Subtherapeutic concentrations of posaconazole tablet: determining risk factors and effectiveness of a standardized dose adjustment in hematology inpatients

Posaconazole is indicated for antifungal prophylaxis in hematology patients at high-risk of invasive fungal infections (IFI). Consensus guidelines recommend maintaining steady-state trough concentrations above 0.7 mg/L; however, upto one-third of patients return subtherapeutic concentrations which is associated with breakthrough IFI. This retrospective observational study of 496 concentrations from 90 hematology inpatients prescribed posaconazole tablet (PCZ-tab) between May 2017 and May 2019 identified 24% (n = 121) of posaconazole concentrations were subtherapeutic after the dosage of 300 mg daily. On multivariable analyses, diarrhea (p = 0.002), male gender (p = 0.018), and concurrent regular metoclopramide (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with subtherapeutic posaconazole concentrations. Eighty-nine percent of patients (n = 16) who underwent dose adjustment to 200 mg twice daily successfully achieved target posaconazole concentrations at first steady-state measurement. This study confirms that therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole remains necessary as subtherapeutic posaconazole concentrations are relatively common, and that dose adjustment of 200 mg twice daily, safely enabled achievement of therapeutic concentrations.

Pharmacist review of high-risk haematology outpatients to improve appropriateness of antifungal prophylaxis

Background Patients with haematological malignancies are at high risk of invasive fungal infections. However, there is a lack of information about the utilisation of the recommended Australian antifungal prophylaxis guidelines in haematology outpatients. Objective To assess the impact of a weekly pharmacist review of high-risk adult haematology outpatients on the utilisation of appropriate antifungal prophylaxis. Setting Outpatient cancer centre, tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Method A 3-month pre-and post-interventional study was conducted. A retrospective audit was conducted to obtain baseline utilisation of antifungal guidelines in adult haematology outpatients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome receiving chemotherapy. This was followed by a weekly pharmacist review over a 3-month period of all eligible outpatients assessing the appropriateness of antifungal agent, dose, use of therapeutic drug monitoring and presence of drug-interactions/contraindications. Recommendations to physicians were conveyed weekly and outcomes recorded. Main outcome measure Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines in outpatient haematology patients before and after implementation of a 3-month weekly pharmacist review service. Results Forty patients were included in the retrospective group, equating to 348 reviews, while 42 patients equating to 269 reviews were included in the prospective group. Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines increased from 31 to 54% post implementation of a pharmacist review (Odds Ratio = 2.44, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.07-5.58, p = 0.0344). The most common reason for nonadherence to guidelines in both groups was lack of therapeutic drug monitoring and failure to prescribe antifungal prophylaxis where indicated. The percentage of appropriate use of antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia increased from 13 to 46% (p value < 0.01) after pharmacist intervention. The pharmacist made 153 recommendations from 269 reviews, with a percentage uptake of 40%. Moderate to severe drug interactions were identified in 19 reviews from 10 patients. One major azole antifungal-chemotherapy interaction was avoided. Conclusions Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines can be improved through a regular pharmacist review. Future studies should identify whether improving adherence to antifungal guidelines leads to improved patient outcomes.

Adherence to Antifungal Guidelines in Malignant Hematology Patients: A Review of the Literature

Objective: To review the published literature assessing adherence rates to antifungal guidelines and reasons for nonadherence in the adult malignant hematology inpatient setting. Data sources: The databases Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed (from data inception to May 2019) were searched using the terms hematology, oncology, antifungal, guidelines, adherence, and stewardship with the search limited to adult human subjects and published in English. This yielded 123 articles. From this list, studies that were published in peer-reviewed journals were extracted, leaving 10 citations that met the final inclusion criteria. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Ten studies were selected assessing adherence to consensus antifungal guidelines in the malignant hematology setting. These included studies investigating the introduction of antifungal stewardship programs in tertiary hospitals. Data Synthesis: Although the studies were heterogeneous, all focused on appropriateness of antifungal therapy in the inpatient setting. Adherence to antifungal guidelines for optimal antifungal prophylaxis and treatment was low in most studies, with rates of inappropriate antifungal therapy ranging from 25% to 70% of fungal prescriptions. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Adherence rates with guidelines for antifungal therapy are low in the hematology inpatient setting. This may affect infection rates influencing morbidity and mortality in this high-risk population. Conclusion: Given the prevalence of invasive fungal infections in malignant hematology inpatients, suboptimal adherence with antifungal guidelines is concerning. This demands a focus on education, antifungal stewardship, and updating guidelines to meet real-world scenarios. Adherence with antifungal guidelines in the outpatient hematology setting is unknown and requires further research.

