Development and Validation of a New Hierarchical Composite End Point for Clinical Trials of Kidney Disease Progression

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

The established composite kidney end point in clinical trials combines clinical events with sustained large changes in GFR but does not weigh the relative clinical importance of the end point components. By contrast, a hierarchical composite end point (HCE) accounts for the clinical importance of the end point components. The authors developed and validated a kidney HCE that combines clinical kidney outcomes with longitudinal GFR changes (GFR slope). They demonstrate that in seven major placebo-controlled kidney outcome trials with different medications, treatment effect estimates on the HCE were consistently in similar directions and of similar magnitudes compared with treatment effects on the established kidney end point. The HCE's prioritization of clinical outcomes and ability to combine dichotomous outcomes with GFR slope make it an attractive alternative to the established kidney end point.

BACKGROUND

The established composite kidney end point in clinical trials combines clinical events with sustained large changes in GFR. However, the statistical method does not weigh the relative clinical importance of the end point components. A HCE accounts for the clinical importance of the end point components and enables combining dichotomous outcomes with continuous measures.

METHODS

We developed and validated a new HCE for kidney disease progression, performing post hoc analyses of seven major Phase 3 placebo-controlled trials that assessed the effects of canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, finerenone, atrasentan, losartan, irbesartan, and aliskiren in patients with CKD. We calculated the win odds (WOs) for treatment effects on a kidney HCE, defined as a hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality; kidney failure; sustained 57%, 50%, and 40% GFR declines from baseline; and GFR slope. The WO describes the odds of a more favorable outcome for receiving the active compared with the control. We compared the WO with the hazard ratio (HR) of the primary kidney outcome of the original trials.

RESULTS

In all trials, treatment effects calculated with the WO reflected a similar direction and magnitude of the treatment effect compared with the HR. Clinical trials incorporating the HCE would achieve increased statistical power compared with the established composite end point at equivalent sample sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

In seven major kidney clinical trials, the WO and HR provided similar direction of treatment effect estimates with smaller HRs associated with larger WOs. The prioritization of clinical outcomes and inclusion of broader composite end points makes the HCE an attractive alternative to the established kidney end point.

Validity and Utility of a Hierarchical Composite End Point for Clinical Trials of Kidney Disease Progression: A Review

Clinical trials in nephrology often use composite end points comprising clinical events, such as onset of ESKD and initiation of kidney function replacement therapy, along with a sustained large ( e.g. , ≥50%) decrease in GFR. Such events typically occur late in the disease course, resulting in large trials in which most participants do not contribute clinical events. In addition, components of the end point are considered of equal importance; however, their clinical significance varies. For example, kidney function replacement therapy initiation is likely to be clinically more meaningful than GFR decline of ≥50%. By contrast, hierarchical composite end points (HCEs) combine multiple outcomes and prioritize each patient's most clinically relevant outcome for inclusion in analysis. In this review, we consider the use of HCEs in clinical trials of CKD progression, emphasizing the potential to combine dichotomous clinical events such as those typically used in CKD progression trials, with the continuous variable of GFR over time, while ranking all components according to clinical significance. We consider maraca plots to visualize overall treatment effects and the contributions of individual components, discuss the application of win odds in kidney HCE trials, and review general design considerations for clinical trials for CKD progression with kidney HCE as an efficacy end point.

Age, Sex, and Outcomes in Heart Failure With Reduced EF: Insights From the VICTORIA Trial

BACKGROUND

Age and sex influence treatment and outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF).

OBJECTIVES

The authors examined the associations of age and sex with clinical characteristics, background therapies, outcomes, and response to vericiguat in this post hoc analysis of 5,050 VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction; 1,568 (31%) were ≥75 years of age, of whom 445 (24%) were women.

