Phase II study of KN046 in patients with thymic carcinoma who failed immune checkpoint inhibitors

TPS8607

Background: Thymic carcinomas are the most aggressive form of thymic epithelial tumors. They are often not operable and are more resistant to chemotherapy than thymomas. Thymic carcinoma is sensitive to pembrolizumab. However, most patients who respond to pembrolizumab eventually recur. Recently, molecules that combine PD(L)1 and CTLA-4 have been developed for solid tumor patients, with the hope that targeted therapy will be more effective than standard of care. KN046 is a bi-specific antibody against PD-L1 and CTLA-4 with a much higher affinity of the anti-PD-L1 portion and a weaker affinity for anti-CTLA-4, potentially leading to less autoimmune disorders and toxicities. We developed a Phase II study to test the hypothesis that dual PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibition with KN046 may represent a safe and tolerable option for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma who have progressed on prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include thymic carcinoma with progression after treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor with no limit to prior lines of therapy, adequate organ function and performance status. History of prior or current autoimmune disorders are not allowed and history of baseline positive anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) autoantibody are not allowed. KN046 will be administered intravenously at 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or excessive toxicity for up to 2 years. A cycle is defined as 2 treatments (28 days). The primary objective is to evaluate the antitumor activity of KN046 in patients with thymic carcinoma as measured by overall response rate defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. The secondary objectives are to assess the safety and tolerability of KN046 including safety as measured by the number of adverse events (CTCAE 5.0), duration of response (RECIST 1.1) from first documented response to the date of first documented disease progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory objectives include the association of biomarkers (PD-L1 expression, tumor immune microenvironment determined by multiplex IHC, tumor mutational burden, T-cell inflamed gene expression profile) and clinical efficacy parameters. We will also characterize the safety laboratory results (AChR autoantibodies and creatinine kinase) and the occurrence of adverse events of interest. Simon’s two-stage design will be used. The null hypothesis that the true response rate is 5% will be tested against a one-sided alternative of target response rate ≥20%. In the first stage, 10 patients will be accrued. If there are no responses in the first stage, then the study will be stopped. Otherwise, 19 additional patients will be accrued for a total of 29 patients. The null hypothesis will be rejected if ≥4 responses are observed in 29 patients, with a type 1 error rate of 0.05 and power of 80%. The study was activated at Weill Cornell Medicine in December 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04925947.

Phase II two-arm study of tepotinib plus osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib due to MET amplification: INSIGHT 2

TPS9136

Background: METamp is a mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METamp occurs in ̃30% of patients who progress on EGFR TKI therapy as measured using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). There is an unmet need for targeted treatment options in these patients. Combination treatment with a MET TKI may overcome MET-related osimertinib resistance. Tepotinib is an oral, once daily (QD), highly selective, potent MET TKI. In the INSIGHT study (NCT01982955), the combination of tepotinib and the EGFR TKI gefitinib improved outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant METamp NSCLC and EGFR TKI resistance compared to chemotherapy (INSIGHT). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.6 vs 4.2 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.13; 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04, 0.43) and median overall survival (OS) was 37.3 vs 13.1 months (HR = 0.08; 90% CI: 0.01, 0.51). Methods: INSIGHT 2 is a global, open-label, Phase II trial of tepotinib + osimertinib in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Following a protocol amendment in Apr 2020, the study is enrolling patients with acquired resistance to 1L osimertinib (radiological documentation of disease progression following previous objective clinical benefit) due to METamp by FISH (GCN ≥5 or MET/CEP7 ratio ≥2). Patients must be ≥18 years old, have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and normal organ function. Both tissue and liquid biopsy, obtained at the time of progression to osimertinib, will be sent for central confirmation of METamp. Liquid biopsy samples will also be used for exploratory biomarker evaluation. Enrollment is allowed based on local FISH testing while awaiting central confirmation of METamp. Patients will receive 500 mg QD (450 mg active moiety) tepotinib + 80 mg QD osimertinib until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The study is anticipated to enroll 120 patients. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) by independent review (RECIST v1.1) in patients with METamp, centrally confirmed by FISH. Secondary endpoints include ORR by investigator assessment, duration of response, disease control, PFS, OS, pharmacokinetics, health-related quality of life, tolerability, and safety. An exploratory tepotinib monotherapy arm will enroll 12 patients to assess the contribution of tepotinib to the activity of the combination. At progression (determined by independent review committee), monotherapy patients can switch to combination treatment. These patients will be analyzed separately. Recruitment is ongoing, with > 300 patients prescreened. Approximately 100 sites in 17 countries in Europe, Asia, and North America are expected to participate. Approximately 15 sites will recruit patients in the US. Clinical trial information: NCT03940703.

