Three-year efficacy of switching to dolutegravir plus lamivudine: A real-world study

BACKGROUND

Dolutegravir (DTG) plus lamivudine (3TC) has proven highly efficacious as a switching strategy in virologically suppressed people with HIV (PWH). As this strategy was introduced relatively recently, real-world, long-term durability studies are lacking.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of treatment-experienced patients who started DTG + 3TC in a cohort of PWH. HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL was analysed at 144 weeks in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (missing = failure) and a per-protocol (PP) analysis (patients with missing data or changes for reasons other than virological failure were excluded).

RESULTS

The study population comprised 358 PWH (19% women). Median age and time with HIV infection were 51.7 and 13.4 years, respectively. The median number of previous antiretroviral combinations was three. Previous virological failure was reported in 27.1% of patients, and the M184V resistance mutation was detected in 17 patients. At 144 weeks, the percentage of individuals with HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL was 77.4% (277/358) in the ITT analysis and 95.5% (277/290) in the PP analysis. A total of 68 participants were excluded from the PP analysis (data missing, 25, discontinuation due to toxicity, 19; other, 16; death, 8). Two people with virological failure selected resistance-associated mutations (M184V and M184V + R263K). HIV-RNA remained undetectable in 17 patients with a previous history of the M184V mutation.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the real-world, long-term efficacy, tolerability and high genetic barrier of DTG + 3TC in treatment-experienced PWH. Although scarce, mutations causing resistance to nucleosides and integrase can emerge.

Real-world efficacy of switching to bictegravir/ emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in pretreated patients with triple therapy containing rilpivirine

Objetivo

Analizar la eficacia y tolerabilidad de la estrategia de cambio desde regímenes basados en rilpivirina (RPV) a bictegravir/emtricitabina/tenofovir alafenamida (B/F/TAF) en la vida real.

Métodos

Estudio unicéntrico, observacional y retrospectivo. Se seleccionaron pacientes que cambiaron de un régimen con RPV a B/F/TAF antes de febrero del 2020 analizándose los resultados después de 24 y 48 semanas. Se determinó el porcentaje que permanecía con carga viral indetectable, así como los cambios en linfocitos CD4+, parámetros metabólicos y función renal.

Resultados

Se incluyeron en el estudio 42 pacientes. 32 de los 35 (91,4%) que completaron las 48 semanas de seguimiento tenían carga viral indetectable. El recuento de linfocitos CD4+ permaneció estable a las 24 y a las 48 semanas. El tipo de análogos recibidos previamente no influyó en la respuesta

Conclusión

El cambio desde una triple terapia con RPV a B/F/TAF es una estrategia segura y eficaz en la vida real.

Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir/Abacavir/Lamivudine in Antiretroviral-Naive Adults (SYMTRI): A Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Study (PReEC/RIS-57)

Background

Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) is the reference for combination therapy based on protease inhibitors due to its efficacy, tolerability, and convenience. Head-to-head randomized comparisons between D/C/F/TAF and combination therapy based on integrase inhibitors in antiretroviral-naive patients are lacking.

Methods

Adult (>18 years old) human immunodeficiency virus-infected antiretroviral-naive patients (HLA-B∗5701 negative and hepatitis B virus negative), with viral load (VL) ≥500 c/mL, were centrally randomized to initiate D/C/F/TAF or dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC/ABC) after stratifying by VL and CD4 count. Clinical and analytical assessments were performed at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, and 48. The primary endpoint was VL <50 c/mL at week 48 in the intention-to-treat (ITT)-exposed population (US Food and Drug Administration snapshot analysis, 10% noninferiority margin).

Results

Between September 2018 and 2019, 316 patients were randomized and 306 patients were included in the ITT-exposed analysis (151 D/C/F/TAF and 155 DTG/3TC/ABC). Almost all (94%) participants were male and their median age was 35 years. Forty percent had a baseline VL >100 000 copies/mL, and 13% had <200 CD4 cells/μL. Median weight was 73 kg and median body mass index was 24 kg/m². At 48 weeks, 79% (D/C/F/TAF) versus 82% (DTG/3TC/ABC) had VL <50 c/mL (difference, −2.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], −11.3 to 6.6). Eight percent versus four percent experienced virologic failure but no resistance-associated mutations emerged. Four percent versus six percent had drug discontinuation due to adverse events. In the per-protocol analysis, 94% versus 96% of patients had VL <50 c/mL (difference, −2%; 95% CI, −8.1 to 3.5). There were no differences in CD4 cell count or weight changes.

Conclusions

We could not demonstrate the noninferiority of D/C/F/TAF relative to DTG/ABC/3TC as initial antiretroviral therapy, although both regimens were similarly well tolerated.