1
|
Titmuss E, Milne K, Jones MR, Ng T, Topham JT, Brown SD, Schaeffer DF, Kalloger S, Wilson D, Corbett RD, Williamson LM, Mungall K, Mungall AJ, Holt RA, Nelson BH, Jones SJM, Laskin J, Lim HJ, Marra MA. Immune Activation following Irbesartan Treatment in a Colorectal Cancer Patient: A Case Study. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24065869. [PMID: 36982943 PMCID: PMC10051648 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancers are one of the most prevalent tumour types worldwide and, despite the emergence of targeted and biologic therapies, have among the highest mortality rates. The Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) program at BC Cancer performs whole genome and transcriptome analysis (WGTA) to identify specific alterations in an individual's cancer that may be most effectively targeted. Informed using WGTA, a patient with advanced mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer was treated with the antihypertensive drug irbesartan and experienced a profound and durable response. We describe the subsequent relapse of this patient and potential mechanisms of response using WGTA and multiplex immunohistochemistry (m-IHC) profiling of biopsies before and after treatment from the same metastatic site of the L3 spine. We did not observe marked differences in the genomic landscape before and after treatment. Analyses revealed an increase in immune signalling and infiltrating immune cells, particularly CD8+ T cells, in the relapsed tumour. These results indicate that the observed anti-tumour response to irbesartan may have been due to an activated immune response. Determining whether there may be other cancer contexts in which irbesartan may be similarly valuable will require additional studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Titmuss
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - K Milne
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada
| | - M R Jones
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - T Ng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada
| | - J T Topham
- Pancreas Centre BC, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1, Canada
| | - S D Brown
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | | | - S Kalloger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada
| | - D Wilson
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - R D Corbett
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - L M Williamson
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - K Mungall
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - A J Mungall
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - R A Holt
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
| | - B H Nelson
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
| | - S J M Jones
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - J Laskin
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - H J Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - M A Marra
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
den Brok WL, Chia S, Kalloger S, Bates C, Aparicio S, Mar C, Gelmon K, Eirew P. Abstract P4-06-10: Rates of successful engraftment in breast cancer xenograft models based on tissue type: Primary vs relapsed disease. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p4-06-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: As we have published expertise in breast cancer xenograft models and clonal dynamics, our aim was to explore rates of engraftment based on type of tissue for attempted xenografting (primary vs relapsed/metastatic disease) and clinical breast biomarker subtype.
Methods: Tissue from patients (pts) enrolled in a locally advanced/metastatic study and a breast tumour tissue repository (ie. resectable primaries) between Sept. 2008 and July 2015 underwent xenografting using NodScid/IL2rgKO (NSG) mice. Xenografts were passaged when tumour volume reached 1 cm3. Mice with no engraftment after 12 months (mos) were sacrificed. Pt charts were reviewed to determine biomarker status (hormone receptor [HR], HER2), date and type of tissue collection for xenografting. Prediction of successful engraftment based on tissue type and biomarker status was performed using nominal logistic regression.
Results: A total of 70 tissue samples with known engraftment status were included in the analysis: 51 from primary breast tumour, 10 from relapsed disease (dz) with ≤ 1 line of therapy in the advanced setting and 9 from relapsed dz with > 1 line of therapy in the advanced setting. Tumours from pts treated with > 1 line of therapy were more likely to engraft compared to primary or recurrent dz with ≤ 1 line of therapy (89%, 35%, and 40% respectively; p=.008). HR- primary tumours were more likely to engraft compared to HR+ primary tumours: 71% of HR-/HER2- (triple negative) and 67% of HR-/HER2+ tumours versus 4% of HR+/HER2- and 38% of HR+/HER2+ tumours; p<.0001. Combining all tissue types, HR- tumours were more likely to engraft compared to HR+ tumours: 76% of HR-/HER2- and 67% of HR-/HER2+ tumours versus 37% of HR+/HER2+ and 22% of HR+/HER2- tumours; p=.0007. Table 1 shows the rate of engraftment for each tissue type and biomarker status. Combining these 2 variables predicts engraftment in 80% of cases.
Conclusion: This preliminary study highlights potential differences in successful xenoengraftment based on biomarker status at diagnosis and type of tissue, primary vs relapsed tumour, the latter suggesting that the underlying biology of primary or first relapsed recurrent disease is distinct from more refractory disease, and warrants further exploration. This work is ongoing. (Funded by CBCRA, BCCF)
Engraftment of primary tumour vs relapsed disease Primary tumour (N=52) N, (%)Recurrent disease and ≤ 1 line of Rx in advanced setting (N=10) N, (%)Recurrent disease and > 1 line of Rx in advanced setting (N=9) N, (%)Engraftment Yes18 (35)4 (40)8 (89)HR-/HER2-10 (55)1 (25)2 (25)HR-/HER2+4 (22)1 (25)1 (13)HR+/HER2+3 (17)00HR+/HER2-1 (6)2 (50)5 (62)Engraftment No33 (65)6 (60)1 (11)HR-/HER2-4 (12)00HR-/HER2+2 (6)1 (17)0HR+/HER2+5 (15)00HR+/HER2-22 (67)5 (83)1 (100)
Citation Format: den Brok W-l, Chia S, Kalloger S, Bates C, Aparicio S, Mar C, Gelmon K, Eirew P. Rates of successful engraftment in breast cancer xenograft models based on tissue type: Primary vs relapsed disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-06-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W-l den Brok
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - S Chia
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - S Kalloger
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - C Bates
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - S Aparicio
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - C Mar
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - K Gelmon
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - P Eirew
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|