METHODS

Clinical characteristics were compared across age (<65, 65 to <75, and ≥75 years) and sex. The treatment effect of vericiguat was estimated by age and sex on the primary composite outcome (time to first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death) using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Compared with younger patients, those ≥75 years of age had more class III and IV symptoms, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and worse kidney function but had the lowest use of triple therapy. No sex differences in triple therapy existed by age, but achieving target doses of triple therapy was less likely in older patients. Men ≥75 years of age were more than twice as likely to receive defibrillators and 65% more likely to undergo cardiac resynchronization than women. The primary composite outcome was nominally lower in women than men across all age groups. Vericiguat dosing did not differ between sexes in each age group, and its beneficial effect on the primary endpoint was not modified by age (continuous age, Pinteraction = 0.169; categorical age, Pinteraction = 0.189); and sex (3-way interaction; P = 0.847).

CONCLUSIONS

Although elderly women received less intense background HF therapy than men, their prognosis was nominally better. The benefit of vericiguat was independent of age and sex. (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction [HFrEF] [MK-1242-001] [VICTORIA]; NCT02861534).

Electronic health record characterization and outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Electronic health record (EHR)-based identification of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in the clinical setting may facilitate screening for clinical trials by improving the understanding of its epidemiology and outcomes; yet, previous data have yielded variable results. We sought to characterize groups identified with HFpEF by different EHR screening strategies and their associated long-term outcomes across a large and diverse population.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 116,499 consecutive patients from an academic referral center who underwent echocardiography, and 9,263 patients who underwent echocardiography within 6 months of right heart catheterization (RHC), between 2008 and 2018. EHR-based screening strategies identified patients with HFpEF using 1) International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/10 codes, 2) H2FpEF score ≥6 and ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%, or 3) RHC wedge pressure ≥15 mmHg and EF ≥50%, when available. Primary outcomes were 1) cumulative incident heart failure hospitalization (HFH), and 2) death, over 10 years.

RESULTS

There were 33,461 (29%) patients who met either ICD or H2FpEF-HFpEF definition, of whom 5,310 (16%) met both criteria. Compared to ICD-HFpEF, patients with H2FpEF-HFpEF were more likely older (median age 72 vs 67), White (78% vs 64%), and had atrial fibrillation (97% vs 41%). Among those also with RHC, 6,353 (69%) patients met any HFpEF criteria, of whom only 783 (12%) satisfied all three criteria. Female sex was more common among RHC-HFpEF (55%) compared to other methods (H2FpEF-HFpEF, 47%; ICD-HFpEF, 43%). Atrial fibrillation was substantially higher among HFpEF identified by the H2FpEF score (97%) compared to other methods (49% for ICD and 47% for RHC). Across HFpEF screening methods, 10-year cumulative incidence rates for HFH was 32% to 45% for echocardiography only and 43% to 52% for echocardiography and RHC populations; 10-year risk of death was 54% to 56% for echocardiography only and 52% to 57% for echocardiography and RHC populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Different EHR-based HFpEF definitions identified cohorts with modest overlap and varying baseline characteristics. Yet, long-term risk for HFH and death were similarly high for cohorts identified among both populations undergoing echocardiography only or echocardiography and RHC. These data aid in identifying relevant subgroups in clinical trials of HFpEF.

Continuous Monitoring of Heart Rate Variability and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

While heart rate variability (HRV) is an established marker of cardiovascular health, the extent to which continuously measured HRV changes over time and the relationship between these changes and clinical outcomes are less clear. We performed a health system analysis of 225 patients implanted with a cardiac defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization device (CRT) with continuous HRV recording capabilities. We found that continuously measured HRV changed modestly over 2 years. Low baseline HRV, which is associated with low parasympathetic tone and/or increases in sympathetic tone, pertains a worse clinical prognosis as reflected by a significant association with all-cause hospitalization. Observed changes in HRV over 6-months of follow-up were not associated with subsequent outcomes.

Clinical Validation of Novel Digital Measures: Statistical Methods for Reliability Evaluation

Background

Assessment of reliability is one of the key components of the validation process designed to demonstrate that a novel clinical measure assessed by a digital health technology tool is fit-for-purpose in clinical research, care, and decision-making. Reliability assessment contributes to characterization of the signal-to-noise ratio and measurement error and is the first indicator of potential usefulness of the proposed clinical measure.

