Cardiac electrophysiology and pacing educational and training needs among early-career cardiologists: a national survey of the Young Committee of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing

BACKGROUND

Over the past three decades, cardiac electrophysiology and pacing, including device therapy and catheter ablation of arrhythmias, has rapidly developed as a subspecialty in cardiology. Currently, there is no clear perception about the needs in cardiac electrophysiology and pacing among early-career cardiologists.

METHODS

To address these concerns, the Young Committee of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC) carried out a survey among those under the age of 40 years to obtain detailed information on practical activities and formal lessons during the fellowship in cardiology and their satisfaction and proficiency level at the end of the fellowship.

RESULTS

We obtained 334 answers to the survey. In invasive cardiac electrophysiology and pacing, the percentage of participants attending the activity for a longer time (3-6 months) is lower compared with those in noninvasive subspecialties. About 40% of participants did not receive lessons on interventional cardiology, cardiac electrophysiology and pacing. On the contrary, 71% of participants received an adequate number of lessons on clinical arrhythmology. The vast majority of the participants expressed satisfaction for the education received in the echocardiographic, cardiac interventional laboratories and clinical arrhythmology, but about half of the participants were unsatisfied with the education received in cardiac electrophysiology and pacing. In interventional arrhythmology, the majority of the participants declare their lack of proficiency with two peaks for more complex procedures, namely interventional electrophysiology procedures (82%) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) procedures (76%).

CONCLUSION

The present survey among Italian early-career cardiologists suggests that the majority of participants consider themselves not confident in performing cardiac electrophysiology and pacing procedures. Due to the complexity of the treatment for heart rhythm disorders and the long learning curve, structured additional training in cardiac electrophysiology and pacing procedures is required after cardiology fellowship.

Radiofrequency ablation in a patient with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with 2:1 atrioventricular block

The authors report the case of 15-year-old girl with a history of palpitations and shortness of breath during exercise. The electrocardiogram showed ventricular preexcitation suggesting a Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with a posteroseptal accessory pathway. During the electrophysiological study a left posterospetal accessory pathway was identified and an orthodromic atrioventricular reentry tachycardia was reproducibly induced (cycle length 400 ms). After disappearance of the ventricular pre-excitation with radiofrequency ablation, a dual physiology of atrioventricular node condution was documented and a slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was repeatedly induced. Upon induction, this tachycardia presented a proximal atrioventricular block with 2:1 condution converted to 1:1 condution with overdrive pacing from the proximal coronary sinus (cycle length 270 ms). Radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway was performed with success. We discuss the need to suspect and seek different arrhythmogenic substracts of tachycardia in a single patient, the electrophysiologic conditions that could explain the inducibility of different arrhythmias in this case, and the controversy regarding ablation of more than one reentry circuit in a single procedure.