Neoadjuvant durvalumab with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-centre, randomised phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Previous phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer have reported major pathological response rates in the range of 15-45%. Evidence suggests that stereotactic body radiotherapy might be a potent immunomodulator in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this trial, we aimed to evaluate the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC as an immunomodulator to enhance the anti-tumour immune response associated with the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab.

METHODS

We did a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial, comparing neoadjuvant durvalumab alone with neoadjuvant durvalumab plus stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC, at NewYork-Presbyterian and Weill Cornell Medical Center (New York, NY, USA). We enrolled patients with potentially resectable early-stage NSCLC (clinical stages I-IIIA as per the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer) who were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either neoadjuvant durvalumab monotherapy or neoadjuvant durvalumab plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (8 Gy × 3 fractions), using permuted blocks with varied sizes and no stratification for clinical or molecular variables. Patients, treating physicians, and all study personnel were unmasked to treatment assignment after all patients were randomly assigned. All patients received two cycles of durvalumab 3 weeks apart at a dose of 1·12 g by intravenous infusion over 60 min. Those in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group also received three consecutive daily fractions of 8 Gy stereotactic body radiotherapy delivered to the primary tumour immediately before the first cycle of durvalumab. Patients without systemic disease progression proceeded to surgical resection. The primary endpoint was major pathological response in the primary tumour. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02904954, and is ongoing but closed to accrual.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 25, 2017, and Sept 15, 2020, 96 patients were screened and 60 were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the durvalumab monotherapy group (n=30) or the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group (n=30). 26 (87%) of 30 patients in each group had their tumours surgically resected. Major pathological response was observed in two (6·7% [95% CI 0·8-22·1]) of 30 patients in the durvalumab monotherapy group and 16 (53·3% [34·3-71·7]) of 30 patients in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group. The difference in the major pathological response rates between both groups was significant (crude odds ratio 16·0 [95% CI 3·2-79·6]; p<0·0001). In the 16 patients in the dual therapy group with a major pathological response, eight (50%) had a complete pathological response. The second cycle of durvalumab was withheld in three (10%) of 30 patients in the dual therapy group due to immune-related adverse events (grade 3 hepatitis, grade 2 pancreatitis, and grade 3 fatigue and thrombocytopaenia). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in five (17%) of 30 patients in the durvalumab monotherapy group and six (20%) of 30 patients in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group. The most frequent grade 3-4 events were hyponatraemia (three [10%] patients in the durvalumab monotherapy group) and hyperlipasaemia (three [10%] patients in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group). Two patients in each group had serious adverse events (pulmonary embolism [n=1] and stroke [n=1] in the durvalumab monotherapy group, and pancreatitis [n=1] and fatigue [n=1] in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group). No treatment-related deaths or deaths within 30 days of surgery were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Neoadjuvant durvalumab combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy is well tolerated, safe, and associated with a high major pathological response rate. This neoadjuvant strategy should be validated in a larger trial.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

Phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) of medical intensive nutrition therapy (MINT) to improve chemotherapy (CT) tolerability in malnourished patients with solid tumor malignancies

