Impact of prior treatment on patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with carfilzomib and dexamethasone vs bortezomib and dexamethasone in the phase 3 ENDEAVOR study

The randomized phase 3 ENDEAVOR study (N=929) compared carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) with bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM). We performed a subgroup analysis from ENDEAVOR in patients categorized by number of prior lines of therapy or by prior treatment. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with one prior line was 22.2 months for Kd vs 10.1 months for Vd, and median PFS for patients with ⩾2 prior lines was 14.9 months for Kd vs 8.4 months for Vd. For patients with prior bortezomib exposure, the median PFS was 15.6 months for Kd vs 8.1 months for Vd, and for patients with prior lenalidomide exposure the median PFS was 12.9 months for Kd vs 7.3 months for Vd. Overall response rates (Kd vs Vd) were 81.9 vs 65.5% (one prior line), 72.0 vs 59.7% (⩾2 prior lines), 71.2 vs 60.3% (prior bortezomib) and 70.1 vs 59.3% (prior lenalidomide). The safety profile in the prior lines subgroups was qualitatively similar to that in the broader ENDEAVOR population. In RMM, outcomes are improved when receiving treatment with carfilzomib compared with bortezomib, regardless of the number of prior therapy lines or prior exposure to bortezomib or lenalidomide.

New drugs and novel mechanisms of action in multiple myeloma in 2013: a report from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG)

Treatment in medical oncology is gradually shifting from the use of nonspecific chemotherapeutic agents toward an era of novel targeted therapy in which drugs and their combinations target specific aspects of the biology of tumor cells. Multiple myeloma (MM) has become one of the best examples in this regard, reflected in the identification of new pathogenic mechanisms, together with the development of novel drugs that are being explored from the preclinical setting to the early phases of clinical development. We review the biological rationale for the use of the most important new agents for treating MM and summarize their clinical activity in an increasingly busy field. First, we discuss data from already approved and active agents (including second- and third-generation proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory agents and alkylators). Next, we focus on agents with novel mechanisms of action, such as monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), cell cycle-specific drugs, deacetylase inhibitors, agents acting on the unfolded protein response, signaling transduction pathway inhibitors and kinase inhibitors. Among this plethora of new agents or mechanisms, some are specially promising: anti-CD38 MoAb, such as daratumumab, are the first antibodies with clinical activity as single agents in MM. Moreover, the kinesin spindle protein inhibitor Arry-520 is effective in monotherapy as well as in combination with dexamethasone in heavily pretreated patients. Immunotherapy against MM is also being explored, and probably the most attractive example of this approach is the combination of the anti-CS1 MoAb elotuzumab with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, which has produced exciting results in the relapsed/refractory setting.

Carfilzomib in multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: pharmacokinetics and safety

This phase 2 study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of carfilzomib, a selective proteasome inhibitor, in patients with multiple myeloma and varying degrees of renal impairment, including patients on chronic hemodialysis. Patients were grouped by creatinine clearance: >80 ml/min, 50-80 ml/min, 30-49 ml/min, <30 ml/min and chronic hemodialysis. Carfilzomib was administered on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 in 28-day cycles: 15 mg/m(2) (Cycle 1), 20 mg/m(2) (Cycle 2) and 27 mg/m(2) (Cycles 3+). There were no differences in carfilzomib clearance or exposure among patients with normal renal function and any group with renal impairment. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included anemia (28.0%), thrombocytopenia (20.0%), lymphopenia (18.0%) and fatigue (14.0%). AEs were similar among groups. At 15 mg/m(2), proteasome inhibition up to 85% was observed and did not differ among groups. Although nearly 50% of patients were refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide, end of study partial response or better (overall response rate) was 25.5% with 7.9 months median duration of response. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics and safety of carfilzomib were not influenced by the degree of baseline renal impairment, including in patients on dialysis, and carfilzomib was well tolerated and demonstrated promising efficacy.

