Correction of coronal suture synostosis using suture and dura mater allografts in rabbits with familial craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

Resynostosis following surgical correction of craniosynostosis is a common clinical correlate. Recent studies suggest that the dura mater is necessary to maintain suture patency. It has also been hypothesized that dura mater from synostotic individuals may provide aberrant biochemical signals to the osteogenic fronts of the calvaria, which result in premature suture fusion and subsequent resynostosis following surgery. This study was designed to test this hypothesis by surgically manipulating the coronal suture and dura mater in rabbits with familial craniosynostosis to prevent postsurgical resynostosis.

DESIGN

Craniofacial growth and histomorphometric data were collected from 129 rabbits: 72 normal controls and 57 rabbits with bilateral coronal suture synostosis (15 unoperated on controls; 13 surgical controls; 9 dura mater transplant only; 10 suture transplant only; and 10 suture and dura mater transplant). At 10 days of age, all rabbits had radiopaque amalgam markers placed on either side of the coronal, frontonasal, and anterior lambdoidal sutures. At 25 days of age, 42 synostosed rabbits had a 3 to 5-mm wide coronal suturectomy. Coronal sutures and/or underlying dura mater allografts were harvested from same-aged, wild-type, isohistogenic control rabbits and transplanted onto the dura mater of synostosed host rabbits. Serial radiographs were taken at 10, 25, 42, and 84 days of age, and the suturectomy sites were harvested at 84 days of age in 44 rabbits and serially sectioned for histomorphometric examination.

RESULTS

Results revealed that cranial vault growth was significantly (p < .05) improved following surgical release of the fused coronal suture compared with synostosed rabbits who were not operated on but was still significantly different (p < .05) from that of normal control rabbits. By 84 days of age, significant (p < .05) differences were noted in calvarial suture marker separation, cranial vault shape indices, and cranial base angles between rabbits with and without dura mater allografts, probably as a result of resynostosis of the suturectomy site or suture-only allografts. Qualitative histological examination revealed that at 84 days of age rabbits with suture and dura allografts had patent coronal sutures, suture-only allografts had fused coronal sutures with extensive endosteal hyperostosis, dura mater-only allografts had some new bone in the suturectomy site that resembled rudimentary osteogenic fronts, and suturectomy controls had extensive endosteal bone formation and resynostosis of the suturectomy site. Significantly (p < .05) more bone was found in the suturectomy sites of rabbits without dura mater allografts compared with rabbits with dura mater allografts.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support the initial hypothesis that normal dura mater allografts will maintain suture or suturectomy site patency and allow unrestricted craniofacial growth. However, it is still unclear whether the dura mater from normal rabbits was providing biochemical signals to the transplanted sutures or suturectomy sites or simply acting as a barrier to prevent abnormal biochemical signals from the dura mater of synostosed rabbits from reaching the calvaria. The clinical and therapeutic implications of these procedures are discussed.

[Healing behavior and bone regeneration of maxillary osteotomies in the experimental rabbit model. Effect of osteosynthesis and guided bone regeneration]

PURPOSE

The development of fibrous nonunions following orthognathic surgery is thought to result from an interaction of biomechanical stress and the differential and more rapid migration of fibroblasts compared to osteoblasts into the wound site during healing. The present study was designed to test this hypothesis through the manipulation of guided tissue regeneration and osteotomy fixation techniques in an experimental rabbit model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bilateral critical size (4 mm) defects (n = 24) were produced in the maxillae of 12 adult New Zealand White rabbits. The maxillary segments were rigidly or nonrigidly fixed using bone microplates and screws or osteosynthetic wires. The defects were then covered with a resorbable collagen membrane or left uncovered. The rabbits were followed for 4 weeks with serial dorsoventral and lateral oblique cephalographs and the maxillae were then harvested for histological analysis.

RESULTS

Radiographic and histomorphometric analysis revealed that rigidly fixed defects, covered with membrane, showed the most rapid and organized new bone formation. The rigidly fixed defects with membrane averaged approximately 40% more new bone in the osteotomy site than the rigidly fixed defects with no membrane. Nonrigidly fixed defects with no membrane also showed an ingrowth of fibroblasts and fibrous nonunions.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that an interaction between the decreased fibrous tissue ingrowth through guided tissue regeneration and osteotomy segment stability from rigid fixation prevented postoperative fibrous nonunions and facilitated new bone regeneration and osteotomy site healing in this rabbit model.

Ultrasonic prenatal diagnosis of coronal suture synostosis

The present study was designed to assess the utility and validity of standard prenatal ultrasonography in identifying individuals with coronal suture synostosis by examining sutural abnormalities before the development of secondary craniofacial dysmorphologies. An Accusson 128 XP ultrasound machine was used to scan the coronal sutures of 31 twenty-five-day-old fetuses (term = 31 days) from four timed-pregnant New Zealand White rabbits with simple, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Each mother was sedated with general anesthesia, and the gravid uterine horns were exposed via a laparotomy procedure. The fetal calvariae were examined using a no. 7 transducer at 7.0 mHz. Each coronal suture was scanned using ultrasonography by first identifying bregma (the anterior fontanelle) at the intersection of the sagittal, interfrontal, and coronal sutures and then following the coronal sutures laterally. Seventeen of the 31 fetuses were diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral coronal suture fusion. In fetuses with synostosis, the suture was echolucent and patent in the midline but then rapidly tapered off to fused bone as it progressed laterally. This finding is in accordance with the natural history of the synostotic foci and coronal suture fusion progression in these rabbits. In addition, the sagittal and interfrontal sutures in each synostotic rabbit appeared wider along their course compared with normal. This reflects early enhanced compensatory transverse growth resulting from the anteroposterior growth restrictions from coronal suture fusion. No other cranial shape abnormalities were recognizable at this stage of fetal development. The validity of the ultrasound diagnoses was tested by direct ex utero inspection of 9 of the 17 synostotic fetuses. Gross morphological examination showed that 8 of 9 rabbit fetuses (89%) had fused coronal sutures. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference (chi 2 = 0.22, P > 0.05) between the diagnostic accuracy of standard ultrasonography and direct examination. In conclusion, we have shown that standard ultrasonography of the calvarial sutures, in the absence of other craniofacial malformations, may be a feasible method of diagnosing simple, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis in utero, a condition that is typically missed during routine prenatal ultrasonic screening examinations.