Relations between the directions of vibration-induced kinesthetic illusions and the pattern of activation of antagonist muscles

In humans, tendon vibration evokes illusory sensations of movement that are usually associated with an excitatory tonic response in muscles antagonistic to those vibrated (antagonist vibratory response, AVR), i.e., in the muscle groups normally contracted if the illusory movement had been performed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relation between the parameters of the illusory sensation of movement and those of the AVR and to determine whether vectorial models could account for the integration of proprioceptive inputs from several muscles, as well as for the organization of the elementary motor commands leading to one unified motor response. For that purpose, we analyzed the relations between the anatomical site of the tendon vibration, the direction of the illusory movement, the muscles in which the AVR develops, and the characteristics of the AVR (surface EMG, motor unit types, firing rates, and activation latencies). This study confirmed the close relationship between the parameters of an AVR and those of the kinesthetic illusion. It showed that, during illusions of movements in different directions, motor units are activated according to a specific pattern correlated with their type, with the direction of the illusory movement and with the biomechanical properties of their bearing muscles. Finally, kinesthetic illusions and AVRs can be effectively represented using similar vectorial computations. These strong relations between the perceptual and motor effects of tendon vibration once again suggest that the AVR may result from a perceptual-to-motor transformation of proprioceptive information, rather than from spinal reflex mechanisms.

Antagonist motor responses correlate with kinesthetic illusions induced by tendon vibration

In humans, vibration applied to muscle tendons evokes illusory sensations of movement that are usually associated with an excitatory tonic response in muscles antagonistic to those vibrated (antagonist vibratory response or AVR). The aim of the present study was to investigate the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying such a motor response. For that purpose, we analyzed the relationships between the parameters of the tendon vibration (anatomical site and frequency) and those of the illusory movement perceived (direction and velocity), as well as the temporal, spatial, and quantitative characteristics of the corresponding AVRs (i.e., surface EMG, motor unit firing rates and activation latencies). Analogies were supposed between the characteristics of AVRs and voluntary contractions. The parameters of the AVR were thus compared with those of a voluntary contraction with similar temporal and mechanical characteristics, involving the same muscle groups as those activated by vibration. Wrist flexor muscles were vibrated either separately or simultaneously with wrist extensor muscles at frequencies between 30 and 80 Hz. The illusory movement sensations were quantified through contralateral hand-tracking movements. Electromyographic activity from the extensor carpi radialis muscles was recorded with surface and intramuscular microelectrodes. The results showed that vibration of the wrist flexor muscle group induced both a kinesthetic illusion of wrist extension and a motor response in the extensor carpi radialis muscles. Combined vibration of the two antagonistic muscle groups at the same frequency evoked neither kinesthetic illusion nor motor activity. In addition, vibrating the same two antagonistic muscle groups at different frequencies induced both a kinesthetic illusion and a motor response in the muscle vibrated at the lowest frequency. The surface EMG amplitude of the extensor carpi radialis as well as the motor unit activation latency and discharge frequency were clearly correlated to the parameters of the illusory movement evoked by the vibration. Indeed, the faster the illusory sensation of movement, the greater the surface EMG in these muscles during the AVRs and the sooner and the more intense the activation of the motor units of the wrist extensor muscles. Moreover, comparison of the AVR with voluntary contraction showed that all parameters were highly similar. Mainly slow motor units were recruited during the AVR and during its voluntary reproduction. That the AVR is observed only when a kinesthetic illusion is evoked, together with the similarities between voluntary contractions and AVRs, suggests that this vibration-induced motor response may result from a perceptual-to-motor transformation of proprioceptive information, rather than from spinal reflex mechanisms.

Task-dependence of muscle afferent monosynaptic inputs to human extensor carpi radialis motoneurones

The task-dependence of homonymous muscle afferent inputs was investigated in motor units of the extensor carpi radialis muscles during voluntary isometric contraction involving either the activation of agonist extensor muscles (wrist extension) or the co-activation of antagonist extensor and flexor muscles (hand clenching). The effectiveness of the muscle afferent monosynaptic inputs was tested by delivering either tendon taps or electrical stimulation to the radial nerve. In both cases, the motor unit responses, which took the form of narrow peaks in the peri-stimulus time histograms, were found to be significantly greater during hand clenching. The parallel enhancement of the responses to both mechanical and electrical stimulations observed during hand clenching could not be explained in terms of changes in the muscle spindle responsiveness. The enhancement of the motor units' responsiveness was apparent during the first 0.5 ms of the peaks in the peri-stimulus time histograms, taken to be uncontaminated by any polysynaptic components. It may therefore have reflected an increase in the amplitude of the excitatory monosynaptic potentials generated by the muscle spindle primary afferents. This is interpreted in terms of changes in the presynaptic inhibition, which might be depressed as the result of the large-scale activation of palm and finger cutaneous afferents liable to occur during hand clenching.