Management of treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is one of the most important complications of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. PN can be caused by MM itself, either by the effects of the monoclonal protein or in the form of radiculopathy from direct compression, and particularly by certain therapies, including bortezomib, thalidomide, vinca alkaloids and cisplatin. Clinical evaluation has shown that up to 20% of MM patients have PN at diagnosis and as many as 75% may experience treatment-emergent PN during therapy. The incidence, symptoms, reversibility, predisposing factors and etiology of treatment-emergent PN vary among MM therapies, with PN incidence also affected by the dose, schedule and combinations of potentially neurotoxic agents. Effective management of treatment-emergent PN is critical to minimize the incidence and severity of this complication, while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Herein, the state of knowledge regarding treatment-emergent PN in MM patients and current management practices are outlined, and recommendations regarding optimal strategies for PN management during MM treatment are provided. These strategies include early and regular monitoring with neurological evaluation, with dose modification and treatment discontinuation as indicated. Areas requiring further research include the development of MM-specific, patient-focused assessment tools, pharmacogenomic analysis of patient DNA, and trials to assess the efficacy of pharmacological interventions.

Long-term follow-up on overall survival from the MM-009 and MM-010 phase III trials of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

We present a pooled update of two large, multicenter MM-009 and MM-010 placebo-controlled randomized phase III trials that included 704 patients and assessed lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus dexamethasone plus placebo in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Patients in both studies were randomized to receive 25 mg daily oral lenalidomide or identical placebo, plus 40 mg oral dexamethasone. In this pooled analysis, using data up to unblinding (June 2005 for MM-009 and August 2005 for MM-010), treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone significantly improved overall response (60.6 vs 21.9%, P<0.001), complete response rate (15.0 vs 2.0%, P<0.001), time to progression (median of 13.4 vs 4.6 months, P<0.001) and duration of response (median of 15.8 months vs 7 months, P<0.001) compared with dexamethasone-placebo. At a median follow-up of 48 months for surviving patients, using data up to July 2008, a significant benefit in overall survival (median of 38.0 vs 31.6 months, P=0.045) was retained despite 47.6% of patients who were randomized to dexamethasone-placebo receiving lenalidomide-based treatment after disease progression or study unblinding. Low beta(2)-microglobulin and low bone marrow plasmacytosis were associated with longer survival. In conclusion, these data confirm the significant response and survival benefit with lenalidomide and dexamethasone.

International myeloma working group (IMWG) consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current status of stem cell collection and high-dose therapy for multiple myeloma and the role of plerixafor (AMD 3100)

Multiple myeloma is the most common indication for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (ASCT) in North America today. Stem cell procurement for ASCT has most commonly been performed with stem cell mobilization using colony-stimulating factors with or without prior chemotherapy. The target CD34+ cell dose to be collected as well as the number of apheresis performed varies throughout the country, but a minimum of 2 million CD34+ cells/kg has been traditionally used for the support of one cycle of high-dose therapy. With the advent of plerixafor (AMD3100) (a novel stem cell mobilization agent), it is pertinent to review the current status of stem cell mobilization for myeloma as well as the role of autologous stem cell transplantation in this disease. On June 1, 2008, a panel of experts was convened by the International Myeloma Foundation to address issues regarding stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in myeloma in the context of new therapies. The panel was asked to discuss a variety of issues regarding stem cell collection and transplantation in myeloma especially with the arrival of plerixafor. Herein, is a summary of their deliberations and conclusions.

PX-171–006: Phase Ib multicenter dose escalation study of carfilzomib (CFZ) plus lenalidomide (LEN) and low-dose dexamethasone (loDex) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM): Preliminary results