Summary

Methodologies for reliability analyses are scattered across literature on validation of PROs, wet biomarkers, etc., yet are equally useful for digital clinical measures. We review a general modeling framework and statistical metrics typically used for reliability assessments as part of the clinical validation. We also present methods for the assessment of agreement and measurement error, alongside modified approaches for categorical measures. We illustrate the discussed techniques using physical activity data from a wearable device with an accelerometer sensor collected in clinical trial participants.

Key Messages

This paper provides statisticians and data scientists, involved in development and validation of novel digital clinical measures, an overview of the statistical methodologies and analytical tools for reliability assessment.

Vericiguat and NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: analyses from the VICTORIA trial

AIMS

Treatment response to vericiguat, based on baseline N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) subgroups specified in the protocol, was evaluated in the heart failure (HF) VICTORIA trial population by post hoc analysis of combined lower three quartiles [Q1-Q3] vs. the upper quartile [Q4].

METHODS AND RESULTS

VICTORIA participants with available baseline NT-proBNP levels (n = 4805; 95.1% of total) were included. Compared with patients in Q1-Q3 (NT-proBNP: Q1, ≤1556 pg/mL; Q2, >1556-2816 pg/mL; and Q3, >2816-5314 pg/mL), patients in Q4 (NT-proBNP: >5314 pg/mL) were older (69.2 ± 12.0 vs. 66.6 ± 12.1 years), had lower mean ejection fraction (27.2 ± 8.3% vs. 29.5 ± 8.2%; P < 0.0001), and were more likely to be in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III (51.8 vs. 35.6%) or IV (2.4 vs. 1.0%). Compared with Q1-Q3, patients in Q4 had higher mean Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score (27.3 ± 6.6 vs. 23.5 ± 6.4; P < 0.0001), had lower mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; 51.5 ± 25.5 vs. 65.0 ± 26.8 mL/min/1.73 m² ; P < 0.0001) and haemoglobin (12.8 ± 2.0 vs. 13.6 ± 1.9 g/dL; P < 0.0001), and more had atrial fibrillation (48.7% vs. 43.1%; P = 0.0007) and were randomized while hospitalized for HF (14.8 vs. 9.9%; P < 0.0001). Target dose was achieved in 72.3 and 63.7% of patients in Q1-Q3 and Q4, respectively (P < 0.0001). Primary outcome (composite of time to cardiovascular death or first HF hospitalization) rates were 24.5 and 31.7 per 100 patient-years for vericiguat and placebo in Q1-Q3 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.88, P < 0.001] and 73.6 and 63.6 in Q4 (HR 1.15; 95% CI 0.99-1.34, P = 0.070). Serious adverse events were more frequent in NT-proBNP Q4 (total population) compared with Q1-Q3 (38.3 vs. 32.3%; P = 0.0001), driven mainly by the placebo group. Adverse events leading to death were more frequent in Q4 than Q1-Q3 (5.8 vs. 2.4%; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma NT-proBNP may help identify patients with worsening HF with reduced ejection fraction, in whom the beneficial effects of vericiguat may be highest. Patients with highest NT-proBNP values are probably too far advanced, suffering more co-morbidities, or still clinically unstable after decompensation to derive benefit from vericiguat.

Vericiguat and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From the VICTORIA Trial

BACKGROUND

We examined the effects of vericiguat compared with placebo in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction enrolled in VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) on health status outcomes measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and evaluated whether clinical outcomes varied by baseline KCCQ score.

METHODS

KCCQ was completed at baseline and 4, 16, and 32 weeks. We assessed treatment effect on KCCQ using a mixed-effects model adjusting for baseline KCCQ and stratification variables. Cox proportional-hazards modeling was performed to evaluate the effect of vericiguat on clinical outcomes by tertiles of baseline KCCQ clinical summary score (CSS), total symptom score (TSS), and overall summary score (OSS).