Therapist Reports of EBP Client Engagement Challenges in Sessions with Diverse Youth and Families in Community Mental Health Settings

BACKGROUND

The implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in community settings appears to result in reduced benefit relative to controlled trials. This difference in outcomes may be attributable in part to engagement challenges therapists encounter when delivering EBPs to low-income ethnic minority youth and families.

OBJECTIVE

The current study sought to identify therapist, client, and session characteristics associated with therapist-reported engagement challenges in therapy sessions, as well the associations between two types of client engagement challenges and therapists' self-reported ability to deliver the EBP in sessions within a system-driven implementation in public children's mental health services.

METHOD

One hundred and three therapists reported on two types of engagement challenges-Limited Client Engagement and Expressed Client Concerns-in 702 sessions with 274 clients.

RESULTS

Results indicated that therapists reported a higher frequency of Limited Client Engagement in sessions with male clients and in sessions where the youth was present, and by therapists with smaller caseloads. No variables significantly predicted Expressed Client Concerns. Both types of engagement challenges were negatively associated with therapists' report of their ability to carry out intended activities in the same session.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that therapists may benefit from learning strategies to address these two distinct types of engagement challenges encountered in implementation of EBPs with diverse families in community settings.

The effect of maintenance cimetidine therapy on the medical, social and economic aspects of patients with chronic gastric ulcers. A placebo-controlled prospective study

We studied the effect of cimetidine maintenance therapy on the socioeconomic life of patients with gastric ulcers in the year after healing and the extent to which treatment was cost-effective. One hundred and seventy patients with a healed ulcer were studied for periods of up to one year after healing; 116 patients completed one year of observation. A double-blind randomized prospective study was performed that compared cimetidine (400 mg at night) with placebo. Analysis was performed on the intention-to-treat principle. The treated group showed benefit over the placebo group; major or minor symptoms were experienced on fewer days, and more months were symptom-free. Male patients were wakened with ulcer pain on fewer nights, led a more normal social life, and had less ulcer-related sick-leave; female patients had less total sick leave. The proven ulcer recurrence rate was lower in the treated group. Fewer endoscopies were performed in this group and the resultant cost saving was equivalent to the cost expenditure on cimetidine treatment. A modest saving in wages was afforded treated patients in the workforce, due to the reduction in sick leave. The principal benefit of cimetidine treatment appeared to be the lessening of the pain and discomfort and, hence, the distress and anxiety that was associated with ulcer disease. The cost-saving due to the reduced number of endoscopies compensated for the cost-expenditure of the cimetidine treatment.

On the combination of alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor blockade in hypertension

A randomized double-blind crossover trial was conducted in 20 patients with moderate to severe hypertension to compare the efficacy of labetalol, which combines alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor blocking properties, with that of metoprolol alone or in combination with prazosin. After placebo for 1 wk, active medication was given in two 6-wk phases. During one phase, metoprolol (100 to 400 mg/day) was given with prazosin (2 to 4 mg/day) as an option in the last 3 wk, whereas during the other phase, labetalol (200 to 1000 mg/day) was given alone. Satisfactory control of supine blood pressure was obtained in 10 patients with metoprolol and in another four patients after the addition of prazosin. During the labetalol phase, blood pressure control was achieved in 11 of 19 patients tested. Gastrointestinal disturbances, nasal congestion, impotence, failure to ejaculate, scalp tingling, and headache were more prevalent in the labetalol phase than in the other. In four cases these occurred in patients who did not require prazosin. Supine, erect, and exercise pulse rates were reduced by both metoprolol with or without prazosin and by labetalol; the effects were less in the labetalol phase. These differences could arise from an action of labetalol on cardiac presynaptic alpha-adrenoceptors. Adjunctive use of prazosin in nonresponders to metoprolol increases the response rate and avoids unnecessary deployment of alpha-adrenoceptor blockade in patients whose blood pressure can be controlled by beta-blockade alone.