8541

Background: CFZ is a highly specific proteasome inhibitor with single agent activity in relapsed/refractory MM (ASH 2008). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and activity of CFZ in combination with LEN and loDex. Methods: This phase Ib trial evaluates 4 dose levels (≥ 3 pts each) to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CFZ/LEN/loDex in relapsed/refractory MM pts who failed 1–3 prior therapies, including prior LEN or bortezomib (BTZ). CFZ IV 15- 20 mg/m2 (d1,2,8,9,15,16), LEN 10–20 mg po (d1–21) and loDex 40 mg po (d1, 8, 15, 22) in 28-day cycles (C). An additional 10–15 pts will be evaluated at the highest dose level reached. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) has been defined as grade (G) ≥ 3 non- hematologic; G4 neutropenia for > 7d and/or neutropenic fever; G4 thrombocytopenia > 7d or G3-G4 thrombocytopenia in association with bleeding. Overall response (CR/sCR, VGPR/PR) is assessed by IWG criteria, with secondary assessment by modified EBMT criteria which includes MR. Results: 11 pts have been enrolled. 8/11 are evaluable for response and toxicity. Median prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 2–3). Prior therapies included DEX (8/8), BTZ (6/8), LEN (7/8), alkylators (6/8), anthracyclines (5/8), stem cell transplant (5/8), and thalidomide (1/8); 6/8 pts had received both LEN and BTZ. MTD has not yet been reached after the first 2 dose cohorts. No drug related SAEs or G3/4 treatment emergent AEs were reported. Responses to date with a median of 2 C (range 1–4) are shown below. Responses were rapid and occurred within the first 28-day cycle. Conclusions: CFZ/LEN/loDex in combination was well tolerated in the first 2 cohorts. There have been no myleosuppressive or renal DLTs. The combination has achieved early encouraging responses in pts who had failed both LEN and BTZ at doses well below the single agent MTD of either LEN or CFZ. Dose escalation is ongoing. Updated data will be presented at the meeting.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Dose-escalation trial of milatuzumab (humanized anti-CD74 monoclonal antibody) in multiple myeloma

8593

Background: CD74 (HLA-DR-associated invariant chain) is highly expressed in multiple myeloma (MM), rapidly internalized, and a promising target for immunotherapy. Methods: A multicenter dose-escalation study was initiated in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM who had failed at least 2 standard therapies. Pts received milatuzumab IV twice-weekly for 4 wks, with doses escalated by a 3+3 cohort design. Pts were evaluated over 12 wks, with responding pts continuing follow-up. AEs and safety laboratories were evaluated by NCI CTC v3 grades, with any treatment-related Grade 3–4 events considered dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Responses were classified by EBMT criteria, with PK and immunogenicity evaluated by serum milatuzumab levels and human anti-milatuzumab antibody (HAHA) titers, respectively. Results: Twenty-one pts (12M/9F, median age 63) have now received 1.5 (n=8), 4.0 (n=9) or 8.0 mg/kg (n=4) doses twice weekly. They had MM for 0.9–16.8 years (median 5.4), predominantly IgG subtype, were heavily pretreated (4 median prior treatments), and were Durie-Salmon stage II (n=13) or III (n=8). After increasing premedications and slowing administration, infusions were well tolerated (Grade 1–2). There was 1 DLT (infusion reaction) and 3 SAEs (bact. meningitis, confusion/hypercalcemia, fever post demerol) at 1.5 mg/kg, 1 DLT (unexplained anemia) and 2 SAEs (cord compression, epistaxis/thrombocytopenia), at 4.0 mg/kg, but no DLTs or SAEs at 8.0 mg/kg. There has been no pattern of other AEs nor effects on routine laboratories, including serum chemistries, CBC, serum immunoglobulins, B- or T-cells, and no cases of HAHA. At current doses, milatuzumab is rapidly cleared from serum, with little accumulation and low trough levels across infusions. There have been no objective responses so far, but 4 pts have had stable disease by EBMT criteria for at least 3 months post-treatment, occurring with a possible trend towards higher milatuzumab serum levels than pts with earlier disease progression. Conclusions: Milatuzumab doses up to 8.0 mg/kg may be given safely twice-weekly for 4 weeks. In spite of rapid clearance, several patients have had disease stabilization at 4.0 and 8.0 mg/kg doses, which is encouraging. Accrual of the next cohort receiving 16.0 mg/kg is ongoing.

[Table: see text]

International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma

Several imaging technologies are used for the diagnosis and management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Conventional radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear medicine imaging are all used in an attempt to better clarify the extent of bone disease and soft tissue disease in MM. This review summarizes all available data in the literature and provides recommendations for the use of each of the technologies. Conventional radiography still remains the 'gold standard' of the staging procedure of newly diagnosed and relapsed myeloma patients. MRI gives information complementary to skeletal survey and is recommended in MM patients with normal conventional radiography and in all patients with an apparently solitary plasmacytoma of bone. Urgent MRI or CT (if MRI is not available) is the diagnostic procedure of choice to assess suspected cord compression. Bone scintigraphy has no place in the routine staging of myeloma, whereas sequential dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans are not recommended. Positron emission tomography/CT or MIBI imaging are also not recommended for routine use in the management of myeloma patients, although both techniques may be useful in selected cases that warrant clarification of previous imaging findings, but such an approach should ideally be made within the context of a clinical trial.