RESULTS

Of 5050 patients, 4664, 4741, and 4470 had KCCQ CSS (median [25th to 75th], 65.6 [45.8-81.8]), TSS (68.8 [47.9-85.4]), and OSS (59.9 [42.0-77.1]) at baseline; 94%, 88%, and 82% had data at 4, 16, and 32 weeks. At 16 weeks, CSS improved by a median of 6.3 in both arms; no significant differences in improvement were seen for TSS and OSS between the 2 groups (P=0.69, 0.97, and 0.13 for CSS, TSS, and OSS). Trends were similar at 4 and 32 weeks. Vericiguat versus placebo reduced cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization risk similarly across tertiles of baseline KCCQ CSS, TSS, and OSS (interaction P=0.13, 0.21, and 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Vericiguat did not significantly improve KCCQ scores compared with placebo. Vericiguat reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization across the range of baseline health status.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02861534.

Digital health and artificial intelligence in kidney research: a report from the 2020 Kidney Disease Clinical Trialists (KDCT) meeting

The exponential growth in digital technology coupled with the global COVID-19 pandemic is driving a profound change in the delivery of medical care and research conduct. The growing availability of electronic monitoring, electronic health records, smartphones and other devices, and access to ever greater computational power, provides new opportunities, but also new challenges. Artificial intelligence (AI) exemplifies the potential of this digital revolution, which also includes other tools such as mobile health (mHealth) services and wearables. Despite digital technology becoming commonplace, its use in medicine and medical research is still in its infancy, with many clinicians and researchers having limited experience with such tools in their usual practice. This paper, derived from the 'Digital Health and Artificial Intelligence' session of the Kidney Disease Clinical Trialists virtual workshop held in September 2020, aims to illustrate the breadth of applications to which digital tools and AI can be applied in clinical medicine and research. It highlights several innovative projects incorporating digital technology that range from streamlining medical care of those with acute kidney injury to the use of AI to navigate the vast genomic and proteomic data gathered in kidney disease. Important considerations relating to any new digital health project are presented, with a view to encouraging the further evolution and refinement of these new tools in a manner that fosters collaboration and the generation of robust evidence.

Vericiguat and health status outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: insights from the VICTORIA trial

Background

In the VICTORIA trial, vericiguat compared with placebo reduced the risk of the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death (CVD) or hospitalization for heart failure (HFH) among 5050 patients with worsening HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Purpose

We evaluated whether the efficacy of vericiguat on clinical outcomes varied according to participants' baseline health status, as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-23, and how vericiguat affected health status post-randomization.

Methods

KCCQ-23 was completed at randomization and at 4, 16, and 32 weeks. Patients were grouped based on tertiles of baseline KCCQ total symptom score (TSS; &lt;55.2, 55.2–79.2, and &gt;79.2), clinical summary score (CSS; &lt;52.1, 52.1–76.0, and &gt;76.2) and overall summary score (OSS; &lt;48.5, 48.5–70.8, and &gt;70.8) across tertiles 1–3, respectively. Cox proportional hazard models were performed for the tertiles to evaluate the effects of vericiguat on the primary outcomes.

Results

Overall 4741, 4664, and 4470 participants had KCCQ-TSS (median 68.8 [interquartile range 47.9, 85.4]), KCCQ-CSS (65.6 [45.8, 81.8]) and KCCQ-OSS (59.9 [42.0, 77.1]) available at baseline. Vericiguat reduced CVD or HFH risk across baseline KCCQ-TSS (P=0.21), KCCQ-CSS (P=0.13) and KCCQ-OSS (P=0.65) tertiles (Table). The effect of vericiguat on HFH alone was also not modified by baseline KCCQ-TSS, CSS and OSS (all P&gt;0.05) scores. At 4 weeks after randomization, improvement in both vericiguat and placebo arms was seen in KCCQ-TSS (vericiguat 6.3 vs. placebo 6.3; P=0.85), KCCQ-CSS (vericiguat: 5.7 vs. placebo 5.7, P=0.54), and KCCQ-OSS (vericiguat 6.3 vs. placebo 5.7, P=0.36). Similar results were seen at weeks 16 and 32.

