Bariatric Surgery as a Bridge to Facilitate Renal Transplantation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

PURPOSE

Renal transplantation (RT) is not recommended above BMI 40 kg/m2 as post-operative risks (delayed graft function, wound complications) are increased. Bariatric surgery (BS) results in sustained long-term weight loss. However, renal failure (RF) patients are theoretically higher risk candidates. We aim to investigate the safety of BS in patients with RF and the effect of BS on access to renal transplantation.

METHODS

We reviewed data from 31 patients with RF referred for BS between 2013 and 2021. We compared the outcomes of patients with RF who underwent BS to those who were referred but did not undergo BS. Controls matched for age/BMI/comorbidity (MC) but without RF were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Of 31 patients referred, 19 proceeded with BS (68% female, median age 52 years, BMI 46.2 ± 4.9 kg/m2) and 12 did not (58% female, median age 58, mean BMI 41.5 ± 4.1). Excess body weight loss (EBWL) was 71.2% ± 20.2% at 2 years in RF patients versus 66.0% ± 28.0% in MC patients. In the operated group, 11/19 (58%) patients reached their treatment target (six transplanted, five placed on waiting list) versus 3/12 (25%) in unoperated patients (three transplanted). There was no difference in perioperative complications between RF and MC groups. Long-term, there were seven deaths amongst RF patients (two operated, five unoperated), none amongst the MC group.

CONCLUSION

BS in patients with RF increased access to RT and was safe and effective. We therefore recommend consideration of BS in patients with obesity and RF in specialised units.

IBCOx_1 Do we really need to use staple line reinforcement to prevent leaks after sleeve gastrectomy?

Introduction

While some of systematic reviews inform us about the superiority of the stapler line reinforcement (SLR) over no reinforcement to prevent leaks in sleeve gastrectomy, the First Report from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) with 188,000 patients contradicts this with higher leak rates associated with SLR. The objective is to understand why the variation in the literature about the SLR in preventing leaks or not and how this relates to surgeon experience.

Methods

Literature review was performed and analysed to identify the type of the SLR used or not. This was compared with the leak site, stomach thickness and type of stapler thickness height used. The surgeon experience was also taken into account.

Results

The leak rates were mainly due to inappropriate use of the stapler colour (thickness) in relation to the SLR type and the stomach thickness. In one systematic review higher leak rates were found when inappropriate low staple height (blue stapler 1.8mm closure height) was used to include bovine SLR (1mm thickness) to staple the fundal area (1.5mm thickness). In another meta-analysis less leaks rates were noticed using the same buttressing material with a larger stapler (green or gold). Increase in surgeon experience was associated with decreased leak rate.

Conclusion

The inappropriate use of the stapler height with the SLR contributes to the leak and can explain the variation in the literature. The surgeon experience associated with decrease leak rates.

TU1.7 The correlation between BITE score and weight outcomes in Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass patients – an update with 24-month post-operative results

Background

The Bulimic Investigatory Test, Edinburgh (BITE) self-report questionnaire is used to assess the risk of bulimic and binge eating habits in bariatric patients preoperatively. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between preoperative BITE scores and weight loss at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months follow up in patients with Mini-Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB).

Method

Consecutive patients who received MGB-OAGB between 2016–2018 completed the BITE questionnaire at initial assessment and were included in this prospective study. Baseline demographics were measured. Excess body weight loss (%EBWL) and total weight loss (%TWL) were calculated on the day of surgery and at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months follow up.

Results

120 patients were eligible with an average age of 43 (± 10.84) years. 21.67% (n=26) had high BITE scores (≥20), 44.17% (n=53) had medium BITE scores (10–19), and 34.17% (n=41) had low BITE scores (≤9). Low and Medium BITE groups had similar outcomes at each follow up. The low BITE group had greater %EBWL and %TWL compared to high BITE group across all the follow ups, however this difference was not significant. There were no reoperations or mortality.

Conclusion

MGB-OAGB results in good weight loss at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively independent of BITE scores. There was no significant difference between pre-operative binge eating behaviours on post-operative weight outcomes. To extend the study, further research between the effect of pre-operative psychological input on weight outcomes could be investigated. Going forward, comparative study in patients with RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy would be recommended.

Depot- and diabetes-specific differences in norepinephrine-mediated adipose tissue angiogenesis, vascular tone, collagen deposition and morphology in obesity

AIMS

Norepinephrine (NE) is a known regulator of adipose tissue (AT) metabolism, angiogenesis, vasoconstriction and fibrosis. This may be through autocrine/paracrine effects on local resistance vessel function and morphology. The aims of this study were to investigate, in human subcutaneous and omental adipose tissue (SAT and OAT): NE synthesis, angiogenesis, NE-mediated arteriolar vasoconstriction, the induction of collagen gene expression and its deposition in non-diabetic versus diabetic obese subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SAT and OAT from obese patients were used to investigate tissue NE content, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) density, angiogenesis including capillary density, angiogenic capacity and angiogenic gene expression, NE-mediated arteriolar vasoconstriction and collagen deposition.