12090

Background: Malnutrition is an underrecognized predictor of inferior cancer related outcomes. Subjective global assessment (SGA), a brief validated survey for malnutrition, may predict increased CT toxicity. This phase II RCT was performed to validate SGA as a predictive tool for malnutrition and to evaluate the impact of MINT on CT associated toxicity. Methods: CT naive pts screened by SGA were assigned to well-nourished (SGA A) or malnourished (SGA B/C) cohorts. Both cohorts were followed for CT delivery, toxicity, quality of life (QOL) by FACT-G, biomarkers, radiology, and survival. SGA B/C pts, stratified by regimen/disease, were randomized 1:1 to MINT vs. usual care. The MINT cohort received weekly registered dietician counseling and symptom assessment over the 8-week study period. Percent standard and planned CT doses were calculated. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for differences between groups, log-rank tests for survival, and multivariable linear regression for adjusted comparisons. Results: 186 eligible pts were enrolled (94 SGA A, 92 SGA B/C). SGA A were younger (median age [range]; 63 [22, 89] vs. 70 [22, 91], p = 0.011) and more fit (ECOG 0-1; 96.8% vs. 72.8%, p < 0.001). Baseline QOL was higher for SGA A (median [range], 87 [34, 115]) vs SGA B/C (70 [31, 101], p < 0.001). SGA A was associated with higher CT delivery: median proportion of planned CT (1 [Q1 0.87, Q3 1] vs 0.94 [0.70, 1], p = 0.022) and standard CT (0.91 [0.72, 1] vs. 0.74 [0.57, 0.95] p < 0.001). Adjusted for age/ECOG, SGA A remained associated with > 80% of planned (OR 2.32, p = 0.05) and standard (OR 2.33, p = 0.04) CT. SGA B/C pts (n = 92) were randomized to MINT vs usual care: median nutrition encounters MINT 5.5 vs. usual care 0.5; we observed no differences in CT delivery: median proportion of planned CT (0.91 [0.69, 1] vs. 0.94 [0.74, 1], p = 0.84) and standard CT (0.75 [0.58, 0.96] vs 0.71 [0.52, 0.99], p = 0.59). SGA A was associated with a longer 12-month survival (77.8% [95% CI 69.6%, 86.9%]) vs. B/C (53.3% [42.8%, 66.4%], p < 0.0001; 12-month survival was similar for MINT (52.3% [38.1%, 71.9%]) vs usual care (54.4% [40.2%, 73.6%], p = 0.58). Conclusions: SGA is a validated tool to characterize malnutrition in pts receiving CT. Malnourished pts received significantly less CT, experienced worse baseline QOL, and had worse 12-month survival. Intensive medical nutrition therapy was not associated with differences in CT associated toxicity. Novel nutritional interventions are still needed to improve pt outcomes.

Therapy of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With an SN-38-Anti-Trop-2 Drug Conjugate, Sacituzumab Govitecan

Purpose Trop-2, expressed in most solid cancers, may be a target for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We studied sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), a Trop-2 ADC, for the targeting of SN-38. Patients and Methods We evaluated IMMU-132 in a single-arm multicenter trial in patients with pretreated metastatic NSCLC who received either 8 or 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The primary end points were safety and objective response rate (ORR). Progression-free survival and overall survival were secondary end points. Results Fifty-four patients were treated. In the response-assessable study population (n = 47), which had a median of three prior therapies (range, two to seven), the ORR was 19%; median response duration, 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.8 to 8.3 months); and clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease ≥ 4 months), 43%. ORR in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population was 17% (nine of 54). Responses occurred with a median onset of 3.8 months, including patients who had relapsed or progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Median ITT progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.2 to 7.1 months) and median ITT overall survival, 9.5 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 16.7 months). Grade 3 or higher adverse events included neutropenia (28%), diarrhea (7%), nausea (7%), fatigue (6%), and febrile neutropenia (4%). One patient developed a transient immune response, despite patients receiving a median of 10 doses. More than 90% of 26 assessable archival tumor specimens were highly positive (2+, 3+) for Trop-2 by immunohistochemistry, which suggests that Trop-2 is not a predictive biomarker for response. Conclusion IMMU-132 was well-tolerated and induced durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic NSCLC. This ADC should be studied further in this disease and in other patients with Trop-2-expressing tumors.

Treatment of recurrent and platinum-refractory stage IV non-small cell lung cancer with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) as a single agent

The role of single-agent nab-paclitaxel in relapsed or platinum-refractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well reported in Western populations. We reviewed our own institution's experience using nab-paclitaxel in these settings. We analyzed the records of stage IV NSCLC patients with relapsed or platinum-refractory disease treated with single-agent nab-paclitaxel at Weill Cornell Medical College between October 2008 and December 2013. The primary endpoint of the study was treatment failure-free survival (TFFS), defined as the time from the start of nab-paclitaxel therapy to discontinuation of the drug for any reason. The best overall response was recorded for each patient, and overall response and disease control rates were calculated. Thirty-one stage IV NSCLC patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 1-40) of nab-paclitaxel. Dose reduction or drug discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 10 patients, mainly because of grade 2/3 fatigue or peripheral neuropathy. The overall response rate was 16.1 %, and the disease control rate was 64.5 %. Median TFFS was 3.5 months (95 % CI 1.3-5.3 months). No statistically significant difference in TFFS based on line of therapy or prior taxane exposure was identified. There was a statistically significant decrease in TFFS for patients with non-adenocarcinoma histology, although there were only five patients in this group. There was a trend toward reduction in the risk of treatment failure with increasing age. One patient remained on nab-paclitaxel therapy for over 3 years. Single-agent nab-paclitaxel was well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy in advanced NSCLC patients with relapsed or platinum-refractory disease. Further prospective clinical trials with nab-paclitaxel in these settings are warranted.

