1
|
Venning B, Pearce A, De Abreu Lourenco R, Hall R, Bergin R, Lee A, Donohoe K, Emery J. Patient Preferences for Investigating Cancer-Related Symptoms in Australian General Practice: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Br J Gen Pract 2024:BJGP.2023.0583. [PMID: 38395444 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Striking the right balance between early cancer diagnosis and the risk of excessive testing for low-risk symptoms is of paramount importance. Patient-centred care must also consider patient preferences for testing. AIM To investigate diagnostic testing preferences of the Australian public for symptoms associated with oesophagogastric (OG), bowel, or lung cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING One of three discrete choice experiments (DCEs) related to either OG, bowel, or lung cancer were administered to a nationally representative sample of Australians aged 40 and above. METHODS Each DCE comprised three scenarios with symptom positive predictive values (PPVs) for undiagnosed cancer ranging from 1% to 3%. The numerical risk was concealed from participants. DCE attributes encompassed the testing strategy, GP familiarity, test and result waiting times, travel duration, and test cost. Preferences were estimated using conditional and mixed logit models. RESULTS A total of 3013 individuals participated in one of three DCEs: OG (n=1004), Bowel (n=1006), and Lung (n=1003). Preferences were chiefly driven by waiting time, test cost followed by the test type. There was preference for more invasive tests. When confronted with symptoms carrying an extremely low risk (symptom PPV of 1% or less), participants were more inclined to abstain from testing. CONCLUSIONS Access-related factors, particularly waiting times and testing costs, emerged as the most pivotal elements influencing preferences, underscoring the substantial impact of these systemic factors on patient choices regarding investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent Venning
- The University of Sydney, Daffodil Centre, Sydney, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alison Pearce
- The University of Sydney, Daffodil Centre, Sydney, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- University of Technology Sydney, Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Haymarket, Australia
| | - Rebekah Hall
- Acaster Lloyd Consulting Limited, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alex Lee
- University of Melbourne, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Centre for Cancer Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Keith Donohoe
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- University of Melbourne Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang Y, Afshar N, Bergin R, Kavanagh A, Disney G. Cancer inequalities experienced by people with disability: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e076070. [PMID: 38326266 PMCID: PMC10860038 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer is a leading cause of death and has a significant impact on individuals, families and society. Emerging evidence shows that people with disability face challenges in accessing services which could assist in early cancer diagnosis and optimal treatment, like cancer screening. Consequently, cancer patients with disabilities may present with later-stage disease, have reduced treatment options and experience lower survival rates compared with people without disability.This systematic review aims to summarise and evaluate the existing evidence on (a) inequalities in cancer survival and mortality between people with and without disability, (b) the inequalities in cancer screening and (c) stage at diagnosis that may contribute to the survival/mortality gap. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A literature search will be performed on MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo and Scopus up to May 2023. The review will include quantitative studies that reported inequalities in cancer survival and mortality, screening and stage at diagnosis between adults with and without disability. A summary of the characteristics and findings of the included studies will be provided. We will assess the quality of each study using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Exposure tool. Depending on the heterogeneity of studies, we will assess whether meta-analysis is appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not applicable for this study since no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023427288.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Yang
- Disability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Disability Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nina Afshar
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rebecca Bergin
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anne Kavanagh
- Disability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - George Disney
- Disability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Disability Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Venning B, Bergin R, Pearce A, Lee A, Emery JD. Factors affecting patient decisions to undergo testing for cancer symptoms: an exploratory qualitative study in Australian general practice. BJGP Open 2023; 7:BJGPO.2022.0168. [PMID: 36750375 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2022.0168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients presenting to their GP are often concerned their symptoms may be due to cancer. However, there is a lack of evidence on the factors that influence patient decisions to undergo investigation for suspected cancer in the general practice setting. AIM To identify the factors influencing patient decisions to undertake investigations for suspected cancer in general practice. DESIGN & SETTING An exploratory qualitative, semi-structured interview study of patients attending rural and metropolitan general practices in Victoria, Australia. METHOD A purposive sample of 15 general practice patients aged ≥40 years participated. Thematic analysis of transcripts drew on interpretative description methodology and shared decision-making (SDM) theory. RESULTS Cancer-related concerns such as 'cancer worry' prompt patients to seek investigations from their GP. Participants prefer that their symptoms are investigated regardless of cancer risk. The perceived 'best test' provides the most reassurance. Trust and SDM enhance dialogue between patients and GPs about diagnostic testing strategies. Deterrents to testing included out-of-pocket costs, waiting time, travel time, and competing work and family demands. CONCLUSION There may be a mismatch between efforts to rationalise investigation use and patient preferences for investigation. SDM that incorporates patient concerns, facilitators, and barriers to testing may ensure appropriate and timely investigation of cancer symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent Venning
