Low-Dose Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Study

PURPOSE

The regimens approved for the treatment of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are accessible to only 1%-3% of patients in low- and middle-income countries because of their cost. In our previous study, metronomic chemotherapy improved survival in this setting. Retrospective data suggest that a low dose of nivolumab may be efficacious. Hence, we aimed to assess whether the addition of low-dose nivolumab to triple metronomic chemotherapy (TMC) improved overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This was a randomized phase III superiority study. Adult patients with recurrent or newly diagnosed advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma being treated with palliative intent with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to TMC consisting of oral methotrexate 9 mg/m² once a week, celecoxib 200 mg twice daily, and erlotinib 150 mg once daily, or TMC with intravenous nivolumab (TMC-I) 20 mg flat dose once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was 1-year OS.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-one patients were randomly assigned, 75 in TMC and 76 in the TMC-I arm. The addition of low-dose nivolumab led to an improvement in the 1-year OS from 16.3% (95% CI, 8.0 to 27.4) to 43.4% (95% CI, 30.8 to 55.3; hazard ratio, 0.545; 95% CI, 0.362 to 0.820; P = .0036). The median OS in TMC and TMC-I arms was 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 8.1) and 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 12.6), respectively (P = .0052). The rate of grade 3 and above adverse events was 50% and 46.1% in TMC and TMC-I arms, respectively (P = .744).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first-ever randomized study to demonstrate that the addition of low-dose nivolumab to metronomic chemotherapy improved OS and is an alternative standard of care for those who cannot access full-dose checkpoint inhibitors.

Phase 3 randomised study evaluating the addition of low-dose nivolumab to palliative chemotherapy in head and neck cancer

LBA6016

Background: The regimens approved for the treatment of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are accessible to only 1-3% of patients in low and middle-income countries due to cost. In our previous study, metronomic chemotherapy (MC) improved survival in this setting. Retrospective data suggest that a low dose of nivolumab may be efficacious. Hence, we aimed to assess whether the addition of low dose nivolumab to MC improved the overall survival. Methods: This was a randomised phase 3 superiority open-label study. Adult patients with relapsed -recurrent or newly diagnosed advanced HNSCC being treated with palliative intent with ECOG PS 0-1 were eligible. Patients were randomised 1:1 to MC consisting of methotrexate 15 mg/m2 PO weekly, celecoxib 200 mg PO daily and erlotinib 150 mg PO daily, or MC with intravenous nivolumab 20 mg flat dose once-every-3-weeks. Therapy was continued until disease progression or intolerable adverse events. Response assessment (RECIST version 1.1) was performed every 2 months. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS) and this was a pre-specified interim analysis with the nominal p-value for efficacy being 0.006. Results: 151 patients were randomised, 75 in MC and 76 in the MC-I arm respectively. The addition of low dose nivolumab led to an improvement in the 1-year overall survival from 16.3% (95%CI 7.95-27.4) to 43.4% (95% CI 30.8-52.3) [Hazard ratio-0.545; 95%CI 0.362-0.82; P=0.00358]. The median overall survival in MC and MC-I arms was 6.7 months (95%CI 5.83 -8.07) and 10.1 months (95%CI 7.37-12.63) respectively (P=0.0052). The median progression-free survival in MC and MC-I arms was 4.57 months (95%CI 4.2 -5.3) and 6.57 months (95%CI 4.43-8.9) respectively (P=0.0021). Response rate in MC and MC-I arm were 49.3% (95% CI 37.8-60.8) and 65.2% (95%CI 53.4-75.4) respectively (P=0.085). The rate of grade 3 and above adverse events was 50% and 46.1% in MC and MC-I arm respectively (P=0.744). Conclusions: In this first-ever randomised study, the addition of low dose nivolumab led to improved overall survival and is an alternative standard of care for those who cannot access full dose nivolumab. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2020/11/028953.

Effect of Early Palliative Care on Quality of Life of Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Phase III Trial

BACKGROUND

Early palliative care (EPC) is an important aspect of cancer management but, to our knowledge, has never been evaluated in patients with head and neck cancer. Hence, we performed this study to determine whether the addition of EPC to standard therapy leads to an improvement in the quality of life (QOL), decrease in symptom burden, and improvement in overall survival.

METHODS

Adult patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region planned for palliative systemic therapy were allocated 1:1 to either standard systemic therapy without or with comprehensive EPC service referral. Patients were administered the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for head and neck cancer (FACT-H&N) questionnaire at baseline and every 1 month thereafter for 3 months. The primary endpoint was a change in the QOL measured at 3 months after random assignment. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were randomly assigned to each arm. There was no statistical difference in the change in the FACT-H&N total score (P = .94), FACT-H&N Trial Outcome Index (P = .95), FACT-general total (P = .84), and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale scores at 3 months between the 2 arms. The median overall survival was similar between the 2 arms (hazard ratio for death = 1.01, 95% confidence interval = 0.74 to 1.35). There were 5 in-hospital deaths in both arms (5.6% for both, P = .99).

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase III study, the integration of EPC in head and neck cancer patients did not lead to an improvement in the QOL or survival.