KEY FINDINGS

In the non-diabetic group, NE concentration, TH immunoreactivity, angiogenesis and maximal vasoconstriction were significantly higher in OAT compared to SAT (p < 0.05). However, arterioles from OAT showed lower NE sensitivity compared to SAT (10^-8 M to 10^-7.5 M, p < 0.05). A depot-specific difference in collagen deposition was also observed, being greater in OAT than SAT. In the diabetic group, no significant depot-specific differences were seen in NE synthesis, angiogenesis, vasoconstriction or collagen deposition. SAT arterioles showed significantly lower sensitivity to NE (10^-8 M to 10^-7.5 M, p < 0.05) compared to the non-diabetic group.

SIGNIFICANCE

SAT depot in non-diabetic obese patients exhibited relatively low NE synthesis, angiogenesis, tissue fibrosis and high vasoreactivity, due to preserved NE sensitivity. The local NE synthesis in OAT and diabetes desensitizes NE-induced vasoconstriction, and may also explain the greater tissue angiogenesis and fibrosis in these depots.

30-Day Morbidity and Mortality of Bariatric Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Multinational Cohort Study of 7704 Patients from 42 Countries

BACKGROUND

There are data on the safety of cancer surgery and the efficacy of preventive strategies on the prevention of postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 in these patients. But there is little such data for any elective surgery. The main objectives of this study were to examine the safety of bariatric surgery (BS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to determine the efficacy of perioperative COVID-19 protective strategies on postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 rates.

METHODS

We conducted an international cohort study to determine all-cause and COVID-19-specific 30-day morbidity and mortality of BS performed between 01/05/2020 and 31/10/2020.

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-nine surgeons from 185 centres in 42 countries provided data on 7704 patients. Elective primary BS (n = 7084) was associated with a 30-day morbidity of 6.76% (n = 479) and a 30-day mortality of 0.14% (n = 10). Emergency BS, revisional BS, insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, and untreated obstructive sleep apnoea were associated with increased complications on multivariable analysis. Forty-three patients developed symptomatic COVID-19 postoperatively, with a higher risk in non-whites. Preoperative self-isolation, preoperative testing for SARS-CoV-2, and surgery in institutions not concurrently treating COVID-19 patients did not reduce the incidence of postoperative COVID-19. Postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 was more likely if the surgery was performed during a COVID-19 peak in that country.

CONCLUSIONS

BS can be performed safely during the COVID-19 pandemic with appropriate perioperative protocols. There was no relationship between preoperative testing for COVID-19 and self-isolation with symptomatic postoperative COVID-19. The risk of postoperative COVID-19 risk was greater in non-whites or if BS was performed during a local peak.

30-Day Morbidity and Mortality of Bariatric Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Multinational Cohort Study of 7704 Patients from 42 Countries

BACKGROUND

There are data on the safety of cancer surgery and the efficacy of preventive strategies on the prevention of postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 in these patients. But there is little such data for any elective surgery. The main objectives of this study were to examine the safety of bariatric surgery (BS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to determine the efficacy of perioperative COVID-19 protective strategies on postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 rates.

METHODS

We conducted an international cohort study to determine all-cause and COVID-19-specific 30-day morbidity and mortality of BS performed between 01/05/2020 and 31/10/2020.

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-nine surgeons from 185 centres in 42 countries provided data on 7704 patients. Elective primary BS (n = 7084) was associated with a 30-day morbidity of 6.76% (n = 479) and a 30-day mortality of 0.14% (n = 10). Emergency BS, revisional BS, insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, and untreated obstructive sleep apnoea were associated with increased complications on multivariable analysis. Forty-three patients developed symptomatic COVID-19 postoperatively, with a higher risk in non-whites. Preoperative self-isolation, preoperative testing for SARS-CoV-2, and surgery in institutions not concurrently treating COVID-19 patients did not reduce the incidence of postoperative COVID-19. Postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 was more likely if the surgery was performed during a COVID-19 peak in that country.

CONCLUSIONS

BS can be performed safely during the COVID-19 pandemic with appropriate perioperative protocols. There was no relationship between preoperative testing for COVID-19 and self-isolation with symptomatic postoperative COVID-19. The risk of postoperative COVID-19 risk was greater in non-whites or if BS was performed during a local peak.