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rebecca Bergin
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alison Pearce
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alex Lee
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vedsted P, Weller D, Zalounina Falborg A, Jensen H, Kalsi J, Brewster D, Lin Y, Gavin A, Barisic A, Grunfeld E, Lambe M, Malmberg M, Turner D, Harland E, Hawryluk B, Law RJ, Neal RD, White V, Bergin R, Harrison S, Menon U. Diagnostic pathways for breast cancer in 10 International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) jurisdictions: an international comparative cohort study based on questionnaire and registry data. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059669. [PMID: 36521881 PMCID: PMC9756230 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A growing body of evidence suggests longer time between symptom onset and start of treatment affects breast cancer prognosis. To explore this association, the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership Module 4 examined differences in breast cancer diagnostic pathways in 10 jurisdictions across Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK. SETTING Primary care in 10 jurisdictions. PARTICIPANT Data were collated from 3471 women aged >40 diagnosed for the first time with breast cancer and surveyed between 2013 and 2015. Data were supplemented by feedback from their primary care physicians (PCPs), cancer treatment specialists and available registry data. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Patient, primary care, diagnostic and treatment intervals. RESULTS Overall, 56% of women reported symptoms to primary care, with 66% first noticing lumps or breast changes. PCPs reported 77% presented with symptoms, of whom 81% were urgently referred with suspicion of cancer (ranging from 62% to 92%; Norway and Victoria). Ranges for median patient, primary care and diagnostic intervals (days) for symptomatic patients were 3-29 (Denmark and Sweden), 0-20 (seven jurisdictions and Ontario) and 8-29 (Denmark and Wales). Ranges for median treatment and total intervals (days) for all patients were 15-39 (Norway, Victoria and Manitoba) and 4-78 days (Sweden, Victoria and Ontario). The 10% longest waits ranged between 101 and 209 days (Sweden and Ontario). CONCLUSIONS Large international differences in breast cancer diagnostic pathways exist, suggesting some jurisdictions develop more effective strategies to optimise pathways and reduce time intervals. Targeted awareness interventions could also facilitate more timely diagnosis of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Vedsted
- Department for Clinical Medicine, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - David Weller
- General Practice, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alina Zalounina Falborg
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Henry Jensen
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Jatinderpal Kalsi
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - David Brewster
- Scottish Registry, Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Yulan Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Anna Gavin
- N Ireland Cancer Registry, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Eva Grunfeld
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mats Lambe
- University Hospital, Regional Cancer Centre of Central Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Martin Malmberg
- Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Donna Turner
- Population Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Harland
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Breann Hawryluk
- Patient Navigation, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Rebecca-Jane Law
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Victoria White
- CBRC, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Deakin University Faculty of Health, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rebecca Bergin
- Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Usha Menon
- Women's Cancer, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gough K, Pascoe MC, Bergin R, Drosdowsky A, Schofield P. Differential adherence to peer and nurse components of a supportive care package-The appeal of peer support may be related to women's health and psychological status. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:762-768. [PMID: 34244032 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Knowledge of factors associated with intervention non-adherence may provide insights into the clinical utility of non-pharmacologic interventions. METHODS This study compared complete and incomplete adherers to two separate components of a novel intervention package for women undergoing curative intent radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer on socio-demographic, clinical and pre-radiotherapy patient-reported outcomes data. RESULTS Adherence to the tailored specialist nurse consultations was satisfactory (71% participated in all available sessions, 19% participated in all but one). Adherence to the telephone peer support sessions was less satisfactory (47% participated in all available sessions, 24% participated in all but one session). Complete adherers to the peer sessions reported significantly lower levels of psychological distress and significantly higher levels of physical, emotional and functional wellbeing before radiotherapy. No other statistically significant differences were observed between complete and incomplete adherers to the nurse- or peer-led sessions. CONCLUSION Women's ability or motivation to engage with peer support may be influenced by their health and psychological status. Further, the extent of intervention non-adherence to the peer-led component may have compromised the assessment of its efficacy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Peer support may be less acceptable or appropriate for women with more complex care needs. Such women may prefer specialised care from trained professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karla Gough
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
| | - Michaela C Pascoe
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia.
