey using four validated instruments.

SETTING

Sixty-two sites in Canada and the United States.

SUBJECTS

Attending physicians (adult, pediatric; intensivist, nonintensivist) who worked in North American ICUs.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We analysed 431 questionnaires (43.3% response rate) from 25 states and eight provinces. Respondents were predominantly male (229 [55.6%]) and in practice for 11.8 ± 9.8 years. Compared with prepandemic, respondents reported significant intrapandemic increases in days worked/mo, ICU bed occupancy, and self-reported moral distress (240 [56.9%]) and burnout (259 [63.8%]). Of the 10 top-ranked items that incited moral distress, most pertained to regulatory/organizational ( n = 6) or local/institutional ( n = 2) issues or both ( n = 2). Average moral distress (95.6 ± 66.9), professional fulfilment (6.5 ± 2.1), and burnout scores (3.6 ± 2.0) were moderate with 227 physicians (54.6%) meeting burnout criteria. A significant dose-response existed between COVID-19 patient volume and moral distress scores. Physicians who worked more days/mo and more scheduled in-house nightshifts, especially combined with more unscheduled in-house nightshifts, experienced significantly more moral distress. One in five physicians used at least one maladaptive coping strategy. We identified four coping profiles (active/social, avoidant, mixed/ambivalent, infrequent) that were associated with significant differences across all wellness measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite moderate intrapandemic moral distress and burnout, physicians experienced moderate professional fulfilment. However, one in five physicians used at least one maladaptive coping strategy. We highlight potentially modifiable factors at individual, institutional, and regulatory levels to enhance physician wellness.

Outcomes of Cytomegalovirus Viremia Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 Infection

Background

Patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) have poor outcomes and frequently develop comorbid conditions, including cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation. The implications of CMV reactivation in this setting are unknown. We aimed to investigate if treatment of CMV viremia improved in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with COVID-19.

Methods

In this single center retrospective study, we analyzed clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia and CMV viremia admitted to an ICU from March 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021, who either received treatment (ganciclovir and/or valganciclovir) or no treatment. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were total hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Results

A total of 80 patients were included, 43 patients in the treatment group and 37 in the control. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. CMV-treated patients were more likely to test positive for CMV earlier in their course, more likely to be on ECMO and received higher total steroid doses on average. In-hospital mortality was similar between the two groups (37.2% vs 43.2.0% p-value = 0.749). There was no significant difference in hospital LOS, though CMV-treated patients had a longer ICU LOS.

Conclusions

Treatment of CMV viremia did not decrease in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with COVID-19, but sample size was limited. CMV viremia was significantly associated with total steroid dose received and longer ICU stay.

Analysis of catheter utilization, central line associated bloodstream infections, and costs associated with an inpatient critical care-driven vascular access model

BACKGROUND

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) carry serious risks for patients and financial consequences for hospitals. Avoiding unnecessary temporary central venous catheters (CVC) can reduce CLABSI. Critical Care Medicine (CCM) is often consulted to insert CVC when alternatives are unavailable. We aim to describe clinical and financial implications of a CCM-driven vascular access model.

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational cohort study, all CLABSI and a sample of CCM consults for CVC insertion on adult medical-surgical inpatient units were reviewed in 2019. Assessment of CVC appropriateness and financial analysis of labor, reimbursement, and attributable CLABSI cost was conducted.

RESULTS

Of 554 CCM consult requests, 75 (13.5%) were for CVC and 36 (48.0%) resulted in CVC insertion; 6 (16.7%) CVC were avoidable. Three CLABSI occurred in avoidable CVC with estimated annual attributable cost of $165,099. Estimated annual CCM consultant cost for CVC was $78,094 generating $110,733 in reimbursement. Overall estimated annual loss was $132,460.

DISCUSSION

Reliance on CCM for intravenous access resulted in avoidable CVC, CLABSI, inefficient physician effort, and financial losses; nurse-driven vascular access models offer potential cost savings and risk reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

CCM-driven vascular access models may not be cost-effective; alternatives should be considered for utilization reduction, CLABSI prevention, and financial viability.

