[Delayed administration of thrombolytic therapy in minor stroke].
Rev Neurol 2021;
72:352-356. [PMID:
33978229 DOI:
10.33588/rn.7210.2020510]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Minor strokes are considered to be those that present with few symptoms, although up to 40% of them entail long-term disability. The rate of thrombolysis in these patients is also lower than in other strokes. The aim of this study is to explore whether there are any differences in intravenous thrombolysis care times in minor strokes.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We conducted a retrospective review of strokes treated with intravenous thrombolysis at our centre and a comparative analysis of the care times in minor strokes and in the other types.
RESULTS
Longer times were found in minor strokes in terms of door-to-CT scan and door-to-needle time. This was not the case, however, for the time from the onset of symptoms to arrival at the hospital.
CONCLUSIONS
The presence of few symptoms in minor strokes can make them difficult to recognise and could be a reason for delaying treatment. Training among staff caring for these patients is essential to improve this aspect.
Collapse