| | - Rebecca Bergin
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
| | - Allison Drosdowsky
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bergin R, White V, English D, Milne R. 797Understanding bias in recruitment through population-based cancer registries. Int J Epidemiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab168.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Focus of Presentation
Participant recruitment through registries can provide population-based samples, but there are methodological challenges. We examine challenges and solutions in two studies recruiting participants through the Victorian Cancer Registry. Cross-sectional surveys of patients with colorectal, lung or ovarian cancer conducted in 2013-14 (study 1) and repeated in an ongoing study (study 2). The registry managed fast-track recruitment of eligible patients ( > =40yrs, confirmed diagnosis, approached within 6-months of diagnosis)
Findings
In study 1, registry rules for confirmed diagnosis required surgical histopathology. For cancers primarily treated non-surgically (e.g. lung), selection bias was common. In study 2, confirmation rules were extended to include biopsies with subsequent hospital notification.
The registry does not receive imaging notifications and pathology labs/hospital reports can be delayed (>60days). Study eligibility criteria meant cases with advanced disease, common in lung cancer, or without a confirmed diagnosis within the study timeframe were excluded. However, colorectal and ovarian cases in study 1 were largely representative of the eligible population.
In study 2, a different fast-track recruitment approach meant a longer time from diagnosis to response compared to study 1 (median 7 vs 5 months). Recruitment procedures are being improved through engagement between researchers and registry.
Conclusions/Implications
Local registry-based rules for recruitment and available data, study eligibility criteria and cancer type (particularly cancers without histopathological confirmation), may introduce bias. Researchers need to work closely with registry colleagues to understand and optimise recruitment.
Key messages
Registry-based recruitment can be biased. Early and ongoing communication between researchers and registry is strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Bergin
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vicki White
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dallas English
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roger Milne
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schofield P, Gough K, Pascoe M, Bergin R, White K, Mileshkin L, Bernshaw D, Kinnane N, Jackson M, Do V, Brand A, Aranda S, Cheuk R, Drosdowsky A, Penberthy S, Juraskova I. A nurse- and peer-led psycho-educational intervention to support women with gynaecological cancers receiving curative radiotherapy: The PeNTAGOn randomised controlled trial – ANZGOG 1102. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:785-793. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
8
|
Bergin R, Emery J, Bollard R, Falborg A, Jensen H, Weller D, Menon U, Vedsted P, Thomas R, Whitfield K, White V. Rural-Urban Variation in Time to Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal or Breast Cancer in Victoria, Australia. J Glob Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jgo.18.10700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Rural-urban disparities in cancer outcomes are found in many countries, though these vary by cancer type. In Victoria, Australia, survival is poorer for rural patients with colorectal cancer, but not breast cancer. Delayed diagnosis and treatment may contribute to disparities, but previous studies have not compared the timeliness of rural and urban pathways to treatment of these common cancers. Aim: We investigated whether time to diagnosis and treatment differed for rural and urban patients with colorectal or breast cancer in Victoria, Australia. Methods: Population-based, cross-sectional surveys examining events and dates on the pathway to treatment completed by patients aged ≥ 40 and approached within six months of diagnosis, their general practitioner (GP) and specialist. Data were collected from 2013 to 2014 as part of the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership, Module 4. Six intervals were explored: patient (symptom to presentation), primary care (presentation to referral), diagnostic (presentation/screening to diagnosis), treatment (diagnosis to treatment), health system (presentation to treatment) and total intervals (symptom/screening to treatment). Rural-urban differences were examined for each cancer using quantile regression (50th, 75th and 90th percentiles) models including age, gender, health insurance and socioeconomic status. Results: 433 colorectal (48% rural) and 489 breast (42% rural) patients, 621 GPs and 370 specialists completed surveys. Compared with urban patients, symptomatic colorectal cancer patients from rural areas had a significantly longer total interval at all percentiles: 50th (18 days longer, 95% confidence interval (CI): 9-27), 75th (53, 95% CI: 47-59) 90th (44, 95% CI: 40-48). These patients also had longer health system intervals, ranging 7-85 days longer. This appeared mostly due to longer diagnostic intervals (range: 6-54 days longer). Results were similar when including screen-detected cases. In contrast, breast cancer intervals were similar for rural and urban patients, except the patient interval, which was shorter for rural patients. Conclusion: Consistent with variation in survival, we found longer total and diagnostic intervals for rural compared with urban patients with colorectal cancer, but not breast cancer. The lack of rural-urban differences observed for breast cancer suggest that inequities in the timeliness of colorectal cancer pathways can be ameliorated, and may improve clinical outcomes. Indeed, based on previous research, delays observed in this study could result in stage progression and hence reduced survival. From our results, interventions targeting the time from presentation to colorectal cancer diagnosis in rural populations should be pursued. Countries seeking to understand cancer disparities in their local context may also consider using a pathways approach to identify possible targets for policy intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Bergin
- Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J. Emery
- Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - R. Bollard
- Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A. Falborg
- Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - H. Jensen
- Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - D. Weller
- Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - U. Menon
- Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P. Vedsted
- Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - R. Thomas
- Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - K. Whitfield
- Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - V. White
- Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vance CM, Larrieu RJ, Bergin R, Mercado J, Richmond J, Walden M, Reeser C. A field exploration of the “expat-preneur” phenomenon. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/joe.21812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
10
|
Bergin R, Emery J, Bollard R, White V. How rural and urban patients in Australia with colorectal or breast cancer experience choice of treatment provider: A qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017; 26. [PMID: 28144993 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Modern healthcare systems promote patient choice of cancer treatment provider, but little is known about how place of residence influences decision-making. This research explored how rural and urban patients with breast or colorectal cancer experience choice of cancer treatment provider in Victoria, Australia. Realist thematic analysis of 43 semi-structured telephone interviews identified little active participation in decision-making regardless of area of residence or cancer diagnosis. Perceptions of choice were impacted by urgency for treatment, insurance status and access to providers, a key issue for rural patients. All patients wanted high quality care, but needed to trust health professional's recommendations. Rural patients experienced more complex decision-making, balancing a range of social factors with perceptions about quality of accessible care. Further research into variation in quality of care and complex cancer pathways for rural and urban cancer patients is warranted to inform choices and enhance patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Bergin
- Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - J Emery
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - R Bollard
- Division of Surgery, Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Vic., Australia
| | - V White
- Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bergin R, Hocking A, Robinson T, Kabel D, Mileshkin L, Juraskova I, Bernshaw D, Aranda S, Schofield P. Continuing variation and barriers to nurse-led vaginal dilator education for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2016; 24:20-21. [PMID: 27697273 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2016] [Revised: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 08/01/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Bergin
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 2, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Alison Hocking
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 2, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Taryn Robinson
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 2, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Donna Kabel
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 2, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 2, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - David Bernshaw
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 2, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Sanchia Aranda
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 2, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 2, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tatlow-Golden M, Murrin C, Bergin R, Kerr M, O’Brien S, Livingstone B. Creating good feelings about unhealthy food: children’s televised ‘advertised diet’ on the island of Ireland, in a climate of regulation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/03033910.2016.1194770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
13
|
Schofield P, Gough K, Lotfi-Jam K, Bergin R, Ugalde A, Dudgeon P, Crellin W, Schubach K, Foroudi F, Tai KH, Duchesne G, Sanson-Fisher R, Aranda S. Nurse-led group consultation intervention reduces depressive symptoms in men with localised prostate cancer: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:637. [PMID: 27530156 PMCID: PMC4986252 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2687-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer has many known and distressing side effects. The efficacy of group interventions for reducing psychological morbidity is lacking. This study investigated the relative benefits of a group nurse-led intervention on psychological morbidity, unmet needs, treatment-related concerns and prostate cancer-specific quality of life in men receiving curative intent radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Methods This phase III, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial included 331 men (consent rate: 72 %; attrition: 5 %) randomised to the intervention (n = 166) or usual care (n = 165). The intervention comprised four group and one individual consultation all delivered by specialist uro-oncology nurses. Primary outcomes were anxious and depressive symptoms as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Unmet needs were assessed with the Supportive Care Needs Survey-SF34 Revised, treatment-related concerns with the Cancer Treatment