Conclusion

Vericiguat reduced the risk of the composite outcome of CVD or HFH as well as HFH alone across the range of baseline health status. Addition of vericiguat to best standard of care did not significantly improve health status compared with standard of care alone in HF patients with a recent worsening event. The early improvement in KCCQ seen in both randomized groups underscore the need to assess trajectory of health status changes in the spectrum of patients with HFrEF.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Merck & Co., Inc. and Bayer

Use of Actigraphy (Wearable Digital Sensors to Monitor Activity) in Heart Failure Randomized Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Actigraphy-based measurements of physiologic parameters may enable design of patient-centric heart failure (HF) clinical trials. Recently, the Heart Failure Collaboratory focused on recommendations for meaningful change and use of actigraphy as an end point in HF clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have quantified the impact of HF interventions using actigraphy.

METHODS

Using a scoping review strategy, we evaluated the use of actigraphy in HF RCTs. Studies were identified through electronic searches of Embase, OVID Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Review. Data on trial characteristics and results were collected.

RESULTS

We identified 11 RCTs with a total of 1,455 participants. The risk of bias across the included trials was high overall. All trials had the primary outcomes reflecting measures of either physical activity (n = 8), sleep (n = 2), or both (n = 1). Five trials evaluated response to pharmacologic therapies compared with placebo, 3 evaluated physical activity interventions, 2 evaluated group or cognitive therapy, and 1 evaluated sleep-ventilation strategy. Sample sizes ranged from 30 to 619 participants. There was significant heterogeneity relating to device type, body placement site, and handling of missing actigraphy data. Duration of monitoring ranged from 48 hours to 12 weeks. None of the studies evaluating pharmacologic therapies (n = 5) demonstrated a significant improvement of actigraphy-based primary end point measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant heterogeneity in the use, methodology, and results of actigraphy-based HF RCTs. Our results highlight the need to develop, standardize, and validate actigraphy-specific outcomes for use in HF clinical trials.

An empirically generated responder definition for rosacea treatment

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to empirically generate a responder definition for the treatment of papulopustular rosacea.

METHODS

A total of 8 multicenter clinical studies on patients with papulopustular facial rosacea were analyzed. All patients were treated with azelaic acid and/or comparator treatments. The severity of rosacea was described by the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) and the number of lesions. Patients with the IGA score of "clear/minimal" were considered as responders, and those staying in the range of IGA "mild to severe" as nonresponders. The respective number of lesions was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 2,748 patients providing 12,410 measurements were included. After treatment, responders showed 2.23±2.48 lesions (median 2 lesions [0-3]), and nonresponders showed 13.74±10.40 lesions (median 12 lesions [6-18]). The optimal cutoff point between both groups was 5.69 lesions.

CONCLUSION

The calculated cutoff point of 5.69 lesions allows discrimination of responders (5 or less remaining lesions) and nonresponders (6 or more remaining lesions) of therapeutic interventions in rosacea.

Comparison of Occlusive and Open Application in a Psoriasis Plaque Test Design, Exemplarily Using Investigations of Mapracorat 0.1% Ointment versus Vehicle and Reference Drugs

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Psoriasis plaque tests (PPTs) are important tools in the early phases of antipsoriatic drug development. Two distinct PPT design variants (open vs. occluded drug application) are commonly used, but no previous work has aimed to directly compare and contrast their performance.

METHODS

We compared the antipsoriatic efficacy of mapracorat 0.1% ointment and reference drugs reported in 2 separate studies, representing open and occluded PPT designs. The drug effect size was measured by sonography (mean change in echo-poor band thickness), chromametry, and standardized clinical assessment.

