Post-COVID-19 syndrome: prospective evaluation of clinical and functional outcomes

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly pathogenic coronavirus characterized by by systemic inflammatory response with endothelial damage and a dysregulated coagulation system. Despite most patients survive the acute setting of COVID-19, their long-term clinical sequelae are highly unclear. We have sought to identify the impact of post-COVID-19 syndrome on mid-term follow-up and gain some additional insights about the potential explanation for persistence of dyspnea.

Methods

This is a 3-month prospective cohort study of previously hospitalised COVID-19 patients recruited from a single Spanish center, a small outpatient group without prior hospitalisation was also evaluated. Patients underwent serial testing with cardio-pulmonary exercise test (CPET), transthoracic echocardiogram, pulmonary lung test, six-minute walking test, serum biomarker analysis and quality of life questionaries. They were classify according to the presence of persistent dyspnea. Primary study outcome was predicted peak oxygen consumption (V02) according to CPET and predicted carbon monoxide diffusion capacity.

Results

Our study included 41 (58.6%) patients with dyspnea and 29 (41.4%) asymptomatic. Symptomatic patients had a higher proportion of females (73.2% vs. 51.7%), but comparable age and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. We did not observe differences among the assessed variables in transthoracic echocardiogram and pulmonary function test. Patients who referred dyspnea had smaller predicted peak O2 consumption (77.8 [64–92.5] vs. 99 [88–105]: p<0.001), total distance in the 6-minute walking test (535 [467–600] vs. 611 [550–650] meters; p=0.001), and quality of life (KCCQ-23 60.1±18.6 vs. 82.8±11.3; p<0.001). Additionally, abnormalities in CPET were suggestive of a ventilation/perfusion misthmach or hyperventilatory syndrome characterized by impaired ventilatory efficiency with a greater VE/VCO2 slope (32 [28.1–37.4] vs. 29.4 [26.9–31.4]; p=0.022) and low PETCO2 (34 [32–39] vs. 38 [36–40]; p=0.025).

Interpretation

In this study >50% of COVID-19 survivors present a symptomatic functional impairment irrespective of age or prior hospitalization. Compared to asymptomatic patients, among those who referred dyspnea our findings suggest potential ventilatory inefficiency.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y Leόn; Grant from the Spanish Society of Cardiology Tabla de resultados

Impact of frailty on elderly patients with infective endocarditis

Introduction

Frailty studies focused on patients with infective endocarditis (IE) are scarce and its potential impact on patient outcomes is not well known.

The aim of this study is to describe the clinical profile and prognosis of elderly patients with IE, comparing patients who met the frailty criteria versus those who did not.

Methods

A total of 121 cases of confirmed IE were consecutively collected in three tertiary hospitals between 2017 and 2019. The patients were classified into two groups: Group I (n=49), patients with IE who met the Frail criteria for frailty, and Group II (n=72), those patients without frailty by this scale.

Results

The median age of our cohort was 77 years (69–82), and 62.8% were men. Frail patients were older than those in Group II, as shown in Table 1.

Regarding comorbidity, chronic anemia (40.8% vs 25%; p<0.060) was more common in Group I, as well as rheumatic manifestations at admission (12.2% vs 1.4%; p=0.014).

The most frequently isolated microorganisms were S. aureus (n=25), coagulase negative staphylococci (n=25), viridans group streptococci (n=14), and enterococci (n=14). Enterococci (16.3% vs 8.3%, p=0.177) and non-viridans streptococci (10.2% vs 2.8%); p=0.086) were more frequent in frail patients.

Vegetation (79.6% vs 80.6%; p=0.896) and periannular complications (24.5% vs 29.2%; p=0.571) were similar in both groups. No significant differences were found regarding the location of the infection.

The incidence of in-hospital complications was similar between both groups. Frail patients underwent surgery less frequently than those in Group II, and had higher predicted mortality on surgical risk scale scores. However, the percentage of patients who met the surgical criteria and were considered inoperable was similar (33.3% vs 26.2%; p=0.415). In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups. When analyzing in-hospital mortality according to the therapeutic strategy in Group I, a mortality of 34.5% was observed in frail patients with conservative medical treatment, compared to 47.1% in those patients who underwent surgery in the same group.

One third of our patients received outpatient antibiotic treatment, being significantly more frequent in Group I (39.6% vs 29.0%; p=0.232).

Conclusions

The elderly patients with IE and frailty criteria were older and more frequently had rheumatic symptoms at admission. Enterococci and non-viridans streptococci were isolated more frequently than in non-frailty patients. Surgery was less performed among frail patients, who had a higher predicted surgical risk. Although complications and in-hospital mortality were similar between both groups, in the group of frail patients, those with conservative management showed lower mortality compared to surgery.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Pulmonary valve replacement in women with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Contrasting indications compared with men

Background

Recent data suggest that in pulmonary regurgitation (PR) after repair of Tetralogy of Fallot (rToF) sex may influence right ventricular (RV) size, mass and function. We hypothesized that women with rToF and PR constitute a patient population with different preoperative clinical characteristics and different postoperative outcomes compared with men.