Scale and quality of life with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index −26. Assessments occurred before, at the end of and 6 months post-radiotherapy. Primary outcome analysis was by intention-to-treat and performed by fitting a linear mixed model to each outcome separately using all observed data. Results Mixed models analysis indicated that group consultations had a significant beneficial effect on one of two primary endpoints, depressive symptoms (p = 0.009), and one of twelve secondary endpoints, procedural concerns related to cancer treatment (p = 0.049). Group consultations did not have a significant beneficial effect on generalised anxiety, unmet needs and prostate cancer-specific quality of life. Conclusions Compared with individual consultations offered as part of usual care, the intervention provides a means of delivering patient education and is associated with modest reductions in depressive symptoms and procedural concerns. Future work should seek to confirm the clinical feasibility and cost-effectiveness of group interventions. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ANZCTRN012606000184572. 1 March 2006.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia. .,Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 2 St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. .,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Karla Gough
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 2 St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Kerryann Lotfi-Jam
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Rebecca Bergin
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 2 St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anna Ugalde
- Deakin University, Faculty of Health, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Australia.,Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Information and Support Services, 615 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul Dudgeon
- School of Behavioural Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Wallace Crellin
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 2 St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kathryn Schubach
- Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 2 St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Farshard Foroudi
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 2 St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Keen Hun Tai
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 2 St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gillian Duchesne
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 2 St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Sanchia Aranda
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 2 St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Huntingdon B, Schofield P, Wolfowicz Z, Bergin R, Kabel D, Edmunds J, Penberthy S, Juraskova I. Toward structured peer support interventions in oncology: a qualitative insight into the experiences of gynaecological cancer survivors providing peer support. Support Care Cancer 2015. [PMID: 26223321 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2853-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Research into dyadic (one-to-one) peer support has predominantly focused on the recipients of peer support whilst neglecting the impact on the peer support providers (PSPs). Increasingly, structured/protocolised peer support interventions are employed. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the experience of providing peer support within a protocolised intervention and how common key characteristics of such interventions (guidelines and checklists, rigorous training and partnerships with health professionals) may influence PSPs' experiences. This research was conducted within the context of an ongoing randomised controlled trial investigating a protocolised peer support intervention (the Peer and Nurse support Trial to Assist women in Gynaecological Oncology (PeNTAGOn) study). METHODS Eleven women (gynaecological cancer survivors) providing peer support within the PeNTAGOn study participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Transcribed interviews were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. RESULTS Five key themes were identified which described the overall experience of providing protocolised peer support: (i) fitting oneself to the protocolised PSP role, (ii) the impact of personal beliefs about the value of research, (iii) protocolisation as both blessing and curse, (iv) discussing taboo or sensitive topics and (v) the impact of interactions with study personnel. CONCLUSIONS These insights into the advantages and disadvantages of protocolised peer support can be used to inform future research and social support programs and maximise the effectiveness of such programs for patients, PSPs and the health-care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Huntingdon
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Brennan MacCallum Building (A18), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia
| | - Zahava Wolfowicz
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rebecca Bergin
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Donna Kabel
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jennifer Edmunds
- Department of Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sylvia Penberthy
