Comparison of demographic, clinic and radiological features of patients with axial spondyloarthritis accompanying familial Mediterranean fever to patients with each condition alone

OBJECTIVE

To compare the demographic, clinical, and radiological features of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) accompanying familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) to patients with each condition alone.

METHOD

Hacettepe University Hospital database was screened regarding ICD-10 codes for FMF (E85.0) and axSpA (M45). The diagnosis of FMF was confirmed by Tel-Hashomer criteria, and axSpA by the presence of sacroiliitis according to the modified New York criteria or active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging. As control groups, 136 gender-matched, consequent FMF patients without axSpA and 102 consequent axSpA patients without FMF previously treated with any biological agents were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

In patients with FMF + axSpA compared to the axSpA group, age at axSpA symptom onset and age at diagnosis were lower [median with interquartile range (IQR): 21 (17-30) vs 27 (21-37), p < 0.001; 23 (21-38) vs 32 (24-43) years, p = 0.001], moderate to severe hip disease and total hip replacement were more prevalent (23.4% vs 4.7%, p < 0.001; 11.2% vs 2.8%, p = 0.016). In patients with FMF + axSpA compared to the FMF group, age at FMF symptom onset and age at diagnosis were higher [13 (6-30) vs 11 (5-18), p = 0.057; 23 (13-33) vs 18 (10-31) years, p = 0.033] and amyloidosis was more prevalent (6.6% vs 2.2%, p = 0.076). Although the M694V variant (in one or two alleles) was more prevalent in the FMF + axSpA group, the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In patients with FMF + axSpA, the age of onset of axSpA was significantly earlier, moderate to severe hip involvement and amyloidosis were more common than in patients with each condition alone.

Assessment of the HScore for reactive haemophagocytic syndrome in patients with rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVES

Reactive haemophagocytic syndrome (RHS) is a hyperinflammatory disorder often occurring in the background of several disorders such as infections, malignancies, and rheumatic diseases. Recently, a score known as the HScore was developed for the diagnosis of RHS. In the original study, most of the patients had underlying haematological malignancy or infection and the best cut-off value for the HScore was 169 (sensitivity 93%; specificity 86%). In this study we aimed to analyse the performance of the HScore in rheumatic disease-related RHS.

METHOD

The patients with rheumatic disorders evaluated in the Departments of Rheumatology and Paediatric Rheumatology at Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey between 2002 and 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. The first group (n = 30) consisted of patients with RHS; the control group (n = 64) included patients with active rheumatic diseases without RHS.

RESULTS

In the RHS group, 14 (46.7%) had adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD), 10 (33.3%) systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA), and six (20%) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The control group (n = 64) consisted of 32 (50%) AOSD, 13 (20.3%) SJIA, and 19 (29.7%) SLE patients. Applying the HScore to the RHS patients, the best cut-off value was 190.5 with a sensitivity of 96.7% and specificity of 98.4%. When we excluded the patients from the control group who had not had bone marrow aspiration (n = 23), the same cut-off (190.5) performed best (sensitivity 96.7%; specificity 97.6%). Applying the 2004 haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH-2004) criteria gave a sensitivity of 56.6% and a specificity of 100% in the whole study group.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, a cut-off value for the HScore different from the original study performed better. Further studies are warranted to determine optimum cut-off values in different studies.

Aspirin resistance in systemic lupus erythematosus. A pilot study

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are at increased risk of thrombosis and cardiovascular diseases. Aspirin is an effective treatment option for these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of aspirin resistance in SLE patients. We studied aspirin resistance in 33 SLE patients and nine healthy controls by using a Multiplate® impedance aggregometer (Dynabyte GmbH, Munich, Germany). Twenty-six SLE patients were on regular aspirin treatment. Aspirin resistance was found in five (19.2%) out of 26 patients who were on aspirin treatment. When the tests were repeated by adding acetylsalicylic acid in the medium, all of these patients became responsive to the aspirin. SLE disease activity, body mass index, smoking status, and the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies or positive lupus anticoagulant test results were no different in patients with or without aspirin resistance. ( p > 0.05 for all). Our results suggest that there may be a considerable number of SLE patients with aspirin resistance.