Abstract
INTRODUCTION
A posterior entry point, a neutral tip position and neutral stem alignment are recommended to avoid a thin cement mantle and ensure an optimal outcome in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our aim was to highlight any influence of surgical approach in obtaining an optimal stem orientation.
METHODS
We examined the post-operative, digitised radiographs of 100 (50 each group) polished, tapered Exeter THA, inserted via the antero-lateral or posterior approaches. Stem tip position was assessed in both coronal and sagittal planes and stem alignment was assessed in the coronal plane.
RESULTS
There was a significant difference between the two approaches in the sagittal stem tip position only (p=0.01).
DISCUSSION
Our results illustrate that a neutral stem tip position in THA is significantly more difficult to obtain with an antero-lateral approach, when compared to the posterior approach. A posterior approach to the hip avoids the cuff of glutei that can lever the proximal stem anteriorly causing an anterior entry point and a posterior stem tip position. We also illustrate how the anatomy of the proximal femur in the sagittal plane makes a neutral stem alignment difficult to achieve with either approach.
Collapse