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Brennan MacCallum Building (A18), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. .,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schofield P, Juraskova I, Bergin R, Gough K, Mileshkin L, Krishnasamy M, White K, Bernshaw D, Penberthy S, Aranda S. A nurse- and peer-led support program to assist women in gynaecological oncology receiving curative radiotherapy, the PeNTAGOn study (peer and nurse support trial to assist women in gynaecological oncology): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14:39. [PMID: 23399476 PMCID: PMC3576284 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2012] [Accepted: 01/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women who undergo radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer (GC) can experience distressing side effects which impact on psychosocial functioning and intimate relationships. Cancer-related distress may be ameliorated by comprehensive preparation for treatment and addressing women’s informational, physical, psychological and psychosexual needs. This paper describes the protocol for a multisite randomised controlled trial (RCT) testing a novel intervention package which combines tailored specialist nursing consultations and telephone peer support with the primary aim to reduce psychological distress. Secondary aims assess patient quality of life, symptom distress, unmet supportive care needs, preparation for treatment, psychosexual functioning and vaginal stenosis. Methods/design This multifaceted intervention comprises four nurse-led consultations coupled with four phone calls from a peer support volunteer (GC survivor). The evidence-based intervention will be delivered at critical points in the illness trajectory: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, treatment completion and post-treatment. Nurses and peers undergo 2-day intensive training workshops, are guided by comprehensive study intervention manuals and receive ongoing supervision and support. Eligible patients will have a diagnosis of GC, be scheduled to receive curative radiotherapy, be aged 18 years or over and speak English. Three-hundred and six participants will be randomized to receive usual care or usual care with the intervention package. Study outcome measures will be collected at baseline, day 1 of radiotherapy and 1, 6 and 12 months post radiotherapy. Clinical assessments of vaginal toxicity will occur at baseline, and 3, 6, and 12 months post radiotherapy. Discussion This timely research has the potential to substantially reduce the physical, psychosexual and supportive care needs of women with GC. Using a telephone peer support model, the intervention package ensures equitable access to support services for geographically isolated patients. The novel intervention engages peer volunteers who liaise with nurses to encourage adherence to professionally-delivered information and provide emotional support. It has been designed to be potentially transferable to a range of treatment settings and diseases. Based on pilot data, the proposed intervention was found to be useful and acceptable to patients and clinicians. If effective and feasible in the multisite RCT, the program could be widely disseminated. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12611000744954
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Schofield
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 3002 East Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yong KL, Callander GE, Bergin R, Samuel CS, Bathgate RAD. Development of human cells with RXFP1 knockdown using retroviral delivery of microRNA against human RXFP1. Ital J Anat Embryol 2013; 118:10-12. [PMID: 24640558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
To study the specific actions of relaxin through RXFP1 in human cells, it would be advantageous to develop cell populations with permanent RXFP1 knockdown (KD). We have developed and assessed four microRNA against human RXFP1. One of the four designed microRNA displayed significant RXFP1 KD as assessed by reduced relaxin binding when co-transfected with human RXFP1 into HEK-293T cells. The selected microRNA sequence was subsequently retrovirally delivered into the human dermal fibroblast cell line BJ3 which natively expresses RXFP1. The RXFP1 KD BJ3 cells displayed diminished RXFP1 mRNA expression and complete loss of ability of relaxin treatment to reduce collagen deposition after TGF-beta1 stimulation. The retroviral expression of miRNA to successfully silence RXFP1 expression is an invaluable tool to investigate receptor specificity, signalling and possible off-target effects of newly developed relaxin analogs.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study focuses on a skills test based clinical assessment where 118 fourth-year medical students at the four teaching hospitals of Karolinska Institutet participated in the same 12-module OSCE. The goal of one of the twelve examination modules was to assess the students' skills and ability to solve a virtual patient (VP) case (the ISP system), which included medical history taking, lab tests, physical examinations and suggestion of a preliminary diagnosis. AIMS The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of a VP as a possible tool for assessment of clinical reasoning and problem solving ability among medical students. The feeling of realism of the VP and its possible affective impact on the student's confidence were also investigated. METHOD We observed and analysed students' reactions, engagement and performance (activity log files) during their interactive sessions with the simulation. An individual human assistant was provided along with the computer simulation and the videotaped interaction student/assistant was then analysed in detail and related to the students' outcomes. RESULTS The results indicate possible advantages of using ISP-like systems for assessment. The VP was for instance able to reliably differentiate between students' performances but some weaknesses were also identified, like a confounding influence on students' outcomes by the assistants used. Significant differences, affecting the results, were found between the students in their degree of affective response towards the system as well as the perceived usefulness of assistance. CONCLUSION Students need to be trained beforehand in mastering the assessment tool. Rating compliance needs to be targeted before VP-based systems like ISP can be used in exams and if such systems would be used in high-stake exams, the use of human assistants should be limited and scoring rubrics validated (and preferably automated).