RESULTS

Antipsoriatic effects were detectable for the study drugs in both occluded and open PPTs. Differences between the potency of antipsoriatic drugs and vehicle were observable. The total antipsoriatic effect size appeared to be higher in the occluded PPT than the open PPT, despite the shorter treatment duration (2 vs. 4 weeks). Effect dynamics over time revealed greater differences between some study drugs in the open PPT compared to the occluded PPT.

CONCLUSION

Taking the higher technical challenges for the open PPT into account, we recommend the occluded PPT as a standard screening setting in early drug development. In special cases, considering certain drug aspects or study objectives that would require procedural adaptations, an open PPT could be the better-suited design. Finally, both PPT models show clear advantages: classification as phase I studies, small number of psoriatic subjects, relatively short study duration, excellent discrimination between compounds and concentrations, parallel measurement of treatment response, and go/no go decisions very early in clinical development.

Patient-reported outcomes of azelaic acid foam 15% for patients with papulopustular rosacea: secondary efficacy results from a randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Patient-reported treatment outcomes are important for evaluating the impact of drug therapies on patient experience. A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study was conducted in 961 participants to assess patient perception of efficacy, utility, and effect on quality of life (QOL) of an azelaic acid (AzA) 15% foam formulation for the treatment of papulopustular rosacea (PPR). Secondary end points included patient-reported global assessment of treatment response, global assessment of tolerability, and opinion on cosmetic acceptability and practicability of product use. Quality of life assessments included the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) and Rosacea Quality of Life Index (RosaQOL). Self-reported global assessment of treatment response favored AzA foam over vehicle foam (P<.001), with 57.2% of the AzA foam group reporting excellent or good improvement versus 44.7% in the vehicle foam group. Tolerability was rated excellent or good in 67.8% of the AzA foam group versus 78.2% of the vehicle foam group. Mean overall DLQI scores at end of treatment (EoT) were improved (P=.018) in favor of the AzA foam group compared with the vehicle foam group. Both treatment groups showed improvements in RosaQOL. Treatment with AzA foam was associated with improved QOL and meaningful reductions in the patient-perceived burden of PPR, which correlates with earlier reported primary end points of this study and supports the inclusion of patient perspectives in studies evaluating the effects of topical dermatologic treatments.

Investigator-reported efficacy of azelaic acid foam 15% in patients with papulopustular rosacea: secondary efficacy outcomes from a randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Papulopustular rosacea (PPR) is characterized by centrofacial papules and pustules commonly associated with erythema. To compare investigator-reported efficacy outcomes for azelaic acid (AzA) foam 15% versus vehicle foam in PPR, a randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blind phase 3 clinical trial was conducted at 48 US sites. Participants received AzA foam or vehicle foam for 12 weeks. Secondary efficacy outcomes included change in inflammatory lesion count (ILC), therapeutic response rate according to investigator global assessment (IGA), and change in erythema rating. This study was comprised of 961 participants with PPR. The results support the therapeutic superiority of AzA foam over vehicle foam.

A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of azelaic acid foam 15% in the treatment of papulopustular rosacea

Rosacea is a chronic relapsing skin disorder primarily affecting the face. Although its etiology is not well defined, rosacea is associated with immune dysregulation and inflammation potentiated by external factors. These manifestations lead to skin sensitivity and impaired quality of life. Azelaic acid (AzA) is approved for the treatment of rosacea in a 15% gel formulation. This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of AzA in a 15% foam formulation for the treatment of papulopustular rosacea (PPR). Coprimary efficacy end points were treatment success according to investigator global assessment (IGA) and the nominal change in inflammatory lesion count (ILC) from baseline to the end of treatment (EoT). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated as a measure of safety. The IGA success rate at EoT was significantly greater in the AzA foam group versus vehicle (P<.001; Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). Likewise, nominal ILC change at EoT in the AzA foam group showed a significantly greater decrease versus vehicle (P<.001; F test). Drug-related AEs were mainly mild to moderate, cutaneous, and local. Overall, the study results support the efficacy and safety of twice-daily AzA foam 15% in patients with PPR.