Oral combination chemotherapy for refractory/relapsed lymphoma with the PEP-C (C3) regimen (daily prednisone, etoposide, procarbazine, cyclophosphamide): Low-dose continuous metronomic multidrug therapy

8064

Background: Oral daily low dose chemotherapy (metronomic therapy) may maintain continuous sequential drug levels to impact endothelial cell viability (anti-angiogenesis) or to overcome drug resistance. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on 97 patients with refractory/relapsed Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with the PEP-C (C3) regimen, which consists of oral prednisone (20 mg in am), cyclophosphamide (50 mg at noon), etoposide (50 mg at dinner) and procarbazine (50 mg at h.s.with an oral anti- emetic). Medications were administered daily until the white blood cell count fell to less than 3000/dl, when treatment was held until recovery from the nadir. Treatment was then reinstituted on a daily, alternate day, or fractionated weekly basis (e.g. 5 of 7 days) based on patient tolerance. Doses given per day were constant. Results: All patients had been previously treated, with 80% having received 2 or more prior therapies and 57% with 3 or more previous regimens. Overall, 69 patients (71%) achieved a response. Responses by histology were: follicular (n=26) 92%, mantle cell (n=22) 82%, marginal zone (n=14) 71%, small lymphocytic (n=12) 67%, Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=9) 44%, diffuse large B cell (n=9) 33%, and T cell (n=5) 40%. Time on therapy of responding patients ranged from 3 weeks to 48 months (median 9 months, mean 11 months). Toxicity was predominantly myelosuppression, with hospitalization for infection occurring in 10 patients. Five patients developed H. zoster. Gastrointestinal effects prompting cessation of therapy occurred in 6 subjects, and 2 patients developed hematuria. Conclusions: Low dose, continuous (metronomic) combination chemotherapy with PEP-C is an easily administered, generally well- tolerated and effective treatment for relapsed/refractory lymphoma, particularly in indolent and mantle cell histologies.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

CHOP-R + bortezomib as initial therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)

8031

Background: Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in B cell malignancies. These effects, which may relate to NF-kappaB associated pathways, could sensitize tumor cells to standard chemotherapy-based regimens and enhance efficacy. We report findings of a phase I/II trial of dose-escalated bortezomib + standard CHOP-rituximab in DLBCL patients (accrual of the MCL cohort of this study remains ongoing). Methods: Patients with previously untreated DLBCL (n=40) received CHOP-21 + rituximab (375 mg/m2 each cycle) plus bortezomib at 0.7 mg/m2 (Arm 0, n=4), 1.0 mg/m2 (Arm 1, n=8) or 1.3 mg/m2 (Arm 2, n=28 including phase I and all phase II) on days 1 and 4 of each cycle Results: Median age (n=40) was 58 years (range 21–86), thirty-five subjects (88%) had stage III/IV disease at study entry, and 29 (73%) had elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Patients generally had unfavorable baseline international prognostic index (IPI) scores of 2 in 16 subjects (40%) and 3–5 in 19 subjects (48%). Median follow-up is 21 months (range 9 - 35 months). Treatment was generally well tolerated. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 22 subjects (55%), with 45% grade 1, 5% grade 2 and 5% grade 3. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity included thrombocytopenia (15%) and leukopenia (15%). Four subjects (3 over age 75 and all with high risk IPI) died prior to first response assessment. Intent to treat (ITT) overall response rate (n=40) is 90% with 68% CR/CRu. For the evaluable subset (n=36), ORR was 100% with CR/CRu 75%. Kaplan-Meier estimate (n=40) of 2-year progression-free survival is 72%. Of all 19 enrolled (ITT) patients in the high-intermediate or high-risk IPI groups, 14 (74%) were alive without progression at last assessment. Correlation of outcome with cell of origin type (activated B cell vs germinal center) is ongoing. Conclusions: Bortezomib can be administered with acceptable toxicity in conjunction with CHOP-R chemotherapy. Efficacy findings with this combination regimen in newly-diagnosed DLBCL are encouraging and warrant further study.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Increased risk of thrombosis with lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone and erythropoietin

