[State of integration of palliative care at Comprehensive Cancer Centers funded by German Cancer Aid]

BACKGROUND

Similarities and differences of integration of palliative care in clinical care, research and education structures at German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCC) are not known in detail.

OBJECTIVE

Provide an overview of availability and the way of integration of specialized palliative care at CCCs funded by the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe, DKH).

METHOD

We conducted structured interviews from May to August 2014 with heads of palliative care departments (personally or by telephone). The interviews included a quantitative and a qualitative part. Other stakeholders of CCCs were asked the questions of the qualitative part. We evaluated the qualitative data using the content analysis by Mayring and MAXQDA 11.0. SPSS 21.0 was used for quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

26 interviews were realized in 13 CCCs with 14 sites, which received funding, by DKH till August 2014 (one CCC had two university hospitals). Of these, 12 sites had a palliative care unit (86%), 11 sites had palliative care consulting services available (79%). Participation of palliative care specialists in tumor boards is not provided in 3 institutions (21%) and is often not feasible on regular basis in the other institutions, due to staffing shortage. In 7 sites (50%) defined criteria to integrate palliative care into CCCs were available. In the last 5 years specialized palliative care of 4 sites received an invitation for a research project by another department within the CCC (29%). 10 sites (71%) had started own palliative care research projects. Chairs in palliative care were available in 4 CCCs (29%).

CONCLUSION

The extent and depth of palliative care integration in the 14 CCC sites is heterogeneous.

Quality assurance by specification and achievement of goals in palliative cancer treatment

As the goals of palliative cancer treatments have not always been clearly specified, this paper describes how frequently the goals of palliative cancer treatment can be specified according to a given definition and how frequently those specified goals can be achieved. The clinical problems of 171 cancer patients were discussed in the Interdisciplinary Oncologic Conference (IOC) of the Cancer Centre University of Ulm (CCUU) and recommendations concerning further diagnostic treatments and/or therapy were provided. These recommendations had been documented and analysed retrospectively. The goals were classified as either cure or palliation or further investigation. If the goal was palliation, it was investigated whether or not the goal was specified as either alleviation of existing problems or prevention of impending problems. The achievement of the specified goals was assessed. Palliation was the goal of treatment in 119 (71%) of the 168 evaluable recommendations. In 83 of the 119 cases (70%), immediate treatment was recommended. The goal was specified in 57 (69%) of the 83 recommendations and could be realized in 24 of 57 specified cases (42%). Patients in this group survived longer (p < 0.01) than patients in whom the goals could not be achieved. Impending problems could be prevented more often (p = 0.001) in 14 out of 18 cases, while existing problems could be alleviated in only 10 out of 34 cases. It is concluded that specification of the goals of palliation is necessary because it is impossible to decide if a goal of treatment could be achieved or not unless the goal of treatment has been defined (as existing/impending problem). The prevention of impending problems could be investigated in prospectively controlled clinical trials.