van Dam CS, Moss N, Schaper SA, Trappenburg MC, Ter Wee MM, Scheerman K, Muller M, Nanayakkara P, Peters M. Screening instruments for identification of vulnerable older adults at the emergency department: a critical appraisal.
Acute Med 2018;
17:124-129. [PMID:
30129944]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Early detection of vulnerable older adults at the emergency department (ED) and implementation of targeted interventions to prevent functional decline may lead to better patient outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the level of agreement between four frequently used screening instruments: ISAR-HP, VMS, InterRAI ED Screener and APOP.
METHODS
Observational prospective cohort study in patients ≥ 70 years attending Dutch ED.
RESULTS
The prevalence of vulnerability ranged from 19% (APOP) to 45% (ISAR-HP). Overall there was a moderate agreement between the screening instruments (Fleiss Kappa of 0.42 (p<0.001)).
CONCLUSION
Depending on the screening instrument used, either only a small percentage or almost as many as half of the presenting patients will be eligible for targeted interventions, leading to large dissimilarities in working processes, resources and costs.
Collapse