7506

Background: Lenalidomide (Len) is a novel, orally administered, immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) that has single-agent activity against multiple myeloma (MM) and additive effects when combined with dexamethasone (Dex). At the interim analysis of MM-009/010, lenalidomide/dexamethasone achieved a significant benefit over dexamethasone, providing a longer median time to progression (TTP), higher response rates, and higher CR rates. Aim: This subgroup analysis of MM-009/010 was performed to evaluate thrombosis in patients receiving Len/Dex vs Dex. Thrombotic events included the following adverse event terms: thrombosis, deep venous thrombosis, thromboembolism, and pulmonary embolism. Methods: Patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory MM were randomized to either receive oral Len (25 mg daily for 3 weeks every 4 weeks) plus Dex (40 mg on Days 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 every 4 weeks for 4 months, then 40 mg on Days 1–4 every cycle thereafter) or placebo plus Dex. Results: Thrombotic events were reported in 39 (11.3%) of 346 pts treated with Len/Dex compared to 13 (3.8%) of 346 pts treated with Dex alone (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified Len/Dex treatment and erythropoietic treatment to be independently correlated with thrombosis (Table). Older age, lower plasma cell percentage in marrow, and better ECOG performance status had a weaker association with thrombosis. Thrombosis occurred more frequently among pts with prior history of thrombosis, although that was not a significant predictor in the multivariate anlaysis. None of 23 pts who used aspirin or salicylate during the first month of treatment developed thrombosis and all events occurred in pts with rising M-paraprotein levels at baseline. Conclusions: The current study findings suggest that the administration of erythropoietic agents should be minimized in MM pts receiving Len/Dex. Prophylactic antithrombotic therapy should also be considered.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone provides improved overall survival compared to high-dose dexamethasone alone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM): Results of a North American phase III study (MM-009)

7521

Background: Lenalidomide is a novel, orally administered, immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) that has single-agent activity against MM and additive effects when combined with dexamethasone (Dex). Methods: In this phase 3, multicenter, double-blind trial, 354 patients (pts)with relapsed or refractory MM were treated with Dex 40 mg daily on days 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 every 28 days and were randomized to receive either lenalidomide (Len) 25 mg daily orally on days 1–21 every 28 days or placebo. Beginning with cycle 5, Dex was reduced to 40 mg daily on days 1–4 only, every 28 days. Patients were stratified with respect to B2M (≤ 2.5 vs. > 2.5 mg/mL), prior stem cell transplant (none vs. ≥ 1), and number of prior regimens (1 vs > 1). The treatment arms were well balanced for prognostic features. Results: The overall response rate was greater with Len-Dex than with Dex-placebo (59.4% vs. 21.1%; p < 0.001). Complete responses were achieved in 12.9% of pts treated with Len-Dex and 0.6% of pts treated with Dex-placebo. The median time to progression (TTP) for pts treated with Len-Dex was 11.1 months compared to 4.7 months for pts treated with Dex-placebo (p < 0.000001). Median overall survival was higher with Len-Dex (not reached) compared to Dex-placebo (24 months) (hazard ratio 1.76, p = .0125). Grade 3–4 neutropenia was more frequent with combination therapy than with Dex-placebo (24% vs. 3.5%), however ≥ grade 3 infections were similar in both groups. Thromboembolic events occurred in 15% of pts treated with Len-Dex and in 3.5% of pts treated with Dex-placebo. Atrial fibrillation occurred in 8 pts and CHF developed in 4 pts treated with Len-Dex. Conclusions: Considering the ease of oral administration, higher response rate, longer time to progression and overall survival benefit, the combination of lenalidomide-dexamethasone may very well represent the treatment of choice for early refractory or relapsing multiple myeloma. The relatively infrequent side effects should not detract from these improvements, but the use of prophylactic antithrombotic therapy should be considered for patients treated with the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone.