Pro1170 Ala polymorphism in HER2-neu is associated with risk of trastuzumab cardiotoxicity

Background

Variations in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with enhanced drug efficacy and toxicity in cancer therapy. SNP variations in the ErbB2 gene have been identified that alter the protein sequence of the HER2-neu protein, but how these polymorphisms affect prognosis and response to HER2 targeted therapy is unknown. We examined eleven ErbB2 SNPs that alter the HER2-neu amino acid sequence to determine whether any of these particular polymorphisms were associated with increased trastuzumab cardiotoxicity in a case–control study.

Methods

140 subjects were enrolled from a single institution under Weill Cornell Medical College IRB protocol #0804009734. Patients were eligible if they had histologically or cytologically proven HER2-neu positive breast cancer and more than 3 months of trastuzumab therapy. Cases had either symptomatic CHF or a decline in LVEF of 15% (or if the LVEF <55%, a decline in LVEF of 10%) that resulted in at least temporary discontinuation of trastuzumab, whereas controls had no decline in their LVEF. Eleven ErbB2 single gene SNPs that resulted in an alteration in the HER2-neu protein amino acid sequence were studied. Single gene SNP analysis was carried out using SNP genotyping assays from genomic DNA obtained from peripheral blood or buccal swab.

Results

Only two of the ErbB2 SNPs (Ile 655 Val and Pro 1170 Ala) were found to have variation. There was no association between codon 665 and cardiotoxicity; however the proline variant of amino acid 1170 was more likely than the alanine variant to be found in cases with trastuzumab cardiotoxicity (35% of case patients as compared to 17% of controls, p = 0.04). This association remained significant in multivariable analysis taking into account age, race, and history of hypertension (adjusted OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.02, 6.62, p = 0.046).

Conclusions

The Her2/neu Pro 1170 Ala polymorphism can be used to identify a subset of patients who are at increased risk of cardiotoxicity from trastuzumab therapy. Her2/neu single nucleotide polymorphisms may be useful in conjunction with other biomarkers to risk stratify patients in order to optimize clinical management.

Non-small-cell lung cancer: treatment of late stage disease: chemotherapeutics and new frontiers

Systemic therapy should be considered in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are no longer amenable to local therapies. Systemic therapy has been shown to improve survival and preserve quality of life in patients with a reasonable performance status. In unselected patients, the standard of care for initial therapy remains platinum-based chemotherapy. At progression, further treatment typically consists of the sequential administration of single-agent therapy, which has also been shown to improve survival and reduce cancer-related symptoms. Molecular biomarkers are essential to guide targeted agents. This analysis requires ample tumor DNA; thus adequate biopsy samples are critical to guide therapeutic options. More biomarkers are currently being validated and may potentially have specific targeted therapy. In the near future, it is likely that rapid multiplexed genotype testing will help reduce the need for large amounts of tumor for analysis and will promote personalized cancer therapy. We review recent changes in the definition of stage IV NSCLC and review current and future systemic therapeutic approaches for patients with advanced disease.

Erratum: Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Treatment of Late Stage Disease: Chemotherapeutics and New Frontiers

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1342961.].

Employment after a breast cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of ethnically diverse urban women

Employment status is related to treatment recovery and quality of life in breast cancer survivors, yet little is known about return to work in immigrant and minority survivors. We conducted an exploratory qualitative study using ethnically cohesive focus groups of urban breast cancer survivors who were African-American, African-Caribbean, Chinese, Filipina, Latina, or non-Latina white. We audio- and video-recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded the focus group discussions and we analyzed the coded transcripts within and across ethnic groups. Seven major themes emerged related to the participants' work experiences after diagnosis: normalcy, acceptance, identity, appearance, privacy, lack of flexibility at work, and employer support. Maintaining a sense of normalcy was cited as a benefit of working by survivors in each group. Acceptance of the cancer diagnosis was most common in the Chinese group and in participants who had a family history of breast cancer; those who described this attitude were likely to continue working throughout the treatment period. Appearance was important among all but the Chinese group and was related to privacy, which many thought was necessary to derive the benefit of normalcy at work. Employer support included schedule flexibility, medical confidentiality, and help maintaining a normal work environment, which was particularly important to our study sample. Overall, we found few differences between the different ethnic groups in our study. These results have important implications for the provision of support services to and clinical management of employed women with breast cancer, as well as for further large-scale research in disparities and employment outcomes.

