Comparison of Hypermetabolic and Hypoxic Volumes Delineated on [18F]FDG and [18F]Fluoromisonidazole PET/CT in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients

PURPOSE

The high rates of failure in the radiotherapy target volume suggest that patients with stage II or III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should receive an increased total dose of radiotherapy. 2-Deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) and [¹⁸F]fluoromisonidazole ([¹⁸F]FMISO) (hypoxia) uptake on pre-radiotherapy positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) have been independently reported to identify intratumor subvolumes at higher risk of relapse after radiotherapy. We have compared the [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]FMISO volumes defined by PET/CT in NSCLC patients included in a prospective study.

PROCEDURES

Thirty-four patients with non-resectable lung cancer underwent [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]FMISO PET/CT before (pre-RT) and during radiotherapy (around 42 Gy, per-RT). The criteria were to delineate 40 % and 90 % SUVmax thresholds on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT (metabolic volumes), and SUV > 1.4 on pre-RT [¹⁸F]FMISO PET/CT (hypoxic volume). The functional volumes were delineated within the tumor volume as defined on co-registered CTs.

RESULTS

The mean pre-RT and per-RT [¹⁸F]FDG volumes were not statistically different (30.4 cc vs 22.2; P = 0.12). The mean pre-RT SUVmax [¹⁸F]FDG was higher than per-RT SUVmax (12.7 vs 6.5; P < 0.0001). The mean [¹⁸F]FMISO SUVmax and volumes were 2.7 and 1.37 cc, respectively. Volume-based analysis showed good overlap between [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]FMISO for all methods of segmentation but a poor correlation for Jaccard or Dice Indices (DI). The DI maximum was 0.45 for a threshold at 40 or 50 %.

CONCLUSION

The correlation between [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]FMISO uptake is low in NSCLC, making it possible to envisage different management strategies as the studies in progress show.

How to work together between nuclear medicine and radiotherapy departments?

Among the available imaging techniques, functional imaging provided by nuclear medicine departments represents a tool of choice for the oncoradiotherapist for targeting tumour activity, with positron emission tomography as the main modality. Before, during or after radiotherapy, functional imaging helps guide the oncoradiotherapist in making decisions and in the strategic choice of pathology management. Setting up a working group to ensure perfect coordination at all levels is the first step. Key points for a common and coordinated management between the two departments are the definition of an organizational logistic, training of personnel at every levels, standardization of nomenclatures, the choice of adapted and common equipment, implementation of regulatory controls, and research/clinical routine continuum. The availability of functional examinations dedicated to radiotherapy in clinical routine is possible and requires a convergence of teams and a pooling of tools and techniques.

[Role of functional imaging in the definition of target volumes for lung cancer radiotherapy]

Functional imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) is interesting to optimize lung radiotherapy planning, and probably to deliver a heterogeneous dose or adapt the radiation dose during treatment. Only fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-computed tomography (CT) is validated for staging lung cancer and planning radiotherapy. The optimal segmentation methods remain to be defined as well as the interest of "dose painting" from pre-treatment PET (metabolism: FDG) or hypoxia (fluoromisonidazole: FMISO) and the interest of replanning based on pertherapeutic PET.

Monte-Carlo simulations of clinically realistic respiratory gated (18)F-FDG PET: application to lesion detectability and volume measurements

In PET/CT thoracic imaging, respiratory motion reduces image quality. A solution consists in performing respiratory gated PET acquisitions. The aim of this study was to generate clinically realistic Monte-Carlo respiratory PET data, obtained using the 4D-NCAT numerical phantom and the GATE simulation tool, to assess the impact of respiratory motion and respiratory-motion compensation in PET on lesion detection and volume measurement. To obtain reconstructed images as close as possible to those obtained in clinical conditions, a particular attention was paid to apply to the simulated data the same correction and reconstruction processes as those applied to real clinical data. The simulations required 140,000h (CPU) generating 1.5 To of data (98 respiratory gated and 49 ungated scans). Calibration phantom and patient reconstructed images from the simulated data were visually and quantitatively very similar to those obtained in clinical studies. The lesion detectability was higher when the better trade-off between lesion movement limitation (compared to ungated acquisitions) and image statistic preservation is considered (respiratory cycle sampling in 3 frames). We then compared the lesion volumes measured on conventional PET acquisitions versus respiratory gated acquisitions, using an automatic segmentation method and a 40%-threshold approach. A time consuming initial manual exclusion of noisy structures needed with the 40%-threshold was not necessary when the automatic method was used. The lesion detectability along with the accuracy of tumor volume estimates was largely improved with the gated compared to ungated PET images.