[Table: see text]

Prediction of response to therapy with clarithromycin/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (BIRD) in multiple myeloma using FDG-PET

17530

Background: End points based on functional imaging data hold promise to better define and stratify response. As a metabolic imaging modality, FDG-PET can characterize tumor aggressiveness and thus can serve as an early surrogate for therapy response. The combination therapy with BIRD augments tumor mass reduction and improves response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The purpose of this study is to determine the value of pre-therapy FDG-PET in predicting therapy response in MM patients undergoing BIRD therapy. Methods: A total of 13 patients with MM (mean age: 60 ± 11) underwent a whole body FDG-PET scan at initial staging prior to BIRD therapy. FDG uptake was qualitatively evaluated in 5 different patterns:minimally diffuse (score 1), focal (score 2), multifocal (score 3), diffuse (score 4) and extramedullary (score 5). Standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were obtained in osseous and extramedullary lesions for quantitative evaluation. Mean SUVmax were also calculated in 14 representative anatomic sites in the axial and appendicular skeleton in 20 age-matched control patients with no osseous malignancy. Ratios of the mean lesion SUVmax to the mean SUVmax in corresponding osseous sections from the control group were calculated. A score was obtained for each patient to reflect disease extent or severity by adding the ratios for each individual lesion. The qualitative and quantitative scores were correlated with the standard response criteria. Results: The results are summarized in the following Table . The pre-therapy qualitative and quantitative scores correlated well with the percent therapy response to BIRD regimen (r = −0.58, p = 0.04 and r = −0.53, p = 0.06, respectively). Conclusions: The pre-therapy FDG-PET scoring system we have developed appears to correlate with the subsequent therapy response to BIRD regimen. Expanded number of patients are warranted to confirm the results of this study.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

FDG-PET predicts disease burden in multiple myeloma

7619

Background: Because of the clinical and biologic heterogeneity of multiple myeloma, staging systems have been developed based on recognition of various prognostic factors. The recent integration of FDG-PET into the diagnostic algorithm may also have prognostic implications. Our aim was to evaluate the value of FDG-PET in determining the extent of disease as a staging tool in MM and to compare PET results with the established staging systems and laboratory data. Methods: Thirty seven patients with MM (mean age: 62±12) underwent a whole body FDG-PET scan at initial staging prior to therapy. FDG uptake was qualitatively scored in the following patterns: minimally diffuse (score 1), focal (score 2), multifocal (score 3), diffuse (score 4) and extramedullary (score 5). Standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were obtained in 780 osseous and extramedullary sites for quantitative evaluation. Additionally, mean SUVmax was calculated in 14 representative anatomic sites in the axial and appendicular skeleton in 20 age-matched control patients with no osseous malignancy. Ratios of the mean lesion SUVmax to the mean SUVmax of corresponding osseous sections from the control group were calculated. A score was obtained for each patient to reflect disease severity by adding the ratio for each lesion. Qualitative and quantitative results were correlated with the tumor burden (paraproteins, free light chains in the serum) and staging scores of Durie-Salmon (D-S) and the international staging systems (ISS). Results: There was good correlation between the quantitative score and both D-S staging and the ISS. However, correlation was stronger with the D-S system compared to that with ISS (r=0.44, p=0.007 vs. r=0.33, p=0.06). There was also good correlation between the quantitative score and the tumor burden (r=0.37, p<0.05). The qualitative scoring system produced a good correlation with the tumor burden (r=0.35, p<0.05). There was no correlation between the qualitative scoring system and D-S staging or ISS (P>0.05). Conclusions: FDG-PET is useful in assessing the extent of disease as a staging tool at initial diagnosis in MM. The scoring system we have developed appears to correlate with the established staging systems and the level of free light chains which may contribute to the prognostic evaluation of patients with MM.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Clarithromycin, lenalidomide and dexamethasone combination therapy as primary treatment of multiple myeloma