Retrospective analysis of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nabP) administered as a single agent in the treatment of recurrent stage IV (st4) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

e18029

Background: NabP is a formulation of P designed to reduce toxicity of therapy and increase drug delivery to tumor cells. An established therapy for st4 breast cancer, single-agent nabP has also been shown to produce responses in frontline therapy of st4 NSCLC. Its role in relapsed NSCLC has not been well reported. Methods: We analyzed the records of st4 NSCLC patients (pts) treated with single-agent nabP at our institution. Cases were assessed with regard to age, sex, KPS, histology, line of systemic therapy, prior taxane exposure, # of cycles administered, dose attenuation, and progression-free survival (PFS) estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Standard dosing of nabP was considered to be 260 mg/m2 IV Q 21 days. Disease was considered to have progressed on the date of any clinical assessment (typically CT scan) that led the treating oncologist to conclude that disease had progressed. All pts completed nabP therapy except 1, who was assessed at 427 days of follow up. Results: From Oct 2008 to Jan 2012, 15 st4 NSCLC pts (median age 67, range 48 to 82; 8 F, 7 M; KPS 60-80%; 12 adenocarcinoma, 2 squamous cell, 1 unspecified) received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-17) of single-agent nabP. All pts received at least 1 prior line of systemic therapy in the st4 setting: 6 received nabP as 2nd line therapy, 4 as 3rd line, and 5 as 4th line. 5 pts had also received prior chemotherapy for early stage NSCLC. 9 pts were taxane-naïve; 6 had received prior taxane therapy. 10 pts began nabP at standard dose; 5 began on an attenuated dose or schedule. Subsequent dose reduction occurred in 3 pts due to toxicity (fatigue, myelosuppression). Only 1 patient discontinued treatment due to toxicity (myalgias, arthralgias). Median PFS for all pts was 82 days (95% CI 35 to 205 days). Older age reduced risk of progression [hazard ratio 0.93 per 1-year age increase (95% CI 0.86 to 0.99), P=0.04]. Prior taxane exposure decreased PFS (median 39 vs. 113 days, P=0.07 by log-rank test). PFS did not vary by KPS, histology, or line of therapy. Conclusions: Single-agent nabP administered in relapsed St4 NSCLC is well tolerated and associated with extension of PFS, particularly in older and taxane-naïve pts.

Safety and maximum tolerated dose of superselective intraarterial cerebral infusion of bevacizumab after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption for recurrent malignant glioma. Clinical article

OBJECT

The authors assessed the safety and maximum tolerated dose of superselective intraarterial cerebral infusion (SIACI) of bevacizumab after osmotic disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) with mannitol in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with recurrent malignant glioma were included in the current study.

RESULTS

The authors report no dose-limiting toxicity from a single dose of SIACI of bevacizumab up to 15 mg/kg after osmotic BBB disruption with mannitol. Two groups of patients were studied; those without prior bevacizumab exposure (naïve patients; Group I) and those who had received previous intravenous bevacizumab (exposed patients; Group II). Radiographic changes demonstrated on MR imaging were assessed at 1 month postprocedure. In Group I patients, MR imaging at 1 month showed a median reduction in the area of tumor enhancement of 34.7%, a median reduction in the volume of tumor enhancement of 46.9%, a median MR perfusion (MRP) reduction of 32.14%, and a T2-weighted/FLAIR signal decrease in 9 (47.4%) of 19 patients. In Group II patients, MR imaging at 1 month showed a median reduction in the area of tumor enhancement of 15.2%, a median volume reduction of 8.3%, a median MRP reduction of 25.5%, and a T2-weighted FLAIR decrease in 0 (0%) of 11 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that SIACI of mannitol followed by bevacizumab (up to 15 mg/kg) for recurrent malignant glioma is safe and well tolerated. Magnetic resonance imaging shows that SIACI treatment with bevacizumab can lead to reduction in tumor area, volume, perfusion, and T2-weighted/FLAIR signal.