Methods

We collected retrospectively demographic data, clinical variables, imaging and functional variables in a cohort of 166 rToF patients (50% males; median age 35; IQR 26–41 years) with at least moderate PR. A transannular patch was used in 73 and 79% of men and women, respectively. The most recent data preceding death and pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) were requested. Variables were compared between men and women.

Results

Over follow-up, none of the patients died but 35 (42.7%) men and 23 (27.4%) women underwent PVR (p=0.05) at a median age of 32.5 (IQR 23.7–42.7 years). Women are more likely to undergo surgery after developing symptoms, while the criterion for surgery in men was ventricular size. At surgery, women were nearly twice as likely to have class III or IV symptoms preoperatively as men. Although PR fraction was similar between the two groups, indexed ventricular volumes were substantially higher and RV function was lower in males, compared to females. 20% of women had a RVEDVi ≥160ml and a RVESVi ≥80ml, compared with 35 and 32% of men, respectively (p=0.06), and only 6% of woman had an RVEDVi >180ml, compared with 18% of men (p=0.01). Fibrosis detected on late gadolinium was observed in 100% of men but only in 20% of women (p=0.009).

Conclusions

Under comparable loading conditions, a striking difference was noted in the condition leading to the surgical indication. These results suggest that the generalization of the RV dimension surgical criteria results in criteria almost never reached by women. Recommendations need more focus on sex differences.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Inter and intraobserver variability in the echocardiographic measurement of vegetations in infective endocarditis

Introduction and objectives

The indication for surgery to prevent embolism in infective endocarditis includes four clinical scenarios and three different echocardiographic measurements of the maximal vegetation diameter. These cut-off points are completely arbitrary and not evidence-based. Our hypothesis is that the vegetation diameter is not an appropriate surgical criterium. The goal of the study is to analyze the inter and intra-observer variability in this measurement and to compare the surgical indications agreement based on these parameters.

Methods

Two trained echocardiographers have measured the maximal vegetation diameter by transesophageal echocardiogram in 67 consecutive patients with definite infective endocarditis in an off-line workstation. The inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated by the interclass correlation coefficient and with the Bland-Altman analysis. The relationship between the strength of agreement for the cut-off points of 10 and 15 mm was also calculated.

Results

Intra and inter-observer interclass correlation coefficient in the measurement of the maximal longitudinal diameter of the vegetations were 0.872 (0.805–0.917) and 0.757 (0.642–0.839) respectively. The strength of agreement of the intra and inter-observer analysis for the cut-off point of 10 mm were 0.674 (0.485–0.862) and 0.533 (0.327–0.759). For the cut-off point of 15 mm they were 0.696 (0.530–0.862) and 0.475 (0.270–0.679).

Conclusions

The variability in the measurements of the maximal longitudinal diameter by transesophageal echocardiogram between two experimented echocardiographers is good. Nonetheless, surgical indications based on the cut-off points recommended in the European guidelines would have changed in an unacceptable high proportion of patients. Therefore, we suggest that these indications should be revised in the light of our results.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Prognostic benefit of urgent cardiac surgery in left-sided infective endocarditis

Background

Cardiac surgery is required in approximately 50% of patients with left-sided infective endocarditis (IE) being a high-risk procedure specially during active phase of the disease.

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of cardiac surgery in the in-hospital mortality of left-sided IE.

Methods

We used a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with definite left-sided IE between 2000 and 2017 (n=1002). A predictive model of in-hospital mortality was derived by adding the variable cardiac surgery to the already published ENDOVAL score. The benefit of cardiac surgery was calculated with the mean difference between the risk of in-hospital mortality considering urgent surgery and considering no surgery for each patient.

Results

The predictive model showed good discriminative capacity with an area under the ROC curve of 0.861 (95% CI: 0.830 - 0.891) and a good calibration (p-value in the Hosmer-Lemeshow test of 0.353). Figure shows the in-hospital mortality prediction of each patient in case of no-surgery (orange), urgent surgery (yellow) or real decision (blue). Mean reduction of in-hospital mortality risk in case of surgery for patients with a theoretical risk of in-hospital mortality between 0–20% in absence of surgery was 3.2±1.6%. For patients with a theoretical risk between 20–40% in absence of surgery the mean reduction was 8.1±1.1%. For patients with a theoretical risk between 40–60% in absence of surgery the mean reduction was 10.7±0.3%. For patients with a theoretical risk between 60–80% in absence of surgery the mean reduction was 9.7±0.9%. For patients with a theoretical risk between 80–100% in absence of surgery the mean reduction was 4.6±2.1%.

Conclusion

Urgent cardiac surgery is a protective factor of in-hospital mortality for all patients with left-sided IE but especially for those with intermediate risk.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Gerencia Regional de Salud, Junta de Castilla y Leόn