Influence of PET/CT on radiologists and contrast-enhanced CT on nuclear medicine physicians in patients with lymphoma

AIM

We assessed in this study the influence of contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) on PET/CT interpretation and PET/CT on ceCT interpretation in patients with lymphoma, before and after chemotherapy.

METHODS

Fifty patients with Hodgkin disease (N.=17) or non-Hodgkin lymphomas (N.=33) were assessed before and after chemotherapy. PET/CT were performed 60 minutes after injection of FDG. Iopamidol was then injected and followed, 50 seconds later, by another CT. PET images were successively reconstructed using non-enhanced CT (PET-) and ceCT (PET+). Four nuclear physicians rated PET- and PET+ in random order. Three radiologists initially rated ceCT alone and then ceCT along with PET+.

RESULTS

Before chemotherapy, global agreement (GA) was 99% (k=0.96) when PET- was compared to PET+. Nine (5%) lesions were discordant, 5 according to PET- and 4 to PET+. After chemotherapy, GA was 99% (k=0.91). Eight (15%) lesions were discordant, 3 according to PET- and 5 to PET+. Before chemotherapy, GA was 97% (k=0.91) when ceCT was compared to ceCT with PET+. Twenty-one (12%) lesions were discordant, 16 when ceCT were analyzed alone and 5 when ceCT was analyzed with PET+. After chemotherapy, GA was 95% (k=0.76). All 30 (35%) discordant lesions were positive according to ceCT alone. A significant difference between the 2 procedures was found in the pelvis and in the groin (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

PET+ did not differ from PET-, before and after chemotherapy. Fewer abnormalities were observed, when ceCT was analyzed with PET+, particularly after chemotherapy, due to residual masses that are better analyzed with functional imaging.

Development of a generic thresholding algorithm for the delineation of 18FDG-PET-positive tissue: application to the comparison of three thresholding models

An iterative generic algorithm has been developed to compare three thresholding models used to delineate gross tumour volume on (18)F-FDG PET images. 3D volume was extracted and characteristic parameters were measured. Three fitting models using different parameters were studied: model 1 (volume, contrast), model 2 (contrast) and model 3 (SUV). The calibration was performed using a cylindrical phantom filled with hot spheres. To validate the models, two other phantoms were used. The calibration procedure showed a better fitting model for model 1 (R(2) from 0.94 to 1.00) than for model 3 (0.95) and model 2 (0.69). The validation study shows that model 3 yielded large volume measurement errors. Models 1 and 2 gave close results with no significant differences. Model 2 was preferred because it presents less error dispersion and needs fewer characteristic parameters, making it easier to implement. Our results show the importance of developing a generic algorithm to compare the performances of fitting models objectively and to validate results on other phantoms than the ones used during the calibration process to avoid methodological biases.

An easy-to-use phantom and protocol for weekly PET quality assessment: a multicenter study

The authors have developed a simple phantom and dedicated software for the quality assessment of positron emission tomography (PET) scanners. The phantom is a parallelepiped box filled with a relatively low activity 18FDG solution and in which simple test objects are placed. Various image quality parameters are checked, including signal-to-noise ratio, image uniformity, slice thickness, slice sensitivity profile, spatial resolution, and dose calibration accuracy. Automatic image analysis consists in detecting surfaces and objects, defining regions of interest, acquiring reference point coordinates, and establishing gray-scale profiles. The total time needed for quality assessment (preparation and image acquisition) is less than 15 min with 37 MBq (1 mCi) 18FDG. The system's ease of use encourages frequent image quality assessment-for example, the comparison of PET scanners in interdepartment studies and the monitoring and evaluation of possible drifts over time. By way of an example, the authors present weekly quality assessment results obtained over up to 7 months at four PET facilities.