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
After a short review of trends in the research on localization of memory, a hypothesis is presented in which DNA is the basis for acquired long-term memory in neurons. This is conceivable as neurons do not divide. As an example, the possible storage capacity in DNA is calculated using the coding of action potentials into DNA sequences. Such a record of a human lifetime of action potentials would not occupy more than a fraction of the available DNA in the cell nucleus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Bergin
- Department for Medical Informatics and Educational Development, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bergin R, Helmers C, Steen L, Wester PO, Widman L. [The computer as patient. Trials with computer-based simulation in medical education in Umeå]. Nord Med 1981; 96:244-6. [PMID: 7301539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
20
|
Abstract
A method to analyse cephalometric radiographs with the help of a computer has been described. With the system a cephalometric radiograph can be analysed and the results compared to corresponding analyses of individuals with ideal occlusion. The results can also be visualized as schematic figures of the patients. The computer calculates means and standard deviations of groups of individuals and can visualize the results as mean figures. A program to train operators in pinpointing radiographic reference points has also been developed. A methodological study has shown that the errors of the computerized method are of little importance compared to the errors made in pinpointing radiographic reference points. A clinical test of the system has shown that inexperienced operators are able to use the system after about one hour's training. The method is about twenty minutes faster compared to an ordinary manual radiographic analysis. Some future aspects are also discussed.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Until recently there has been very limited information concerning the molecular geometry and conformation of biogenic monoamines and this lack of knowledge has seriously hampered efforts to unravel the structure—function relationships at the molecular level. Nevertheless, several theories have been proposed regarding interaction between the monoamines and their receptor sites. This is especially true for the neurohumoral transmitters dopamine, noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine), the target areas of which seem to be specific not only in the sense of chemical structure but also from the steric point of view. The well-known differences in biological activity due to chiralty illustrate the importance of the three-dimensional architecture of the molecules and indicate also the presence of stereospecific receptor sites. A detailed knowledge of the conformation of the biogenic monoamines would not only elucidate the requirements upon a natural or synthetic monoamine for proper function but also give indirect information about the geometry of the receptor sites.
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
|
24
|
|
25
|
Bergin R, Carlström D. The structure of the catecholamines. II. The crystal structure of dopamine hydrochloride. Acta Crystallogr B Struct Crystallogr Cryst Chem 1968; 24:1506-10. [PMID: 5756994 DOI: 10.1107/s0567740868004553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
26
|
Bergin R, Carlström D, Falkenberg G, Ringertz H. Preliminary X-ray crystallographic study of some psychoactive indole bases. Acta Crystallogr Sect B 1968. [DOI: 10.1107/s0567740868003353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
27
|
Carlström D, Bergin R. The structure of the catecholamines. I. The crystal structure of noradrenaline hydrochloride. Acta Crystallogr 1967; 23:313-9. [PMID: 5630602 DOI: 10.1107/s0365110x67002646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|