Serum anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a IgG antibodies are biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis

OBJECTIVES

A previous single-country pilot study indicated serum anti-GM2 and anti-GA1 anti-glycolipid antibodies as potential biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis. This study aims to validate these findings in a large geographically heterogenous cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sera from 175 dogs clinically diagnosed with acute canine polyradiculoneuritis, 112 dogs with other peripheral nerve, cranial nerve or neuromuscular disorders and 226 neurologically normal dogs were screened for anti-glycolipid antibodies against 11 common glycolipid targets to determine the immunoglobulin G anti-glycolipid antibodies with the highest combined sensitivity and specificity for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis.

RESULTS

Anti-GM2 anti-glycolipid antibodies reached the highest combined sensitivity and specificity (sensitivity: 65.1%, 95% confidence interval 57.6 to 72.2%; specificity: 90.2%, 95% confidence interval 83.1 to 95.0%), followed by anti-GalNAc-GD1a anti-glycolipid antibodies (sensitivity: 61.7%, 95% confidence interval 54.1 to 68.9%; specificity: 89.3%, 95% confidence interval 82.0 to 94.3%) and these anti-glycolipid antibodies were frequently present concomitantly. Anti-GA1 anti-glycolipid antibodies were detected in both acute canine polyradiculoneuritis and control animals. Both for anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a anti-glycolipid antibodies, sex was found a significantly associated factor with a female to male odds ratio of 2.55 (1.27 to 5.31) and 3.00 (1.22 to 7.89), respectively. Anti-GalNAc-GD1a anti-glycolipid antibodies were more commonly observed in dogs unable to walk (OR 4.56, 1.56 to 14.87).

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a immunoglobulin G anti-glycolipid antibodies represent serum biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis.

Integration of formulary systems with centralized pharmaceutical procurement

The integration of formularies with pharmaceutical group purchasing and supply systems for multiple hospitals and ambulatory health centers in the Indian Health Service of the US Public Health Service is described. Two models by which these systems have been integrated are presented. The approach of one group of facilities for maintaining high-quality therapeutics in a cost-effective manner was to maintain separate P & T Committees and formularies for each facility, with one centralized drug procurement center. The other group developed a central P & T Committee and formulary to serve all area facilities, as well as continued to maintain a separate P & T Committee at each facility that could act between meetings of the central committee. These models of centralized procurement have provided both decreased drug costs and increased information on drug use within the multifacility systems. In both models, staff have reached consensus on drugs that will provide quality therapeutics in a cost-conscious environment.