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes After Introduction of a Dedicated Infectious Diseases-Critical Care Medicine Service in Critical Care Units

Background

Infection is a leading cause of admission to intensive care units (ICUs), with critically ill patients often receiving empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics. Nevertheless, a dedicated infectious diseases (ID) consultation and stewardship team is not routinely established. An ID–critical care medicine (ID-CCM) pilot program was designed at a 400-bed tertiary care hospital in which an ID attending was assigned to participate in daily rounds with the ICU team, as well as provide ID consultation on select patients. We sought to evaluate the impact of this dedicated ID program on antibiotic utilization and clinical outcomes in patients admitted to the ICU.

Methods

In this single-site retrospective study, we analyzed antibiotic utilization and clinical outcomes in patients admitted to an ICU during the postintervention period from January 1 to December 31, 2017, and compared it to antibiotic utilization in the same ICUs during the preintervention period from January 1 to December 31, 2015.

Results

Our data showed a statistically significant reduction in usage of most frequently prescribed antibiotics including vancomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefepime during the intervention period. When compared to the preintervention period there was no difference in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, and readmission.

Conclusions

With this multidisciplinary intervention, we saw a decrease in the use of the most frequently prescribed broad-spectrum antibiotics without a negative impact on clinical outcomes. Our study shows that the implementation of an ID-CCM service is a feasible way to promote antibiotic stewardship in the ICU and can be used as a strategy to reduce unnecessary patient exposure to broad-spectrum agents.

1877. Evaluation of Antibiotic Utilization After Introduction of a Dedicated Infectious Diseases-Critical Care Medicine Service in Critical Care Units

Background

Infection is a leading cause of admission to intensive care units (ICU), with critically ill patients often receiving a high volume of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics. Nevertheless, a dedicated infectious diseases (ID) consultation and stewardship team is not routinely implemented. An ID-Critical Care Medicine (ID-CCM) pilot program was designed at a large tertiary hospital in which an ID attending was assigned to participate in daily rounds with the ICU team, as well as provide an ID consult on select patients. We sought to evaluate the impact of this dedicated ID consultation and stewardship program on antibiotic utilization in the ICU.

Methods

This is an IRB-approved single-site retrospective study. We analyzed antibiotic utilization in the ICU during the post-intervention period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 and compared it to antibiotic utilization in the same ICU during the pre-intervention period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. Using Poisson regression analysis, we evaluated antibiotic utilization of each agent, expressed as days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient-days, between the two groups.

Results

The six most commonly used broad-spectrum antibiotic agents were included in the final analysis. During the intervention period, statistically significant reductions were seen in cefepime (131 vs. 101 DOT per 1,000 patient-days, P = 0.01), piperacillin-tazobactam (268 vs. 251 DOT per 1,000 patient-days, P = 0.02) and vancomycin (265 vs. 228 DOT per 1,000 patient-days, P = 0.01). The utilization of other antibiotics including daptomycin, linezolid, and meropenem did not differ significantly (Figure 1).

Conclusion

With this multidisciplinary intervention, we saw a decrease in the use of the most frequently administered broad-spectrum antibiotics. Our study shows that the implementation of an ID-CCM service is a feasible way to promote antibiotic stewardship in the ICU and can be used as a strategy to reduce unnecessary patient exposure to broad-spectrum agents.

Disclosures

All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

Listeria brain abscess in a patient with autoimmune hepatitis

Listeria monocytogenes is an uncommon cause of brain abscesses. Immunocompromised hosts, pregnant women and patients at extremes of age are especially susceptible. We discuss the successful management of a woman with autoimmune hepatitis on prednisone and azathioprine therapy with a L. monocytogenes brain abscess. Previously thought to be a rare cause of central nervous system (CNS) infection, the incidence of CNS listeriosis has increased due to a rise in organ and bone marrow transplantation requiring immunosuppressive medications. L. monocytogenes brain abscesses are now more frequently described and are associated with high rates of concomitant bacteremia suggesting a hematogenous route of infection.