The effect of tetrathiomolybdate on circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with breast cancer at high risk of recurrence

Abstract #1036

Background: Endothelial progenitor cells are critical to tumor angiogenesis and are increased in breast cancer patients. Copper is required for angiogenesis, and pre-clinical data suggest that tetrathiomolybdate (TM), a copper-depleting compound, inhibits angiogenesis and maintains tumor dormancy. We sought to measure circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEPCs) in patients at high risk of breast cancer recurrence and to evaluate the effect of copper depletion on CEPCs.&#x2028; Methods: This analysis is part of an ongoing phase II study of TM in breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence defined as Stage III or IV with no evidence of disease. All therapy other than hormonal was completed at least 6 weeks prior to study. Treatment: TM 180 mg daily to achieve a target ceruloplasmin (Cp) level of 5-15 mg/dL (copper depletion), and then 100 mg daily. We monitored levels of CEPCs (CD45dim, CD133+, VEGFR2+), CEA, CA15-3, and Cp at baseline and monthly. CEPCs were also measured in 6 healthy controls.&#x2028; Results: To date we have enrolled 16 patients with a median age of 51 years (range: 29-64). 14 had a history of Stage III disease, while 2 were considered to be Stage IV with no evidence of disease. The median number of positive lymph nodes among Stage III patients was 7 (1-42), with 2 patients having received neoadjuvant therapy. The median baseline Cp level was 28 mg/dL (21-41). Among 12 patients who have reached target Cp, the median time to target was 1 month (1-3 months). The median follow-up of the 4 patients who have not yet achieved target is 2.5 months. 1 of these discontinued treatment before reaching target. The median baseline CEPCs was lower in patients than healthy controls: 0.022 cells/μL (0.000-0.286) vs. 0.123 cells/μL (0.058-0.418); p=0.03. There was no statistically significant change in CEPCs from baseline over time.&#x2028; One patient was diagnosed with recurrent breast cancer at month 10. A rise in her CEPCs preceded a rise in a CEA and overt relapse by 1 and 5 months, respectively.&#x2028; Toxicity: Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 3 patients. TM was held, and this resolved 5-13 days later, after which TM was resumed. No other grade 3/4 toxicity was observed. One patient discontinued TM due to diarrhea attributed to the lactose used in the compounding of TM.&#x2028; Conclusions: TM is well tolerated in breast cancer patients. We postulate that the increased CEPCs noted in one patient at month 4, 6 months prior to overt relapse, could represent the “turning on” of an angiogenic switch, resulting in an outpouring of CEPCs to the new site of metastasis. The trial is ongoing, and with additional follow-up other trends might emerge.&#x2028; Supported by Komen for the Cure Foundation, Anbinder Foundation, NY Community Trust and Breast Cancer Alliance of Greenwich.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 1036.

Superselective intraarterial cerebral infusion of bevacizumab: a revival of interventional neuro-oncology for malignant glioma

Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is a uniformly fatal disease with a median survival of approximately 15 months. Recent monoclonal antibody therapies such as Bevacizumab (Avastin) have been shown to be active in GBM and to prolong survival in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Therefore, patients routinely receive intravenous (i.v.) Bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every two weeks when they have recurred following standard therapy with chemoradiation. I.v Bevacizumab; however, can cause significant systemic side effects including bowel perforation and pulmonary embolism. In addition, the blood brain barrier (BBB) continues to provide an obstacle to the effective delivery of the antibody to the brain tumor bed. In order to overcome the BBB, and to limit the systemic toxicity of i.v. Bevacizumab, we have begun a Phase I clinical trial to test the safety of transient blood brain barrier disruption with intraarterial (IA) Mannitol followed by superselective intraarterial cerebral infusion (SIACI) of Bevacizumab. This case report describes the technical aspects of this procedure and its associated benefits and risks. This novel delivery method, which may herald the revival of Interventional Neuro-oncology, may significantly alter the way therapy is administered to patients with GBM.

Jejunoileal bypass. Late metabolic sequelae and weight gain

Of 101 patients originally operated on, the status of 98 is known. Given the mortality and reanastomosis rates, the operation must be considered an absolute failure in 28 percent of the patients. Given the other complications that appear (or persist) late postoperatively, only 18 percent of the entire series of patients have had what can be considered a good result. We therefore conclude that intestinal bypass is not an appropriate operation for morbid obesity and that complete long-term follow-up is essential for all patients who undergo the operation, despite what might seem to be a smooth course in the 1st 2 years postoperatively.