Clinical tools to assess functional capacity before elective non-cardiac surgery: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this scoping review is to map the evidence on clinical tools to assess functional capacity prior to elective non-cardiac surgery.

INTRODUCTION

Functional capacity is a strong prognostic indicator before surgery, which can be used to identify patients at elevated risk of postoperative complications, yet, there is no consensus on which clinical tools should be used to assess functional capacity in patients prior to non-cardiac surgery.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will consider any randomized or non-randomized studies that evaluate the performance of a functional capacity assessment tool in adults (≥18 years) prior to non-cardiac surgery. For studies to be included, the tool must be used clinically for risk stratification. We will exclude studies on lung and liver transplant surgery, as well as ambulatory procedures performed under local anesthesia.

METHODS

The review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A peer-reviewed search strategy will be used to query relevant databases (ie, MEDLINE, Embase, EBM Reviews). Additional sources of evidence will include databases of non-peer-reviewed literature and the reference lists of included studies. Two independent reviewers will identify eligible studies in 2 stages: stage 1, based on titles and abstracts; and stage 2, based on full texts. Information on study details, measurement properties, pragmatic qualities, and/or clinical utility metrics will be charted in duplicate onto standardized data collection forms. The results will be presented using descriptive summaries, frequency tables, and visual plots that highlight the extent of evidence and remaining gaps in the validation process of each tool.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework https://osf.io/6nfht.

Identifying Canadian patient-centred care measurement practices and quality indicators: a survey

BACKGROUND

Patient-centred quality indicators allow health care systems to monitor and evaluate patient-centred care practices and identify gaps in health care quality. Our objective was to determine whether Canadian provinces and territories measure patient-centred care, identify patient-centred quality indicators currently being used and compare patient-centred care practices and measurement in Canada to those of health care systems in other countries.

METHODS

An online survey was developed to collect data on demographic characteristics, patient-centred care practices, and indicators used at quality improvement organizations and health care authorities. The survey was conducted with quality improvement leads in Canada and 4 other countries. Content analysis methods were used to analyze and report the data. Patient-centred quality indicators were identified and categorized according to the Donabedian framework (structure, process, outcome).

RESULTS

The survey had a response rate of 47/67 (70%) and a completion rate of 58/60 (97%). We obtained completed surveys from 12 of the 13 provinces and territories in Canada. Respondents from most provinces indicated their organization used patient-centred care measures to inform practices. Respondents in only 4 provinces/territories reported using patient-centred quality indicators, for a total of 61 unique indicators. Most indicators used across Canada assessed aspects of care related to the Donabedian components of process and outcome. Findings for Canada were comparable to those for Sweden, England, Australia and New Zealand, where many measures are still in development.

INTERPRETATION

This study provided greater insight into patient-centred care measurement across Canada, Sweden, England, Australia and New Zealand and helped us to identify patient-centred quality indicators currently in use. These results will inform the development of a standard set of patient-centred quality indicators for implementation by health care organizations to improve the quality of health care.

Discharge Communication and Patient Involvement are Associated with Unplanned Hospital Readmissions: Results from a Validated Hospital Experience Survey

ABSTRACTObjectivesUnplanned hospital readmissions are an indicator of quality of care, and are associated with significant costs to healthcare systems. Previous research has shown that poor communication and discharge experiences are associated with higher readmission rates. This, however, has only been examined in the short-term, and in many instances, at the hospital-level. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between aspects of inpatient communication and discharge instructions and unplanned readmissions at the individual-level up to one-year post-discharge. ApproachThe Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) telephone survey was completed by patients within 6 weeks of hospital discharge in Alberta, Canada. Survey data were linked to corresponding inpatient records using personal health number, discharge date, and facility codes. Unplanned readmissions (yes vs. no; all causes) from 43 to 365 days post-hospital discharge comprised the outcome variable. Independent variables included selected demographic characteristics, clinical variables, and five survey questions: a) patient involvement in their care decisions, b) receiving written information at discharge, c) understanding the purpose of taking medications, d) understanding responsibility for one’s health, and e) discussing help needed when returning home. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine each question in the presence of the other predictors. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. ResultsFrom April 2011 to March 2014, 24,868 patients completed a survey which was successfully linked to the corresponding inpatient record. The cohort had a mean age of 52.8±19.8 years of age (range=18-100), and was predominantly female (65.4%). 18.6% of patients (n=4,620) experienced an unplanned hospital readmission within 43 to 365 days post-discharge. Patients who felt that they were not involved in their care decisions were more likely to be readmitted (OR=1.79; 95%CI: 1.59-2.01), as were patients who did not receive written information at discharge (OR=1.96; 95%CI: 1.83-2.11). Odds of unplanned readmissions did not differ according to understanding of medications (OR=1.08; 95%CI: 0.90-1.30), understanding responsibility for one’s health (OR=1.02; 95%CI: 0.86-1.20), or discussion of help needed when returning home (OR=1.03; 95%CI: 0.93-1.14). ConclusionOur results demonstrate that a lack of patient involvement in their care and not receiving written information at discharge is associated with increased unplanned readmission rate up to one-year post-discharge. This present study provides an example of how patient-reported measures may be linked to individual-level administrative data to drive healthcare improvements. Future research examining patient-reported hospital experience and other health system measures is warranted.

Confirmation of QTL mapping and marker validation for partial seedling resistance to crown rot in wheat line '2-49'

We have tested the efficacy of putative microsatellite single sequence repeat (SSR) markers, previously identified in a 2-49 (Gluyas Early/Gala) × Janz doubled haploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) population, as being linked to partial seedling resistance to crown rot disease caused by Fusarium pseudograminearum. The quantitative trait loci (QTLs) delineated by these markers have been tested for linkage to resistance in an independent Gluyas Early × Janz doubled haploid population. The presence of a major QTL on chromosome 1DL (QCr.usq-1D1) and a minor QTL on chromosome 2BS (QCr.usq-2B1) was confirmed. However, a putative minor QTL on chromosome 2A was not confirmed. The QTL on 1D was inherited from Gluyas Early, a direct parent of 2-49, whereas the 2B QTL was inherited from Janz. Three other putative QTLs identified in 2-49 × Janz (on 1AL, 4BL, and 7BS) were inherited by 2-49 from Gala and were not able to be confirmed in this study. The screening of SSR markers on a small sample of elite wheat genotypes indicated that not all of the most tightly linked SSR markers flanking the major QTLs on 1D and 1A were polymorphic in all backgrounds, indicating the need for additional flanking markers when backcrossing into some elite pedigrees. Comparison of SSR haplotypes with those of other genotypes exhibiting partial crown rot resistance suggests that additional, novel sources of crown rot resistance are available.

Cardiovascular status of panic disorder patients with and without prominent cardiac symptoms

The extent of the cardiovascular evaluation of panic disorder patients with cardiac symptoms remains a dilemma for the clinician. The authors conducted a pilot study to assess the cardiac status of 20 panic disorder patients, 10 of whom had prominent cardiac symptoms and 10 of whom did not. No differences in the cardiac abnormalities were found between the groups. These findings suggest that panic disorder patients with cardiac symptoms are not more likely to have cardiac disease than those without prominent cardiac symptoms. The practical implications of these findings are discussed.