7545

Background: Lenalidomide (Revlamid [R]) is the leading clinical compound in a new group of drugs called IMiDs. Our group demonstrated that clarithromycin (Biaxin [Bi]) augments tumor mass reduction and improves responses in patients (pts) receiving low-dose thalidomide and/or dexamethasone (D). We report the results of the combination of Bi plus R plus D (BiRD) in newly diagnosed MM. Methods: A phase II trial designed to accrue 50 pts. A 2-stage design rejects a CR rate of < 10% (alt >30%). Between Nov. 2004 and Jan. 2006, 46 pts have been accrued of which 40 pts are eligible for evaluation. R is given po at 25 mg daily on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. D is given po at 40 mg once weekly. Bi is given po at 500 mg bid. Pts receive low dose aspirin (ASA)(81mg) qd as thrombosis (TE) prophylaxis. Responses are defined according to modified EBMTR criteria. Analysis is by intent-to-treat. Patient Selection: Median age: 62.5 years (36–80), Male/Female 25/15, Hgb: 10.6 g/dL (7.2–15.1), Plt 234 k/uL (51–526), β2m: 3 mg/L (0.8–12.8), CRP: 0.6 mg/dL (0.12–14.2), creat: 1.1 mg/dL (0.6–3.1), albumin 3.5 g/dL (2.3–4.9). SD stage IIIa: 48%, stage IIIb: 10% and IIa: 42%. ISS stage I: 50%, stage II: 25% and stage III: 25%. Cytogenetics and FISH: trisomy 11 (10 pts), tetrasomy 11 (3 pts), del13q14 (14 pts), t (4,14) (1pt), t (11,14) (3 pts). Results: Of the 40 evaluable pts, 38 (95%) have achieved an objective response (>PR) within 3–4 months of Rx with the remaining pts continuing to respond. Seventeen pts (43%) had a >90% reduction of the initial paraprotein. Nearly one third of pts have achieved either a CR (10/40) or a nCR (2/40-continuing on Rx). CR has been confirmed in all pts by normalization of free light chain levels and ratio. The remaining 26 pts (65%) achieved a PR. Of those pts who achieved a PR, 5/26 pts (19%) had >90% reduction in the initial paraprotein. Nineteen pts have experienced grade ≥3 adverse events. Heme toxicities: anemia (11%), neutropenia (9%) and thrombocytopenia (9%). Non-heme toxicities (NHT) include TE in 7 patients (15%) 2 of them fatal. Four of the TE events were while off ASA. Other NHT include myopathy (6%), GI (4%), and mood (4%). Conclusions: BiRD therapy is a safe and highly effective primary therapy for symptomatic, treatment-naïve MM.

[Table: see text]

A phase 2 study of two doses of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory myeloma

In a phase 2 open-label study of the novel proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, 54 patients with multiple myeloma who had relapsed after or were refractory to frontline therapy were randomized to receive intravenous 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m(2) bortezomib twice weekly for 2 weeks, every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. Dexamethasone was permitted in patients with progressive or stable disease after two or four cycles respectively. Responses were determined using modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria. The complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) rate for bortezomib alone was 30% [90% confidence interval (CI), 15.7-47.1] and 38% (90% CI, 22.6-56.4) in the 1.0 mg/m(2) (8 of 27 patients) and 1.3 mg/m(2) (10 of 26 patients) groups respectively. The CR + PR rate for patients who received bortezomib alone or in combination with dexamethasone was 37% and 50% for the 1.0 and 1.3 mg/m(2) cohorts respectively. The most common grade 3 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (24%), neutropenia (17%), lymphopenia (11%) and peripheral neuropathy (9%). Grade 4 events were observed in 9% (five of 54 patients). Bortezomib alone or in combination with dexamethasone demonstrated therapeutic activity in patients with multiple myeloma who relapsed after frontline therapy.

The management of unicentric and multicentric Castleman's disease: a report of 16 cases and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Castleman's disease (CD), or angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia, creates both diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas for most physicians. For patients with this rare and poorly understood disease, the optimal therapy is unknown. The authors report their experience during the years 1986-1997 with this uncommon clinicopathologic entity.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with a histologic diagnosis of CD were identified in the pathology database. Unicentric disease was defined as a solitary mass. Multicentric disease compromised patients with widespread lymphadenectomy. Clinical, radiologic, and laboratory data were analyzed to evaluate treatment response.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 16 patients classified into 3 clinicopathologic groups: hyaline-vascular, plasma cell, and "mixed." Of those patients who underwent complete surgical excision of a unicentric hyaline-vascular CD mass (n = 8), all remain symptom free without clinical or radiographic recurrence. Two patients remain asymptomatic following partial resection or radiation therapy for an unresectable unicentric hyaline-vascular CD mass. Two patients with multicentric hyaline-vascular CD are currently in complete remission following adjuvant therapy. Multicentric plasma cell CD was present in a single patient. This patient (who underwent surgical and systemic therapy) died of disease within 4 months of presentation. Three patients with unicentric hyaline-vascular/plasma cell-CD remain symptom free following either complete resection or observation.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors recommend surgical resection for patients with the unicentric variant of CD. Surgical removal of a unicentric mass of hyaline-vascular or hyaline-vascular/plasma cell type is curative. Partial resection, radiotherapy, or observation alone may avoid the need for excessively aggressive therapy. Patients with multicentric disease, either hyaline-vascular or plasma cell type, do not benefit from surgical management and should be candidates for multimodality therapy, the nature of which has yet to be defined.

The management of unicentric and multicentric Castleman's disease: a report of 16 cases and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Castleman's disease (CD), or angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia, creates both diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas for most physicians. For patients with this rare and poorly understood disease, the optimal therapy is unknown. The authors report their experience during the years 1986-1997 with this uncommon clinicopathologic entity.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with a histologic diagnosis of CD were identified in the pathology database. Unicentric disease was defined as a solitary mass. Multicentric disease compromised patients with widespread lymphadenectomy. Clinical, radiologic, and laboratory data were analyzed to evaluate treatment response.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 16 patients classified into 3 clinicopathologic groups: hyaline-vascular, plasma cell, and "mixed." Of those patients who underwent complete surgical excision of a unicentric hyaline-vascular CD mass (n = 8), all remain symptom free without clinical or radiographic recurrence. Two patients remain asymptomatic following partial resection or radiation therapy for an unresectable unicentric hyaline-vascular CD mass. Two patients with multicentric hyaline-vascular CD are currently in complete remission following adjuvant therapy. Multicentric plasma cell CD was present in a single patient. This patient (who underwent surgical and systemic therapy) died of disease within 4 months of presentation. Three patients with unicentric hyaline-vascular/plasma cell-CD remain symptom free following either complete resection or observation.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors recommend surgical resection for patients with the unicentric variant of CD. Surgical removal of a unicentric mass of hyaline-vascular or hyaline-vascular/plasma cell type is curative. Partial resection, radiotherapy, or observation alone may avoid the need for excessively aggressive therapy. Patients with multicentric disease, either hyaline-vascular or plasma cell type, do not benefit from surgical management and should be candidates for multimodality therapy, the nature of which has yet to be defined.

Proteinaceous (angiocentric sclerosing) lymphadenopathy: a polyclonal systemic, nonamyloid deposition disorder

Proteinaceous lymphadenopathy with hypergammaglobulinemia (PLWH) is an exceedingly rare disease of unknown etiology. Described primarily as a pathologic entity, relatively little is known about its clinical manifestations or its response to therapy. The disease is often referred to and treated as an unusual form of plasma cell dyscrasia or light chain deposition disease. We have recently encountered a young patient with PLWH who presented with generalized lymphadenopathy, marked liver function abnormalities, hypocomplementemia, cryoglobulinemia, decreased T4/T8 ratio, and ophthalmopathy. Contrary to the notion that PLWH is a clonal disorder, we found no evidence of clonality in this patient. The most characteristic finding in this and in another patient, previously seen at our institution, was marked angiocentric hyaline sclerosis of the small and mid-sized blood vessels of involved lymph nodes and organs. Based on these findings, we propose the term angiocentric sclerosing lymphadenopathy, which more accurately defines this clinicopathologic entity that appears to be distinct from light chain deposition disease and other plasma cell dyscrasias.

Hypercalcaemia and increased serum interleukin-6 levels induced by all-trans retinoic acid in patients with multiple myeloma

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) inhibits human myeloma cell growth in vitro, presumably through the down-regulation of interleukin 6 receptors (IL-6R). Based on these and other studies, we initiated a phase II clinical trial using ATRA in patients with advanced refractory multiple myeloma (MM). We report that three out of six treated patients developed severe hypercalcaemia following administration of ATRA, which was accompanied by a significant rise in serum IL-6 levels. Normal calcium levels were restored after the discontinuation of the drug and the administration of standard anti-hypercalcaemic care. We suspect that down-regulation of IL-6R resulted in increased serum IL-6 levels, leading to advanced bone resorption and hypercalcaemia. We conclude that the use of ATRA in patients with advanced MM is not warranted.